Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1529/19 02-02-2023
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1529/19 02-02-2023

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2023:T152919.20230202
Date of decision
02 February 2023
Case number
T 1529/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
09741302.5
IPC class
D06F 35/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 1.56 MB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

A HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE USING OZONE GAS

Applicant name
Arçelik Anonim Sirketi
Opponent name
BSH Hausgeräte GmbH
Board
3.2.06
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 84
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 11
Keywords

Amendments - Main request and auxiliary requests 2 and 6

Amendments - extension beyond the content of the application as filed (yes)

Remittal - (no)

Late-filed auxiliary requests - diverging versions of claims 1, 3-5 and 7

Late-filed auxiliary requests - request clearly allowable (no) 7 to 13

Late-filed auxiliary requests - diverging versions of claims

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0002/10
T 0331/87
T 1852/13
Citing decisions
-

I. The appellant (opponent) filed an appeal against the interlocutory decision of the opposition division in which it found that European patent No. 2 361 327 in an amended form met the requirements of the EPC.

II. With its response, the respondent (patent proprietor) requested that the appeal be dismissed or, in the alternative, that the patent be maintained according to one of auxiliary requests 1 to 6 filed therewith.

III. With letter dated 17 October 2022, the opponent filed inter alia arguments regarding auxiliary requests 1 to 6.

IV. The Board issued a summons to oral proceedings and a subsequent communication containing its provisional opinion, in which it indicated inter alia that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and of the auxiliary requests 1 to 6 did not seem to fulfil the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC.

V. With its letter dated 30 December 2022, the respondent filed 13 auxiliary requests, with the former auxiliary requests 1 to 6 filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal corresponding to auxiliary requests 2, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13. The respondent further requested that the arguments in the appellant's letter filed on 17 October 2022 not be taken into account, in particular the attacks on the auxiliary requests.

VI. Oral proceedings were held before the Board on 2 February 2023, during which the respondent filed an additional auxiliary request 7. Further, the respondent filed a request for remittal of the case to the opposition division (see the minutes for further details).

The request for remittal reads as follows:

"Wir beantragen die Zurückverweisung in die erste Instanz. Laut Zwischenentscheidung waren die Einwände der Einsprechenden gemäß Art. 123(2) EPC nicht zutreffend und das Merkmal ,,drawn continously" implizit im Merkmal k) enthalten. Daher wurde im Rahmen der Hilfsanträge nur das Merkmal ,,fan" eingefügt. Daher ist eine erneute Sacherhebung in der ersten Instanz notwendig."

At the end of the oral proceedings the requests were as follows:

The appellant (opponent) requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked.

The respondent (patent proprietor) requested that the appeal be dismissed (main request),

auxiliarily that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 1 to 6 filed with letter of 30 December 2022, or

that the case be remitted to the opposition division for further prosecution, or

that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of auxiliary request 7 of 2 February 2023 or

on the basis of one of auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022.

VII. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows (with the feature breakdown as used on pages 2 and 3 of the interlocutory decision):

"a) A household appliance (1) being a washing machine or a washing machine and dryer, the household appliance (1) comprising a tub (2) wherein the washing process is performed, and

b) an ozone generator (3) situated outside the tub (2) which generates ozone gas (O3),

c) having an air inlet (4) for the entry of the air used in producing the ozone gas and

d) an ozone outlet (5) for the exit of the ozone gas to the outside, characterized by

e) an ozone supply line (6) with one end connected to the ozone outlet (5) and the other end to the tub (2), for delivering the ozone gas from the ozone generator (3) to the tub (2),

f) an air supply line (7), with one end connected to the air inlet (4) and the other end to the tub (2), for the feedback of oxygen-rich air (H) in the tub (2) to the ozone generator (3),

g) a first opening (10) for entry of the ozone gas delivered from the ozone supply line (6) into the tub (2),

h) a second opening (110) to pass the air (H) from the tub (2) into the air supply line (7) by leaving the tub (2),

i) the first opening (10) is located above the water level of the tub (2)

j) wherein the first opening (10) and the second opening (110) are situated so as to stay above the maximum level of wash water in the tub (2),

k) whereby a closed cycle is formed that follows the sequence of the ozone generator (3) - the ozone supply line (6) - the first opening (10) - the tub (2) - the second opening (110) - air supply line (7) - the ozone generator (3)."

VIII. Claim 1 of all fourteen auxiliary requests are annexed at the end of this decision.

IX. The respondent's arguments relevant to the present case may be summarised as follows:

Main request - Article 123(2) EPC

Feature i) and j) - position of the openings

Paragraph [0028] of the published application provided a basis for features i) and j). Any difference of feature i) to paragraph [0028] was implicitly present in claim 1.

The arrangement of the openings "at separate points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of the household appliance" was not structurally and functionally linked to feature j), so this did not need to be included in claim 1.

The expression "close to the opposite side walls or corners" in the foregoing arrangement was vague and did not limit the claim. It was therefore not necessary to include it.

Feature k) "closed cycle"

A "closed cycle" meant that the indicated sequence was mandatory and that there were no further inflows or outflows.

This cyclic arrangement was originally disclosed by paragraph [0025] but was already implicit from the features c) to h) of claim 1.

The presence of a fan was also already implicit from the wording of the claim and a fan was not essential as it was the subject of a dependent claim.

As to the oxygen-rich air being drawn continuously to be converted into ozone gas, this was implicit from the fact that feature k) defined a closed cycle.

Auxiliary requests 1-6 - Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 and Article 123(2) EPC

The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 6 fulfilled the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC for the same reasons as the main request. No specific argument was made as to why auxiliary requests 1 and 3-5 should be admitted after the Board indicated that these requests would not overcome the objections to the preceding requests.

Request for remittal of the case to the opposition division

The case should be remitted to the opposition division. It was only with the preliminary opinion of the Board that it became clear that the addition of the feature "fan" to the auxiliary requests was not enough to overcome the objections made under Article 123(2) EPC.

Admittance of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023

Auxiliary request 7 should be admitted into the proceedings. The expression "to embody" prima facie did not introduce a clarity problem into claim 1. In addition, the feature "the tub being in the horizontal position" in claim 1 was amended with regard to the original feature from granted dependent claim 5 only in order to improve readability without there being a change of sense, i.e. it was not a real amendment.

Admittance of auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022

The respondent did not provide any specific arguments regarding why any of auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 should be admitted.

X. The appellant's arguments relevant to the present case may be summarised as follows:

Main request - Article 123(2) EPC

Features i) and j)

Paragraph [0028] of the application as filed, upon which features i) and j) were seemingly based, disclosed that the openings were at the upper half of the tub and arranged at separate points from each other.

The level of water in a washing machine did not necessarily fill to at least half of the tub such that the definition "above the maximum level of wash water in the tub" as defined in feature j) did not necessarily imply that the openings were situated in the upper half of the tub.

The arrangement of the openings "at separate points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of the household appliance" was not implicit in the wording of claim 1 and was structurally and functionally linked to feature j), as paragraph [0031] also attested. It had been inadmissibly omitted from claim 1.

Feature k)

Paragraph [0025] disclosed that the fan blew ozone gas into the tub (2) and drew air from inside the tub (2) continuously. This had also been inadmissibly omitted from claim 1.

That the cycle is a "closed cycle" did not imply that the fan was not required in the cycle. In addition, all the embodiments of the description comprised a fan to provide the gas flow such that there was no reason to believe that the fan was somehow not required or in some way not essential to the disclosure.

A closed cycle did not imply that the air was drawn continuously, e.g. it could be drawn intermittently in bursts.

Auxiliary requests 1 to 6 - Admittance and Article 123(2) EPC

None of the amendments to claim 1 in auxiliary requests 1 to 6 overcame the objections under Article 123(2) EPC to claim 1 of the main request. Auxiliary requests 1 and 3 to 5 should therefore not be admitted into the proceedings and auxiliary requests 2 and 6 were not allowable.

Respondent's request for remittal of the case to the opposition division

There were no special circumstances that justified a remittal of the case to the opposition division.

Admittance of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023

Auxiliary request 7 was late-filed and some of the amendments made to claim 1 of the request were not clear under Article 84 EPC or not occasioned by a ground of opposition. It should not be admitted.

Admittance of auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022

Auxiliary request 7 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 was not convergent with auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023. None of the requests 7 to 13 should be admitted.

1. Main request - Article 123(2) EPC

1.1 The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request does not fulfil the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC.

1.2 Claim 1 of the main request was amended to define inter alia that

i) the first opening (10) is located above the water level of the tub (2)

j) wherein the first opening (10) and the second opening (110) are situated so as to stay above the maximum level of wash water in the tub (2),

k) whereby a closed cycle is formed that follows the sequence of the ozone generator (3) - the ozone supply line (6) - the first opening (10) - the tub (2) - the second opening (110) - air supply line (7) - the ozone generator (3)

Features i) and j)

1.3 The respondent argued that paragraph [0028] of the published application provided a basis for features i) and j) but that the arrangement of the openings being situated at the upper half of the tub need not be defined in claim 1 as this was implied by the wording of claim 1. In a washing machine at the priority date, the maximum level of wash water was supposed to fill at least half of the tub and the claim already defined in feature i) that the first opening (10) is located above the water level of the tub.

The Board does not accept this argument. The maximum level of wash water in the tub depends of the wash programs and possibly even on the amount of laundry in the drum and it is not a property of the washing machine, let alone being such that the maximum level of water necessarily was only up to half the level of the tub. The respondent also did not provide any evidence that at the priority date it was the case that the tub of a washing machine was necessarily filled with water up to half its height.

1.4 The respondent also argued that the arrangement of the openings "at separate points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of the household appliance" was not structurally and functionally linked to feature j).

According to the respondent, feature j) restricted the vertical position of the first and second openings such that it was not necessary for the ozone gas to surpass the water pressure column when being supplied to the tub. On the other hand, the being "arranged at separate points from each other" simply related to the horizontal spacing and contributed to prolonging the contact duration of the ozone gas with the items to be washed (see paragraph [0031]).

In addition, the respondent argued that the contact duration could also be influenced by several other effects besides the distance of the openings (e.g. rotation of the drum, orientation of the openings) and that, for example, paragraph [0029] also taught that the ozone gas reached into the drum independently from the arrangement of the openings "at separate points from each other".

The Board does not find these arguments persuasive. Paragraph [0028] discloses that the openings are positioned not only above the maximum level of wash water in the tub but also inter alia in the upper half of the tub as well as at separate points from each other. The skilled person reading the description understands that all of these relate to the physical arrangement of the openings in the tub such that they are all structurally related.

In addition, as the openings are positioned above the water level and do not feed the ozone directly to the water, the distance between the openings also avoids the ozone being drawn almost immediately into the second opening before it contacts the items being washed. As explained also in paragraph [0031] ("re-absorption...is prevented"). There is thus also a functional relationship between the vertical and the horizontal arrangement of the openings.

Paragraph [0029] describes the cycle without mentioning the separation between the openings but the skilled person reading the description understands that this paragraph is only a detailed description of the flow of the ozone gas in the embodiment comprising a cylindrically shaped tub arranged in the horizontal position and having perforations. This paragraph does not broaden or contradict the teaching of paragraph [0031] explained above. The Board notes that paragraph [0031] alludes to "the above embodiments"(plural) such that the skilled person would understand that the effects disclosed apply not only to the embodiment of paragraph [0030] (a tub in the shape of a rectangular prism) but also to the embodiment in paragraphs [0028] and [0029] (a cylindrically shaped tub).

1.5 The arrangement of the openings "at the upper half of the tub" and "at separate points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of the household appliance" is therefore structurally and functionally linked to features i) and j). There is no disclosure in the application as filed which omits these features.

Feature k)

1.6 The respondent argued that the skilled person would interpret the word "cycle" as an arrangement and not - as argued by the appellant - as a succession of process steps. It also argued that the cyclic arrangement of feature k) was originally disclosed by paragraph [0025] but was also implicit from the features c) to h) of claim 1 and that paragraph [0029] provided an additional disclosure. Further, the additional components and process features defined in this paragraph [0025] did not alter this cyclic arrangement. A "closed cycle" meant that there were no further steps, inflows or outflows. Therefore, feature k) could be separated from the remaining disclosure in paragraph [0025].

The Board does not find these arguments persuasive. Whilst a cycle does not necessarily need to be made of process steps and can be described by apparatus

at a station, the skilled person would understand that a closed cycle is an endless cycle in which after the last step/component of the sequence there is a return to the first step/component. The description of a sequence of components in paragraph [0025] as a closed cycle does not override the fact that it is also directly and unambiguously disclosed that there is a fan to blow ozone gas into the tub and simultaneously draw the air from inside the tub into the ozone generator, and that such drawing occurs continuously.

Further, whilst features c) to h) do define the arrangement of components of the household appliance that forms the cycle, they do not define that a closed cycle is formed, as explained above. The skilled person reading paragraph [0029] would also understand that this paragraph describes the specific embodiment of a washing machine comprising a cylindrically shaped tub arranged in the horizontal position and a drum having perforations thus relating to the disclosure starting in paragraph [0028]. The skilled person reading the description thus understands that paragraph [0029] belongs to the disclosure of a different embodiment (other than paragraph [0025]) of a household appliance.

1.7 The respondent argued that the presence of a fan was already implicit from the wording of the claim and a fan was anyway not essential as it was the subject of a dependent claim.

The Board does not accept these arguments and cannot see why a fan would be implicit from the wording of the claim. Merely having a closed cycle following a sequence does not make a fan implicit. For example, even the rotation of the drum itself causes a (albeit smaller) pressure variation that would create a flow of ozone gas such that the presence of a fan is not immediately seen as necessary for the skilled person reading the claim.

As to the proprietor's argument that the fan was not "essential", the Board finds that this is not the relevant standard for assessing whether an amendment fulfils the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC. As an aside, it may be added that this would also contradict the respondent's previous argument. In its decision G 2/10, and summarising long standing case law of the Boards of Appeal, the Enlarged Board of Appeal found that the test to be applied is whether the skilled person would, using common general knowledge, regard the claimed subject-matter as explicitly or implicitly, but directly and unambiguously, disclosed in the application as filed (Reasons 4.5.4). This is commonly referred to as the "gold standard" (Reasons 4.3).

The proprietor has not provided any reasons as to why the Board should deviate from this test such that any other test can only assist in answering this question, but not substitute it. In this sense, the so-called "essentiality test" according to T 331/87 was found to be potentially in contradiction with the "gold standard" (see e.g. T 1852/13, Reasons 2.2.3) and the Board also does not see a reason to use it.

1.8 The respondent further argued that the oxygen-rich air being drawn continuously to be converted into ozone gas was implicit from the fact that feature k) defined a closed cycle.

This argument is also not persuasive. As argued by the appellant, a closed cycle does not need to run continuously and can be operated intermittently, e.g. by operating the fan only in certain periods. However, paragraph [0025] only provides a basis for a closed cycle whereby the oxygen-rich air is drawn continuously to be converted into ozone gas.

2. Auxiliary requests 1 to 6 - Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 and Article 123(2) EPC

2.1 Auxiliary requests 2 and 6 were filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal.

2.2 The respondent requested that the arguments from the appellant's letter filed on 17 October 2022, in particular the attacks on the auxiliary requests filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal, came almost three years after the reply to the grounds of appeal and were late-filed.

However, whilst the arguments regarding the auxiliary requests from the appellant were filed as an amendment to its appeal case, the Board itself has a duty ex officio (under Article 114(1) EPC) to conduct an examination of the auxiliary requests not least based on the arguments, facts and evidence already on file, at least in order to determine whether the auxiliary requests 1 to 6 filed with the reply to the grounds of appeal (now corresponding to auxiliary requests 2, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022) overcome the objections put forward for the main request in the grounds of appeal.

The Board therefore sees no reason not to examine ex officio whether the amendments made to claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 6 overcome the objections put forward in regard to the main request and thus whether the subject-matter of these claims fulfils the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC.

2.3 Auxiliary requests 1 and 3 to 5 were filed by the respondent with letter of 30 December 2022, i.e. after the reply to the grounds of appeal, and constitute an amendment to the respondent's appeal case.

2.4 Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 stipulates that any amendment to a party's appeal case may be admitted only at the Board's discretion. This discretion is to be exercised in view of, inter alia, the current state of the proceedings, whether the amendment is detrimental to procedural economy, the suitability of the amendment to resolve the issues which were admissibly raised and whether the party has demonstrated that any such amendment, prima facie, overcomes the issues raised by another party in the appeal proceedings or by the Board and does not give rise to new objections.

The amendments made are summarised below.

2.5 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differs from claim 1 of the main request in that it further defines that the first opening and the second opening (110) are situated "at the upper half of the tub (2)".

2.6 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 differs from claim 1 of the auxiliary request 1 in that it further defines that the first opening and the second opening (110) are "arranged at separate points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of an household appliance (1) exterior body (G)".

2.7 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the claim is restricted to a washing machine having a cylindrically shaped tub with the tub being the horizontal position and in that the first opening and the second opening are situated at the upper half of the tub and arranged at different points from each other such that they are close to the opposite side walls or corners of the exterior body (G).

2.8 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that "the first opening (10) and the second opening (110) are situated on the upper wall of the tub (2)."

2.9 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that "at least one fan (8) blows the ozone gas into the tub (2) from the ozone supply line (6) and/or draws the air (H) from the tub (2) into the ozone generator (3)".

2.10 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 adds both the amendments of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 4 and 5.

2.11 No claim 1 of any of the requests above defines that the oxygen-rich air is drawn continuously to be converted into ozone gas as disclosed in paragraph [0025] of the published application. As explained above under points 1.6 and 1.8, paragraph [0025] only provides a basis for a closed cycle whereby the oxygen-rich air is drawn continuously to be converted into ozone gas. The respondent has also not provided any other basis or any further argument specific to claim 1 of any of auxiliary requests 1 to 6 that could alter the Board's reasoning given for claim 1 of the main request above. Also, although not itself decisive, it should not go unmentioned that in the Board's provisional opinion (see item 1.3), the Board had already stated what it considered to be directly and unambiguously disclosed.

2.12 Since prima facie the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC is not fulfilled, the Board exercised its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 not to admit auxiliary requests 1 and 3 to 5 into the proceedings.

2.13 In addition, the amendments to claim 1 of auxiliary requests 2 and 6 do not overcome the objections explained above which are prejudicial to claim 1 of the main request, since they evidently do not contain all the omitted features which are necessary to conform to the actual disclosure. The respondent did not argue further on this. The subject-matter of claim 1 of each of auxiliary requests 2 and 6 thus does not fulfil the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC. Auxiliary requests 2 and 6 are therefore not allowable.

3. Request for remittal of the case to the opposition division

3.1 The respondent's request for remittal reads as follows:

"Wir beantragen die Zurückverweisung in die erste Instanz. Laut Zwischenentscheidung waren die Einwände der Einsprechenden gemäß Art. 123(2) EPC nicht zutreffend und das Merkmal ,,drawn continously" implizit im Merkmal k) enthalten. Daher wurde im Rahmen der Hilfsanträge nur das Merkmal ,,fan" eingefügt. Daher ist eine erneute Sacherhebung in der ersten Instanz notwendig."

The Board translates this in the language of proceedings approximately as follows "We request remittal to the first instance. According to the interlocutory decision, the objections under Art. 123(2) EPC were not relevant and the feature "drawn continuously" was implicitly contained in feature k). Only the feature "fan" was thus introduced into the auxiliary requests. Therefore a renewed consideration at first instance was necessary."

3.2 According to Article 11 RPBA 2020, the Board shall not remit a case to the department whose decision was appealed for further prosecution, unless special reasons present themselves for doing so.

3.3 In the present case the Board cannot identify any special reasons. Considering that the aim of the appeal proceedings is to review the decision under appeal in a judicial manner (cf. Article 12(2) RPBA 2020) and in view of the appellant's main request to set aside the decision and revoke the patent, it is the primary task of the Board to review the requests, facts, objections, arguments and evidence on which the decision under appeal was based.

This consequently includes the review of the conclusion of the opposition division that claim 1 of the main request does not relate to subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed, and, more specifically feature k)(see point 11.2 of the decision, paragraph bridging pages 6 and 7).

The fact that the Board comes to a different conclusion than the opposition division regarding the objection under Article 123(2) EPC is therefore a possible outcome resulting from the appeal proceedings, which should also be taken into account by the respondent, and thus in the present case cannot constitute special reasons for a remittal.

3.4 The respondent argued that it was only with the preliminary opinion of the Board that it became clear that the addition of the feature "fan" was not enough.

3.4.1 The Board does not accept this argument. The appellant had quite evidently maintained its argument, which it had made in the opposition proceedings, on page 8 of its grounds of appeal, continuing to argue that feature k) including the feature "drawn continuously" from paragraph [0025] was not included in feature k) which had been added to claim 1. The appellant even underlined certain missing features (including "drawn continuously") in its transcription of paragraph [0025].

3.4.2 The Board finds thus that there was thus no reason for the respondent not to have understood the objection at this point. The Board's negative preliminary reassessment of the opposition division's conclusion of whether feature k) fulfilled the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC has thus not altered the legal and factual framework of the case, since all the facts and arguments had already been laid out during the opposition proceedings and in the grounds of appeal.

3.5 The Board notes that although it is the primary object of the appeal proceedings to review the decision under appeal in a judicial manner (see Article 12(2) RPBA 2020), there is also no absolute right to have every issue decided at two instances such that even if there were a necessity for the respondent to file a new request with its reply to the grounds of appeal or during the appeal proceedings, this does not lead necessarily to a remittal to the first instance.

The foregoing notwithstanding, it should also not be overlooked that the Board had already found auxiliary requests 2 and 6 not allowable and had not admitted auxiliary requests 1, and 3 to 5 into the proceedings. Remitting the case back to the opposition division at this particular point in the appeal proceedings is thus anyway unsuitable as the Board had concluded on the issues relevant to the matter.

3.6 In summary, the Board finds that remittal of the case to the department of first instance is not appropriate. The respondent's request for remittal is therefore refused.

4. Admittance of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023

4.1 Auxiliary request 7 was filed on 2 February 2023 during the oral proceedings in an amendment to the respondent's appeal case.

4.2 Having been filed after its complete appeal case, the admittance of auxiliary request 7 is also at the discretion of the Board under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020. Although Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 applies also to this case, the Board restricted its considerations to Article 13(1) RPBA 2020. As set out therein, the Board's discretion shall therefore be exercised inter alia in view of whether the party has demonstrated that any such amendment, prima facie, overcomes the issues raised by another party in the appeal proceedings or by the Board and does not give rise to new objections.

4.3 Claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023 defines inter alia the cylindrically shaped tub being in the horizontal position and that the at least one fan is embodied to draw continuously the oxygen-rich air (H) to be converted into ozone gas.

4.4 As objected by the appellant, the expression "the at least one fan is embodied to draw continuously the oxygen-rich air (H) to be converted into ozone gas" is prima facie not clear since the skilled person does not understand in the context of the amendment what the verb "to embody", which is usually used in the sense of "to represent", might mean when used in the passive tense and in what way the fan is necessarily structured to draw the oxygen rich air continuously.

5. In addition, in response to the appellant's argument, the respondent argued that the feature "the tub being in the horizontal position" in claim 1 had been amended with regard to the original definition in granted dependent claim 5 ("the cylindrically shaped tub in the horizontal position" ) allegedly in order to improve readability without there being any real change of sense.

However, according to Rule 80 EPC, the claims may be amended, provided that the amendments are occasioned by a ground for opposition under Article 100 (even if that ground has not been invoked by the opponent). Even on a prima facie basis, an improvement of readability does therefore not render such an amendment allowable as it is not responsive to a ground of opposition. Whether there is also a change of sense does therefore not need to be considered.

5.1 Since at least the above amendments are not admissible or introduce a lack clarity in claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023, the Board exercised its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 not to admit auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023 into the proceedings.

6. Admittance of auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022

6.1 During the oral proceedings before the Board, the respondent appended the auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 to the auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023. For simplicity, the Board has retained their original numbering.

6.2 The sequence of the auxiliary requests selected by the respondent leads to an evident lack of convergency in the subject-matter of the requests. Although not decisive, this possible consequence was already explained to the respondent by the Chairman during the oral proceedings when auxiliary request 7 of 2 February 2023 was filed.

6.3 Whilst claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023 is limited to a washing machine comprising inter alia at least one fan (8) which blows the ozone gas into the tub from the ozone supply line (6) and simultaneously draws the air (H) from the tub (2) into the ozone generator (3), claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 is directed to a household appliance being a washing machine or a washing machine and dryer, the latter covering a wider range of machines than auxiliary request 7 filed during the oral proceedings. In addition, none of the auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 defines at least one fan which blows the ozone gas into the tub from the ozone supply line and simultaneously draws the air from the tub into the ozone generator, which had already been included in auxiliary request 7 of 2 February 2023 in regard to the Board's provisional opinion in item 1.3 where it was stated what was directly and unambiguously disclosed.

Admittance of such requests would have the effect of the Board and parties having to consider subject-matter broader than that included in the higher ranking auxiliary request 7 filed on 2 February 2023.

6.4 Such a change made after a party has presented its complete case runs counter to the requirement for procedural economy as set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020.

6.5 Accordingly, the Board exercised its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA 2020 not to admit auxiliary requests 7 to 13 filed with letter of 30 December 2022 into the proceedings.

7. In the absence of any request in the proceedings on the basis of which the patent can be maintained, the patent must be revoked.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility