| OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESS |
| Luís NORONHA NASCIMENTO | 1 | PDF | HTML |
| Alberto MARTINS | 2-5 | PDF | HTML |
| Benoît BATTISTELLI | 6-10 | PDF | HTML |
| António CAMPINOS | 11-18 | PDF | HTML |
| Peter MESSERLI | 19-24 | PDF | HTML |
| REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS |
| Ulrich JOOS Fabienne GAUYE | 25-58 | PDF | HTML |
| WORKING SESSION |
| The judicial system in Europe |
| Margot FRÖHLINGER | 59-65 | PDF | HTML |
| Exclusions from patentability with special focus on the medical field |
| Sylvie MANDEL Exceptions to patentability in the medical field | 66-73 | PDF | HTML |
| Brigitte GÜNZEL Exclusions from patentability of relevance in the medical field – recent cases before the Enlarged Board of Appeal | 74-84 | PDF | HTML |
| Peter MEIER-BECK Non-patentability, in particular in the medical field | 85-92 | PDF | HTML |
| Patentability of computer implemented inventions |
| Dai REES Patentability of computerimplemented inventions at the EPO | 93-102 | PDF | HTML |
| Randall R. RADER Patent Eligible subject-matter in the United States – After Bilski | 103-107 | PDF | HTML |
| The role of intent in patent claims |
| Dieter BRÄNDLE The significance of subjective elements in patent law | 108-115 | PDF | HTML |
| Rainer MOUFANG Use and purpose indications in patent claims | 116-128 | PDF | HTML |
| Christopher FLOYD The role of intent in patent claims – old paint in new tins | 129-148 | PDF | HTML |
| NATIONAL JUDGES' PRESENTATIONS |
| AT Austria |
| Irmgard GRISS | 149-151 | PDF | HTML |
| CH Switzerland |
| Tobias BREMI | 152-155 | PDF | HTML |
| DE Germany |
| Peter MEIER-BECK | 156-169 | PDF | HTML |
| FR France |
| Sophie DARBOIS | 170-172 | PDF | HTML |
| GB United Kingdom |
| David KITCHIN | 173-182 | PDF | HTML |
| IT Italy |
| Gabriella MUSCOLO | 183-189 | PDF | HTML |
| Massimo SCUFFI | 190-192 | PDF | HTML |
| NL Netherlands |
| Rian KALDEN Philips v. SK Kassetten/FRAND | 193-195 | PDF | HTML |
| Rian KALDEN Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz/Allowability of disclaimer | 196-199 | PDF | HTML |
| Rian KALDEN Solvay v. Honeywell/referral to ECJ on 6 (1) and 16 (4) EEX Regulation | 200-202 | PDF | HTML |
| NO Norway |
| Are STENVIK | 203-204 | PDF | HTML |
| LIST OF PARTICIPANTS |
| List of participants | 205-208 | PDF | HTML |
| ANNEX |
| Case study "Folding Attic Stairway" |
| Ulrich JOOS Dieter STAUDER | 209-210 | PDF | HTML |
| 1. Presentation of the case study | 211-220 | PDF | HTML |
| 2. UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 221-236 | PDF | |
| 3. German translation of UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 237-246 | PDF | |
| 4. French translation of UK Patent Application GB 2319 051 A | 247-256 | PDF | |
| 5. Folding Attic Stairs v. The Loft Stairs Company Ltd., High Court of Justice – Patents court – [2009] EWHC 1221 (Pat) | 257-308 | PDF | HTML |
