EPO President comments on referral G 2/24 concerning intervention
15 April, the President of the EPO submitted written observations to the Enlarged Board of Appeal relating to G 2/24, “Skin cleanser”. The referral concerns the question whether, after withdrawal of all appeals, the proceedings may be continued with a third party who intervened during the appeal proceedings.
The President concludes that a third party should have effective rights, including the right to continue the appeal proceedings independently.
The written comments are available in the publicly accessible files via the European Patent Register service.
Related items

The EPO has published its decision setting out the reasons for its recent refusal of two European patent applications in which an AI system was design

The President of the EPO has filed his comments in the matter of the referral G 1/19 (“Patentability of computer-implemented simulations”) to the Enla

Today, pursuant to Article 112(1)(b) EPC, the President of the EPO has submitted questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal which relate to the patenta

Flagship conference highlights quality as a shared responsibility

Continuation of proceedings to ensure proper functioning of the patent system

Changes to the search engine and results listings are part of ongoing efforts to modernise the EPO website.

EPO President comments on referrals G 1/22 and G 2/22

The EPO has published its decision setting out the reasons for its recent refusal of two European patent applications in which an AI system was design

The President of the EPO has filed his comments in the matter of the referral G 1/19 (“Patentability of computer-implemented simulations”) to the Enla

Today, pursuant to Article 112(1)(b) EPC, the President of the EPO has submitted questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal which relate to the patenta

Flagship conference highlights quality as a shared responsibility

Continuation of proceedings to ensure proper functioning of the patent system

Changes to the search engine and results listings are part of ongoing efforts to modernise the EPO website.

EPO President comments on referrals G 1/22 and G 2/22

The EPO has published its decision setting out the reasons for its recent refusal of two European patent applications in which an AI system was design

The President of the EPO has filed his comments in the matter of the referral G 1/19 (“Patentability of computer-implemented simulations”) to the Enla

Today, pursuant to Article 112(1)(b) EPC, the President of the EPO has submitted questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal which relate to the patenta