Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1255/18 16-06-2020
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1255/18 16-06-2020

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2020:T125518.20200616
Date of decision
16 June 2020
Case number
T 1255/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
12003913.6
IPC class
C08K3/22
C08K3/34
C08K9/04
C09D5/08
C09D7/12
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 413.71 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Coating compositions exhibiting corrosion resistance properties, related coated substrates, and methods

Applicant name
PPG Industries Ohio, Inc.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention 076(1) (2007)
European Patent Convention 123(2) (2007)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal 013(2) (2020)
Keywords

Divisional application - subject matter extends beyond the content of the earlier application (yes) (all requests)

Auxiliary requests 4 to 7 submitted after notification of the summons to oral proceedings - admitted into the proceedings (yes) - exceptional circumstances

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0001/93
G 0001/03
G 0001/05
G 0001/06
G 0002/10
T 0012/81
T 0783/09
Citing decisions
T 1538/17
T 1804/19
T 1089/20
T 1105/20

I. The appeal lies from the decision of the examining division to refuse European patent application n° 12003913.6.

II. The decision was based on two sets of claims filed respectively as main request with letter dated 6 August 2014 and as auxiliary request with letter dated 20 October 2017. Claims 1 of those requests were identical and read as follows:

"1. Use of a primer and/or pretreatment composition comprising

(1) a film-forming resin for use in automotive OEM coating compositions, automotive refinish coating compositions, industrial coating compositions, architectural coating compositions, coil coating compositions, and aerospace coating compositions,

(2) an adhesion promoting component, and

(3) corrosion resisting particles comprising magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers, as determined by visually examining a micrograph of a transmission electron microscopy ("TEM") image, measuring the diameter of the particles in the image, and calculating the average primary particle size of the measured particles based on magnification of the TEM image, wherein the primary particle size of a particle refers to the smallest diameter sphere that will completely enclose the particle,

to coat a metal substrate selected from aluminum, aluminum alloys, zinc-aluminum alloys and aluminum plated steel."

III. The European patent application was filed as a divisional of the earlier application n° 06802556.8 whose claim 1 read as follows:

"1. A primer and/or pretreatment coating composition comprising:

(a) an adhesion promoting component; and

(b) corrosion resisting particles selected from:

(i) magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers;

(ii) particles comprising an inorganic oxide network comprising one or more inorganic oxides; and/or

(iii) chemically modified particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 500 nanometers."

IV. In the contested decision of 6 December 2017 the examining division held inter alia that claim 1 of the main request did not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC as its subject-matter, in particular the combination of magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers as corrosion resisting particles with a specific substrate to be coated (namely one selected from aluminium, aluminium alloys, zinc-aluminium alloys and aluminium plated steel), was not directly and unambiguously derivable from the parent application. A first selection had to be made as to the corrosion resisting particles among the alternatives in claim 1 of the earlier application independently of whether such a limitation was designated as an "invention", an "embodiment" or an "alternative" and a second selection had to be made as to the nature of the substrate limiting the list of useful metallic substrates provided in paragraph [0096] of the earlier application, therefore resulting in not disclosed subject-matter. This conclusion was not changed by the presence of examples 5B, 6B, 6F, 6G and 6H as employed on test substrates in tables 59 and 61 of the earlier application which fell under the scope of the amended claim. Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was identical to claim 1 of the auxiliary request and therefore for the same reasons did not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

V. The decision was appealed and the statement setting out the grounds of appeal was submitted with letter of 16 April 2018 to which two auxiliary requests labelled "2. AUXILIARY REQUEST" and "3. AUXILIARY REQUEST" (hereafter auxiliary request 2 and auxiliary request 3, respectively) were attached. The main request and the auxiliary request (hereafter auxiliary request 1) on which the decision was based were maintained. Claims 1 of auxiliary request 2 and auxiliary request 3 were identical. They corresponded to claim 1 of the main request in which the metal substrate was defined to be selected from aluminum alloys.

VI. With the statement setting out the grounds of appeal the appellant also submitted five annexes concerning an excerpt from Duden (entry "Liste", Annex A1), three excerpts from Wikipedia (entry "Aluminium" in German and English, Annexes A2 and A3 respectively; entry "Aluminium alloy" in English, Annex A4) and a photo and description of panel item number 21047 (Annex A5).

VII. In preparation of oral proceedings, the Board issued a communication dated 14 April 2020 in which the Board came to the preliminary opinion that none of the appellant's requests met the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC. While concurring with the position of the examining division the Board submitted a further reason why the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request extended beyond the content of the application as filed, namely that the corrosion resisting particles were defined to comprise magnesium oxide particles according to option (i) of claim 1 of the parent application, rendering possible the presence of corrosion resisting particles of any type in addition to those defined by option (i), whereas claim 1 of parent application merely defined the use of corrosion resisting particles selected from options (i), (ii) and/or (iii).

VIII. In response to the Board's communication, with letter of 15 May 2020 the appellant submitted auxiliary requests 4 to 7. Auxiliary requests 4, 5, 6 and 7 corresponded to the main request, auxiliary request 1, 2 and 3, respectively, wherein in claims 1 of the latter requests the wording "(3) corrosion resisting particles comprising" had been replaced by "(3) corrosion resisting particles selected from". These requests did not contain further amendments.

IX. The oral proceedings took place on 16 June 2020. They were held by videoconference at the appellant's request.

X. The appellant requested to set aside the decision under appeal and to remit the case to the examining division on the basis of one of the sets of claims of the main request or auxiliary request 1 on which the decision was based, or of auxiliary requests 2 and 3 filed with the statement setting out the grounds of appeal dated 16 April 2018, or of auxiliary requests 4 to 7 submitted with letter of 15 May 2020.

Main request - amendments - Article 76(1) EPC

1. According to Article 76(1) EPC, second sentence, a divisional application may be filed only in respect of subject-matter which does not extend beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. When determining whether the subject-matter of a divisional application extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed, exactly the same principles are to be applied as for extension of subject-matter under Article 123(2) EPC (G 1/05, OJ EPO 2008, 271, point 5.1 of the Reasons).

This means that the subject-matter disclosed in the divisional application must be directly and unambiguously derivable by the skilled person from the earlier application as filed (G 1/06, OJ EPO 2008, 307, Headnote), in line with the so-called "gold" standard for assessing compliance of amendments to a patent application with Article 123(2) EPC (G 2/10, OJ EPO 2012, 376, point 4.3 of the Reasons).

2. Concerning feature (3) the parent application as filed does not disclose that the corrosion resisting particles comprised in the primer and/or treatment coating composition comprise magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers, which would render possible the presence of corrosion resisting particles of any type in addition to those defined by option (i), whereas claim 1 of parent application merely discloses the use of corrosion resisting particles selected from options (i), (ii) and/or (iii), i.e. allows the use of corrosion resisting particles in addition to those of option (i) which are selected only from options (ii) and/or (iii).

The appellant's argument that the "comprising language" for defining the corrosion resisting particles is based on paragraphs [0022], [0076] and [0078] to [0080] of the parent application as filed does not convince, because none of these passages has been shown to have to be read in the context of claim 1 of the parent application as filed, in particular in the context of magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers in accordance with option (i). The skilled person has no reason to read these paragraphs in the light of claim 1 of the parent application as filed, not only because the "comprising language" is in contradiction with the unambiguous language of claim 1 of the parent application according to which only specific particles according to options (ii) and/or (iii) can be additionally used, but also because these paragraphs can be read in the context of additional independent claims of the parent application as filed such as independent claims 19, 36, 38 and 39 which do not contain said "consisting language".

Hence, feature (3) as defined in claim 1 of the main request has no basis in the parent application as filed.

3. Even if the Board, to the benefit of the appellant, considered that the passages cited by the appellant provided a basis in the parent application as filed for feature (3), one could not conclude that the claimed subject-matter meets the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC for the following reasons.

3.1 The appellant did not indicate any explicit single disclosure for the claimed combination of features, but rather relied on various separate passages of the earlier application as filed relating to each of said features individually. The mere fact that each of the features of claim 1 of the main request would as such, i.e. when read in isolation, be disclosed in the earlier application as filed is not sufficient to conclude that the skilled person would implicitly derive the presently claimed combination of features directly and unambiguously from the application as filed, using common general knowledge. In this context "implicitly" means that the skilled person would have found a disclosure for said combination of features as objectively and necessarily implied by the explicit content of the application as originally filed as a whole.

3.2 While conditions have been developed by the case law, such as the so-called "two-lists principle" (indeed starting from decision T 12/81 of 9 February 1982 in the context of the novelty analysis as cited by the appellant), they are not meant to be additional or alternative conditions to be checked, but only a possible aid in certain cases to verify whether the gold standard is satisfied and should thus not lead to a different result than when applying the gold standard directly. The appellant's argument that the definition of the corrosion-resisting particles in claim 1 of the earlier application is not given in the form of a list whose definition was given in Annex A1, but in the form of overlapping items is not decisive. The central question to be answered in order to assess whether the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC are met is therefore not whether the two-lists principle strictly applies in the present case, with possible implications related to the precise meaning of the term "list", but whether the combination of features, in particular that of claim 1 of the main request, can be seen by the skilled person as directly and unambiguously derivable from the content as a whole of the parent application as filed, in agreement with decision T 783/09 of 25 January 2011 cited by the appellant.

3.3 For that purpose it has to be determined first whether the combination of "corrosion resisting particles comprising magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers" and a substrate "selected from aluminium, aluminium alloys, zinc-aluminium alloys and aluminium plated steel" which the examining division found to be critical in assessing whether the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC were met is directly and unambiguously derivable from the whole of the parent application as filed.

3.4 Claim 1 of the parent application as filed relates to a "primer and/or pretreatment coating composition comprising an adhesion promoting component and corrosion resisting particles selected from (i) magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle diameter size of no more than 100 nanometers; (ii) particles comprising an inorganic oxide network comprising one or more inorganic oxides; and/or (iii) chemically modified particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 500 nanometers". No specification of the kind of substrate to which the composition may be applied is present in any of the claims of the parent application referring to claim 1 (claims 2 to 16). Further coating compositions comprising an adhesion promoting component and corrosion resisting particles are defined in independent claims 19 and 36, which contain however further alternative definitions of the corrosion resisting particles none of which corresponds to any of classes (i) to (iii).

3.5 Independently of the question whether claim 1 of the parent application as filed encompasses also embodiments with the combination of more than one of classes (i) to (iii) in view of the wording "and/or" (which appears to be the case and is also in conformity with the combination of particles used in some of the dependent claims and in a number of the examples of the parent application), it is clear that the parent application as filed discloses a number of alternatives as far as the corrosion resisting particles present in the compositions are concerned, only one of which is represented by the specific magnesium oxide particles according to option (i) of claim 1 of the parent application. This aspect of the original disclosure is unaffected by the fact that some of these alternatives may be partly overlapping, or by the question whether these alternatives are formally present in the form of a "list" or not. Moreover, it is completely unrelated to the question whether the parent application in its originally filed version lacked unity or not, alternatives (i) to (iii) representing different inventions as argued by the appellant, which in itself, although possibly being a reason for filing a divisional application, has no bearing on the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC and their fulfillment.

3.6 The appellant's argument that claim 1 of the parent application covered three different embodiments or inventions, which could have been drafted as three different separate claims or in three separate applications, the first of which, namely option (i), would require no selection, fails to convince. The mere fact of choosing one of three different options or embodiments disclosed in the parent application, be it the first option disclosed therein, constitutes a selection among these three alternatives. Moreover, no argument was made that the earlier application as filed gave any preference for alternative (i). This also is not apparent from the whole parent application.

3.7 The supports to which the compositions of the parent applications may be applied are disclosed mainly in the original description, paragraph [0096], where the last two sentences concern metal substrates that may be coated with "such compositions" including "substrates comprising steel (including electrogalvanized steel, cold rolled-steel, hot-deep galvanized steel, among others), aluminium, aluminium alloys, zinc-aluminium alloys and aluminium plated steel", substrates which "comprise more than one metal or metal alloy" and substrates which "may be a combination of two or more metal substrates assembled together". In this paragraph, which starts with the indication "in certain embodiments" limiting the disclosure to part of the whole disclosure of the parent application, no mention is made of which kind of corrosion resisting particles are to be used in "such compositions". In particular no mention is present of specific magnesium oxide particles. Moreover, the aluminium related substrates present in claim 1 of the main request are only a few of the possible options which are listed.

3.8 In view of the above considerations neither the claims of the parent application, nor the general part of the description have been shown to provide the skilled person with a direct and unambiguous disclosure of a use according to claim 1 of the main request with the above two critical features in combination. Thus, even if feature (3) were considered to be disclosed in the parent application as filed or construed as to define corrosion resisting particles selected from magnesium oxide particles in accordance with option (i) of the parent application, the two critical features relating to the corrosion resisting particles and the metal substrate would instead be disclosed only in separate parts of the parent application as possible options among several others for two different and independent aspects.

3.9 Furthermore, the parent application as filed does not require that the primer and/or pretreatment composition comprises a film-forming resin, the use thereof being implicitly described as optional. The appellant's argument that the skilled person would understand that it would not be possible to form such a primer and/or pretreatment composition without a film-forming resin is not supported by the unambiguous teaching of dependent claim 10 and paragraphs [00107], [00117] and [00128] of the earlier application as filed, according to which the composition may also comprise a film-forming resin.

Even if to the benefit of the appellant, the common general knowledge - which according to settled case law (G 2/10, supra, point 4.3 for the Reasons) is to be taken into account to assess what a skilled person would derive directly and unambiguously from the whole of the application documents as filed - would rather suggest the mandatory use of a film-forming resin, the deliberate and unambiguous choice of the applicant to define in the parent application as filed the use of a film-forming resin as optional cannot be ignored. At best the skilled person would conclude on the basis of the explicit repeated disclosure in the parent application as filed rendering the use of a film-forming resin to be optional and the common general knowledge in this respect that the teaching concerning the use of a film-forming resin is ambiguous. Also for this reason the combination of features defined in operative claim 1 which does not only require the use of corrosion resisting particles comprising magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers on a metal substrate selected from aluminum, aluminum alloys, zinc-aluminum alloys and aluminum plated steel, but also the presence of a film-forming resin the use of which would result from an additional selection by the skilled person, cannot be held to be directly and unambiguously disclosed in the earlier application as filed.

3.10 The disclosure of the examples does not change this conclusion. Out of the large number of examples of the parent application there are only 5 which fall under the wording of claim 1 of the main request, namely Examples 5B, 6B, 6F, 6G and 6H. Each of them, however, concerns a very specific disclosure, as far as e.g. the kind of particles, their size (average primary particle size of 20 nanometers for the magnesium oxide particles), the kind of resin (a mixture of phenolic and poly(vinyl butyral) resin combined with an epichlorohydrin-bisphenol A resin in case of Examples 6G and 6H) and the kind of support are concerned, which can hardly be seen as generalisable to the combination in claim 1 of the main request. It is further noted that this analysis is independent on whether the support used in these examples is in view of evidence A2, A3, A4 and A5 aluminium or an aluminium alloy. Moreover, the appellant's argument that these examples provide better results in terms of corrosion protection of aluminum may be of interest for the question of inventive step, but is of no relevance for the fulfilment of the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC.

3.11 As pointed out in decision G 2/10 (supra, point 4.5.3 of the Reasons) it cannot be considered a principle that where an application discloses a general teaching and specific embodiments, groups thereof or areas, all other potential embodiments or intermediate generalisations falling within the ambit of the general teaching (but not as such disclosed in the application as filed) would thereby, by implication, inevitably also be disclosed. Whether the subject-matter defined now in claim 1 of the main request, which represents a restriction of the subject-matter of claim 1 of the parent application as filed or a generalisation of more specific embodiments disclosed therein, i.e. of Examples 5B, 6B, 6F, 6G and 6H, is directly and unambiguously derivable from the parent application as filed can only be decided having due regard to the circumstances of the present case.

3.12 The appellant, however, failed to show that the combination of options defined now in claim 1 of the main request would emerge in a direct and unambiguous manner in view of whole structure of the text of the parent application as filed, in particular when considering its claim 1 in the light of the application as a whole. The combination of features as defined in amended claim 1 is also not apparent in view of the examples, Examples 5B, 6B, 6F, 6G and 6H being not considered to be fairly representative of the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request over its full scope. Submissions made starting from any of these specific embodiments of the parent application as filed and explaining as to why a generalisation thereof based on the technical information contained in the parent application as filed would lead to the subject-matter of claim 1 in a direct and unambiguous manner were not provided either. Hence, also in view of the examples of the parent application as filed, it cannot be concluded that the subject-matter as defined in claim 1 of the main request was contemplated to the extent defined in that claim by the inventor of the parent application.

The underlying idea of Article 123(2) EPC is that applicants or patent proprietors shall not be allowed to improve their position by adding subject-matter not disclosed in the application as filed, since so doing would give them an unwarranted advantage and could be damaging to the legal security of third parties relying on the content of the original application (G 1/93, OJ EPO, 1994, 541, point 9 of the reasons for the decision). The same is valid for the requirement of Article 76(1) EPC, second sentence, having regard to the fact that this provision and that of Article 123(2) EPC serve the same purpose (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 9th edition 2019, II.F.2.1).

3.13 The primer and/or pretreatment coating composition of claim 1 was defined on filing of the parent application in a broad manner, its definition including as the sole structural features an adhesion promoting component and a corrosion resisting particles selected from (i) magnesium oxide particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 100 nanometers; (ii) particles comprising an inorganic oxide network comprising one or more inorganic oxides; and/or (iii) chemically modified particles having an average primary particle size of no more than 500 nanometers. Subsequently introducing some limits into claim 1 on the basis of preferences or options defined in the parent application as filed for the purpose of overcoming objections based on prior art revealed in proceedings before the EPO, is allowable in view of the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC subject to the condition that the parent application as filed reveals, at least implicitly in a direct and unambiguous manner the resulting specific combination of features.

Allowing the various restrictions introduced into present claim 1 without there being any - even implicit - indication in the parent application as filed that the combination of newly introduced features was envisaged would be unfair to third parties. In particular, it would give an applicant who filed a broad speculative claim an unwarranted advantage over other applicants who were the first to attribute any significance to a specific combination of features encompassed by said broad original claim, e.g. a specific combination of features falling within the ambit of present claim 1 which does not overlap with the examples of the parent application.

The underlying principle is that any invention for which protection is sought, i.e. in the specific form claimed, and which therefore is meant to provide a contribution to the art justifying for a specified time the right to exclude others from exploiting the invention, must have been made at the date of filing the application and be properly disclosed therein. As indicated in point 2.3.3 of the reasons for G 1/03 (OJ EPO, 2004, 413) "applicants deal with the state of the art of which they are aware (see Rule 27(1)(b) EPC)" (now Rule 43(1)(b) EPC) "and try to delimit the invention against it. For any further state of the art of which they are not aware, they draft fall-back positions for preferred (and more preferred) embodiments. In this way the invention as set out in the specification may appear like the skins of an onion and it becomes clear where the core of the invention is." Amending the subject-matter to address objections raised in view of prior art documents revealed in proceedings before the EPO is acceptable as long as a corresponding fall-back position can be considered to be disclosed in the application as filed. In the present case, the parent application as originally filed did not contain any fall-back position on the basis of which the combinations of features as presently claimed might be considered to be disclosed.

3.14 On this basis, claim 1 of the main request does not meet the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC. The main request is therefore not allowable.

Auxiliary request 1

4. Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 is identical to claim 1 of the main request. It follows therefore that auxiliary request 1 is not allowable either.

Auxiliary request 2 and 3

5. Claims 1 of auxiliary request 2 and auxiliary request 3 are identical. They correspond to claim 1 of the main request in which the metal substrate is defined to be selected from aluminum alloys. The restriction of the list of possible metal substrate from aluminum, aluminum alloys, zinc-aluminum alloys and aluminum plated steel to aluminum alloys does not change the above reasoning according to which the claimed subject-matter cannot only result from a triple selection within the whole content of the parent application as filed when using in combination the corrosion resisting particles and the substrates defined in operative claim 1, as well as a film-forming resin. This restriction also does not change the fact that Examples 5B, 6B, 6F, 6G and 6H cannot be considered to be fairly representative of the subject-matter of operative claim 1 over its full scope. On that basis, claims 1 of auxiliary request 2 and auxiliary request 3 do not comply with the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC either. These auxiliary requests are therefore not allowable.

Auxiliary requests 4 to 7

6. Auxiliary requests 4, 5, 6 and 7 correspond to the main request, auxiliary requests 1, 2 and 3, respectively, wherein in claims 1 of the latter requests the wording "(3) corrosion resisting particles comprising" had been replaced by "(3) corrosion resisting particles selected from". These auxiliary requests 4 to 7 which do not contain additional amendments were submitted with letter of 15 May 2020, i.e. after the summons to oral proceedings had been notified. This constitute an amendment to the appellant's appeal case, the admittance of which has to be considered at the Board's discretion under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, taking into account the provisions of Articles 24 and 25 RPBA 2020.

6.1 According to Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, any amendment to a party's case filed after a summons to oral proceedings shall, in principle, not be taken into account unless there are exceptional circumstances, which have been justified with cogent reasons by the party concerned. As apparent from the appellant's submissions, the filing of the auxiliary requests constitutes not only a legitimate, but a timely response to the additional objection raised by the Board in the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 dated 14 April 2020. The amendment introduced into these auxiliary requests does not go beyond amending the feature whose presence in the requests of higher ranking had been objected by the Board. These constitute in the Board's view exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 justifying to take into account the newly submitted auxiliary requests 4 to 7 into the proceedings.

6.2 Although it follows from the above point 2 that the replacement in claims 1 of the main request, auxiliary requests 1, 2 and 3 of the feature "corrosion resisting particles comprising" by the feature "corrosion resisting particles selected from" overcomes the separate objection against feature (3) of these claims 1, it also follows from above point 3 and the reasons indicated in points 3.1 to 3.13, 4 and 5 that this amendment is not suitable to overcome the finding that the subject-matter of claims 1 of the requests of higher ranking are not in keeping with the requirements of Article 76(1) EPC. Consequently, auxiliary requests 4 to 7 are not allowable either.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility