Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Startseite
  • Patentrecherche

    Patentwissen

    Unsere Patentdatenbanken und Recherchetools

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Technische Information
      • Übersicht
      • Espacenet - Patentsuche
      • Europäischer Publikationsserver
      • EP-Volltextrecherche
    • Rechtliche Information
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentregister
      • Europäisches Patentblatt
      • European Case Law Identifier Sitemap
      • Einwendungen Dritter
    • Geschäftsinformationen
      • Übersicht
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technologieanalyseberichte
    • Daten
      • Übersicht
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Massendatensätze
      • Web-Dienste
      • Datenbestände, Codes und Statistiken
    • Technologieplattformen
      • Übersicht
      • Kunststoffe im Wandel
      • Innovationen im Wassersektor
      • Innovationen im Weltraumsektor
      • Technologien zur Bekämpfung von Krebs
      • Technologien zur Brandbekämpfung
      • Saubere Energietechnologien
      • Kampf gegen Corona
    • Nützliche Informationsquellen
      • Übersicht
      • Zum ersten Mal hier? Was ist Patentinformation?
      • Patentinformation aus Asien
      • Patentinformationszentren (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Wirtschaft und Statistik
      • Patentinformationen rund um den einheitlichen Patentschutz
    Bild
    Plastics in Transition

    Technologieanalysebericht zur Plastikabfallwirtschaft

  • Anmelden eines Patents

    Anmelden eines Patents

    Praktische Informationen über Anmelde- und Erteilungsverfahren.

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Europäischer Weg
      • Übersicht
      • Leitfaden zum europäischen Patent
      • Einsprüche
      • Mündliche Verhandlung
      • Beschwerden
      • Einheitspatent & Einheitliches Patentgericht
      • Nationale Validierung
      • Antrag auf Erstreckung/Validierung
    • Internationaler Weg (PCT)
      • Übersicht
      • Euro-PCT-Leitfaden: PCT-Verfahren im EPA
      • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen des EPA
      • PCT-Bestimmungen und Informationsquellen
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungsantrag
      • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
      • Beschleunigung Ihrer PCT-Anmeldung
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Schulungen und Veranstaltungen
    • Nationale Anmeldungen
    • Zugelassenen Vertreter suchen
    • MyEPO Services
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste verstehen
      • Zugriff erhalten
      • Bei uns einreichen
      • Akten interaktiv bearbeiten
      • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • Formblätter
      • Übersicht
      • Prüfungsantrag
    • Gebühren
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Gebühren (EPÜ)
      • Internationale Gebühren (PCT)
      • Einheitspatentgebühren (UP)
      • Gebührenzahlung und Rückerstattung
      • Warnung

    UP

    Erfahren Sie, wie das Einheitspatent Ihre IP-Strategie verbessern kann

  • Recht & Praxis

    Recht & Praxis

    Europäisches Patentrecht, Amtsblatt und andere Rechtstexte

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Rechtstexte
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
      • Amtsblatt
      • Richtlinien
      • Erstreckungs-/ Validierungssyste
      • Londoner Übereinkommen
      • Nationales Recht zum EPÜ
      • Système du brevet unitaire
      • Nationale Maßnahmen zum Einheitspatent
    • Gerichtspraxis
      • Übersicht
      • Symposium europäischer Patentrichter
    • Nutzerbefragungen
      • Übersicht
      • Laufende Befragungen
      • Abgeschlossene Befragungen
    • Harmonisierung des materiellen Patentrechts
      • Übersicht
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Gruppe B+
    • Konvergenz der Verfahren
    • Optionen für zugelassene Vertreter
    Bild
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Informieren Sie sich über die wichtigsten Aspekte ausgewählter BK-Entscheidungen in unseren monatlichen „Abstracts of decisions“

  • Neues & Veranstaltungen

    Neues & Veranstaltungen

    Aktuelle Neuigkeiten, Podcasts und Veranstaltungen.

    Zur Übersicht 

     

    • Übersicht
    • News
    • Veranstaltungen
    • Europäischer Erfinderpreis
      • Übersicht
      • Die bedeutung von morgen
      • Über den Preis
      • Kategorien und Preise
      • Lernen Sie die Finalisten kennen
      • Nominierungen
      • European Inventor Network
      • Preisverleihung 2024
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Nominierungen
      • Die jury
      • Die Welt, neu gedacht
    • Pressezentrum
      • Übersicht
      • Patent Index und Statistiken
      • Pressezentrum durchsuchen
      • Hintergrundinformation
      • Copyright
      • Pressekontakt
      • Rückruf Formular
      • Presseinfos per Mail
    • Innovation und Patente im Blickpunkt
      • Übersicht
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Forschungseinrichtungen
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Raumfahrt und Satelliten
      • Zukunft der Medizin
      • Werkstoffkunde
      • Mobile Kommunikation: Das große Geschäft mit kleinen Geräten
      • Biotechnologiepatente
      • Patentklassifikation
      • Digitale Technologien
      • Die Zukunft der Fertigung
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast "Talk innovation"

    Podcast

    Von der Idee zur Erfindung: unser Podcast informiert Sie topaktuell in Sachen Technik und IP

  • Lernen

    Lernen

    Europäische Patentakademie – unser Kursportal für Ihre Fortbildung

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Schulungsaktivitäten und Lernpfade
      • Übersicht
      • Schulungsaktivitäten
      • Lernpfade
    • EEP und EPVZ
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Eignungsprüfung – EEP
      • Europäisches Patentverwaltungszertifikat – EPVZ
      • Projekt zur Unterstützung von EEP-Bewerbern
    • Lernmaterial nach Interesse
      • Übersicht
      • Patenterteilung
      • Technologietransfer und -verbreitung
      • Durchsetzung
    • Lernmaterial nach Profil
      • Übersicht
      • Geschäftswelt und IP
      • EEP und EPVZ Bewerber
      • Justiz
      • Nationale Ämter und IP-Behörden
      • Patentanwaltskanzleien
      • Lehre und Forschung
    Bild
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Werfen Sie einen Blick auf das umfangreiche Lernangebot im Schulungskatalog der Europäischen Patentakademie

  • Über uns

    Über uns

    Erfahren Sie mehr über Tätigkeit, Werte, Geschichte und Vision des EPA

    Zur Übersicht 

    • Übersicht
    • Das EPA auf einen Blick
    • 50 Jahre Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
      • Übersicht
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kinderwettbewerb für kollektive Kunst
    • Rechtsgrundlagen und Mitgliedstaaten
      • Übersicht
      • Rechtsgrundlagen
      • Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Patentorganisation
      • Erstreckungsstaaten
      • Validierungsstaaten
    • Verwaltungsrat und nachgeordnete Organe
      • Übersicht
      • Kommuniqués
      • Kalender
      • Dokumente und Veröffentlichungen
      • Der Verwaltungsrat der Europäischen Patentorganisation
    • Unsere Grundsätze und Strategie
      • Übersicht
      • Auftrag, Vision und Werte
      • Strategischer Plan 2028
      • Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Normalität
    • Führung und Management
      • Übersicht
      • Präsident António Campinos
      • Managementberatungsausschuss
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Übersicht
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Dienste & Aktivitäten
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste & Struktur
      • Qualität
      • Nutzerkonsultation
      • Europäische und internationale Zusammenarbeit
      • Europäische Patentakademie
      • Chefökonom
      • Ombudsstelle
      • Meldung von Fehlverhalten
    • Beobachtungsstelle für Patente und Technologie
      • Übersicht
      • Akteure im Innovationsbereich
      • Politisches Umfeld und Finanzierung
      • Tools
      • Über die Beobachtungsstelle
    • Beschaffung
      • Übersicht
      • Beschaffungsprognose
      • Das EPA als Geschäftspartner
      • Beschaffungsverfahren
      • Nachhaltiger Beschaffungsstandard
      • Registrierung zum eTendering und elektronische Signaturen
      • Beschaffungsportal
      • Rechnungsstellung
      • Allgemeine Bedingungen
      • Archivierte Ausschreibungen
    • Transparenzportal
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemein
      • Humankapital
      • Umweltkapital
      • Organisationskapital
      • Sozial- und Beziehungskapital
      • Wirtschaftskapital
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Übersicht
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Die Geschichte des EPA
      • Übersicht
      • 1970er-Jahre
      • 1980er-Jahre
      • 1990er-Jahre
      • 2000er-Jahre
      • 2010er-Jahre
      • 2020er Jahre
    • Die EPA Kunstsammlung
      • Übersicht
      • Die Sammlung
      • Let's talk about art
      • Künstler
      • Mediathek
      • What's on
      • Publikationen
      • Kontakt
      • Kulturraum A&T 5-10
      • "Lange Nacht"
    Bild
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Verfolgen Sie die neuesten Technologietrends mit unserem Patentindex

