5.5. Zur Beachtung der Sorgfalt gehaltene Personen und Sorgfaltsanforderungen
Übersicht
T 600/18 × View decision
No conclusive case has been submitted with the request for re-establishment of rights that explains why an attempt was (erroneously) made to pay the appeal fee using a form that was no longer accepted at the EPO. Article 122 EPC and the relevant case law does not excuse mistakes by the representative himself or herself that are caused by the ignorance of the latest provisions even if the representative does not normally perform the duty of paying fees himself or herself. As he or she is the one that is expected to instruct and supervise his or her staff, he or she must always keep informed of the latest developments on how to handle the payment of fees. As he or she is expected to remember what he or she has learned even in stressful situations it cannot be acknowledged that the mistake has happened despite all due care having been taken. The situation (stress caused by an upcoming snow storm) cannot be equated with one where a patent attorney was incapable of taking sound decisions due to sudden serious illness or a sudden and unexpected bereavement.
5.5. Zur Beachtung der Sorgfalt gehaltene Personen und Sorgfaltsanforderungen
Dies ist die 9. Ausgabe (2019) dieser Publikation; für die 10. Ausgabe (2022) siehe hier |
Zur Beachtung der Sorgfalt ist primär der Anmelder (Patentinhaber) gehalten. Der Anmelder muss die Handlungen seines Vertreters akzeptieren, einschließlich aller Handlungen, die dessen Assistenten und Mitarbeiter in seinem Namen vornehmen (J 5/13 unter Verweis auf J 5/80, ABl. 1981, 343; J 1/07). Die Sorgfalt, die es zu beachten gilt, wird unterschiedlich beurteilt, je nachdem ob es sich dabei um den Anmelder, den Vertreter oder eine Hilfsperson handelt.
- T 600/18