Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0917/06 21-05-2008
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0917/06 21-05-2008

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T091706.20080521
Date of decision
21 May 2008
Case number
T 0917/06
Petition for review of
-
Application number
03008458.6
IPC class
B05B 7/04
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 42.14 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Improved flat fan spray nozzle

Applicant name
BETE FOG NOZZLE, INC.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.2.07
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention R 115(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(3)
Keywords

Main request - lack of inventive step

Auxiliary requests I, II - not admitted

Decision partially based on a new objection in the absence of the Appellant at the oral proceedings

Catchword
See points 1 and 4
Cited decisions
T 1704/06
T 0602/03
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal lies from the decision of the examining division refusing European patent application 0 300 8458.6 under Article 97(1) EPC 1973 for lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC).

II. The Claims 1 according to the main request and auxiliary requests I and II, all filed with letter dated 21 April 2008, read as follows:

a) main request

"1. A nozzle (10) for mixing a liquid (1) with a gas (g), comprising at least one inlet conduit (12,14) for introducing the liquid and gas into the nozzle (10); a mixing chamber (50) coupled in fluid communication with at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) for receiving and mixing the liquid and gas; a liquid atomizer (18,100) coupled in fluid communication between the at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) and the mixing chamber (50) for atomizing the liquid flowing through the at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) and discharging the atomized liquid into the mixing chamber (50); and a plurality of orifices (19) angularly spaced relative to each other about an axis (a) of the mixing chamber (50) within an end portion (58) of the nozzle (10) and coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50), wherein the axis (a) of the end portion of the nozzle substantially lies within a plane (X-Z), a first group of orifices (19) are located on one side of the plane (X-Z), and a second group of orifices (19) are located on another side of the plane (X-Z) relative to the first group of orifices (19), characterized in that the axes (m to t) of the orifices (19) are each oriented at an acute angle of incidence with respect to the plane (X-Z) and intersect said plane (X-Z) along an elongated target (17) substantially lying in said plane (X-Z); and further characterised in that each orifice (19) is coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50) and is contiguous with a peripheral surface (71) defining the mixing chamber for receiving peripheral fluid flow from the chamber, the mixing chamber (50) extending between the liquid atomizer (18, 100) and the plurality of orifices (19) is axially elongated such that a length of the mixing chamber (e) is greater than a diameter (d) of the mixing chamber for further atomizing the liquid and mixing the liquid and gas prior to discharging the liquid-gas mixture through the plurality of orifices (19), the orifices (19) are angled radially out ward from the axis (a) with respect to the plane (X-Z) to produce a fan pattern of predetermined width (w) along the target (17) and prevent the trajectories of the spray jets from intersecting each other, and the angles of the orifices (19) with respect to the plane (X-Z) outwardly increase as the orifices are disposed further from the axis (a) such that the spray jets (n-s) are substantially equally spaced relative to each other along the target (17)."

b) auxiliary request I

"1. A nozzle (10) for mixing a liquid (1) with a gas (g), comprising at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) for introducing the liquid and gas into the nozzle (10);

a mixing chamber (50) coupled in fluid communication with at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) for receiving and mixing the liquid and gas; and

a plurality of orifices (19) angularly spaced relative to each other about an axis (a) of the mixing chamber (50) within an end portion (58) of the nozzle (10) and coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50), wherein the axis (a) of the end portion of the nozzle substantially lies within a plane (X-Z), a first group of orifices (19) are located on one side of the plane (X-Z), and a second group of orifices (19) are located on another side of the plane (X-Z) relative to the first group of orifices (19),

characterized in that the axes (m to t) of the orifices (19) are each oriented at an acute angle of incidence with respect to the plane (X-Z) and intersect said plane (X-Z) along an elongated target (17) substantially lying in said plane (X-Z); and

further characterized by at least one vane located between the inlet conduit (12) and the mixing chamber (50) and extending transversely relative to an elongated axis (a) of the inlet conduit (12) for receiving fluid from the inlet conduit (12) and creating a swirling annular flow, and defining at least a portion of an aperture (128) in an approximately central portion thereof for receiving a portion of the liquid and gas from the inlet conduit (12) and creating a substantially axial flow, and for introducing the swirling annular flow and axial flow into the mixing chamber (50) for mixing and (correctly: an) annular and axial flows; and wherein

the axes (m to t) of the orifices (19) are each fixedly oriented and further characterised by a liquid atomizer (18, 100) coupled in fluid communication between the at least one inlet conduit (12) and the mixing chamber (50) for atomizing the liquid flowing through the at least one inlet conduit (12) and discharging the atomized liquid into the mixing chamber (50), and wherein the mixing chamber (50) extending between the liquid atomizer (18, 100) and the plurality of orifices (19) is axially elongated such that a length of the mixing chamber (e) is greater than a diameter (d) of the mixing chamber for further atomizing the liquid and mixing the liquid and gas prior to discharging the liquid-gas mixture through the plurality of orifices (19), and wherein

the liquid atomizer (100) may be a tubular unitary body similar to the liquid input conduit (12) having an outlet end with a central outlet orifice (110) of cylindrical configuration which extends through the outer end wall (111) thereof and intersects with conical surface (112), which constitutes the outlet wall of an outlet chamber (114), and wherein the outer end wall (111) radially flares from the longitudinal axis of a spray head (16)."

c) auxiliary request II

"1. A nozzle (10) for mixing a liquid (1) with a gas (g), comprising

at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) for introducing the liquid and gas into the nozzle (10);

a mixing chamber (50) coupled in fluid communication with at least one inlet conduit (12, 14) for receiving and mixing the liquid and gas; and

a plurality of orifices (19) angularly spaced relative to each other about an axis (a) of the mixing chamber (50) within an end portion (58) of the nozzle (10) and coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50), wherein the axis (a) of the end portion of the nozzle substantially lies within a plane (X-Z), a first group of orifices (19) are located on one side of the plane (X-Z), and a second group of orifices (19) are located on another side of the plane (X-Z) relative to the first group of orifices (19),

characterized in that the axes (m to t) of the orifices (19) are each oriented at an acute angle of incidence with respect to the plane (X-Z) and intersect said plane (X-Z) along an elongated target (17) substantially lying in said plane (X-Z); and

further characterized by at least one vane located between the inlet conduit (12) and the mixing chamber (50) and extending transversely relative to an elongated axis (a) of the inlet conduit (12) for receiving fluid from the inlet conduit (12) and creating a swirling annular flow, and defining at least a portion of an aperture (128) in an approximately central portion thereof for receiving a portion of the liquid and gas from the inlet conduit (12) and creating a substantially axial flow, and for introducing the swirling annular flow and axial flow into the mixing chamber (50) for mixing and (correctly: an) annular and axial flows; and

further characterized in that the orifices (19) are interconnected by a U-shaped or V-shaped groove or channel (80) that is inscribed on an outer surface (81) of the spray head (16)."

III. In the impugned decision the following documents have been considered

D1: US-A-5 240 183

D2: US-A-4 014 470

D3: DE-A-25 36 883.

IV. According to the impugned decision the subject-matter of claim 1 underlying this decision has been found as not involving an inventive step in view of documents D1 and D3. D1 has been considered as disclosing the structure of a nozzle of the kind concerned, and D3 as disclosing the arrangement of orifices as further defined in claim 1.

V. The appellant (applicant) requests that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be granted according to claims 1 - 14 of the main request or auxiliarily according to claims 1 - 13 or claims 1 - 14, filed respectively as auxiliary requests I and II, all requests filed with letter dated 21 April 2008.

Its arguments in the grounds of appeal can be summarised as follows:

Claim 1 according to the then main request, filed with the grounds of appeal, concisely defines the features enabling the nozzle to produce a flat fan spray pattern of uniform and evenly distributed material along the target.

With the nozzle according to D1 a more complete mixing of various gas and liquid combinations and generation of finer spray droplets is sought for. To achieve this effect D1 is explicit in its teachings concerning the location of the spray orifice(s) on the end portion of the nozzle.

Differently to D1 document D3 is not directed to a spray nozzle for mixing a liquid and a gas but rather directed to a nozzle for spraying urethane foam. D3 does not suggest changing of the specific teachings of D1. Consequently combined consideration of documents D1 and D3 does not lead to the arrangement of orifices as defined in claim 1.

VI. Following the request for oral proceedings according to the notice of appeal and maintained in the grounds of appeal the Board summoned with communication dated 5 March 2008 for oral proceedings scheduled for 21 May 2008.

In the annex to the summons the Board gave in detail its preliminary opinion with respect to claim 1 of the set of claims filed as sole (main) request with the grounds of appeal.

In particular the question has been raised whether claim 1 is clear (annex to the summons, point 5).

Furthermore the question has been addressed whether the subject-matter of claim 1 can be considered as involving an inventive step in view of documents D1 and D3 (annex to the summons, points 6 - 6.3).

In this respect the question of whether D1 and D3 can be considered in combination, has been referred to as a key issue (point 6).

Having regard to the disclosure of D3 it has been indicated that this document does not disclose a nozzle applicable to spray synthetic foam, as erroneously indicated in the decision under appeal, but rather a nozzle for spraying a liquid reactive mixture (point 3).

According to the preliminary opinion given in the annex to the summons (points 6.2 and 6.3) D1 discloses a nozzle having essentially the structure (mixing chamber; conduits and plurality of orifices) as defined in the preamble of claim 1 then on file and thus constitutes the closest prior art.

D3 discloses according to this preliminary opinion a nozzle for which, concerning its use, it is indicated that a liquid reacting mixture is to be sprayed for the production of an item made of foam (cf. claim 1; page 1, paragraph 1). The spray pattern should be uniform (page 10, paragraph 2) and in a band like or line like pattern (page 4, last paragraph).

Concerning the examination of inventive step according to the preliminary opinion:

The use disclosed for the nozzle in D3 appears to correspond, with respect to the liquid material to be sprayed and the spray pattern to be obtained, to the one according to the application in suit.

It appears that the person skilled in the art will consider D3 when attempting to solve the problem indicated above, and starting from the nozzle according to D1. This appears to hold true even more considering the instruction of D1 relating to the arrangement of nozzles to be adapted to the use of the nozzles.

Considering D3 in combination with D1 it appears that the person skilled in the art will maintain the basic structure of the nozzle as disclosed in D1 (since for the use according to claim 1 only modifications with respect to the arrangement of the orifices are required) when modifying the arrangement of orifices, as referred to in the instruction of D1, utilising in this respect the information given in D3 with regard to the arrangement of orifices, in order to obtain the intended flat line spray pattern.

It thus appears that the subject-matter of claim 1, even when considering it as satisfying the requirement of Article 84 EPC (cf. point 5 of the annex to the summons), is obvious in view of a combined consideration of D1 and D3.

VII. With letter dated 21 April 2008 the appellant responded to the preliminary opinion given in the annex to the summons, filing - "For the preparation of the oral proceedings on May 21, 2008" a main request comprising a claim 1, which has been amended as compared to claim 1 of the previous main request, and two sets of claims according to auxiliary requests I and II (see point II above).

The arguments given in this letter do not address the question of clarity raised in the annex to the summons, which, irrespective of the amendments to claim 1, still applies with respect to claim 1 according to the main request.

Concerning the disclosure of D3, disregarding the preliminary opinion given in the annex to the summons, it is referred to D3 being directed to a nozzle for spraying urethane foam.

According to the letter, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request involves an inventive step, the reason being that applying the teaching of D3, concerning the arrangement of orifices, to the arrangement of D1 would not lead to one in which each orifice is contiguous with a peripheral surface defining the mixing chamber, since D1 explicitly discloses an inward spacing of the orifices and D3 does teach changing this arrangement in the context of liquid-gas mixtures.

According to the letter the subject-matter of claim 1 according to auxiliary request I involves an inventive step since the liquid atomizer being in the form of a sinusoidal spray member is not suggested by documents D1, D2 or D3.

Furthermore the subject-matter of claim 1 according to auxiliary request II involves an inventive step since orifices connected by a U-shaped or V-shaped groove or channel that is inscribed on an outer surface of the spray head is not suggested by documents D1, D2 or D3.

VIII. With a further letter also dated 21 April 2008 the appellant notified the Board that the undersigning representative, accompanied by a person identified in this letter, would attend the oral proceedings.

By letter dated 8 May 2008 the Board was informed that the appellant would not be represented at the oral proceedings. Furthermore, the request for the oral proceedings was withdrawn and a "decision in writing" was requested. It was further requested to inform the appellant "(i)n the event that in the preparation of the decision it turned out that modifications could bring about a version that qualifies for granting ...".

IX. With fax dated 19 May 2008 the Board informed the appellant that the oral proceedings would be held as scheduled.

Oral proceedings were held 21 May 2008 in the absence of the appellant.

The facts, evidence and arguments relied upon by the appellant are as given in the written part of the proceedings, namely in the grounds of appeal and, in response to the preliminary opinion of the Board, in the letter dated 21 April 2008 (see points V and VII above).

1. Procedural issues

1.1 The Board interprets the statement of the appellant "to bring about a decision in writing" in context with the statement that "the request for an oral proceeding is withdrawn" as well as the request that in case "modifications could bring about a version that qualifies for granting", the rapporteur provide a relevant indication, (letter dated 8 May 2008, page 1, paragraphs 2, 3 and 4) as an auxiliary request for continuation of the proceedings in writing if the Board finds the available requests not allowable.

This request thus amounts to one that no final negative decision is taken at the end of the scheduled oral proceedings.

No reasons have been given in support of this request.

To avoid any procedural ambiguity the appellant had been informed that the oral proceedings were going to be held as scheduled by a fax of the Board dated 19 May 2008.

1.2 According to Article 15(3) Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA), the "Board shall not be obliged to delay any step in the proceedings, including the decision, by reason only of the absence at the oral proceedings of any party duly summoned...".

Requests relating to unspecified modifications cannot be considered by the Board as the instance reviewing the decision under appeal.

The oral proceedings have therefore been conducted in the absence of the duly summoned appellant according to Rule 115(2) EPC. At the end of these oral proceedings the Board gave its decision dismissing the appeal.

The duly summoned appellant has, corresponding to Article 15(3) RPBA, been treated as relying only on its written case. The explanatory notes to this Article state the following (CA/133/02 dated 12 November 2002, available via the EPO web site):

"This provision does not contradict the principle of the right to be heard pursuant to Article 113(1) EPC since that article only affords the opportunity to be heard and, by absenting itself from the oral proceedings, a party gives up that opportunity".

1.3 According to the established case law of the Boards of Appeal an appellant which files amended claims shortly before the oral proceedings and subsequently does not attend these proceedings must expect a decision based on objections which might arise against such claims in his absence (T 1704/06, reasons point 7.4 of the reasons, referring to T 602/03, point 7 of the reasons).

The above applies in the present case notwithstanding the request given in the letter dated 8 May 2008 to continue the proceedings in writing if modifications were considered necessary (see the paragraph bridging pages 1, 2), since the formulation of requests is the sole responsibility of the appellant.

Main request

2. Amended claim 1

Claim 1 according to the main request differs from claim 1 which has been filed with the grounds of appeal and discussed in detail in the annex to the summons to the oral proceedings (cf. section VI) essentially in that the feature according to which "each orifice (19) is coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50) adjacent to a peripheral surface (71) defining the mixing cham ber for receiving peripheral fluid flow from the chamber" has been replaced by the feature "each orifice (19) is coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber (50) and is contiguous with a peripheral surface (71) defining the mixing cham ber for receiving peripheral fluid flow from the chamber".

2.1 By way of this amendment the manner in which the orifices are arranged on the nozzle has been defined more specifically and is thereby limited to the one shown e.g. in figures 1, 6 and 9 of the application.

2.2 Concerning this amendment the Board has no objections under Articles 123(2) and (3) EPC. This issue needs no further discussion since, even leaving the objection raised in the annex to the summons (point 5) with respect to clarity (Article 84 EPC) aside, the nozzle according to this claim cannot be considered as involving an inventive step (Article 56 EPC), as established in the following.

3. Inventive step

3.1 According to the appellant due to this amendment the nozzle according to claim 1 involves an inventive step even in view of the combined consideration of documents D1 and D3 (letter dated 21 April 2008, pages 2 - 4).

3.2 The appellant did not object to D1 being considered as constituting the closest prior art. The appellant focused on the amended feature of claim 1 by which the arrangement of the orifices in the nozzle is further defined (cf. point 2.1 above), concluding that the person skilled in the art which, in addition to the closest prior art according to D1, considers the arrangement of the orifices according to D3, would maintain the radial inward spacing of the orifices referred to in D1 and thus would not arrive at the nozzle according to claim 1 without inventive step being involved.

Concerning these arguments it is true that according to D1 the orifices are arranged radially inward of the peripheral surface defining the mixing chamber, to further accelerate the liquid and gas mixture to be discharged (cf. column 3, lines 50 - 60). It is, however, likewise true that according to D1, as indicated in the annex to the summons (point 6.2.1), with respect to the arrange ment of the orifices various specific examples (cf. figures 3 - 7) are disclosed and a general instruction is given: "Depending on the application of the nozzle, the outer end wall 48 will be provided with one or more outlet orifices and in FIG. 1, orifice 50 is disposed in axial alignment with the axis of the helical member 20." (column 3, lines 1-4).

3.2.1 As indicated in the annex to the summons the features distinguishing the nozzle according to claim 1 from the one disclosed in D1 lead to a nozzle with orifices arranged such that a specific application of the nozzle - in the sense of a specific spray pattern - is obtained (annex to the summons, point 6.2.2).

The above evaluation with respect to the features distinguishing claim 1 filed with the grounds of appeal from the nozzle according to D1 holds true also with respect to claim 1 according to the present main request since the amendment of claim 1 likewise concerns the arrangement of the nozzles (cf. point 2.1 above).

The effect to be obtained by the nozzle according to amended claim 1 thus remains the one indicated in the annex to the summons (cf. point 6.2.2) with respect to claim 1 as filed with the grounds of appeal. This effect correlates with the problem referred to in the application in suit, namely to provide a spray head for producing, in a specific application, a uniform flat fan spray pattern (column 2, lines 2 - 9) and is in line with the instruction given in D1 as indicated above, that the arrangement of orifices is to be chosen depending on the field of application of the nozzle.

3.2.2 The view expressed by the appellant with respect to the disclosure of D3 (letter dated 21 April 2008, page 4, first full paragraph), according to which this document is directed to a nozzle for spraying urethane foam, does not take account of the disclosure as stated in D3, according to which, as referred to in the annex to the summons (point 6.3.3), a liquid reacting mixture - and not a urethane foam - is to be sprayed for the production of an item made of foam (claim 1; page 1, paragraph 1).

Furthermore according to D3 the spray pattern should be uniform (page 10, paragraph 2) and in a band like or line like pattern (page 4, last paragraph).

Based on this disclosure of D3 the Board came to its preliminary opinion given in the annex to the summons (points 6.2 - 7.2) that the nozzle according to claim 1 as filed with the grounds of appeal does not involve an inventive step starting from D1 as closest prior art and considering the arrangement of the nozzles according to D3.

This evaluation still applies with respect to the nozzle of claim 1 as amended according to the main request, since, in line with the amended feature (cf. point 2. above), according to which each orifice is coupled in fluid communication with the mixing chamber and is contiguous with a peripheral surface defining the mixing chamber for receiving peripheral fluid flow from the chamber, according to D3 it is considered as being important that the orifices are contiguous with the peripheral (and more precisely: circumferential) surface of the mixing chamber such that, corresponding to the application in suit (column 1, lines 49 - 57; column 2, lines 3 - 9), an overall uniform spray pattern is obtained (D3, paragraph bridging pages 3 and 4; page 10, paragraph 2; paragraph bridging pages 10, 11; claim 1; figure 2).

Application of the teaching of D3 to the nozzle of D1 would include also this feature.

Thus, as indicated above, for the reasons given already in the annex to the summons to oral proceedings the nozzle according to claim 1 does not involve an inventive step such that the requirement of Article 56 EPC is not fulfilled.

Auxiliary requests I and II

4. Admissibility

The two sets of claims according to auxiliary requests I and II have been filed on 21 April 2008, i.e. one month before the oral proceedings, i.e. just in time in respect of the ultimate date by which further submissions should be filed, as indicated in the annex to the summons.

According to Article 13(1) RPBA, in line with the consistent jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal, the admission of late filed requests lies in the discretion of the Board. Furthermore according to the consistent jurisprudence relating to the Board's power of exercising this discretion it is considered inter alia whether a convincing reason for the late filing is given, whether the newly filed claims are clearly allowable in the sense that no issues with respect to clarity (Article 84 EPC) or the admissibility of the amendments (Article 123(2) EPC) arise and whether the amendments to the claims are such that divergent subject-matter results in the sense that from one request to the other a shift in the subject-matter of the claims takes place.

Concerning auxiliary requests I and II no reason is given for the late filing and as indicated in the following, the amendments introduce new issues with respect to Article 123(2) EPC. Furthermore, since the subject-matter of these requests is not convergent, they would lead to a shift with respect to the subject-matter in such a late stage of the proceedings. Under these circumstances the Board exercises its discretion to not admit auxiliary requests I and II.

4.1 Claim 1 according to auxiliary request I comprises the features of claims 1 and 3 as originally filed. In addition this claim comprises the following feature taken from the description "the liquid atomizer (100) may be a tubular unitary body similar to the liquid input conduit (12) having an outlet end with a central outlet orifice (110) of cylindrical configuration which extends through the outer end wall (111) thereof and intersects with conical surface (112), which constitutes the outlet wall of an outlet chamber (114), and wherein the outer end wall (111) radially flares from the longitudinal axis of a spray head (16)." (cf. column 7, lines 36 - 41).

The following needs to be considered with respect to these amendments.

The amendments of claim 1 according to auxiliary request I result in subject-matter which is not convergent with the subject-matter resulting from the amendment to claim 1 according to the main request, in that, instead of the arrangement of the orifices, the provision of a liquid atomizer has been further defined.

4.2 Further, the amendments also add the feature from the description according to which the outer end wall radially flares from the longitudinal axis of a spray head, while considering only the portion of the description directly concerning the structure of the outer end wall, thereby omitting the functional part of the description according to which the outer end wall radially flares "to expand the liquid spray pattern about the mixing chamber of the spray head" (column 7, lines 43 - 46).

In this connection reference is made to appellant's letter dated 21 April 2008 in which the effect of the radial flaring of the outer end wall (cf. page 5, paragraph 1) is specifically discussed in association with the feature newly incorporated into claim 1.

Since the above mentioned two portions of the description referred to are evidently closely related, the omission of the function of the radially flared outer end wall leads to serious doubts whether this amendment satisfies the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC.

4.3 Furthermore the expression "may be" at the beginning of the last paragraph of claim 1 according to auxiliary request I casts doubt as to what extent definitions in this paragraph are directed to alternatives and to what extent they are mandatory, such that questions arise with respect to clarity of the claim (Article 84 EPC).

Consequently claim 1 according to auxiliary request I is not clearly allowable.

Exercising the Board's discretion to not admit claim 1 according to auxiliary request I is thus justified.

4.4 Claim 1 according to auxiliary request II comprises the features of claim 1 as filed together with features taken exclusively from the description (column 6, lines 31 - 34).

The features taken from the description define "that the orifices (19) are interconnected by a U-shaped or V-shaped groove or channel (80) that is inscribed on an outer surface (81) of the spray head (16).".

These features do not further define the subject-matter of claim 1 according auxiliary request I so its subject-matter diverges from that of the main request as well as that of auxiliary request I.

4.5 Furthermore these structural features taken from the description are, however, further defined therein by "(t)he channel 80 widens the outer edge of the orifices 19 such that the spray jets (m to t) as shown in Fig. 3, emanating therefrom peripherally expand along the channel upon exiting each orifice to thereby produce a broader orifice jet pattern being less concentrated than one emanating from an orifice." (column 6, lines 43 - 48).

The omission of this associated portion of the description relating to the effect to be obtained by the features added to claim 1 according to auxiliary request II makes it questionable whether this claim satisfies the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC.

In this connection reference is made to the effect the groove or channel has - in combination with further structural features also not comprised in claim 1 - as emphasized in the letter of the appellant dated 21 April 2008 (page 5, paragraphs 1 and 2 from the bottom and paragraph bridging pages 5, 6).

Consequently claim 1 according to auxiliary request II is also not clearly allowable.

Exercising the Board's discretion to not admit claim 1 according to auxiliary request II is thus justified.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility