Chapter VII – Inventive step
12. Selection inventions
The subject-matter of selection inventions differs from the closest prior art in that it represents selected subsets or sub-ranges. On the assessment of novelty, see G‑VI, 7. If this selection is linked to a particular technical effect, and if there are no hints leading the skilled person to the selection, then an inventive step is accepted (this technical effect occurring within the selected range may also be the same effect as is achieved with the broader known range, but to an unexpected degree).
The technical effect must apply to the entire range as claimed. If it occurs in only part of the claimed range, the claimed subject-matter does not solve the specific problem to which the effect relates, but only the more general problem of obtaining, for example, "a further product X" or "a further process Y" (see T 939/92).
Similarly, if there is no evident or plausible effect associated with the selection, a less ambitious problem of providing an alternative needs to be formulated (see T 2108/21, Reasons 3.3.10).
The criterion of "seriously contemplating" mentioned in connection with the test for novelty of overlapping ranges must not be confused with the assessment of inventive step. For inventive step, it has to be considered whether the skilled person would have made the selection or would have chosen the overlapping range in the expectation of some improvement or advantage. If the answer is no, then the claimed matter involves an inventive step.
The unexpected technical effect must apply to the entire range as claimed. If it occurs in only part of the claimed range, the claimed subject-matter does not solve the specific problem to which the effect relates, but only the more general problem of obtaining, for example, "a further product X" or "a further process Y" (see T 939/92).