9.4.4 Fundamental deficiencies
This section has been updated to reflect case law and legislative changes up to 31 December 2023. For the previous version of this section please refer to the "Case Law of the Boards of Appeal", 10th edition (PDF). |
R. 111(2) EPC gives parties to EPO proceedings a fundamental procedural right to be provided with the reasons for a decision. A breach of R. 111(2) EPC is a fundamental procedural deficiency that can lead to a remittal as a special reason within the meaning of Art. 11 RPBA 2020. The following cases were remitted to the department of first instance:
T 2475/17 (insufficient reasons given for the first-instance decision, which also did not address the version of claim 1 filed by the applicant), T 942/18 (the board considered lack of compliance with R. 111(2) EPC to be a fundamental deficiency, not a minor defect), T 78/17 (all relevant arguments have to be given appropriate consideration in the written decision), T 1928/17 (inadequate reasons) and T 571/19 (reasons for the decision must enable both the parties and the board of appeal to understand whether or not the decision is justified).
- 2023 compilation “Abstracts of decisions”