The tenth edition of the "Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO" is now available online
Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, tenth edition, July 2022
The tenth edition of the "Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO" provides a comprehensive overview of this case law. It contains summaries of or references to almost 8 000 decisions which were issued in writing in the period up to the end of 2021 and the most important cases from the beginning of 2022. It includes summaries of six additional decisions or opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal as well as extensive coverage of case law on the application of the revised Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA 2020).
The publication is available online, in HTML and PDF formats and contains links to the cited decisions and legal texts. For further information, visit the dedicated Case Law of the Boards of Appeal webpage.
The Boards of Appeal page on epo.org also offers an RSS feed for users who want to be informed about newly published decisions or information about the Boards of Appeal in general.
Carl Josefsson
President of the Boards of Appeal
Related items

BoA refers a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if it considers that a decision is required, in order to ensure uniform application of the law.

Because of COVID-19, the BoA has revised some measures regulating the arrangement and conduct of oral proceedings.

New Case Law publication containing summaries of decisions in the language of the proceedings now published

Annual conference shares recent BoA case law with the user community

The EBoA today issued decision G 2/21 and concluded that the term “plausibility” did not amount to a distinctive legal concept.

Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court on complaints against Boards of Appeal decisions
The German Federal Constitutional Court today published its decision on several constitutional complaints.

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Boards of Appeal have revised some of the measures regulating the arrangement and conduct of oral proceedings.

The Legal Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office issued the written reasons for its decision in case J 8/20.

Last year was again shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Boards of Appeal adapted their working methods to ensure access to justice.

New Case Law publication containing summaries of decisions in the language of the proceedings now published

BoA refers a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if a decision is required, in order to ensure uniform application of the law.

The Legal Board of Appeal confirmed the decisions to refuse the applications n which an artificial intelligence system was designated as the inventor.

BoA refers a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if it considers that a decision is required, in order to ensure uniform application of the law.

Because of COVID-19, the BoA has revised some measures regulating the arrangement and conduct of oral proceedings.

New Case Law publication containing summaries of decisions in the language of the proceedings now published

Annual conference shares recent BoA case law with the user community

The EBoA today issued decision G 2/21 and concluded that the term “plausibility” did not amount to a distinctive legal concept.

Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court on complaints against Boards of Appeal decisions
The German Federal Constitutional Court today published its decision on several constitutional complaints.

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Boards of Appeal have revised some of the measures regulating the arrangement and conduct of oral proceedings.

The Legal Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office issued the written reasons for its decision in case J 8/20.

Last year was again shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Boards of Appeal adapted their working methods to ensure access to justice.

New Case Law publication containing summaries of decisions in the language of the proceedings now published

BoA refers a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if a decision is required, in order to ensure uniform application of the law.

The Legal Board of Appeal confirmed the decisions to refuse the applications n which an artificial intelligence system was designated as the inventor.

BoA refers a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal if it considers that a decision is required, in order to ensure uniform application of the law.

Because of COVID-19, the BoA has revised some measures regulating the arrangement and conduct of oral proceedings.

New Case Law publication containing summaries of decisions in the language of the proceedings now published