HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation against cancer
        • Assistive robotics
        • Space technologies
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
        • Research universities and public research organisations
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Supplements / Special editions
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Official Journal
  4. 2013
  5. Supplements / Special editions
  6. Special edition
  7. Pages 33-47
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email
Special edition

Overview

Index
1 - January
2 - February
3 - March
4 - April
5 - May
6 - June
7 - July
8-9 - August-September
10 - October
11 - November
12 - December
Supplements / Special editions
Supplement to OJ 1/2013
Special edition

Pages 33-47

Download PDF 
Citation: Special edition OJ EPO 2013, 33
Online publication date: 22.5.2013
OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESS

Wim VAN DER EIJK - Vice-President DG 3

Lady Chief Justice, Mr Justice Murphy, [Minister], Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure to address you at the 16th judges' symposium here in Dublin. It is the first time that I speak to you as Vice-President of the EPO responsible for appeals and chairman of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. I am honoured to be part of the boards of appeal, which are an established authority in the international patent community. And I am of course honoured to address you, the distinguished guests at this event. I am convinced that we as we are gathered here in this symposium have an important role to play in the well functioning of the patent system in Europe. As the economies in Europe become more and more integrated, it becomes more and more important that the judicial instances in Europe develop a harmonised approach to patent law issues. The intense discussions on the creation of a unitary patent and a unified patent court are testimony to the fact that also the political authorities take this challenge serious. I believe therefore that it is more important than ever that all those adjudicating on patents in Europe share and exchange their ideas on pivotal issues of patent law. In that sense I look forward to the presentations and discussions we will have in the coming days. I hope that by the end of this symposium we will have a better understanding of the issues under discussion and the various approaches to them. Above all I hope we engage in the discussions with an open mind and are also ready to reflect on new ways to deal with certain issues in the interest of a truly European patent system.

The symposium is here so that we can share ideas, but it is also a good forum to learn more about the issues and problems facing each of us. I would like to start by sharing with you some of the recent developments within the boards of appeal and some of the issues facing us. In the second part of my speech, I would like to address the issue of our interaction with national judges and the public as well as the position of the boards of appeal in the framework of the unitary patent and the unified patent court.

My first topic is cautiously entitled "volume of work".

Volume of work

For years, the number of appeals filed with the boards of appeal has been increasing continuously. The development of new and settled cases before the technical boards of appeal in the past 5 years shows a clear picture:

Year

New cases

Settled cases

Difference between new and settled cases

2007

2090

1661

429

2008

2409

1782

627

2009

2484

1918

566

2010

2545

1964

581

2011

2657

1875

782

As you can see, despite an increase in settled cases we observe a continuing trend that more appeals are coming in than we can settle. Therefore, the stock of pending appeals continues to grow, as do pendency times.

There may be numerous reasons for the increase in the number of appeals filed. An important one is that the number of applications for European patents has increased and is still increasing. The number of decisions by examining and opposition divisions is also increasing. With a relatively stable appeal ratio it is not surprising that also the number of appeals is increasing. Furthermore, we are observing that in specific technical areas the examining divisions are refusing many patent applications and this leads naturally to a greater number of appeals. One such area is that of computer-implemented inventions and so-called business methods. The boards dealing with this technical area are faced with a flood of appeals and have the biggest increase in pending cases. I note in passing that this trend reflects a state of disharmony in the global patent system. Many of these applications come from abroad, in particular the USA, where the approach to such patents is more liberal.

Below is an illustration of the incoming and settled cases per technical field in 2011 and of the appeals pending as at 31.12.2011.

New cases

Settled cases

Appeals pending

 

 

 

 

One of the main priorities for the boards of appeal and for me as Vice- President is to address this workload issue. There is not one specific measure which can resolve this problem. And it cannot be resolved without the involvement of everyone in the Directorate-General "Appeals". Based on input received from the members of the boards of appeal and their support departments, measures are being considered which should have a beneficial effect on procedural efficiency and case management. The aim is to improve the efficiency of the procedures in order to increase the number of cases that are being settled without, however, touching on quality.

In order to bridge the gap between incoming and settled appeals efforts are also being made to focus on recruitment, succession planning and improved support for the boards of appeal. DG 3 is seeking to improve forecasting methods that would help detect evolving trends in the various technical fields. Given the different increases in the number of appeals filed in the different technical fields, this would mean that when new boards are set up in 2013 and 2014, the necessary technical expertise can be identified. With the variety of measures which we currently have in mind, I am confident that steady progress can be made towards stabilising and even reducing the stocks and pendency times of appeals.

Some of the measures just described will not have an immediate effect on the pendency times of appeals. It is thus important to be aware of the possibility of accelerated processing before the boards of appeal. The possibility to ask a board to deal with the appeal rapidly not only exists for parties with a legitimate interest, but also for courts. If you deal with an infringement proceeding in relation to a patent which is the subject of opposition appeal proceedings you may wish to contact the relevant board to request that the appeal is dealt with rapidly. You can rest assured that we take these requests very seriously.

Outcome of appeals

Another aspect of our work I would like to share with you is an analysis of the outcome of appeal proceedings. I would like to distinguish here between two types of cases. One is where the decision of the examining division refusing a patent application is appealed - these are the ex-parte cases. The other is where the appeal lies from a decision of the opposition division - these are inter-partes cases. As a point of information: of the technical appeals in 2011, 49% were ex parte cases, and 51% inter partes.

The figures are those for the year 2011.

59% of ex parte cases were settled after substantive legal review, i.e. not terminated through rejection as inadmissible, withdrawal of the appeal or application, or the like. The outcomes of these are illustrated below:

 In 51% of cases the appeal was successful in full or in part. In just over half of those cases the...

In 51% of cases the appeal was successful in full or in part. In just over half of those cases the board ordered the grant of the patent. In just less than half of them, resumption of the examination proceedings was ordered.

Of inter partes cases, 69% were settled after substantive legal review. The outcomes were as follows:

 In the vast majority of cases, there was no resumption of the opposition proceedings, but the board...

In the vast majority of cases, there was no resumption of the opposition proceedings, but the board decided to order maintenance of the patent as granted or in amended form or revocation of the patent.

The interpretation of these figures has to be done with care. Many cases where appeals are successful are the result of amended claims or evidence and do not mean that the examining or opposition division got it wrong. Yet the often very different results for the party or the parties at the end of the appeal proceedings clearly confirm that the boards of appeal have a very important role to play.

There is of course also the important role that the boards play with their jurisprudence. My colleagues will highlight some pertinent topics in this regard in the course of this symposium. I would simply like to refer to two areas where interesting developments can be observed. Before I do this, let me say a few words about harmonisation among the boards.

Harmonisation among the boards

One challenge for the boards of appeal is to create a greater degree of harmony among the 27 technical boards on procedural matters. With the EPC being relatively brief on procedural matters, much is left to the discretion of the boards. The wish to have a more consistent practice on procedural questions has been mentioned by the outside world but is also expressed by many colleagues in DG 3. No-one can of course tell judges what to decide. But a process of informal exchanges of ideas and views on legal issues not related to an actual open case may eventually lead to greater harmonisation. One area where a tendency towards more harmonisation can already be observed is how the boards approach late-filed facts, evidence and requests.

Developments in the case law

Late-filed facts, evidence and requests

From time to time it can be observed that some parties to proceedings before the EPO do not put forward all the facts, evidence or requests before the examining and opposition divisions. Instead, they wait until the case has gone to the boards of appeal before presenting these. This has become a dangerous tactic. Article 12(4) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal makes it clear that a board does not have to admit into the appeal proceedings facts, evidence or requests which could have been presented in the first-instance proceedings. One can observe a recent tendency in the case law to apply this article more stringently. Those who do not take the proceedings before the examining and opposition divisions seriously take the risk that facts, evidence or requests introduced only at the appeals stage are held inadmissible if they could have been presented before the department of first instance.

Whilst it may be a coincidence that this recent tendency in the case law has developed at a time when we are also considering the issue of procedural efficiency, it is nevertheless helpful in this context when proceedings are approached somewhat more stringently than had been the case years ago.

Petitions for review

Let me also say a few words about the case law that the Enlarged Board of Appeal has developed in its decisions on petitions for review.

You may recall that in 2007, in the context of EPC2000, this new procedure was introduced allowing parties who believe that there had been a fundamental procedural defect in the appeal procedure to file a petition for review with the Enlarged Board. Since the introduction of this procedure the Enlarged Board has rendered almost 60 decisions on petitions for review. Three petitions have been successful and the decisions of the boards of appeal were set aside and the appeal proceedings re-opened.

Almost 60 decisions is a considerable body of case law. Given that pretty much all of the cases concern an alleged fundamental violation of the right to be heard, some principles have by now been established and I would like to mention one in particular. One recurring theme in this respect is the argument that the board ought to have informed a party in advance about the decision to be taken and the reasoning for it, in order to enable it to present additional arguments and evidence.

The case law of the Enlarged Board of Appeal has established that there is no right obliging a board to inform the parties in detail before taking its decision about all the foreseeable grounds set out in the reasons for its decision. It is generally sufficient for the respect of the right to be heard if the grounds given in the written decision correspond to an argument put forward by any of the parties to the proceedings or by the board. The petitioner will have been aware of the argument and could have presented its views on it.

Having given you a short glimpse of case law developments on procedural matters (the substantive issues will be discussed later during this symposium) I will now turn to the boards of appeal and the public.

Informing the public

One important task of DG 3 is to inform the public about the case law of the boards of appeal. At the beginning of this year, the annual Official Journal supplement "Information from the Boards of Appeal" was published. It contains information about the business distribution of the boards of appeal as well as important texts concerning the appeals procedure such as the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. The annual edition of the Special Edition "Case Law of the Boards of Appeal" appeared in July this year. It provides a systematic overview of the more important cases rendered by the boards of appeal last year. Work on the next edition of the Case law book, also known as the "white book", and published every three to four years has already started.

I would also like to mention that the searchability of decisions of the boards of appeal has been improved significantly in the last few years. A large number of search options is available, giving the user for example the option of identifying all recent cases rendered important enough by the boards to be circulated among all members of the boards of appeal.

DG 3 also has a role to play in supporting you and the general public by publishing information concerning national case law in the area of patent law. One publication which is of particular relevance to you is the comprehensive collection of national decisions entitled "Case law from the Contracting States". It was published at the end of last year and covers the years 2004-2011. A number of you have contributed to this publication by sending us decisions of particular importance from your jurisdictions and I would like to thank you for this support. We would like to provide this publication more regularly and rely on your support to make it as comprehensive as possible. We will therefore contact the relevant courts in order to establish the best way of accessing the national case law in your respective countries.

Interaction with stakeholders

One area to which I attach particular importance is the interaction with the stakeholders of the European patent system. We ought to understand their concerns and consider their feedback but also discuss developments within the boards and the role parties and their representatives could play to enhance the quality and efficiency of the appeal proceedings. I intend to hold regular meetings with stakeholders for that purpose.

Cooperation and exchanges with national judges

Of equal importance are our cooperation and exchanges with national judges. These take place in a variety of ways. The most formal one is the participation of national judges as external members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. When the Enlarged Board of Appeal decides on a point of law referred to it, it is composed of 7 members - 5 legally qualified and 2 technically qualified ones. One or two of the legally qualified members can be replaced by one or two legally qualified external members if the case extends beyond the internal administration of the EPO. These external members are predominantly national judges and I am sure some of you are among them.

My predecessor as chairman of the Enlarged Board of Appeal made considerable use of this option. In seven of the eight decisions taken by the Enlarged Board in 2010 and 2011 on referrals, one or two legally qualified external members were members of the Enlarged Board. It is a practice which supports harmonisation and which has worked well in the past. For these reasons, I intend to continue with the practice of designating legally qualified external members to the Enlarged Board in all cases where the issues at hand go beyond the internal administration of the EPO.

This year the EPO has started a programme of internships for judges at the boards of appeal. The programme is open to national judges of Contracting States. Whilst not strictly speaking necessary, it is nevertheless useful if the national judges who wish to participate in the programme work in courts competent to deal with patent cases. The judicial internship programme lasts one month. Up to seven judges attend a one-week intensive training course on patentability requirements and the procedures of the boards of appeal followed by three weeks of shadowing a technical board of appeal. The first judicial internship programme took place in June this year. Both the national judges concerned and the EPO colleagues involved were of the view that it was a worthwhile exercise and should be repeated in future.

The Unified Patent Court and the boards of appeal

Let me now turn briefly to my last point which is of particular relevance at present. It is the plan for a unified patent court and the role of the boards of appeal.

I will restrict myself to making some observations from the perspective of the boards of appeal. First of all, it is to be noted that the projects are based on the concept that the proceedings conducted by the EPO, up to and including the appeal stage, will remain unchanged. For the Unified Patent Court, this means that this court will only take over the role of the national courts in the member states and has no role in the process of grant or refusal of a patent application.

This means that where an examining division has refused a patent application, the boards of appeal remain the only competent court to which an appeal against this decision can be directed. The Unified Patent Court has no competence in such cases. Where the boards of appeal confirm refusal by the examining division, the Unified Patent Court has no competence either.

The boards of appeal also remain competent to decide on appeals from decisions of the opposition divisions. Any decision revoking a patent cannot be challenged before the Unified Patent Court.

When it comes to decisions of the boards of appeal to maintain a patent or order the grant of a patent, third parties have always had the opportunity to have the issue of validity on the national level decided in the context of infringement proceedings by a national court. The Unified Patent Court now offers the possibility of a centralised attack on the validity of a European patent or a European patent with unitary effect. Given that the possibility of third parties to file oppositions against European patents before the EPO remains, the draft agreement foresees that the Unified Patent Court may stay its proceedings when a rapid decision is expected from the EPO in opposition (or revocation or limitation) proceedings.

The competence for actions against decisions of the EPO concerning the tasks that it is entrusted with in implementing enhanced cooperation lies with the Unified Patent Court. These tasks of the EPO are the administration of requests for unitary patent protection, receiving and registering statements on licensing, publication of the translations, collection and administration of renewal fees, and the administration of a compensation scheme for translation costs. The boards of appeal play no role with regard to these decisions.

So formally, things will remain unchanged for the boards. The creation of a unified patent court will however dramatically change the landscape. Today the boards are the only European judicial instance in the field of patents. With the creation of the Unified Patent Court there will be a second European instance, albeit with competence for a restricted group of EPO member states. As we are concerned about harmonisation of our approaches today, we must also in this new setting strive towards common approaches wherever possible. In that sense we will follow the developments closely and try to find ways to promote a common approach to legal questions. This cannot be done in a formal way, as the two bodies are independent and have to act on the basis of different legal provisions. But as we have found today informal ways of interacting and exchange, I am sure we will be also able to find ways in the future. Furthermore I am also convinced that the members of the boards of appeal, both the technical and the legal members, have valuable knowledge and experience. To the extent that it is legally possible, participation of board of appeal members in the work of the Unified Patent Court would be beneficial to the success of the new construction.

Conclusion

These reflections bring me back to the beginning of my presentation: the usefulness - I would even go one step further: the need - of cooperation and interaction between all those responsible for the administration of justice in the field of patents in Europe.

I thank you for your participation in this symposium and look forward to fruitful discussions and inspiring outcomes.


Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility