HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Financing innovation programme
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Financing innovation programme
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Our studies on the financing of innovation
        • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
        • Financial support for innovators in Europe
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Annexes
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. European Patent Guide
  4. Contents
  5. Annexes
  6. Annex II
  7. Chemistry
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

Annex II – Examples of European patent applications

Overview

Chapter 1 – Foreword
Chapter 2 – General
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Nature and purpose of the European Patent Convention
2.3 Relationship to other international conventions
2.4 Choosing a route: national, European or international
Legal factors
Economic factors
2.5 Extending/validating European patents to/in non-contracting states
Chapter 3 – Patentability
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Invention
3.3 Novelty
Basic principles
Prior rights
3.4 Inventive step
Chapter 4 – Preparing and filing a European patent application
4.1 Formal requirements
Entitlement to file European patent applications
States for which European patent applications may be filed
Languages for European patent applications
Language arrangements to assist applicants from certain contracting states
Items making up a European patent application
Request for grant
Designation of inventor
Claiming priority
Filing by reference
Representation
4.2 Presenting your invention
Disclosing your invention
Unity of invention
Drafting the technical application documents
Description
Biotechnology applications
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences
Depositing biological material to supplement the description
Claims
Claims incurring fees
Drawings
Abstract
Prohibited matter
Unitary character of European patent applications and patents
4.3 Filing European patent applications
Where and how to file
Date of filing
Acknowledgement of receipt
Applications filed with national authorities and forwarded to the EPO
Fees
Fee amounts and payment methods
Refund of fees
4.4 Filing other documents
Where and how to file
Signature
Date of receipt
Acknowledgement of receipt
Chapter 5 – The European patent grant procedure
5.1 General survey
5.2 Procedure up to publication of the application
Examination on filing
Examination as to formal and other requirements
European search report
Lack of unity of invention
5.3 Publication of the European patent application
5.4 Examination procedure
Request for examination
Stages of the procedure
Amending applications before and during examination proceedings
National requirements governing translations of European patents
5.5 Opposition procedure
Opposition period
Grounds for opposition
Form and content of the notice of opposition
Examination of the notice of opposition for admissibility
Substantive examination of the opposition
5.6 Limitation and revocation procedure
5.7 Appeals procedure
Filing an appeal
Interlocutory revision
Stages of the procedure before the boards of appeal
Petition for review
5.8 Divisional applications
5.9 Renewal fees
5.10 General provisions governing periods
Missed time limits
Completion of an omitted act
5.11 How to register transfers, changes of name, licences and other rights
Transfer of rights
Changes of name
Licences and other rights
Annexes
Annex I – Overview of the procedure for the grant of a European patent
Annex II – Examples of European patent applications
Chemistry
Mechanics
Computers
Annex III – Authorities with which European patent applications may be filed
Annex IV – Time limits
Annex V – Fees
Annex VI – Patent information services

Chemistry

A revised version of this publication entered into force.

Art. 78, 83
R. 42
Description of invention 

METHOD FOR DETERMINING TOLERANCE OF CANCER CELL TO EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR INHIBITOR 

Title of invention (designation in request for grant suffices) 

Technical Field 

The present invention relates to a method for determining tolerance of a cancer cell to an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (hereinafter will be referred to as "EGFR inhibitor") in a human patient suffering from a cancer. 

R. 42(1)(a)
Technical field to which invention relates 

Background Art 

EGFR inhibitors, for example, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody drugs (anti-EGFR antibody drug) such as cetuximab and panitumumab have been known as a therapeutic agent for cancer. These EGFR inhibitors act in cancer cells to inhibit the function of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which is involved in cancer cell growth. 

R. 42(1)(b)
Relevant prior art 

Meanwhile, it has been known that, in a case where cancer cells of a cancer patient have a mutation in the KRAS gene, the cancer cells are resistant to the EGFR inhibitor, and therefore effects of the EGFR inhibitor are reduced. The EGFR inhibitor has side effects such as skin disorder, and therefore it is preferable to administer the EGFR inhibitor only to cancer patients for whom high therapeutic efficacy may be expected by administration of the EGFR inhibitor. As a method for determining whether a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is effective or not to the patient, a method for checking the presence or absence of a mutation in the KRAS gene of the cancer cells of the patient has been known. 

For example, WO2014/148557 discloses a method for predicting sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors, in which, in a case where a nucleic acid derived from a mutant-type KRAS gene or a protein thereof is detected in a blood sample, it is determined that a possibility that a tumour is not sensitive to the EGFR inhibitor is high. 

Assessment of prior art 

According to de Roock et al, Lancet Oncology, vol. 12, 2011, p. 594 – 603, BRAF mutation V600E confers resistance of cancer patients to EGFR antibodies. 

Technical Problem 

The inventors of the present invention have found that the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is not effective in some cases even to the cancer patient whose cancer cells have the wild-type KRAS gene. 

R. 42
Technical problem 

The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to select in advance a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR. inhibitor is ineffective. 

Solution to Problem 

The present invention is a method for determining tolerance of a cancer cell to an EGFR inhibitor in a human patient suffering from a cancer, the method comprising a step of determining the presence or absence of a mutation of a 326th amino acid residue of an amino acid sequence of a B-Raf protein (hereinafter referred to as "B-Raf") of the cancer cell by using a sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient, wherein the cancer cell is determined as tolerant to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, when the mutation of the amino acid residue is present. 

R. 42(1)(c)
Disclosure of invention 
R. 42(1)(c)
Advantageous effects of invention 

According to this method, it is possible to determine the tolerance of the cancer cell to the EGFR inhibitor by determining the presence or absence of the mutation of a specific amino acid residue, which is the 326th amino acid residue, in the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell, and therefore it is possible to select in advance a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The above-described EGFR inhibitor may be an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody drug. 

The determination of the presence or absence of the mutation of the amino acid residue described above may include detection of a mutation of a base sequence encoding the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf. 

The detection of the mutation of the base sequence described above may be performed by DNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction, allele-specific amplification, hybridization using allele-specific probes, mismatch cleavage analysis, single-strand conformation polymorphism, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, or temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. 

The above-described sample may be a cancer resection tissue specimen, a biopsy specimen, an ascites-infiltrating cancer cell, a circulating cancer cell, serum, or plasma. If these samples are used as a sample, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The above-described cancer may be a colorectal cancer or a rectal cancer. If the cancer is a colorectal cancer or a rectal cancer, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The mutation of the amino acid residue described above may be I326V. If the mutation is I326V, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The mutation of the base sequence described above may be c.976A>G. If the mutation is c.976A>G it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The above-described cancer cell preferably has a wild-type KRAS gene. With the cancer cell having the wild-type KRAS gene, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

Advantageous Effects of Invention 

According to the present invention, it is possible to select in advance a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

Advantageous effects of invention 

Brief Description of Drawings 

Fig. 1 is a graph showing results of an example. 

R. 42(1)(d)
Brief description of drawings 

Description of Embodiments 

Hereinafter, embodiments for carrying out the present invention will be described in detail. However, the present invention is not limited to the following embodiments. 

R. 42(1)(e)
Description of at least one way of carrying out the invention with reference to drawings 

In one aspect, the present invention is a method for determining tolerance of a cancer cell to an EGFR inhibitor in a human patient suffering from a cancer (hereinafter referred to as "cancer patient"). The method according to this aspect comprises a step of determining the presence or absence of a mutation of a 326th amino acid residue of an amino acid sequence of a B-Raf of the cancer cell by using a sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient. 

Examples of cancers for which the method according to the present invention may be used include colorectal cancer, rectal cancer, colon cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, thyroid cancer, uterine cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, tongue cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, skin cancer, ovarian cancer, gallbladder cancer, head and neck cancer, testicular cancer, adrenal cancer, oral cancer, bone and soft tissue tumour, brain tumour, malignant melanoma, osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, leukaemia, malignant lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Among these, in a case where the cancer is a colorectal cancer or a rectal cancer, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The "EGFR inhibitor" in the present description is not particularly limited as long as the EGFR inhibitor is a drug that inhibits expression or activity of the EGFR, and may be any of a low molecular compound targeting the EGFR, such as gefitinib and erlotinib, an anti-EGFR antibody drug, an EGFR antisense oligonucleotide, an aptamer, and the like. The anti-EGFR antibody drug is, for example, an antibody that inhibits binding of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to the EGFR. Examples of the anti-EGFR antibody drug include a monoclonal antibody that recognizes an extracellular domain of the EGFR as an epitope. Specific examples of the anti-EGFR antibody drug include cetuximab and panitumumab. The EGFR inhibitor may be used alone, or a plurality of EGFR inhibitors may be used in combination. 

The "antibody" in the present description encompasses not only an antibody molecule having two complete light chains and two complete heavy chains, but also an antibody fragment capable of binding to an antigen. Examples of the antibody fragment include F(ab’)2, Fab’, Fab, and Fv. The antibody is preferably either a chimeric antibody, a humanized antibody, or a fully human antibody. 

In addition, the method according to the present embodiment is effective also in a case of determining the tolerance of the cancer cell to a treatment in which the EGFR inhibitor and other anticancer agent are used in combination. Examples of the treatment in which the EGFR inhibitor and other anticancer agent are used in combination include CPT-11 + Panitumumab therapy, IRIS + Panitumumab therapy, FOLFOX (for example, mFOLFOX6) + Panitumumab therapy, FOLFIRI + Panitumumab therapy, CPT-11 + Cetuximab therapy, IRIS + Cetuximab therapy, FOLFOX (for example, mFOLFOX6) + Cetuximab therapy, FOLFIRI + Cetuximab therapy, and sLV5FU2 + Cetuximab therapy. 

Examples of the sample containing the cancer cell include a cancer resection tissue specimen, a biopsy specimen, an ascites-infiltrating cancer cell, a circulating cancer cell, serum, plasma, blood, faeces, urine, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, nipple aspirate fluid, lymph fluid, cell culture liquid, and other tissues and fluids collected from the patient. From the viewpoint of selecting with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective, the sample containing the cancer cell is preferably a cancer resection tissue specimen, a biopsy specimen, an ascites-infiltrating cancer cell, a circulating cancer cell, serum, or plasma, and more preferably a cancer resection tissue specimen or a biopsy specimen. In addition, in a case where the sample containing the cancer cell is the cancer resection tissue specimen or the biopsy specimen, these specimens may be subjected to freezing, alcohol fixation, formalin fixation, paraffin wrapping, or a combination of these treatments. 

In the present description, "mutation of the amino acid residue" means that a specific amino acid residue in an amino acid sequence of a protein is substituted with an amino acid residue different from an amino acid residue in a corresponding wild-type amino acid sequence. For example, the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the wild-type B-Raf shown in SEQ ID NO: 1 is isoleucine, and substitution of this amino acid residue with an amino acid residue other than isoleucine is called the mutation. 

The mutation of the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf may be a mutation in which the isoleucine is substituted with phenylalanine, threonine, aspartic acid, lysine, serine, arginine, methionine, glycine, alanine, valine, or leucine. In a case where the mutation of the amino acid residue is the mutation described above, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. Among these, in a case where the mutation is a mutation (I326V) in which the isoleucine has been substituted with valine, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

The determination of the presence or absence of the mutation of the amino acid residue described above may be performed by known methods. The determination of the presence or absence of the mutation may include, for example, detection of a mutation of a base sequence that encodes the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf. 

In the present description, "mutation of the base sequence" means that at least a part of the bases in the base sequence is substituted with other base such that the amino acid residue encoded by the base sequence becomes different from an amino acid residue encoded by a corresponding wild-type base sequence (also called as a "missense mutation"). 

The mutation of the base sequence that encodes the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf may be a mutation in which the amino acid residue encoded by the base sequence is altered from isoleucine to phenylalanine, threonine, aspartic acid, lysine, serine, arginine, methionine, glycine, alanine, valine, or leucine. In a case where the mutation of the base sequence is the mutation described above, it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. Among these, in a case where the mutation of the base sequence is a mutation in which the base sequence encoding the isoleucine is mutated to a base sequence encoding valine (c.976A>G), it is possible to select with higher certainty a cancer patient for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

Detection of the mutation of the base sequence may be performed by known methods. The detection of the mutation of the base sequence may be performed by, for example, DNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction, allele-specific amplification, hybridization using allele-specific probes, mismatch cleavage analysis, single-strand conformation polymorphism, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, or temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. The technique may be used alone, or a plurality of techniques may be used in combination. 

When the mutation exists on the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell, it is possible to determine that the cancer cell is tolerant to the EGFR inhibitor. 

The mechanism between the presence or absence of the mutation of the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell and the tolerance of the cancer cell to the EGFR inhibitor is not certain; however, the inventors of the present invention speculate that the presence or absence of the mutation, and the tolerance of the cancer cell are related to each other at least in the following mechanism. The B-Raf is an activation factor present downstream of the EGFR in an intracellular growth signalling pathway involved in cancer cell growth. The EGFR inhibitor has an effect in which growth signals are inhibited from being transmitted to downstream of the EGFR by inhibiting the function of EGFR, and thus the progression of cancer is suppressed. However, if the mutation exists on the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell, the B-Raf is activated even when the growth signals are not transmitted to downstream of the EGFR due to the EGFR inhibitor, and thus the growth signals are transmitted to downstream of the B-Raf. Therefore, it is considered that, even if the EGFR inhibitor is administered to such a cancer cell, the effect of suppressing the progression of cancer is not exerted, or is unlikely to be exerted. 

The present invention may also said to be a method for determining tolerance of the cancer cell to the EGFR inhibitor in a human patient suffering from a cancer, the method including a step of determining the presence or absence of the mutation of the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell by using the sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient, wherein the presence of the mutation of the amino acid residue indicate that the cancer cell is tolerant to the anti-EGR antibody drug. 

In one embodiment, the cancer cell collected from the cancer patient may have the wild-type KRAS gene. The treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is not effective in some cases even if the cancer cells of the cancer patient have the wild-type KRAS gene. According to this embodiment, by evaluating the efficacy of the EGFR inhibitor in the cancer patient whose cancer cells have the wild-type KRAS gene, it is possible to avoid unnecessary side effects caused by the EGFR inhibitor. In the present description, a wild-type KRAS gene means a KRAS gene having no mutation that gives cancer cells tolerance to the EGFR inhibitor. The mutation is a gene mutation that causes an alteration in the type of 12th and 13th amino acids of the KRAS protein. 

In one embodiment, the cancer patient may be a patient who intends to undergo or has undergone a treatment with medication with the EGFR inhibitor. According to this embodiment, it is possible to avoid performing the treatment with medication with the EGFR inhibitor in a patient having cancer cells tolerant to the EGFR inhibitor, or to reduce a dose of the EGFR inhibitor. Accordingly, the side effects caused by the EGFR inhibitor can be avoided or reduced. 

In one embodiment, the cancer cell collected from the cancer patient may have a wild-type NRAS gene as well as a wild-type KRAS gene. Generally, a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is considered to be effective for the cancer patients whose cancer cells have a wild-type NRAS gene as well as wild-type KRAS gene. However, even among such patients, there are patients for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. According to this embodiment, it is possible to discriminate the patients for whom the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective among such cancer patients. In the present description, a wild-type NRAS gene means a NRAS gene having no mutation that gives cancer cells tolerance to the EGFR inhibitor. The mutation, for example, is a gene mutation that causes an alteration in the type of a 12th, 13th, 59th, 61st, 117th, or 146th amino acid of the NRAS protein. 

In one aspect, the present invention is a method for determining prognosis of cancer, that is a method which involves determining the presence or absence of the mutation of the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf of the cancer cell by using the sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient suffering from the cancer, wherein the prognosis is determined as poor, when the mutation of the amino acid residue is present. 

Hereinbefore, the specific embodiments of the present invention were described in detail, but the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments. 

Examples 

Hereinafter, the present invention will be more specifically described based on examples, but the present invention is not limited to the following examples. 

(Detection of Mutation in BRAF Gene) 

Patients with a colorectal cancer not having a mutation in codons of the 12th and 13th amino acids of the KRAS protein were treated with a therapy using Panitumumab or Cetuximab (shown in Table 1). A formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimen was prepared from a cancer resection specimen of the patient, and cut into thin sections to prepare two sections with a thickness of 20 μm. A sample obtained by attaching the prepared two sections to a slide glass was used as a sample for DNA extraction. Separately, a sample obtained by preparing a section with a thickness of 4 μm, and attaching the prepared section to a slide glass was used as a sample for microscopic observation. Samples of 26 patients (patients A to Z) were prepared, and mutations in the base sequence of the BRAF gene were detected for each patient sample as follows.

[Table 1] 

Patient

Therapy

B‑Raf mutation

Cancer regression index (%)

A 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

1326V 

115 

B 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

34.3 

C 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

18.5 

D 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

17.8 

E 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

11.3 

F 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

D22N 

5 

G 

FOLFIRI + Cetuximab 

- 

5.1 

H 

IRIS + Panitumumab CPT - 11 + Cetuximab 

- 

0.1 

I 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-7.4 

J 

CPT - 11 + Cetuximab 

- 

-11.6 

K 

mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab 

V600E 

-11.5 

L 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-12.5 

M 

mFOLFOX6 + Cetuximab 

- 

-15.9 

N 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-19.1 

O 

IRIS + Panitumumab mFOLFOX6 + Cetuximab sLV5FU2 + Cetuximab 

N581Y 

-22.4 

P 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-27 

Q 

FOLFIRI + Cetuximab 

- 

-26.6 

R 

CPT - 11 + Cetuximab 

- 

-32.8 

S 

mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab 

- 

-33.8 

T 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-33.7 

U 

CPT - 11 + Panitumumab 

V600E 

-35.7 

V 

CPT - 11 + Panitumumab 

- 

-36.8 

W 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-52.8 

X 

mFOLFOX6 + Cetuximab 

- 

-55 

Y 

mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab 

- 

-72.3 

Z 

IRIS + Panitumumab 

- 

-72.7 

The sample for microscopic observation was stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The sample after the staining was observed with a microscope and a site containing many cancer cells in the section was specified. From the sample for DNA extraction, the site specified in the sample for microscopic observation was scraped with a razor, and DNA was extracted from the scraped site. The DNA extraction was carried out by using BiOstic FFPE Tissue DNA Isolation Kit (trade name). 

The BRAF gene was isolated from the DNA of the specimen by using, as a probe, a probe nucleic acid containing a part or all of continuous sequences (100 to 130 bases) in each of 18 exon sequences of the BRAF gene, or containing a complementary sequence thereof. The base sequence of the BRAF gene was analysed by MiSeq sequencer of Illumina, Inc. to detect mutations in the base sequence of the BRAF gene. 

For the patient A, the mutation (c.976A>G) that causes the mutation of I326V in the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf was detected in the base sequence of the BRAF gene. For the patients F, K, O, und U, mutations that cause mutations of D22N, V600E, N581Y, and V600E, respectively, were detected in the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf in the base sequence of the BRAF gene. For the other patients, no mutation that causes a mutation in the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf was detected in the base sequence of the BRAF gene. 

(Effect of Treatment with Anti-EGFR Antibody Drug) 

For the patients A to Z, a cancer regression index (%) was calculated as the following formula: 

Cancer regression index (%) = (diameter of primary lesion after treatment + diameter of metastatic lesion after treatment) / (diameter of primary lesion before treatment + diameter of metastatic lesion before treatment) x 100 - 100 

The relationship between the presence or absence of the mutation of the BRAF gene, and the effect of the treatment with the anti-EGFR antibody drug in the patients A to Z is shown in Fig. 1 and Tables 1 and 2. 

[Table 2] 

B‑Raf mutation

Number of patients

Average cancer regression index (%)

Standard deviation

1326V 

1 

115 

- 

D22N 

V600E 

N581Y 

4 

-16.3 

17.3 

No mutation 

22 

-19 

28.9 

As shown in Fig. 1 and Tables 1 and 2, in the patient A for whom the mutation that causes the mutation in the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf was detected in the base sequence of the BRAF gene, the progression of cancer was 10 recognised, and the cancer cells of the patient A had tolerance to the anti-EGFR antibody drug. 

SEQUENCE LISTING 

Claims

Claims

Claims

Claims

Claims 

1. A method for determining tolerance of a cancer cell to an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in a human patient suffering from a cancer, the method comprising: 

R. 43(1)(a)
Independent claim 

a step of determining the presence or absence of a mutation of a 326th amino acid residue of an amino acid sequence of a B-Raf protein of the cancer cell by using a sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient, 

wherein the cancer cell is determined as tolerant to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, when the mutation of the amino acid residue is present. 

2. The method according to claim 1, 

R. 43(3), (4)
Dependent claim 

wherein the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor is an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody drug. 

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, 

wherein the determination of the presence or absence of the mutation of the amino acid residue includes detection of a mutation of a base sequence encoding the 326th amino acid residue of the amino acid sequence of the B-Raf protein. 

4. The method according to claim 3, 

wherein the detection of the mutation of the base sequence is performed by DNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction, allele-specific amplification, hybridization using allele-specific probes, mismatch cleavage analysis, single-strand conformation polymorphism, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, or temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. 

5. The method according to-any one of claims 1 to 4, 

wherein the sample is a cancer resection tissue specimen, a biopsy specimen, an ascites-infiltrating cancer cell, a circulating cancer cell, serum, or plasma. 

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, 

wherein the cancer is a colorectal cancer or a rectal cancer. 

7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, 

wherein the mutation of the amino acid residue is I326V. 

8. The method according to claim 3 or 4, 

wherein the mutation of the base sequence is c.976A>G. 

9. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, 

wherein the cancer cell has a wild-type KRAS gene. 

Abstract 

Art. 85

METHOD FOR DETERMINING TOLERANCE OF CANCER CELL TO EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR INHIBITOR 

R. 47(1)
Title of invention 

The present invention provides a method for determining tolerance of a cancer cell to an EGFR inhibitor in a human patient suffering from a cancer, the method comprising a step of determining the presence or absence of a mutation of a 326th amino acid residue of an amino acid sequence of a B-Raf protein of the cancer cell by using a sample containing the cancer cell collected from the human patient, wherein the cancer cell is determined as tolerant to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, when the mutation of the amino acid residue is present. According to such a method, it is possible to select in advance a cancer patient for whom a treatment with the EGFR inhibitor is ineffective. 

R. 47(2), (3), (5)
Content of abstract 

Art. 78R....

Art. 78
R. 46


Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility