Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Startseite
  • Patentrecherche

    Patentwissen

    Unsere Patentdatenbanken und Recherchetools

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Technische Information
      • Übersicht
      • Espacenet - Patentsuche
      • Europäischer Publikationsserver
      • EP-Volltextrecherche
    • Rechtliche Information
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentregister
      • Europäisches Patentblatt
      • European Case Law Identifier Sitemap
      • Einwendungen Dritter
    • Geschäftsinformationen
      • Übersicht
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technologieanalyseberichte
    • Daten
      • Übersicht
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Massendatensätze
      • Web-Dienste
      • Datenbestände, Codes und Statistiken
    • Technologieplattformen
      • Übersicht
      • Kunststoffe im Wandel
      • Innovationen im Wassersektor
      • Innovationen im Weltraumsektor
      • Technologien zur Bekämpfung von Krebs
      • Technologien zur Brandbekämpfung
      • Saubere Energietechnologien
      • Kampf gegen Corona
    • Nützliche Informationsquellen
      • Übersicht
      • Zum ersten Mal hier? Was ist Patentinformation?
      • Patentinformation aus Asien
      • Patentinformationszentren (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Wirtschaft und Statistik
      • Patentinformationen rund um den einheitlichen Patentschutz
    Bild
    Plastics in Transition

    Technologieanalysebericht zur Plastikabfallwirtschaft

  • Anmelden eines Patents

    Anmelden eines Patents

    Praktische Informationen über Anmelde- und Erteilungsverfahren.

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Europäischer Weg
      • Übersicht
      • Leitfaden zum europäischen Patent
      • Einsprüche
      • Mündliche Verhandlung
      • Beschwerden
      • Einheitspatent & Einheitliches Patentgericht
      • Nationale Validierung
      • Antrag auf Erstreckung/Validierung
    • Internationaler Weg (PCT)
      • Übersicht
      • Euro-PCT-Leitfaden: PCT-Verfahren im EPA
      • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen des EPA
      • PCT-Bestimmungen und Informationsquellen
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungsantrag
      • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
      • Beschleunigung Ihrer PCT-Anmeldung
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Schulungen und Veranstaltungen
    • Nationale Anmeldungen
    • Zugelassenen Vertreter suchen
    • MyEPO Services
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste verstehen
      • Zugriff erhalten
      • Bei uns einreichen
      • Akten interaktiv bearbeiten
      • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • Formblätter
      • Übersicht
      • Prüfungsantrag
    • Gebühren
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Gebühren (EPÜ)
      • Internationale Gebühren (PCT)
      • Einheitspatentgebühren (UP)
      • Gebührenzahlung und Rückerstattung
      • Warnung

    UP

    Erfahren Sie, wie das Einheitspatent Ihre IP-Strategie verbessern kann

  • Recht & Praxis

    Recht & Praxis

    Europäisches Patentrecht, Amtsblatt und andere Rechtstexte

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Rechtstexte
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
      • Amtsblatt
      • Richtlinien
      • Erstreckungs-/ Validierungssyste
      • Londoner Übereinkommen
      • Nationales Recht zum EPÜ
      • Système du brevet unitaire
      • Nationale Maßnahmen zum Einheitspatent
    • Gerichtspraxis
      • Übersicht
      • Symposium europäischer Patentrichter
    • Nutzerbefragungen
      • Übersicht
      • Laufende Befragungen
      • Abgeschlossene Befragungen
    • Harmonisierung des materiellen Patentrechts
      • Übersicht
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Gruppe B+
    • Konvergenz der Verfahren
    • Optionen für zugelassene Vertreter
    Bild
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Informieren Sie sich über die wichtigsten Aspekte ausgewählter BK-Entscheidungen in unseren monatlichen „Abstracts of decisions“

  • Neues & Veranstaltungen

    Neues & Veranstaltungen

    Aktuelle Neuigkeiten, Podcasts und Veranstaltungen.

    Zur Übersicht 

     

    • Übersicht
    • News
    • Veranstaltungen
    • Europäischer Erfinderpreis
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Kategorien und Preise
      • Lernen Sie die Finalisten kennen
      • Nominierungen
      • European Inventor Network
      • Preisverleihung 2024
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Nominierungen
      • Die jury
      • Die Welt, neu gedacht
      • Preisverleihung 2025
    • Pressezentrum
      • Übersicht
      • Patent Index und Statistiken
      • Pressezentrum durchsuchen
      • Hintergrundinformation
      • Copyright
      • Pressekontakt
      • Rückruf Formular
      • Presseinfos per Mail
    • Innovation und Patente im Blickpunkt
      • Übersicht
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Forschungseinrichtungen
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Raumfahrt und Satelliten
      • Zukunft der Medizin
      • Werkstoffkunde
      • Mobile Kommunikation: Das große Geschäft mit kleinen Geräten
      • Biotechnologiepatente
      • Patentklassifikation
      • Digitale Technologien
      • Die Zukunft der Fertigung
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast "Talk innovation"

    Podcast

    Von der Idee zur Erfindung: unser Podcast informiert Sie topaktuell in Sachen Technik und IP

  • Lernen

    Lernen

    Europäische Patentakademie – unser Kursportal für Ihre Fortbildung

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Schulungsaktivitäten und Lernpfade
      • Übersicht
      • Schulungsaktivitäten
      • Lernpfade
    • EEP und EPVZ
      • Übersicht
      • EEP – Europäische Eignungsprüfung
      • EPVZ – Europäisches Patentverwaltungszertifikat
      • CSP – Programm zur Unterstützung von Bewerbern
    • Lernmaterial nach Interesse
      • Übersicht
      • Patenterteilung
      • Technologietransfer und -verbreitung
      • Durchsetzung
    • Lernmaterial nach Profil
      • Übersicht
      • Geschäftswelt und IP
      • EEP und EPVZ Bewerber
      • Justiz
      • Nationale Ämter und IP-Behörden
      • Patentanwaltskanzleien
      • Lehre und Forschung
    Bild
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Werfen Sie einen Blick auf das umfangreiche Lernangebot im Schulungskatalog der Europäischen Patentakademie

  • Über uns

    Über uns

    Erfahren Sie mehr über Tätigkeit, Werte, Geschichte und Vision des EPA

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Das EPA auf einen Blick
    • 50 Jahre Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
      • Übersicht
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kinderwettbewerb für kollektive Kunst
    • Rechtsgrundlagen und Mitgliedstaaten
      • Übersicht
      • Rechtsgrundlagen
      • Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Patentorganisation
      • Erstreckungsstaaten
      • Validierungsstaaten
    • Verwaltungsrat und nachgeordnete Organe
      • Übersicht
      • Kommuniqués
      • Kalender
      • Dokumente und Veröffentlichungen
      • Der Verwaltungsrat der Europäischen Patentorganisation
    • Unsere Grundsätze und Strategie
      • Übersicht
      • Auftrag, Vision und Werte
      • Strategischer Plan 2028
      • Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Normalität
    • Führung und Management
      • Übersicht
      • Präsident António Campinos
      • Managementberatungsausschuss
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Übersicht
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Dienste & Aktivitäten
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste & Struktur
      • Qualität
      • Nutzerkonsultation
      • Europäische und internationale Zusammenarbeit
      • Europäische Patentakademie
      • Chefökonom
      • Ombudsstelle
      • Meldung von Fehlverhalten
    • Beobachtungsstelle für Patente und Technologie
      • Übersicht
      • Technologien
      • Akteure im Innovationsbereich
      • Politisches Umfeld und Finanzierung
      • Tools
      • Über die Beobachtungsstelle
    • Beschaffung
      • Übersicht
      • Beschaffungsprognose
      • Das EPA als Geschäftspartner
      • Beschaffungsverfahren
      • Nachhaltiger Beschaffungsstandard
      • Registrierung zum eTendering und elektronische Signaturen
      • Beschaffungsportal
      • Rechnungsstellung
      • Allgemeine Bedingungen
      • Archivierte Ausschreibungen
    • Transparenzportal
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemein
      • Humankapital
      • Umweltkapital
      • Organisationskapital
      • Sozial- und Beziehungskapital
      • Wirtschaftskapital
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Übersicht
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Die Geschichte des EPA
      • Übersicht
      • 1970er-Jahre
      • 1980er-Jahre
      • 1990er-Jahre
      • 2000er-Jahre
      • 2010er-Jahre
      • 2020er Jahre
    • Die EPA Kunstsammlung
      • Übersicht
      • Die Sammlung
      • Let's talk about art
      • Künstler
      • Mediathek
      • What's on
      • Publikationen
      • Kontakt
      • Kulturraum A&T 5-10
      • "Lange Nacht"
    Bild
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Verfolgen Sie die neuesten Technologietrends mit unserem Patentindex

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • Sind Patente Neuland für Sie?
  • Sind Patente Neuland für Sie?
    • Go back
    • Patente für Ihr Unternehmen?
    • Warum ein Patent?
    • Was ist Ihre zündende Idee?
    • Sind Sie bereit?
    • Darum geht es
    • Der Weg zum Patent
    • Ist es patentierbar?
    • Ist Ihnen jemand zuvorgekommen?
    • Patentquiz
    • Video zum Einheitspatent
  • Patentrecherche
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Technische Information
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Espacenet - Patentsuche
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Datenbanken der nationalen Ämter
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Versionshinweise
      • Europäischer Publikationsserver
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise
        • Konkordanzliste für Euro-PCT-Anmeldungen
        • EP-Normdatei
        • Hilfe
      • EP-Volltextrecherche
    • Rechtliche Information
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentregister
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise: Archiv
        • Dokumentation zu Register
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Datenverfügbarkeit für Deep Links
          • Vereinigtes Register
          • Ereignisse im Register
      • Europäisches Patentblatt
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Patentblatt herunterladen
        • Recherche im Europäischen Patentblatt
        • Hilfe
      • European Case Law Identifier Sitemap
      • Einwendungen Dritter
    • Geschäftsinformationen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Versionshinweise
      • Technologieanalyseberichte
    • Daten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Massendatensätze
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Manuals
        • Sequenzprotokolle
        • Nationale Volltextdaten
        • Daten des Europäischen Patentregisters
        • Weltweite bibliografische Daten des EPA (DOCDB)
        • EP-Volltextdaten
        • Weltweite Rechtsereignisdaten des EPA (INPADOC)
        • Bibliografische Daten von EP-Dokumenten (EBD)
        • Entscheidungen der Beschwerdekammern des EPA
      • Web-Dienste
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Europäischer Publikationsserver (Web-Dienst)
      • Datenbestände, Codes und Statistiken
        • Go back
        • Wöchentliche Aktualisierungen
        • Regelmäßige Aktualisierungen
    • Technologieplattformen
      • Go back
      • Kunststoffe im Wandel
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Verwertung von Plastikabfällen
        • Recycling von Plastikabfällen
        • Alternative Kunststoffe
      • Übersicht
      • Innovative Wassertechnologien
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Sauberes Wasser
        • Schutz vor Wasser
      • Innovationen im Weltraumsektor
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Kosmonautik
        • Weltraumbeobachtung
      • Technologien zur Bekämpfung von Krebs
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Prävention und Früherkennung
        • Diagnostik
        • Therapien
        • Wohlergehen und Nachsorge
      • Technologien zur Brandbekämpfung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Branderkennung und -verhütung
        • Feuerlöschen
        • Schutzausrüstung
        • Technologien für die Sanierung nach Bränden
      • Saubere Energietechnologien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Erneuerbare Energien
        • CO2-intensive Industrien
        • Energiespeicherung und andere Enabling-Technologien
      • Kampf gegen Corona
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Impfstoffe und Therapeutika
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Impfstoffe
          • Übersicht über Therapieansätze für COVID-19
          • Kandidaten für antivirale Therapeutika
          • Nukleinsäuren zur Behandlung von Coronavirus-Infektionen
        • Diagnose und Analyse
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Protein-und Nukleinsäure-Nachweis
          • Analyseprotokolle
        • Informatik
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Bioinformatik
          • Medizinische Informatik
        • Technologien für die neue Normalität
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Geräte, Materialien und Ausrüstung
          • Verfahren, Maßnahmen und Aktivitäten
          • Digitale Technologien
        • Erfinderinnen und Erfinder gegen das Coronavirus
    • Nützliche Informationsquellen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Zum ersten Mal hier? Was ist Patentinformation?
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Grundlegende Definitionen
        • Patentklassifikation
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Gemeinsame Patentklassifikation
        • Patentfamilien
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Einfache DOCDB Patentfamilie
          • Erweiterte INPADOC Patentfamilie
        • Daten zu Rechtsstandsereignissen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • INPADOC-Klassifikationssystem
      • Patentinformation aus Asien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinesisch-Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Indien (IN)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russische Föderation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patentinformationszentren (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Wirtschaft und Statistik
      • Patentinformationen rund um den einheitlichen Patentschutz
  • Anmelden eines Patents
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Europäischer Weg
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Leitfaden zum europäischen Patent
      • Einsprüche
      • Mündliche Verhandlung
        • Go back
        • Kalender der mündlichen Verhandlungen
          • Go back
          • Kalender der mündlichen Verhandlungen
          • Technische Richtlinien
          • Zugang für die Öffentlichkeit zum Beschwerdeverfahren
          • Zugang für die Öffentlichkeit zum Einspruchsverfahren
      • Beschwerden
      • Einheitspatent & Einheitliches Patentgericht
        • Go back
        • Einheitspatent
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Rechtlicher Rahmen
          • Wesentliche Merkmale
          • Beantragung eines Einheitspatents
          • Kosten eines Einheitspatents
          • Übersetzungsregelungen und Kompensationssystem
          • Starttermin
          • Introductory brochures
        • Übersicht
        • Einheitliches Patentgericht
      • Nationale Validierung
      • Erstreckungs- /Validierungsantrag
    • Internationaler Weg
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Euro-PCT-Leitfaden
      • Eintritt in die europäische Phase
      • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • PCT-Bestimmungen und Informationsquellen
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungsantrag
      • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
      • Beschleunigung Ihrer PCT-Anmeldung
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Programm "Patent Prosecution Highway" (PPH) - Übersicht
      • PCT: Schulungen und Veranstaltungen
    • Nationaler Weg
    • MyEPO Services
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste verstehen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Versionshinweise
      • Zugriff erhalten
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise
      • Bei uns einreichen
        • Go back
        • Bei uns einreichen
        • Wenn unsere Dienste für die Online-Einreichung ausfallen
        • Versionshinweise
      • Akten interaktiv bearbeiten
        • Go back
        • Versionshinweise
      • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • Gebühren
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Gebühren (EPÜ)
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • Internationale Gebühren (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Ermäßigung der Gebühren
        • Gebühren für internationale Anmeldungen
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
        • Übersicht
      • Einheitspatentgebühren (UP)
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • Gebührenzahlung und Rückerstattung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zahlungsarten
        • Erste Schritte
        • FAQs und sonstige Anleitungen
        • Technische Informationen für Sammelzahlungen
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
        • Versionshinweise
      • Warnung
    • Formblätter
      • Go back
      • Prüfungsantrag
      • Übersicht
    • Zugelassenen Vertreter suchen
  • Recht & Praxis
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Rechtstexte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Archiv
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Dokumentation zur EPÜ-Revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Übersicht
            • Diplomatische Konferenz für die Revision des EPÜ
            • "Travaux préparatoires" (Vorarbeiten)
            • Neufassung
            • Übergangsbestimmungen
            • Ausführungsordnung zum EPÜ 2000
            • Gebührenordnung
            • Ratifikationen und Beitritte
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPÜ 1973
      • Amtsblatt
      • Richtlinien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • EPÜ Richtlinien
        • PCT-EPA Richtlinien
        • Richtlinien für das Einheitspatent
        • Überarbeitung der Richtlinien
        • Ergebnisse der Konsultation
        • Zusammenfassung der Nutzerbeiträge
        • Archiv
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungssystem
      • Londoner Übereinkommen
      • Nationales Recht zum EPÜ
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Archiv
      • Einheitspatentsystem
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • Nationale Maßnahmen zum Einheitspatent
    • Gerichtspraxis
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Symposium europäischer Patentrichter
    • Nutzerbefragungen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Laufende Befragungen
      • Abgeschlossene Befragungen
    • Harmonisierung des materiellen Patentrechts
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Gruppe B+
    • Konvergenz der Verfahren
    • Optionen für zugelassene Vertreter
  • Neues & Veranstaltungen
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • News
    • Veranstaltungen
    • Europäischer Erfinderpreis
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Kategorien und Preise
      • Lernen Sie die Erfinder kennen
      • Nominierungen
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • Preisverleihung 2024
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Nominierungen
      • Die Jury
      • Die Welt, neu gedacht
      • Preisverleihung 2025
    • Pressezentrum
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patent Index und Statistiken
      • Pressezentrum durchsuchen
      • Hintergrundinformation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Europäisches Patentamt
        • Fragen und Antworten zu Patenten im Zusammenhang mit dem Coronavirus
        • Fragen und Antworten zu Pflanzenpatenten
      • Copyright
      • Pressekontakt
      • Rückruf Formular
      • Presseinfos per Mail
    • Im Blickpunkt
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Wasserbezogene Technologien
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Übersicht
        • CodeFest 2024 zu generativer KI
        • Codefest 2023 zu grünen Kunststoffen
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Forschungseinrichtungen
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Raumfahrt und Satelliten
        • Go back
        • Weltraumtechnologie und Patente
        • Übersicht
      • Gesundheit
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Medizintechnik und Krebs
        • Personalised medicine
      • Werkstoffkunde
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Nanotechnologie
      • Mobile Kommunikation
      • Biotechnologie
        • Go back
        • Rot, weiß oder grün
        • Übersicht
        • Die Rolle des EPA
        • Was ist patentierbar?
        • Biotechnologische Erfindungen und ihre Erfinder
      • Patentklassifikation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digitale Technologien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Über IKT
        • Hardware und Software
        • Künstliche Intelligenz
        • Vierte Industrielle Revolution
      • Additive Fertigung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Die additive Fertigung
        • Innovation durch AM
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Lernen
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Schulungsaktivitäten und Lernpfade
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Schulungsaktivitäten: Arten und Formate
      • Lernpfade
    • EEP und EPVZ
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • EEP – Europäische Eignungsprüfung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Aufgabe F
          • Aufgabe A
          • Aufgabe B
          • Aufgabe C
          • Aufgabe D
          • Vorprüfung
        • Erfolgreiche Bewerber
        • Archiv
      • EPVZ – Europäisches Patentverwaltungszertifikat
      • CSP – Programm zur Unterstützung von Bewerbern
    • Angebot für bestimmte Interessengebiete
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patenterteilung
      • Technologietransfer und -verbreitung
      • Patentdurchsetzung und Streitregelung
    • Angebot für bestimmte Zielgruppen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Geschäftswelt und IP
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Fallstudien zum Technologietransfer
          • Fallstudien zu wachstumsstarken Technologien
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EEP und EPVZ Bewerber
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Denkaufgaben zu Aufgabe F
        • Tägliche Fragen zur Aufgabe D
        • Europäische Eignungsprüfung - Leitfaden zur Vorbereitung
        • EPVZ
      • Richter, Anwälte und Staatsanwälte
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • Die Zuständigkeit europäischer Gerichte bei Patentstreitigkeiten
      • Nationale Ämter und IP-Behörden
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Lernpfad für Patentprüfer der nationalen Ämter
        • Lernpfad für Formalsachbearbeiter und Paralegals
      • Patentanwaltskanzleien
      • Hochschulen, Forschungseinrichtungen und Technologietransferstellen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Modularer IP-Ausbildungsrahmen (MIPEF)
        • Programm "Pan-European-Seal für junge Fachkräfte"
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Für Studierende
          • Für Hochschulen
            • Go back
            • Übersicht
            • IP-Schulungsressourcen
            • Hochschulmitgliedschaften
          • Unsere jungen Fachkräfte
          • Beruflicher Entwicklungsplan
        • Akademisches Forschungsprogramm (ARP)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Abgeschlossene Forschungsprojekte
          • Laufende Forschungsprojekte
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Download modules
        • Handbuch für die Gestaltung von IP-Kursen
        • PATLIB Wissenstransfer nach Afrika
          • Go back
          • Kernaktivitäten
          • Geschichten und Einblicke
  • Über uns
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Das EPA auf einen Blick
    • 50 Jahre EPÜ
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Übersicht
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kinderwettbewerb für kollektive Kunst
    • Rechtsgrundlagen und Mitgliedstaaten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Rechtsgrundlagen
      • Mitgliedstaaten
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Mitgliedstaaten sortiert nach Beitrittsdatum
      • Erstreckungsstaaten
      • Validierungsstaaten
    • Verwaltungsrat und nachgeordnete Organe
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Kommuniqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Übersicht
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Kalender
      • Dokumente und Veröffentlichungen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Dokumente des Engeren Ausschusses
      • Verwaltungsrat
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zusammensetzung
        • Vertreter
        • Geschäftsordnung
        • Kollegium der Rechnungsprüfer
        • Sekretariat
        • Nachgeordnete Organe
    • Grundsätze
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Auftrag, Vision und Werte
      • Strategieplan 2028
        • Go back
        • Treiber 1: Personal
        • Treiber 2: Technologien
        • Treiber 3: Qualitativ hochwertige Produkte und Dienstleistungen
        • Treiber 4: Partnerschaften
        • Treiber 5: Finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit
      • Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Normalität
      • Datenschutzerklärung
    • Führung und Management
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Präsidenten
      • Managementberatungsausschuss
    • Nachhaltigkeit beim EPA
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Umwelt
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspirierende Erfindungen für die Umwelt
      • Soziales
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspirierende soziale Erfindungen
      • Governance und finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit
    • Beschaffung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Beschaffungsprognose
      • Das EPA als Geschäftspartner
      • Beschaffungsverfahren
      • Veröffentlichungen des Dynamischen Beschaffungssystems
      • Nachhaltiger Beschaffungsstandard
      • Über eTendering
      • Rechnungsstellung
      • Beschaffungsportal
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Elektronische Signatur von Verträgen
      • Allgemeine Bedingungen
      • Archivierte Ausschreibungen
    • Dienste & Aktivitäten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste & Struktur
      • Qualität
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Grundlagen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
          • Richtlinien für die Prüfung
          • Unsere Bediensteten
        • Qualität ermöglichen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Stand der Technik
          • Klassifikationssystem
          • Tools
          • Qualitätssicherung
        • Produkte & Dienstleistungen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Recherche
          • Prüfung
          • Einspruch
          • Fortlaufende Verbesserung
        • Qualität durch Netzwerke
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Nutzerengagement
          • Zusammenarbeit
          • Befragung zur Nutzerzufriedenheit
          • Stakeholder-Qualitätssicherungspanels
        • Charta für Patentqualität
        • Qualitätsaktionsplan
        • Qualitäts-Dashboard
        • Statistik
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Recherche
          • Prüfung
          • Einspruch
        • Integriertes Management beim EPA
      • Charta unserer Kundenbetreuung
      • Nutzerkonsultation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Ständiger Beratender Ausschuss beim EPA
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Ziele
          • Der SACEPO und seine Arbeitsgruppen
          • Sitzungen
          • Bereich für Delegierte
        • Befragungen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Methodik
          • Recherche
          • Sachprüfung, abschließende Aktionen und Veröffentlichung
          • Einspruch
          • Formalprüfung
          • Kundenbetreuung
          • Einreichung
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • EPA-Website
          • Archiv
      • Europäische und internationale Zusammenarbeit
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zusammenarbeit mit den Mitgliedstaaten
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
        • Bilaterale Zusammenarbeit mit Nichtmitgliedstaaten
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Validierungssystem
          • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
        • Internationale Organisationen, Trilaterale und IP5
        • Zusammenarbeit mit internationalen Organisationen außerhalb des IP-Systems
      • Europäische Patentakademie
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Partner
      • Chefökonom
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Wirtschaftliche Studien
      • Ombudsstelle
      • Meldung von Fehlverhalten
    • Beobachtungsstelle für Patente und Technologie
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Technologien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Innovation gegen Krebs
        • Assistenzrobotik
        • Weltraumtechnologien
      • Akteure im Innovationsbereich
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Start-ups und KMU
          • Go back
          • Publikationen
          • Übersicht
        • Forschungshochschulen und öffentliche Forschungseinrichtungen
      • Politisches Umfeld und Finanzierung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Programm zur Innovationsfinanzierung
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Unsere Studien zur Innovationsfinanzierung
          • EPA-Initiativen für Patentanmelder/innen
          • Programm zur Innovationsfinanzierung
        • Patente und Normen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Publikationen
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • Über die Beobachtungsstelle
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Arbeitsplan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemein
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Jahresrückblick 2024
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Zusammenfassung
          • Treiber 1 – Personal
          • Treiber 2 – Technologien
          • Treiber 3 – Qualitativ hochwertige, pünktliche Produkte und Dienstleistungen
          • Treiber 4 – Partnerschaften
          • Treiber 5 – Finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Humankapital
      • Umweltkapital
      • Organisationskapital
      • Sozial- und Beziehungskapital
      • Wirtschaftskapital
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Geschichte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • 1970er-Jahre
      • 1980er-Jahre
      • 1990er-Jahre
      • 2000er-Jahre
      • 2010er-Jahre
      • 2020er Jahre
    • Kunstsammlung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Die Sammlung
      • Let's talk about art
      • Künstler
      • Mediathek
      • What's on
      • Publikationen
      • Kontakt
      • Kulturraum A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Frühere Ausstellungen
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Lange Nacht"
  • Beschwerdekammern
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Entscheidungen der Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Neue Entscheidungen
      • Übersicht
      • Ausgewählte Entscheidungen
    • Mitteilungen der Beschwerdekammern
    • Verfahren
    • Mündliche Verhandlungen
    • Über die Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Präsident der Beschwerdekammern
      • Große Beschwerdekammer
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technische Beschwerdekammern
      • Juristische Beschwerdekammer
      • Beschwerdekammer in Disziplinarangelegenheiten
      • Präsidium
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
    • Verhaltenskodex
    • Geschäftsverteilungsplan
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archiv
    • Jährliche Liste der Verfahren
    • Mitteilungen
    • Jahresberichte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • Veröffentlichungen
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Rechtsprechung der Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Archiv
  • Service & Unterstützung
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Aktualisierungen der Website
    • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • Veröffentlichungen
    • Bestellung
      • Go back
      • Patentwissen – Produkte und Dienste
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Patentinformationsprodukte
        • Massendatensätze
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Leitfaden zur fairen Nutzung
    • Verfahrensbezogene Mitteilungen
    • Nützliche Links
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patentämter der Mitgliedstaaten
      • Weitere Patentämter
      • Verzeichnisse von Patentvertretern
      • Patentdatenbanken, Register und Patentblätter
      • Haftungsausschluss
    • Aboverwaltung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Anmelden
      • Einstellungen verwalten
      • Abmelden
    • Veröffentlichungen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Möglichkeiten der Einreichung
      • Standorte
    • Offizielle Feiertage
    • Glossar
    • RSS-Feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Übersicht
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Startseite
  2. T 0281/15 05-10-2018
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0281/15 05-10-2018

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T028115.20181005
Datum der Entscheidung:
05 October 2018
Aktenzeichen
T 0281/15
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
04722422.5
IPC-Klasse
C08J 9/16
C08J 9/232
Verfahrenssprache
EN
Verteilung
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download und weitere Informationen:

Entscheidung in EN 488.59 KB
Alle Dokumente zum Beschwerdeverfahren finden Sie im Europäisches Patentregister
Bibliografische Daten verfügbar in:
EN
Fassungen
Nicht veröffentlicht
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung

Expandable resin beads of styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene

Name des Anmelders
Sekisui Plastics Co., Ltd.
Name des Einsprechenden
BASF SE
Kammer
3.3.09
Leitsatz
-
Relevante Rechtsnormen
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 123(3)
European Patent Convention Art 83
European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 56
Schlagwörter

Amendements - added subject-matter (no)

Amendments - broadening of claim (no)

Sufficiency of disclosure - (yes)

Novelty - (yes)

Inventive step - (yes)

Orientierungssatz
-
Angeführte Entscheidungen
G 0001/10
T 1483/10
Anführungen in anderen Entscheidungen
-

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. This decision concerns the appeal filed by the opponent against the interlocutory decision of the opposition division finding that European patent No. 1 607 436 as amended met the requirements of the EPC.

II. The opponent had requested revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of Article 100(a) (lack of novelty and inventive step) and (b) EPC. The documents cited during the opposition proceedings included:

D1: JP 1284536 A (D1e: its translation into English);

D2: JP 4183706 A (D2e: its translation into English);

D3: EP 0 682 079 A2;

D5: DE 24 13 408 A1;

D6: DE 24 13 375 A1;

D10: Translator's declaration as regards the translation of claims 1 and 3 of the international patent application as published in Japanese (WO 2004/085527 A1) into English (dated 15 February 2013);

D10a: Translator's further declaration (dated 26 December 2013);

D11: Japanese Industrial Standard JIS K 7121-1987. "Testing Methods for Transition Temperatures of Plastics" (12 pages);

D16: ASTM Standard D 3418-99, "Standard Test Method for Transition Temperatures of Polymers By Differential Scanning Calorimetry" (5 pages), July 1999;

D17: Analytical Report: "Differential scanning calorimetry of the PE" by Mitsui chemical analysis & consulting services INC, 21 November 2013 (3 pages);

D18: Technical brochure "L-LDPE Ultzex**(®)" (5 pages in Japanese language);

D19: Experimental report: "Melting point measurement of PE", 15 November 2013 (1 page);

D21: Report: Follow-up experiment on example 4 of D1, 29 November 2013;

D22: Report: Follow-up experiment on comparative example 1 of D1, 29 November 2013;

D23: Report: Follow-up on comparative example 2 of D1, 29 November 2013;

D24: Report: Follow-up experiment on example 1 of D2, 29 November 2013;

D25: US 4 282 334 A;

D26: US 3 243 481 A;

D27: US 3 658 946 A;

D28: US 3 428 712 A;

D29: Report: Follow-up experiment on example 1 of D3, 27 September 2014; and

D30: Copy of a letter dated 7 January 2014 in the opposition procedure of EP 1 607 437 (23 pages).

III. The opposition division maintained the patent on the basis of claims 1 to 7 of the main request filed by letter of 18 February 2013. Independent claims 1, 3 and 5 read as follows:

"1. A method for producing expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin comprising, in the order recited, the steps of:

dispersing 100 parts by weight of non-crosslinked linear low-density polyethylene-based resin beads, 50 to 1000 parts by weight of a styrene-based monomer, and 0.1 to 0.9 parts by weight of a polymerization initiator relative to 100 parts by weight of the styrene-based monomer into a suspension containing a dispersant;

impregnating the styrene-based monomer into the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads by heating the resultant dispersion at such a temperature that polymerization of the styrene-based monomer does not substantially take place;

performing polymerization of the styrene-based monomer at a temperature of (T-15) to (T-8)°C or (T+1) to (T+5)°C (where T°C is the melting point of the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads); and

impregnating a volatile blowing agent into the resin beads during or after the polymerization,

whereby the resin components of the expandable beads contain less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer,

wherein the gel fraction is determined according to the following equation:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

wherein the term "weight of resultant solid" relates to the weight of a sample remaining on a wire gauze (Ø 0.12 mm, 80-mesh) which is insoluble in boiling toluene after 24 hrs and drying at 130 °C for 1 hour and wherein the term "weight of sample" relates to the weight of the sample resin beads prior to extraction with toluene."

"3. A method for producing expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin comprising, in the order recited, the steps of:

dispersing 100 parts by weight of non-crosslinked linear low-density polyethylene-based resin beads, 30 to 300 parts by weight of a styrene-based monomer, and 0.1 to 0.9 parts by weight of a polymerization initiator relative to 100 parts by weight of the styrene-based monomer into a suspension containing a dispersant;

impregnating the styrene-based monomer into the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads by heating the resultant dispersion at such a temperature that polymerization of the styrene-based monomer does not substantially take place;

performing a first polymerization of the styrene-based monomer at a temperature of (T-15) to (T-8)°C or (T+1) to (T+5)°C (where T°C is the melting point of the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads);

adding a styrene-based monomer and 0.1 to 0.9 parts by weight of a polymerization initiator relative to 100 parts by weight of the styrene-based monomer when the conversion ratio of polymerization reaches to 80 to 99.9%, and performing impregnation of the styrene-based monomer into the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads and a second polymerization of the styrene-based monomer at a temperature of (T-15) to (T-8)°C or (T+1) to (T+5)°C (where T°C is the melting point of the polyethylene-based resin beads) (wherein the total amount of the styrene monomers used in the first and second polymerisations is more than 50 parts by weight and not more than 1000 parts by weight relative to 100 parts by weight of the low-density polyethylene-based resin beads); and

impregnating a volatile blowing agent into the resin beads during or after the polymerization,

whereby the resin components of the expandable beads contain less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer,

wherein the gel fraction is determined according to the following equation:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

wherein the term "weight of resultant solid" relates to the weight of a sample remaining on a wire gauze (Ø 0.12 mm, 80-mesh) which is insoluble in boiling toluene after 24 hrs and drying at 130 °C for 1 hour and wherein the term "weight of sample" relates to the weight of the sample resin beads prior to extraction with toluene."

"5. Expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin comprising a volatile blowing agent and a base resin, the base resin containing more than 50 to 1000 parts by weight of a polystyrene-based resin component relative to 100 parts by weight of a non-crosslinked linear low-density polyethylene-based resin component, wherein the base resin contains less than 2 wt% of a gel component comprising a graft polymer of the polystyrene-based resin component and the low-density polyethylene-based resin component,

wherein the gel fraction is determined according to the following equation:

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

wherein the term "weight of resultant solid" relates to the weight of a sample remaining on a wire gauze (Ø 0.12 mm, 80-mesh) which is insoluble in boiling toluene after 24 hrs and drying at 130 °C for 1 hour and wherein the term "weight of sample" relates to the weight of the sample resin beads prior to extraction with toluene."

Claims 2, 4, 6 and 7 were dependent claims.

IV. The opposition division's decision may be summarised as follows:

- Late-filed documents D25 and D29 were admitted into the proceedings due to their prima facie relevance, whereas D26, D27, D28 and D30 were not admitted. Concerning D30, the opposition division noted that it related to different opposition proceedings and that its relevance for the possible outcome of the present proceedings had not been established.

- The amended claims fulfilled the requirements of Article 123(2) and (3) EPC, because the amendment made was based on the original wording of the claims of the Japanese application and the amendment did not extend the protection conferred by the granted claims.

- The requirements of sufficiency of disclosure were met. The skilled person would use a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) method according to JIS K 7121 and ASTM D3418-88 to determine the melting point of the polyethylene used. Furthermore, the patent itself gave clear instructions on how to determine the gel fraction without undue burden.

- The subject-matter of claim 5 was novel over the disclosure of D1, D2, D3, D5 and D6. As to D1 and D2, the patent proprietor had shown that the expandable beads of these documents contained more than 2 wt% of a gel component. Novelty over D3 was acknowledged because it had not been demonstrated that no formation of graft polymers of styrene on the linear low-density polyethylene took place during the extrusion process of D3. Lastly, D5 and D6 disclosed resin beads comprising low-density polyethylene, but not linear low-density polyethylene.

- Starting from D1 as the closest prior art, the opposition division defined the problem to be solved by the invention as how "to provide expandable resin beads having improved recyclability and a method of manufacture thereof". The evidence in the patent showed that gel fractions in an amount above 2 wt% lead to deteriorated recyclability, whereas gel fractions below 2 wt% showed favourable recyclability. This effect justified an inventive step. D3 did not represent the closest prior art, but even if one were to start from this document, the claimed subject-matter would still involve an inventive step. Nothing in the prior art hinted at a relationship between gel content and recyclability of styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene expandable beads.

V. This decision was appealed by the opponent (in the following: the appellant), which requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked in its entirety. The appellant further requested that D30 be admitted into the proceedings.

VI. In its reply to the statement of grounds of appeal, the patent proprietor (in the following: the respondent) requested that the appeal be dismissed (main request) or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to the auxiliary request filed on 30 September 2014 during the opposition proceedings. The respondent also filed the following documents and requested that they be admitted into the proceedings:

D21a: Supplemented version of D21;

D22a: Supplemented version of D22;

D23a: Supplemented version of D23;

D24a: Supplemented version of D24; and

D29a: Supplemented version of D29.

VII. In a communication the board indicated the points to be discussed during the oral proceedings. It also gave its preliminary view that the disclosure of D1 and/or D2 did not appear to anticipate the subject-matter of claim 5.

VIII. Both parties replied to the board's communication. The reply of the respondent included a second auxiliary request and the following further evidence:

D29b: corrected version of D29a; and

D31: Declaration of Mr. Morishima dated 22 August 2018 (1 page).

IX. Oral proceedings were held before the board on 5 October 2018. During the oral proceedings, the appellant withdrew its request that D30 be admitted into the proceedings. It also withdrew its novelty attack against claim 5 based on D1 and D2.

X. The appellant's relevant arguments may be summarised as follows:

- The patent (claims 1 and 3) could not be corrected under Rule 140 EPC for the reasons given in decision G 1/10. Moreover, claim 5 could not be the basis for the amendment of method claims 1 and 3.

- The amendment to claims 1 and 3 extended the scope of the protection of the granted claims. Due to the amendment, the claims embraced methods for producing expandable beads that were not covered by the granted claims.

- The claimed invention was insufficiently disclosed because there was no information in the patent concerning the method for measuring the melting point of the polyethylene-based resin. Furthermore, the determination of the graft polymer in the gel component was insufficiently disclosed.

- The disclosure of example 1 of D3 was novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 5.

- The subject-matter of claim 5 lacked inventive step starting from D3 as the closest prior-art document and the subject-matter of claims 1 and 3 lacked inventive step starting from D1 and/or D2 as closest prior art. The evidence on file did not convincingly show any improvement of the claimed expandable beads or of their methods of preparation. The claimed subject-matter was therefore an obvious alternative to the expandable beads disclosed in D3 or to the methods disclosed in D1 and D2.

XI. The respondent's arguments may be summarised as follows:

- The amendments made to claims 1 and 3 were not corrections of the granted patent but "true" amendments based on the disclosure of the application as originally filed. The text of the international application as filed in Japanese and confirmed by the translator's declaration was the basis for the amendments to claims 1 and 3. Thus, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC were fulfilled.

- The requirements of Article 123(3) EPC were also fulfilled. Amended claims 1 and 3 were now directed to methods of manufacture of the products of granted claim 5. A claim directed to a product per se had the broadest scope of protection and covered all processes for its manufacture.

- The invention was sufficiently disclosed because the skilled person would know how to determine the melting point of a polyethylene resin. This would be done by standard methods well known to the skilled person. The method for determining the gel content and the graft polymer was disclosed in the patent specification, and the appellant had not provided any evidence that this could not be carried out without undue burden.

- Example 1 of D3 did not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 5. The beads prepared in this example were not expandable beads produced from a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin. They were structurally different because, in D3, styrene was polymerised in the absence of polyethylene. Furthermore, D29b showed that the resin composition obtained in example 1 had a gel content of 10.4 wt% and that the polystyrene content in said gel was 16.2 wt%. Such a resin was not within the scope of claim 5 of the patent.

- D1, not D3, represented the closest prior art. Nothing in the prior art hinted that observing the limit of less than 2 wt% for the gel component, as defined in the claims, would lead to improved recyclability for the expanded moulded product. The appellant's objections had clearly been made with knowledge of the invention.

XII. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that European patent No. 1 607 436 be revoked in its entirety. It further requested that the first auxiliary request of the respondent not be admitted into the proceedings and, if admitted, that the case be remitted to the opposition division for further consideration.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed (main request) or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained on the basis of the claims according to auxiliary requests 1 or 2, auxiliary request 1 as filed on 30 September 2014 during the opposition proceedings and auxiliary request 2 as filed by letter of 5 September 2018. It further requested that documents D21a to D24a filed on 21 August 2015 and document D29b filed on 5 September 2018 be admitted into the proceedings.

Reasons for the Decision

1. New evidence

1.1 With its reply to the appeal, the respondent requested that the newly cited documents D21a to D24a and D29a be admitted into the appeal proceedings. With its letter dated 5 September 2018 it requested that D29a be replaced by D29b, which is identical to D29a apart from a corrected typing error.

1.2 The above documents are supplemented versions of the experimental reports D21 to D24 and D29 already filed during the opposition proceedings.

1.3 The appellant had not objected to the admission of these documents into the proceedings, and the board saw no reason to raise an objection on its own motion. They had been filed in direct reaction to the statement of grounds of appeal in support of arguments already made in the proceedings, and D29b merely corrects a typing mistake in D29a. Thus, the documents were admitted into the proceedings.

MAIN REQUEST (claims maintained by the opposition division)

2. Amendments

2.1 Independent claims 1 and 3 were amended in the opposition proceedings. In both claims the wording:

"whereby the resin components of the expandable beads contain a gel component comprising less than 2 wt% of a graft polymer,"

was changed to read:

"whereby the resin components of the expandable beads contain less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer,"

2.2 The appellant saw this amendment as the correction of an error in the text of the granted patent under Rule 140 EPC, which according to G 1/10 was not allowable.

2.2.1 However, the respondent never pursued the amendment of claims 1 and 3 as a correction of the granted patent. It amended claims 1 and 3 as granted in the opposition proceedings to overcome the appellant's insufficiency objection in view of the different definitions of the gel component in claims 1 and 3 as granted on the one hand and claim 5 as granted on the other. Claim 5 as granted has always specified that "the base resin contains less than 2 wt% of a gel component comprising a graft polymer ...". After the amendment to granted claims 1 and 3, all independent claims now define the gel component in the same way, namely as in claim 5 as granted.

2.2.2 In this context, is should be noted that G 1/10 states in point 13 of the Reasons that:

"However, it is always open to a patent proprietor to seek to amend his patent during opposition or limitation proceedings and such amendment could remove a perceived error. Such an amendment would have to satisfy all the legal requirements for amendments including those of Article 123 EPC."

2.2.3 Thus, being an amendment under Article 123 EPC and not a correction under Rule 140 EPC, it has to be investigated in the present case whether the amendment satisfies the requirements of Article 123 EPC.

2.3 Amendments (Article 123(2) EPC)

2.3.1 In support of the amendment, the respondent referred to the wording of claims 1 and 3 of the international patent application which gave rise to the European patent application on the basis of which the patent in suit was granted. The international patent application was filed and published in Japanese. The true wording of claims 1 and 3 of the international patent application is confirmed by a translator's declarations (D10/D10a).

In order to initiate proceedings at the EPO, a translation into English was filed pursuant to Article 153(4) EPC. However, the wording of claims 1 and 3 in the English version contained an incorrect translation with regard to the definition of the gel component (as confirmed by D10/D10a). This incorrect translation has been kept in claims 1 and 3 as granted, resulting in the discrepancy objected to between claims 1 and 3 as granted on the one hand and claim 5 as granted on the other.

2.3.2 According to Article 14(2) EPC, the translation of a European application may be brought into conformity with the application as filed throughout the proceedings before the EPO. The present application is deemed to be a European application pursuant to Article 153(2) EPC and must hence be treated as a regular European application. As a consequence, the provision of Article 14(2) EPC equally applies to the present application, and, by analogy, the translation may be corrected throughout the proceedings before the EPO (see, for instance, T 1483/10, reasons 2.1 to 2.3). The correct translation of the application as filed therefore forms the basis for the amendment of claims 1 and 3 of the present main request.

2.3.3 Taking into account the translator's declarations D10/D10a and that their accuracy has not been contested by the appellant, the board is satisfied that the amendment made to claims 1 and 3 reflects a correct translation of the Japanese text and that, consequently, the amendment does not infringe Article 123(2) EPC.

2.4 Amendments (Article 123(3) EPC)

2.4.1 The appellant argued that the subject-matter of amended claims 1 and 3 extended the protection conferred by the granted claims because the amended method claims 1 and 3 allowed for the possibility that no gel fraction is present (less than 2 wt% and thus including 0 wt%), whereas granted claims 1 and 3 required the presence of a gel fraction (more than 0 wt%).

2.4.2 The board disagrees. According to established case law, a product claim confers protection to all processes for making that product, such that the replacement of a claim directed to a product by a claim directed to a specific process or method for making that product does not extend the protection conferred thereby (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO 8th edition 2016, II.E.2.6.3).

2.4.3 As indicated in point 2.2.1 above, granted product claim 5 had already defined the gel content of the expandable beads in the same way as now done in amended claims 1 and 3. Thus, the protection conferred by granted claim 5 already covered the product as such and, consequently, any method of manufacturing it.

2.4.4 As a result, the protection conferred by method claims 1 and 3 does not extend beyond the protection conferred by granted product claim 5. Thus, the amendments comply with the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC).

3. Sufficiency

3.1 The appellant maintained that the disclosure was insufficient since the skilled person would not know how to determine:

- the melting point of the linear low-density polyethylene-based resin, and

- the gel fraction comprising the graft polymer.

3.2 Determination of the melting point of the linear low-density polyethylene-based resin

3.2.1 It is correct that the patent specification does not describe the test method for determining the melting point of the polyethylene. However, the board agrees with the respondent that the skilled person would know from their common general knowledge how to determine this parameter.

3.2.2 Indeed there are standard test methods for determining the melting point of polymers which belong to the common general knowledge of the skilled person, such as JIS K 7121 (D11) or ASTM D3418-99 (D16). Thus, the skilled person would determine the melting point by using, for instance, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which is known to be one of the most accurate methods for this purpose.

3.2.3 The opponent essentially argued that D11 described DSC, as well as differential thermal analysis (DTA), as methods generally suitable for determining the melting point of a polymer. Furthermore, even if the skilled person were to select the DSC method, the exact conditions for conducting the measurement would not be known.

3.2.4 The board cannot accept the appellant's arguments. The experimental reports D17 and D19 filed by the respondent confirm that even different methods are suitable for determining the melting point of a polyethylene resin within good accuracy. Thus, the melting point of a specific polyethylene mentioned in the prior art cited by the appellant, namely "Ultzex 3021F", had been determined by DSC (122°C; D17) and hot stage microscope (122.1°C; D19). This value corresponded well with the 122°C indicated in the technical brochure (D18) for this commercial product.

As regards the conditions of the DSC method, there is nothing on file indicating that the usual conditions used for polyethylene would lead to any difficulty. Also, the fact that D4 reports a melting point of 123°C for "Ultzex 3021F", which is roughly 1°C higher than the values obtained in D17 and D19, is in itself not a reason for lack of sufficiency. This might, at most, lead to some lack of clarity at the edges of the temperature ranges required by claims 1 and 3. In any case, there is no experimental evidence on file showing that the use of the standard methods for determining the melting point would amount to an undue burden when carrying out the invention.

3.2.5 For these reasons the board is convinced that the skilled person would know from their common general knowledge how to determine the melting point of the polyethylene resin used.

3.3 Determination of the gel fraction

3.3.1 According to paragraphs [0007] and [0008] of the specification, the polymerisation of styrene monomer in the presence of a linear low-density polyethylene-based resin results in the formation of a gel fraction which may comprise two different components, namely (i) a gel component containing polystyrene and (ii) a gel component containing substantially no polystyrene. Gel component (i) is the result of graft polymerisation of styrene monomer on a polyethylene chain, whereas gel component (ii) is basically cross linked polyethylene.

3.3.2 The independent claims require that the resin components of expandable beads contain less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer. The gel fraction is defined as the weight percentage of the part which remains insoluble in boiling toluene under specific extraction conditions. Thus, according to claims 1, 3 and 5, the gel fraction is determined as

FORMULA/TABLE/GRAPHIC

where the term "weight of resultant solid" relates to the weight of a sample remaining on a wire gauze (Ø 0.12 mm, 80-mesh) which is insoluble in boiling toluene after 24 hrs and drying at 130°C for 1 hour, and where the term "weight of sample" relates to the weight of the sample resin beads prior to extraction with toluene. The method of extraction of the insoluble solid is also described in paragraph [0068] of the patent specification.

3.3.3 The insoluble solid is then analysed according to the method described in paragraph [0069] in order to determine its polystyrene content. It is the convention in the present patent that the amount of the polystyrene in the gel fraction is the criterion for judging whether or not the gel component comprises a graft polymer. Thus, when the polystyrene content is 10 wt% or more, it was determined that a gel component comprises a graft polymer, but not a crosslinked polymer (paragraph [0070]).

3.3.4 This method has been used in the examples and comparative examples in the patent to determine the gel fraction. Moreover, the respondent has used this method for determining the gel fraction of several polyethylene-based resins of prior-art documents D1 and D2 (see D21a to D24a). In all cases the gel fraction and the polystyrene content could be determined.

3.3.5 The appellant objected that the method described in the patent would not allow the two gel components to be differentiated. However, as explained above, the criterion whether or not the gel fraction comprises a graft copolymer is based on a convention, and the appellant has not provided any experimental evidence that this convention would lead to any difficulty relating to sufficiency of disclosure.

3.3.6 At the oral proceedings, the appellant argued that the method disclosed in the patent did not allow the determination of the stage of the process at which the graft polymer was formed. In this context, it referred to the method of example 1 of D3.

This objection too must fail. First of all, the board notes that D3 relates to expandable beads prepared from a conventional polymer blend. As set out in point 4.3 below, the skilled person would not consider that such a blend is a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin. Thus, the sufficiency objection with regard to D3 appears irrelevant. Secondly, even if the objection were to be considered, the respondent determined the gel fraction in a polymer according to D3, and by following the convention set out in the patent it found that the resin composition of example 1 of D3 had a gel content of 10.4 wt% with a polystyrene content of 16.2 wt% (D29b page 2, lines 3 to 7). The board cannot see how the appellant's objection amounts to a lack of sufficiency.

3.4 For these reasons the claimed invention as defined in the main request is considered to be sufficiently disclosed.

4. Novelty

4.1 The only novelty attack maintained by the appellant during the oral proceedings was that the subject-matter of claim 5 lacked novelty over example 1 of D3.

4.2 Example 1 of D3 discloses the preparation of expandable beads by mixing the following components in a twin-screw extruder at 200°C:

- 50 parts by weight of a polymer obtained by dissolving 8 parts by weight of a polybutadiene in 92 parts by weight of styrene followed by free radical polymerisation of the solution;

- 40 parts by weight of a linear polyethylene (Dowlex 2045 E from Dow); and

- 10 parts by weight of a linear, anionically polymerised styrene-butadiene block polymer having a polybutadiene content of 26% by weight.

6 000 g of this blend were transferred together with 21 000 g of demineralised water and further ingredients into a vessel, heated and pressurised with a mixture of n-pentane/isopentane and n-heptane (as volatile blowing agents).

D3 does not disclose whether the resulting beads of example 1 contain less than 2 wt% of a gel component.

4.3 There is a structural difference between the expandable beads of the invention and those of D3. Thus, the claimed beads are expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin that are made by "adopting linear low-density polyethylene and by adding a styrene monomer to polyethylene for polymerization at a specific range of temperatures under the presence of a specific amount of initiator" (paragraph [0011] of the specification).

In contrast to this, in example 1 of D3 the polyethylene is blended with a polymer prepared by polymerising styrene in the presence of polybutadiene (point 4.2 above). In other words, in example 1 of D3 the polystyrene is prepared by polymerising styrene in the absence of polyethylene. Therefore, the resin composition in example 1 of D3 cannot be regarded as being a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin within the meaning of claim 5 of the patent.

4.4 Apart from that, as set out in point 3.3.6 above, the respondent has shown that the content of the gel fraction comprising a graft polymer for the resin composition of example 1 of D3 was too high when following the convention set out in the patent.

4.5 Thus, the subject-matter of claim 5 is novel over the disclosure of example 1 of D3.

5. Inventive step

5.1 The invention aims to provide expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin for the production of an expanded moulded article which has excellent impact resistance and physical properties and which can be readily recycled by minimising generation of a gel component derived from graft polymerisation of styrene on a polyethylene chain (paragraph [0010] of the specification).

5.2 Closest prior art

5.2.1 The set of claims of the main request includes three independent claims, namely claim 5 directed to the expandable beads as such and claims 1 and 3 directed to methods for producing such expandable beads. As already discussed above in relation to Article 123(3) EPC, the broadest claim is claim 5.

5.2.2 The appellant saw the disclosure of D3 as representing the closest prior art for the subject-matter of claim 5. The respondent and the opposition division considered D1 as the closest prior art.

5.2.3 D1, like the patent in suit, relates to styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin beads similar to those of the present invention (abstract). They are prepared by impregnating a polyethylene-based resin with styrene at a temperature at which polymerisation does not occur and then raising the temperature to polymerise the styrene (claim 1 of the English translation of D1, D1e; also paragraphs [0006] to [0008] of the present patent specification, in which D1 is acknowledged).

5.2.4 As already discussed above in relation to novelty, the beads produced by the process of example 1 of D3 are structurally quite different from the beads of the invention, because in the process of D3, styrene is polymerised in the presence of polybutadiene but not polyethylene. Therefore, the resin of D3 cannot be regarded as being a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin.

5.2.5 Consequently, the board agrees with the respondent and the opposition division that D1 is the most appropriate starting point for the assessment of inventive step.

5.2.6 D1 is silent about the amount of gel component present in the resins therein prepared, but the respondent has repeated several examples and found that the amount of gel component is always higher than 2 wt%, namely: 3.8 wt% for example 4 (D21, last paragraph), 4.2 wt% for comparative example 1 (D22, last paragraph) and 4.3 wt% for comparative example 2 (D23, last paragraph).

5.3 Problem to be solved and its solution

5.3.1 According to the respondent, the technical problem to be solved by the patent in view of D1 was the provision of expandable beads of a styrene-modified linear low-density polyethylene-based resin having good mechanical properties and improved recyclability.

5.3.2 This problem is solved by the claimed beads, where the resin component of the beads contains less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer.

5.3.3 The examples and comparative examples in the patent specification show that good recyclability is only obtained only when the gel fraction content is below 2 wt.% (see tables 2 and 5). All examples in the patent specification in which the resins have a gel fraction higher than 2 wt% are not acceptable for being recycled.

5.3.4 In this context, it is also noted that the appellant's observation that comparative example 9 was not suitable for being recycled is not correct. Although this example is marked as a comparative example because the required amount of initiator used was outside the amounts required by the method of claim 1, it does indeed result in resin beads according to claim 5. It has a gel content of 0.9 wt.% (table 2, column "gel fraction") and is acceptable for being recycled, as can be seen in said table 2, where "sufficient recyclability" was observed.

5.3.5 The board is therefore satisfied that the above technical problem has been credibly solved.

5.4 Obviousness

5.4.1 It remains to be decided whether or not it was obvious in view of the cited prior art to modify the resins of D1 so that they present a gel fraction of less than 2 wt%.

5.4.2 The board agrees with the respondent that nothing in the cited prior art hinted at the solution found in the patent. None of the documents recognises the importance of the gel fraction contained in the expandable resin beads for improving their recyclability. In fact, this feature is not mentioned in any of the documents in the proceedings.

5.4.3 In view of the above, the board concludes that the person skilled in the art, starting from D1 as closest prior art, would not have arrived in an obvious manner at the subject-matter of claim 5 of the main request. The subject-matter of claim 5 therefore involves an inventive step.

5.4.4 This line of argument, starting from D1 as the closest prior art, was not contested by the appellant, which argued on the basis of D3 as closest prior art. However, this line must fail because, as set out above, D3 does not qualify as the closest prior-art document.

5.5 The appellant further argued that, starting from D1 or D2 as closest prior art, the subject-matter of claims 1 and 3 would lack inventive step because it would be obvious for the skilled person to arrive at the claimed conditions merely by routine experimentation.

5.6 The board notes that claims 1 and 3 are directed to methods for the preparation of the expandable beads according to claim 5. They essentially define the process conditions (reaction temperature, amount of initiator, etc.) that ensure that an expandable resin with less than 2 wt% of a gel fraction comprising a graft polymer is obtained. The examples and comparative examples in the specification show that products with the desired properties can be achieved only when working under the conditions specified in claims 1 and 3.

5.7 It is well-established that analogy processes are patentable in so far as they provide novel and inventive products (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 8th edition 2016, I.D.9.17). Since the board acknowledges that the product of claim 5 is novel and inventive, the processes of claims 1 and 3 involve an inventive step even if they are merely seen as analogy processes.

5.8 In view of the above, the board concludes that the skilled person would not have arrived in an obvious way at the subject-matter of independent claims 1, 3 and 5. The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to the subject-matter of dependent claims 2, 4, 6 and 7.

AUXILIARY REQUESTS

Since the main request is allowable, there is no need for the board to deal with these requests.

Entscheidungsformel

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Unterstützung
    • Aktualisierungen der Website
    • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • FAQ
    • Veröffentlichungen
    • Verfahrensbezogene Mitteilungen
    • Kontakt
    • Aboverwaltung
    • Offizielle Feiertage
    • Glossar
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & Karriere
  • Pressezentrum
  • Single Access Portal
  • Beschaffung
  • Beschwerdekammern
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Impressum
  • Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Datenschutz
  • Barrierefreiheit

Wir verwenden auf dieser Website Cookies, um die Gebrauchsfreundlichkeit zu verbessern

Klicken Sie "Akzeptieren", um sich damit einverstanden zu erklären. 

Wenn Sie Videos auf unserer Website ansehen möchten, müssen Sie YouTube-Cookies akzeptieren. Zusätzliche Auskünfte finden sich in der Datenschutzerklärung von YouTube.