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • Sind Patente Neuland für Sie?
  • Sind Patente Neuland für Sie?
    • Go back
    • Patente für Ihr Unternehmen?
    • Warum ein Patent?
    • Was ist Ihre zündende Idee?
    • Sind Sie bereit?
    • Darum geht es
    • Der Weg zum Patent
    • Ist es patentierbar?
    • Ist Ihnen jemand zuvorgekommen?
    • Patentquiz
    • Video zum Einheitspatent
  • Patentrecherche
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Technische Information
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Espacenet - Patentsuche
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Datenbanken der nationalen Ämter
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Versionshinweise
      • Europäischer Publikationsserver
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise
        • Konkordanzliste für Euro-PCT-Anmeldungen
        • EP-Normdatei
        • Hilfe
      • EP-Volltextrecherche
    • Rechtliche Information
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentregister
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise: Archiv
        • Dokumentation zu Register
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Datenverfügbarkeit für Deep Links
          • Vereinigtes Register
          • Ereignisse im Register
      • Europäisches Patentblatt
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Patentblatt herunterladen
        • Recherche im Europäischen Patentblatt
        • Hilfe
      • European Case Law Identifier Sitemap
      • Einwendungen Dritter
    • Geschäftsinformationen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Versionshinweise
      • Technologieanalyseberichte
    • Daten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Massendatensätze
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Manuals
        • Sequenzprotokolle
        • Nationale Volltextdaten
        • Daten des Europäischen Patentregisters
        • Weltweite bibliografische Daten des EPA (DOCDB)
        • EP-Volltextdaten
        • Weltweite Rechtsereignisdaten des EPA (INPADOC)
        • Bibliografische Daten von EP-Dokumenten (EBD)
        • Entscheidungen der Beschwerdekammern des EPA
      • Web-Dienste
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Europäischer Publikationsserver (Web-Dienst)
      • Datenbestände, Codes und Statistiken
        • Go back
        • Wöchentliche Aktualisierungen
        • Regelmäßige Aktualisierungen
    • Technologieplattformen
      • Go back
      • Kunststoffe im Wandel
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Verwertung von Plastikabfällen
        • Recycling von Plastikabfällen
        • Alternative Kunststoffe
      • Übersicht
      • Innovative Wassertechnologien
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Sauberes Wasser
        • Schutz vor Wasser
      • Innovationen im Weltraumsektor
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Kosmonautik
        • Weltraumbeobachtung
      • Technologien zur Bekämpfung von Krebs
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Prävention und Früherkennung
        • Diagnostik
        • Therapien
        • Wohlergehen und Nachsorge
      • Technologien zur Brandbekämpfung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Branderkennung und -verhütung
        • Feuerlöschen
        • Schutzausrüstung
        • Technologien für die Sanierung nach Bränden
      • Saubere Energietechnologien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Erneuerbare Energien
        • CO2-intensive Industrien
        • Energiespeicherung und andere Enabling-Technologien
      • Kampf gegen Corona
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Impfstoffe und Therapeutika
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Impfstoffe
          • Übersicht über Therapieansätze für COVID-19
          • Kandidaten für antivirale Therapeutika
          • Nukleinsäuren zur Behandlung von Coronavirus-Infektionen
        • Diagnose und Analyse
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Protein-und Nukleinsäure-Nachweis
          • Analyseprotokolle
        • Informatik
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Bioinformatik
          • Medizinische Informatik
        • Technologien für die neue Normalität
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Geräte, Materialien und Ausrüstung
          • Verfahren, Maßnahmen und Aktivitäten
          • Digitale Technologien
        • Erfinderinnen und Erfinder gegen das Coronavirus
    • Nützliche Informationsquellen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Zum ersten Mal hier? Was ist Patentinformation?
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Grundlegende Definitionen
        • Patentklassifikation
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Gemeinsame Patentklassifikation
        • Patentfamilien
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Einfache DOCDB Patentfamilie
          • Erweiterte INPADOC Patentfamilie
        • Daten zu Rechtsstandsereignissen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • INPADOC-Klassifikationssystem
      • Patentinformation aus Asien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinesisch-Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Indien (IN)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russische Föderation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patentinformationszentren (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Wirtschaft und Statistik
      • Patentinformationen rund um den einheitlichen Patentschutz
  • Anmelden eines Patents
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Europäischer Weg
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Leitfaden zum europäischen Patent
      • Einsprüche
      • Mündliche Verhandlung
        • Go back
        • Kalender der mündlichen Verhandlungen
          • Go back
          • Kalender der mündlichen Verhandlungen
          • Technische Richtlinien
          • Zugang für die Öffentlichkeit zum Beschwerdeverfahren
          • Zugang für die Öffentlichkeit zum Einspruchsverfahren
      • Beschwerden
      • Einheitspatent & Einheitliches Patentgericht
        • Go back
        • Einheitspatent
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Rechtlicher Rahmen
          • Wesentliche Merkmale
          • Beantragung eines Einheitspatents
          • Kosten eines Einheitspatents
          • Übersetzungsregelungen und Kompensationssystem
          • Starttermin
          • Introductory brochures
        • Übersicht
        • Einheitliches Patentgericht
      • Nationale Validierung
      • Erstreckungs- /Validierungsantrag
    • Internationaler Weg
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Euro-PCT-Leitfaden
      • Eintritt in die europäische Phase
      • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • PCT-Bestimmungen und Informationsquellen
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungsantrag
      • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
      • Beschleunigung Ihrer PCT-Anmeldung
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Programm "Patent Prosecution Highway" (PPH) - Übersicht
      • PCT: Schulungen und Veranstaltungen
    • Nationaler Weg
    • MyEPO Services
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste verstehen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Versionshinweise
      • Zugriff erhalten
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Versionshinweise
      • Bei uns einreichen
        • Go back
        • Bei uns einreichen
        • Wenn unsere Dienste für die Online-Einreichung ausfallen
        • Versionshinweise
      • Akten interaktiv bearbeiten
        • Go back
        • Versionshinweise
      • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • Gebühren
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Gebühren (EPÜ)
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • Internationale Gebühren (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Ermäßigung der Gebühren
        • Gebühren für internationale Anmeldungen
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
        • Übersicht
      • Einheitspatentgebühren (UP)
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
      • Gebührenzahlung und Rückerstattung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zahlungsarten
        • Erste Schritte
        • FAQs und sonstige Anleitungen
        • Technische Informationen für Sammelzahlungen
        • Beschlüsse und Mitteilungen
        • Versionshinweise
      • Warnung
    • Formblätter
      • Go back
      • Prüfungsantrag
      • Übersicht
    • Zugelassenen Vertreter suchen
  • Recht & Praxis
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Rechtstexte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Archiv
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Dokumentation zur EPÜ-Revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Übersicht
            • Diplomatische Konferenz für die Revision des EPÜ
            • "Travaux préparatoires" (Vorarbeiten)
            • Neufassung
            • Übergangsbestimmungen
            • Ausführungsordnung zum EPÜ 2000
            • Gebührenordnung
            • Ratifikationen und Beitritte
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPÜ 1973
      • Amtsblatt
      • Richtlinien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • EPÜ Richtlinien
        • PCT-EPA Richtlinien
        • Richtlinien für das Einheitspatent
        • Überarbeitung der Richtlinien
        • Ergebnisse der Konsultation
        • Zusammenfassung der Nutzerbeiträge
        • Archiv
      • Erstreckungs-/Validierungssystem
      • Londoner Übereinkommen
      • Nationales Recht zum EPÜ
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Archiv
      • Einheitspatentsystem
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • Nationale Maßnahmen zum Einheitspatent
    • Gerichtspraxis
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Symposium europäischer Patentrichter
    • Nutzerbefragungen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Laufende Befragungen
      • Abgeschlossene Befragungen
    • Harmonisierung des materiellen Patentrechts
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Gruppe B+
    • Konvergenz der Verfahren
    • Optionen für zugelassene Vertreter
  • Neues & Veranstaltungen
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • News
    • Veranstaltungen
    • Europäischer Erfinderpreis
      • Go back
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Kategorien und Preise
      • Lernen Sie die Erfinder kennen
      • Nominierungen
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • Preisverleihung 2024
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Preis
      • Nominierungen
      • Die Jury
      • Die Welt, neu gedacht
      • Preisverleihung 2025
    • Pressezentrum
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patent Index und Statistiken
      • Pressezentrum durchsuchen
      • Hintergrundinformation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Europäisches Patentamt
        • Fragen und Antworten zu Patenten im Zusammenhang mit dem Coronavirus
        • Fragen und Antworten zu Pflanzenpatenten
      • Copyright
      • Pressekontakt
      • Rückruf Formular
      • Presseinfos per Mail
    • Im Blickpunkt
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Wasserbezogene Technologien
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Übersicht
        • CodeFest 2024 zu generativer KI
        • Codefest 2023 zu grünen Kunststoffen
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Forschungseinrichtungen
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Raumfahrt und Satelliten
        • Go back
        • Weltraumtechnologie und Patente
        • Übersicht
      • Gesundheit
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Medizintechnik und Krebs
        • Personalised medicine
      • Werkstoffkunde
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Nanotechnologie
      • Mobile Kommunikation
      • Biotechnologie
        • Go back
        • Rot, weiß oder grün
        • Übersicht
        • Die Rolle des EPA
        • Was ist patentierbar?
        • Biotechnologische Erfindungen und ihre Erfinder
      • Patentklassifikation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digitale Technologien
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Über IKT
        • Hardware und Software
        • Künstliche Intelligenz
        • Vierte Industrielle Revolution
      • Additive Fertigung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Die additive Fertigung
        • Innovation durch AM
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Lernen
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Schulungsaktivitäten und Lernpfade
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Schulungsaktivitäten: Arten und Formate
      • Lernpfade
    • EEP und EPVZ
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Europäische Eignungsprüfung – EEP
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Aufgabe F
          • Aufgabe A
          • Aufgabe B
          • Aufgabe C
          • Aufgabe D
          • Vorprüfung
        • Erfolgreiche Bewerber
        • Archiv
      • Europäisches Patentverwaltungszertifikat – EPVZ
      • Programm zur Unterstützung von EEP-Bewerbern
    • Angebot für bestimmte Interessengebiete
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patenterteilung
      • Technologietransfer und -verbreitung
      • Patentdurchsetzung und Streitregelung
    • Angebot für bestimmte Zielgruppen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Geschäftswelt und IP
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Fallstudien zum Technologietransfer
          • Fallstudien zu wachstumsstarken Technologien
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EEP und EPVZ Bewerber
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Denkaufgaben zu Aufgabe F
        • Tägliche Fragen zur Aufgabe D
        • Europäische Eignungsprüfung - Leitfaden zur Vorbereitung
        • EPVZ
      • Richter, Anwälte und Staatsanwälte
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • Die Zuständigkeit europäischer Gerichte bei Patentstreitigkeiten
      • Nationale Ämter und IP-Behörden
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Lernpfad für Patentprüfer der nationalen Ämter
        • Lernpfad für Formalsachbearbeiter und Paralegals
      • Patentanwaltskanzleien
      • Hochschulen, Forschungseinrichtungen und Technologietransferstellen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Modularer IP-Ausbildungsrahmen (MIPEF)
        • Programm "Pan-European-Seal für junge Fachkräfte"
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Für Studierende
          • Für Hochschulen
            • Go back
            • Übersicht
            • IP-Schulungsressourcen
            • Hochschulmitgliedschaften
          • Unsere jungen Fachkräfte
          • Beruflicher Entwicklungsplan
        • Akademisches Forschungsprogramm (ARP)
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Abgeschlossene Forschungsprojekte
          • Laufende Forschungsprojekte
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Download modules
        • Handbuch für die Gestaltung von IP-Kursen
        • PATLIB Wissenstransfer nach Afrika
          • Go back
          • Die PATLIB-Initiative "Wissenstransfer nach Afrika" (KT2A)
          • KT2A-Kernaktivitäten
          • Erfolgsgeschichte einer KT2A-Partnerschaft: PATLIB Birmingham und Malawi University of Science and Technology
  • Über uns
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Das EPA auf einen Blick
    • 50 Jahre EPÜ
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Übersicht
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kinderwettbewerb für kollektive Kunst
    • Rechtsgrundlagen und Mitgliedstaaten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Rechtsgrundlagen
      • Mitgliedstaaten
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Mitgliedstaaten sortiert nach Beitrittsdatum
      • Erstreckungsstaaten
      • Validierungsstaaten
    • Verwaltungsrat und nachgeordnete Organe
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Kommuniqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Übersicht
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Kalender
      • Dokumente und Veröffentlichungen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Dokumente des Engeren Ausschusses
      • Verwaltungsrat
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zusammensetzung
        • Vertreter
        • Geschäftsordnung
        • Kollegium der Rechnungsprüfer
        • Sekretariat
        • Nachgeordnete Organe
    • Grundsätze
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Auftrag, Vision und Werte
      • Strategieplan 2028
        • Go back
        • Treiber 1: Personal
        • Treiber 2: Technologien
        • Treiber 3: Qualitativ hochwertige Produkte und Dienstleistungen
        • Treiber 4: Partnerschaften
        • Treiber 5: Finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit
      • Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Normalität
      • Datenschutzerklärung
    • Führung und Management
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Über den Präsidenten
      • Managementberatungsausschuss
    • Nachhaltigkeit beim EPA
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Umwelt
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspirierende Erfindungen für die Umwelt
      • Soziales
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspirierende soziale Erfindungen
      • Governance und finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit
    • Beschaffung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Beschaffungsprognose
      • Das EPA als Geschäftspartner
      • Beschaffungsverfahren
      • Veröffentlichungen des Dynamischen Beschaffungssystems
      • Nachhaltiger Beschaffungsstandard
      • Über eTendering
      • Rechnungsstellung
      • Beschaffungsportal
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Elektronische Signatur von Verträgen
      • Allgemeine Bedingungen
      • Archivierte Ausschreibungen
    • Dienste & Aktivitäten
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Unsere Dienste & Struktur
      • Qualität
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Grundlagen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Europäisches Patentübereinkommen
          • Richtlinien für die Prüfung
          • Unsere Bediensteten
        • Qualität ermöglichen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Stand der Technik
          • Klassifikationssystem
          • Tools
          • Qualitätssicherung
        • Produkte & Dienstleistungen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Recherche
          • Prüfung
          • Einspruch
          • Fortlaufende Verbesserung
        • Qualität durch Netzwerke
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Nutzerengagement
          • Zusammenarbeit
          • Befragung zur Nutzerzufriedenheit
          • Stakeholder-Qualitätssicherungspanels
        • Charta für Patentqualität
        • Qualitätsaktionsplan
        • Qualitäts-Dashboard
        • Statistik
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Recherche
          • Prüfung
          • Einspruch
        • Integriertes Management beim EPA
      • Charta unserer Kundenbetreuung
      • Nutzerkonsultation
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Ständiger Beratender Ausschuss beim EPA
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Ziele
          • Der SACEPO und seine Arbeitsgruppen
          • Sitzungen
          • Bereich für Delegierte
        • Befragungen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Methodik
          • Recherche
          • Sachprüfung, abschließende Aktionen und Veröffentlichung
          • Einspruch
          • Formalprüfung
          • Kundenbetreuung
          • Einreichung
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • EPA-Website
          • Archiv
      • Europäische und internationale Zusammenarbeit
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Zusammenarbeit mit den Mitgliedstaaten
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
        • Bilaterale Zusammenarbeit mit Nichtmitgliedstaaten
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Validierungssystem
          • Programm für verstärkte Partnerschaft
        • Internationale Organisationen, Trilaterale und IP5
        • Zusammenarbeit mit internationalen Organisationen außerhalb des IP-Systems
      • Europäische Patentakademie
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Partner
      • Chefökonom
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Wirtschaftliche Studien
      • Ombudsstelle
      • Meldung von Fehlverhalten
    • Beobachtungsstelle für Patente und Technologie
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Innovation gegen Krebs
      • Akteure im Innovationsbereich
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Start-ups und KMU
      • Politisches Umfeld und Finanzierung
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Programm zur Innovationsfinanzierung
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Unsere Studien zur Innovationsfinanzierung
          • EPA-Initiativen für Patentanmelder/innen
          • Programm zur Innovationsfinanzierung
        • Patente und Normen
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Publikationen
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • Über die Beobachtungsstelle
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Arbeitsplan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemein
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Übersicht
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Humankapital
      • Umweltkapital
      • Organisationskapital
      • Sozial- und Beziehungskapital
      • Wirtschaftskapital
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • Geschichte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • 1970er-Jahre
      • 1980er-Jahre
      • 1990er-Jahre
      • 2000er-Jahre
      • 2010er-Jahre
      • 2020er Jahre
    • Kunstsammlung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Die Sammlung
      • Let's talk about art
      • Künstler
      • Mediathek
      • What's on
      • Publikationen
      • Kontakt
      • Kulturraum A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Frühere Ausstellungen
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Lange Nacht"
  • Beschwerdekammern
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Entscheidungen der Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Neue Entscheidungen
      • Übersicht
      • Ausgewählte Entscheidungen
    • Mitteilungen der Beschwerdekammern
    • Verfahren
    • Mündliche Verhandlungen
    • Über die Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Präsident der Beschwerdekammern
      • Große Beschwerdekammer
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technische Beschwerdekammern
      • Juristische Beschwerdekammer
      • Beschwerdekammer in Disziplinarangelegenheiten
      • Präsidium
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
    • Verhaltenskodex
    • Geschäftsverteilungsplan
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archiv
    • Jährliche Liste der Verfahren
    • Mitteilungen
    • Jahresberichte
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • Veröffentlichungen
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Rechtsprechung der Beschwerdekammern
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Archiv
  • Service & Unterstützung
    • Go back
    • Übersicht
    • Aktualisierungen der Website
    • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
    • Veröffentlichungen
    • Bestellung
      • Go back
      • Patentwissen – Produkte und Dienste
      • Übersicht
      • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
        • Go back
        • Übersicht
        • Patentinformationsprodukte
        • Massendatensätze
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Leitfaden zur fairen Nutzung
    • Verfahrensbezogene Mitteilungen
    • Nützliche Links
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Patentämter der Mitgliedstaaten
      • Weitere Patentämter
      • Verzeichnisse von Patentvertretern
      • Patentdatenbanken, Register und Patentblätter
      • Haftungsausschluss
    • Aboverwaltung
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Anmelden
      • Einstellungen verwalten
      • Abmelden
    • Veröffentlichungen
      • Go back
      • Übersicht
      • Möglichkeiten der Einreichung
      • Standorte
    • Offizielle Feiertage
    • Glossar
    • RSS-Feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Übersicht
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Startseite
  2. Node
  3. J 0004/23 25-10-2023
Facebook X Linkedin Email

J 0004/23 25-10-2023

Europäischer Rechtsprechungsidentifikator
ECLI:EP:BA:2023:J000423.20231025
Datum der Entscheidung:
25 October 2023
Aktenzeichen
J 0004/23
Antrag auf Überprüfung von
-
Anmeldenummer
-
IPC-Klasse
-
Verfahrenssprache
EN
Verteilung
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download und weitere Informationen:

Entscheidung in EN 430.47 KB
Bibliografische Daten verfügbar in:
EN
Fassungen
Nicht veröffentlicht
Bezeichnung der Anmeldung
-
Name des Anmelders
-
Name des Einsprechenden
-
Kammer
3.1.01
Leitsatz
-
Relevante Rechtsnormen
European Patent Convention Art 112
European Patent Convention Art 134(2)
European Patent Convention Art 134(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 134(3)
European Patent Convention Art 134(7)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 21
European Patent Convention R 103(1)(a)
Schlagwörter

Request that appellant be entered on the list of representatives (not allowed)

Principle of legitimate expectation - expectation relied on by appellant not legitimate

Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (no)

Reimbursement of appeal fee - (no)

Reimbursement of appeal fee - request for reimbursement must be justifed with reasons relating to a substantial procedural violation

Orientierungssatz
-
Angeführte Entscheidungen
G 0005/88
G 0003/91
G 0005/93
G 0002/97
J 0027/92
J 0010/20
T 0460/95
T 0152/95
T 1063/18
Anführungen in anderen Entscheidungen
J 0003/24

Summary of Facts and Submissions

I. The appeal is directed against the decision of the Legal Division of 4 March 2023 rejecting the request dated 11 November 2022 according to which the appellant sought to be entered on the list of professional representatives before the EPO.

II. The appellant requested (as the main request) that:

- the decision under appeal be set aside, and

- he be entered on the list of representatives

before the EPO.

As an auxiliary measure, he requested that:

the case be referred to the Enlarged Board of

Appeal.

In addition, he requested

the reimbursement of the appeal fee.

III. The requestor (the appellant) asked to be entered on the list of professional representatives before the EPO. He addressed the Vice-President in charge of the Directorate-General for Legal and International Affairs (VP5) and requested an exemption from the requirement of passing the European Qualifying Examination (EQE) as set out under Article 134(2)(c) EPC. For his request, he relied on the following information published on the EPO's website at the time of the request (emphasis added):

"... in accordance with Article 134(7) EPC, the Vice-President in charge of DG5 is entitled to grant exemption from requirements (a) and (c) of Article 134(2) EPC (see Decision of the President of the EPO dated 1 December 2011 delegating his powers to decide on requests for exemption from requirements for entry on the list of professional representatives, OJ EPO 2012, 13)".

IV. In reply, VP5 informed the requestor that the erroneous information on the website had been rectified but that the request for an exemption could not be granted since there was no possibility of being exempted from having to pass the EQE other than the so-called grandfather clause under Article 134(3) EPC, which was not applicable to the requestor's case.

V. Further letters between the requestor and VP5 as well as the Legal Division were exchanged.

VI. The Legal Division stated in the decision under appeal that VP5 had decided not to grant the requested exemption and confirmed this decision. This had been justified on the grounds that there was no legal basis for granting an exemption from Article 134(2)(c) EPC, other than the grandfather clause under Article 134(3) EPC, which did not apply in the requestor's case. VP5 had also decided that an exemption could not be granted based on the principle of good faith for having followed erroneous instructions published on the EPO's website. This was so because such a reliance was explicitly excluded by the terms and conditions of the use of the EPO's website. The information on the website could also have easily been verified by checking the legal text itself. Moreover, neither the EPC provisions on good faith the requestor had referred to nor the decision cited by him applied directly or by analogy to the case at hand. In addition, the Legal Division held that it could also not enter the requestor on the list of professional representatives itself based on the principle of good faith, referring to the same reasoning as the one provided by VP5 set out in the preceding paragraph.

VII. On appeal, the appellant submitted that the EPO was bound by its own announcements. The appellant referred to case J 10/20 and essentially argued that in that case, even if there had been no legal basis for the extension under Rule 134(2) EPC, the Legal Board had decided that the EPO was still bound by its own announcements. According to the appellant, a user of the EPO should not be penalised without good reason for relying on notices published by the EPO. The appellant was also entitled to expect that the EPO should apply the interpretation published on the EPO's website (to which he had referred in the request) up to the date on which the website was corrected. He referred to G 5/93, where the Enlarged Board had held that the EPO was bound by its own published interpretation and that applicants were entitled to expect that the EPO should apply this interpretation up to the date on which decision G 3/91 was made available to the public.

He further submitted that the principle of legitimate expectation was essential in the dealings of the EPO with its users (reference was made to G 2/97, G 5/88, G 5/93 and J 10/20; he also made reference to T 1063/18 and T 152/95). In further support of his core argument on the principle of legitimate expectation, the appellant referred to general legal principles, such as legal certainty, the rule of law and the right to be heard. Parties must be able to rely on the EPO complying with the relevant provisions of the EPC. It was decisive for the current case that the information on the website had been there for over five years without anyone realising that it might not be in accordance with the legal norms. Since this information had been available for such a long time, users could assume that it was correct. He should not suffer any disadvantage from relying on the EPO's information on its website. Whether or not there was actually a legal basis for the requested exemption was irrelevant. Common sense alone dictated that he was entitled to be given an exemption. If there was no legal basis for his request to be granted an exception, this was the EPO's problem, not his. In any case, if there were a rule permitting the grant of the exception he requested, he would qualify. The appellant further submitted that it was he who had found this "crack" in the system and that he should therefore be able to benefit from it. The "crack" had also been closed since as the EPO had removed the information from its website, so there was no danger for the EPO that anybody else could claim an exemption in the future. But in his case, he could rely on what had been stated on the website when he had filed his request for an exemption.

He further submitted that there should be a two-step procedure according to which, first, it should be made clear that an exemption was possible and that he was entitled to request this exemption and, second, VP5 should be tasked with evaluating whether he was entitled to the requested exemption. He made reference to the fact that he was qualified as a patent attorney in Germany and Denmark and to his other qualifications and experience, from which it could only be concluded that he was indeed entitled to the exemption.

Reasons for the Decision

1. The facts of the case are not disputed. The appellant has not passed the European qualifying examination (EQE). He also confirmed during the oral proceedings that there was no legal basis in the EPC under which the EPO could grant an exemption from the requirement under Article 134(2)(c) EPC to pass the EQE for being entered on the list of professional representatives. Indeed, no such legal basis exists.

The appellant also confirmed at the oral proceedings before the Board that he relied solely on the principle of legitimate expectations, also called the principle good faith, for his main request.

The principle of the protection of legitimate expectations

2. The principle of the protection of legitimate expectations is well established in proceedings before the EPO. This is also made clear in the decisions referred to by the appellant (see above point VII., in particular the decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal G 2/97, G 5/88 and G 5/93). It is thus not necessary to invoke, as the appellant did, further legal principles, such as legal certainty or the rule of law, in support of the principle's existence.

However, the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations does not give a carte blanche to the person relying on it. Rather, it is subject to several limitations (see in general Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 10th edition 2022, III.A.2.2). First and foremost, not any expectation held by a person is automatically a legitimate one within the meaning of this principle. Whether an expectation is legitimate must be assessed by applying the principle to the facts of the case and, depending on the circumstances of the case, the relief sought may or may not be granted.

It is therefore inherent in the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations that a person can only successfully invoke an expectation on which they could, on an objective basis, legitimately rely. As put by the Enlarged Board in G 2/97, the erroneous information from the EPO must objectively justify their conduct (G 2/97, Reasons 4.1, citing T 460/95). Therefore, it must be established that, on an objective basis, it was reasonable for the appellant to have been misled by the information on which he relied (see also J 27/92, Reasons 3.2; on the requirement to know the relevant legal provisions, see J 10/17, Reasons 3.3).

Main request - appellant be entered on the list of representatives before the EPO

3. The appellant seeks with his main request to be entered on the list of professional representatives before the EPO.

The wording of the request is clear and unambiguous. It must fail for the simple reason that the information on the website relied upon by the appellant does not give him a legitimate expectation for such a request. The EPO's website at the time of the request provided the following information: "... in accordance with Article 134(7) EPC, the Vice-President in charge of DG5 is entitled to grant exemption from requirements (a) and (c) of Article 134(2) EPC", referring to the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 1 December 2011 delegating his powers to decide on requests for exemption from requirements for entry on the list of professional representatives (OJ EPO 2012, 13).

This information, taken from the letter on which the appellant in fact relies for his main request, merely states that a power has been delegated by the President of the Office to VP5. Therefore, a person may at most have an expectation that this power is exercised by VP5, and not by someone else. However, from this information on the website, the appellant cannot deduce that he will be entered on the list of professional representatives before the EPO, as requested by him in the current proceedings.

However, the appellant made it clear during oral proceedings that he also sought to establish with his main request that he was entitled to request this exemption (and in a second step, that VP5 would evaluate whether the appellant was entitled to this exemption). The Board considers that if the appellant sought this to be encompassed in his main request, he should have made this explicit in his request.

Nonetheless, in the appellant's favour, the Board will address all his arguments, taking into account this understanding of the main request. However, as set out below, the Board finds the appellant's arguments unconvincing.

4. As set out above under point 2., the principle of legitimate expectation is not unrestricted, and it is inherent in the principle that a person can only successfully invoke an expectation on which they could, on an objective basis, legitimately rely. It must be established that, on an objective basis, it was reasonable for a requestor to have been misled by the information on which they relied, here the information of the EPO's website.

The appellant has not sufficiently and convincingly demonstrated in his favour that this is the case.

4.1 The Board notes that the appellant was immediately informed by the EPO that the information on the website was erroneous. In addition, the appellant could not simply rely on any information provided by the EPO's website. As alluded to by the Legal Division in its decision, the terms and conditions of use of the EPO's website indicate the following disclaimer: "5. Information on the website 5.1. Unless otherwise stated, the information is purely general in nature and is not to be construed as addressing the specific circumstances of any particular case, individual or entity. Unless otherwise stated in a specific case, the EPO does not guarantee that the information is exhaustive, accurate or up to date."

4.2 This does not mean that the EPO's website is excluded per se as a source of information which may lead to the application of the principle of legitimate expectation. It may indeed be seen as constituting such a source (see J 10/20, Reasons 1.13). But such information on a website must not be taken at face value.

It is a general legal principle that, as a rule, a person cannot successfully invoke ignorance of the law. Hence, the appellant cannot rely on not having been aware of the contents of Article 134 EPC either. This is particularly true as the information on the website relied upon by the appellant contained an explicit reference to the relevant legal norms of the EPC framework. It is expected from persons who read this information on the website to act in a reasonable manner and also to read these legal norms. In the case at hand, the information on the website referred to Article 134(2) and (7) EPC and the Decision of the President delegating the power of exemption to VP5. It even specifically stated that the information given on the possibility of exemption was based on Article 134(7) EPC.

A person reading these provisions, acting in a reasonable manner, would have immediately realised that the information on the website was erroneous since the wording of paragraphs 2 and 7 of Article 134 EPC are unambiguous and leave no room for any doubt: exemption from the requirements of Article 134(2) EPC is expressly provided - see Article 134(7)(a) EPC - only for the requirement set out in lit. (a), but not the one in lit. (c).

Hence, even if the appellant had the expectation that an exemption for the requirement set out in lit. (c) of Article 134(2) EPC could be granted, this expectation was not legitimate.

4.3 The appellant's further arguments are also not convincing.

4.3.1 The appellant argued that it was irrelevant whether there was a legal basis for the exemption as "common sense" dictated that he was entitled to be given an exemption. The Board disagrees. If, as in this case, no exemption for a specific requirement is provided for under the law (and in addition, there is an express exemption provided for a different requirement), the lack of a legal basis for the requested exemption cannot simply be overcome by referring to "common sense". In addition, the rationale underlying the requirement under lit. (c) of Article 134(2) EPC to pass the EQE is to ensure that professional representatives who are entitled to act in all proceedings before the EPO have a certain minimum competence which can be established in an objective manner. This is not only in the interest of the parties they represent but also of the general public. Ignoring a legal provision and its rationale cannot be regarded as "common sense".

4.3.2 The appellant also argued that parties had to be able to rely on the EPO complying with the relevant provisions of the EPC. The Board agrees, but this argument does not help the appellant's case. The legal provisions provide for exemptions to certain requirements but not for others (see Article 134(2), (3) and (7) EPC). If the EPO opened a further possibility of exemption not provided for in law, it would not be complying with the relevant legal provisions.

4.3.3 The appellant also argued that it was decisive in his case that the information on the website had been there for over five years without anyone realising that it might not be in accordance with the legal norms. So in his view, users could assume that the information was correct. This is also not convincing. The extent of time the erroneous information was on the website does not change that no-one, including the appellant, could legitimately rely on the erroneous information for the relief sought by the appellant.

4.4 The Board concludes that the appellant failed to establish that, on an objective basis, it was reasonable for him or any other person acting in a reasonable manner to have been misled by the information on the EPO's website. Therefore, the appellant has not demonstrated that the expectation on which he relied was legitimate.

5. In a further albeit related line of argument, the appellant posited that he should not suffer any disadvantage from relying on the EPO's incorrect information on its website. The Board considers that, indeed, the protection of the legitimate expectations of users of the European patent system requires that such a user not suffer a disadvantage as a result of, for example, having relied on erroneous information received from the EPO or in a misleading communication (see G 2/97, Reasons 4.1 and 5.1).

5.1 However, the appellant seeks to create, by way of the principle of legitimate expectation, a non-existing right under the EPC according to which VP5 may consider and ultimately grant an exemption from the requirement of Article 134(2)(c) EPC. In contrast, the principle of legitimate expectations usually applies where a loss of rights occurred, for example due to a missed time limit, where this loss may be remedied by applying this principle. In any case, for a successful reliance on the principle of legitimate expectation, the appellant must demonstrate that there was a disadvantage he has suffered from the erroneous information given by the EPO.

5.2 The appellant has not specified what kind of disadvantage he suffered from the EPO's erroneous information on its website. Yet again, it is relevant that he never had the right to be exempted from the requirement to pass the EQE, nor did he have a right that VP5 evaluate whether he was entitled to the requested exemption based on his qualifications and experience. Since there were no such rights in the first place, he could also never have lost this right. As a consequence, the fact that he was not given an exemption from the requirement to pass the EQE cannot be seen as a disadvantage in line with the case law established under the principle of the protection of legitimate expectation. The appellant did not put forward any other disadvantage he allegedly had suffered.

5.3 Therefore, in addition to the fact that the appellant has not demonstrated that the expectation on which he relied was legitimate (see point 4.), he has also failed to demonstrate that he suffered any disadvantage.

6. The appellant's lines of argument in which he relied on J 10/20 and G 5/93 are not convincing, either.

6.1 The appellant relied on J 10/20 and argued that the "EPO is bound by its own announcement". The Board agrees to the extent that an "announcement" of the EPO, for example on its website, may be a source of legitimate expectation. However, this does not mean that a person relying on any such "announcement" necessarily benefits from the principle of legitimate expectations for any result sought. As pointed out above, the principle does not give a carte blanche. This was also recognised in J 10/20, in which it was stated that a statement issued by the EPO on how to act in a given area had to be honoured "unless there is good reason not to do so". As the appellant can in this case not legitimately rely on the expectation which he invoked, there is - in the words of J 10/20 - "good reason" not to honour the incorrect statement given on the EPO's website.

Moreover, the case underlying J 10/20 is different to the situation in the current case. J 10/20 concerned the possible irrevocable loss of rights as a result of having relied on erroneous information by the EPO on the extension of time limits. In the case at hand, such a loss of rights is not at issue because the appellant never had any right to be exempted from the requirement under Article 134(2)(c) EPC in the first place.

In addition, the Board in J 10/20 relied in its reasoning on the fact that users and representatives could not be expected to question, without any apparent reason, statements on the extension of time limits made in publications under Rule 134(4) EPC, nor could they be expected to engage in individual investigations on whether and during which exact period a dislocation occurred in one of the contracting states, which might not even be their own (see Reasons 1.16; see also Catchword). These statements confirm that it is decisive whether users can be expected to question the information given to them and, if so, whether they would then come to a conclusion different from the one provided in the EPO's information. This further distinguishes the current situation from the one in J 10/20. In the current case, the appellant could be expected to read the - easily accessible - legal provisions, which were expressly mentioned in the information on the website on which the appellant relies.

6.2 The appellant also relied for his case on G 5/93. The Board understands the appellant's argument to be that the Enlarged Board had found that the EPO was bound "by its own interpretation" until contrary information was published. According to the appellant, this would lead to the conclusion that he was entitled to expect that the EPO applied the interpretation published on the EPO's website up to the date on which the correction was made available to the public.

This is not convincing for the following reasons.

6.2.1 The Enlarged Board found in G 5/93 that Euro-PCT applicants could rely on specific information for PCT applicants published in the EPO Official Journal (see EPO OJ 06/1991, page 328, referring, inter alia, to the decision of the Legal Board of Appeal in J 6/79) and thus were entitled to expect that the EPO should apply its own interpretation up to the date on which decision G 3/91 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, which had established that this interpretation and the corresponding practice had not been the proper interpretation of the relevant provisions of the EPC, was made available to the public (see G 5/93, Reasons 2.1 to 2.3).

However, this situation is not comparable to that in the case at hand. The situation in G 5/93 concerned a change in the case law of the Boards of Appeal and - due to the findings of the Enlarged Board in G 3/91 - a subsequent change of practice of the EPO. It concerned the question of whether applicants could rely on information provided by the EPO (regarding the possibility for Euro-PCT applicants to be re-established in the time limits for paying specific fees) up to the time G 3/91, which had found that the previous interpretation and the corresponding practice was not the proper one, was published. In contrast, no such change of case law or practice has occurred in the current case. For this reason alone, the appellant's arguments relying on G 5/93 must fail.

6.2.2 In addition, in the case at hand, the information on the website cannot - in contrast to the information referred to in G 5/93 - be said to constitute an "interpretation" of Article 134(2) or (7) EPC. The reference to the exemption from the requirement set out in lit. (c) of Article 134(2) EPC was simply an error which was immediately recognisable for a reasonable person reading the legal provisions. Indeed, there can be no doubt about the interpretation of the relevant provisions in Article 134 EPC and, as considered above, for a reasonable person there is no doubt about the question of which requirement of Article 134(2) EPC is open to an exemption made by the President of the Office or, by delegation, VP5.

7. Lastly, the appellant reminded the Board that his case was a one-time issue in that since the EPO had removed the information from its website, no-one could claim an exemption in the future. He added that his case was different since he had found the "crack" in the system and could rely on what had been written on the website when he filed his request.

The consideration that in future, for other persons, the exemption could no longer be requested, has no bearing on the outcome of this case and must be disregarded as irrelevant.

Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal

8. The appellant requested that the case be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if the decision is not set aside. He referred to Article 21 RPBA 2020 and argued that if the Legal Board did not put aside the decision under appeal, it would deviate from the earlier opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 5/93, where - according to the appellant - the Enlarged Board had held that the EPO was "bound by its own published interpretation". In his written submissions, the appellant did not propose any specific question. During the oral proceedings, the appellant proposed that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board:

"What kind of information can the EPO publish and later amend without this having any consequences for the users?"

9. This request had to be refused.

9.1 Under Article 112(1)(a) EPC, a Board may refer a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if it considers that a decision is required to ensure the uniform application of the law or because a point of law of fundamental importance arises. A Board can refer questions either of its own motion or following a request from a party. Under Article 21 RPBA 2020, "[s]hould a Board consider it necessary to deviate from an interpretation or explanation of the Convention contained in an earlier decision or opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal according to Article 112(1) EPC, the question shall be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal".

9.2 The Board considers that it does not deviate from any interpretation or explanation of the Convention (within the meaning of Article 21 RPBA 2020) set out by the Enlarged Board in G 5/93. G 5/93 was not concerned with the "interpretation or explanation" of the here relevant article of the Convention, i.e. Article 134(2) and (7) EPC. Instead, the Enlarged Board was concerned with a different and specific case. It did not hold that the EPO was generally bound by its own published interpretation as suggested by the appellant, but instead it applied the principle of legitimate expectation to the facts of the case and came to a specific conclusion (see G 5/93, Reasons 2.1 to 2.3).

9.3 Moreover, as explained in point6.2.1 above, the case at issue is not comparable to the one underlying G 5/93 in that the information on the website in the current case cannot even be seen as providing an "interpretation" of Article 134(2) and (7).

9.4 As to the question proposed and discussed at the oral proceedings, the Board considers that the proposed question is not a question of law within the meaning of Article 112 EPC that can or should be referred to the Enlarged Board. The proposed question is also very wide and generic and not linked to the particular factual and legal circumstances relevant to the case at hand. At the same time, the abstract manner in which the proposed question has been formulated does not mean that it can be answered such that it would be relevant for a large number of similar cases. Rather, any answer would have to take account of the type and content of the information published. Hence, the answer to the proposed question necessarily depends on the circumstances of each individual case.

Furthermore, to the extent to which the proposed question may concern the application of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations to the facts of the current case, it can be answered by the current Board without doubt. As set out above, the Board has found that the relief sought by the appellant cannot be granted as the expectation relied on was not legitimate. Thus, even if the proposed question was reformulated and directed to the circumstances of the case at hand, a decision of the Enlarged Board would not be required within the meaning of Article 112(1)(a) EPC.

9.5 Therefore, the Board does not consider that a decision of the Enlarged Board is required to ensure uniform application of the law or because a point of law of fundamental importance needs clarification. Exercising its discretion (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 10th edition 2022, V.B.2.3.2), the Board decides not to refer a question of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.

Reimbursement of the appeal fee

10. The appellant further requested the reimbursement of the appeal fee. The appellant did not make any submissions on this request and merely stated at the oral proceedings that this was a "standard request" for reimbursement, for which no specific reasons were required.

11. However, contrary to the appellant's assertion, a request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is not a "standard request" which does not require any substantiation. A Board may on its own motion reimburse the appeal fee if the relevant requirements, for example as set out in Rule 103(1)(a) EPC, are fulfilled. However, if an appellant requests reimbursement of the appeal fee, they must justify their request, and the reasons must be related to whether a substantial procedural violation within the meaning of this provision occurred. In this case, the appellant has not done this. He has not even alleged that a substantial procedural violation occurred. For this reason alone, his request is to be refused.

In addition, the appeal is not found allowable.

Therefore, none of the requirements of Rule 103(1)(a) EPC is fulfilled.

Entscheidungsformel

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The request for referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is

refused.

3. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is refused.

Footer - Service & support
  • Unterstützung
    • Aktualisierungen der Website
    • Verfügbarkeit der Online-Dienste
    • FAQ
    • Veröffentlichungen
    • Verfahrensbezogene Mitteilungen
    • Kontakt
    • Aboverwaltung
    • Offizielle Feiertage
    • Glossar
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & Karriere
  • Pressezentrum
  • Single Access Portal
  • Beschaffung
  • Beschwerdekammern
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Impressum
  • Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Datenschutz
  • Barrierefreiheit