2.4 Some examples of determining priority dates
2.4.4 Where it is necessary to check whether the application from which priority is actually claimed is the "first application" within the meaning of Art. 87(1)
P1 is the earliest application of the same applicant containing the invention. EP claims the priority of the later US application P2, which is a "continuation-in-part" of P1. D is a public disclosure of A+B.
1.7.89 |
1.1.90 |
1.6.90 |
1.12.90 |
Filing |
Filing |
Publication |
Filing |
P1 |
P2 (cip) |
D |
EP |
A + B |
A + B |
A + B |
claim 1: A + B |
A + B + C |
claim 2: A + B + C |
The priority of P2 cannot validly be claimed for claim 1, as P2 is not the "first application" for this subject-matter within the meaning of Art. 87(1); rather the "first application" is P1, which has "left rights outstanding" in that P2 is a "continuation-in-part" of P1. Therefore, Art. 87(4) does not apply and this does not change even if P1 is abandoned, withdrawn, refused or not published. D is prior art pursuant to Art. 54(2) for claim 1, but not for claim 2, as the latter claim has the earlier priority of P2.