Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0765/96 (Fluid composition/UNILVER) 19-10-2000
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0765/96 (Fluid composition/UNILVER) 19-10-2000

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2000:T076596.20001019
Date of decision
19 October 2000
Case number
T 0765/96
Petition for review of
-
Application number
90203209.3
IPC class
A23L 1/05
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 36.9 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Fluid composition

Applicant name
UNILEVER N.V., et al
Opponent name
Hercules Incorporated
Board
3.3.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 111 1973
European Patent Convention Art 138(1) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 139 1973
European Patent Convention R 87 1973
European Patent Convention R 57a 1973
Keywords

Main request - novelty - no

First auxiliary request - novelty -yes

Remittal to the first instance

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0550/88
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent No. 0 432 835, based on application No. 90 203 209.3 was granted with a set of eleven claims for the contracting states AT, BE, CH, DE, DK, ES, FR, GB, GR, IT, LI, NL and SE

Claim 1 as granted reads as follows:

"A process for preparing a fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, wherein a liquid containing the gelling agent is chemically set, whilst subjecting said liquid to sufficient shear to obtain a substantially less rigid composition than would have been obtained by chemically setting the liquid under quiescent conditions, wherein the composition comprises at least 75 wt% of the liquid and wherein either (a) the gelling agent comprises a gelling agent selected from the group consisting of pectin, iota-carrageenan, kappa-carrageenan, furcelleran and mixtures thereof, or (b) the gelling agent is alginate and the liquid containing the gelling agent is set at a temperature above 30 C."

II. Opposition was filed by the Respondent (Opponent) alleging lack of both novelty and inventive step under Article 100(a) EPC as well as insufficiency of disclosure under Article 100(b) EPC.

The following documents were cited during the opposition proceedings:

(1) US-A-2859115

(2) GB-A-1525123

(3) GB-A-2048642

(4) US-A-3804951

(5) EP-A-0271132

(6) EP-A-0011891

(7) GB-A-2035360

III. The Opposition Division decision of 25 June 1996, posted on 29 July 1996, revoked the patent under Article 102(1) EPC. The decision was based on the set of claims as granted.

The Opposition Division took the view that the process according to claim 1 lacked novelty in the light of Example 1 of document (4).

More particularly it was held that Example 1 clearly indicated that the liquid containing 98.9% weight parts of water, kappa-carrageenan and potassium citrate was subjected to stirring and agitation in order to obtain an elastic interrupted gel having an extremely high viscosity and that accordingly the liquid was also chemically set. In the absence of any definition of what was meant by "sufficient shear" in claim 1, the Opposition Division concluded that the process of Example 1 of document (4) led to the same "substantially less rigid composition" as required by claim 1.

IV. The Appellant (Proprietor Unilever N.V.) lodged an appeal against the said decision. In response to the grounds of appeal the Respondent inter alia referred to document (7) and raised an objection for lack of novelty of claim 8 as granted.

Oral proceedings took place on 6 August 1999 during which for the first time the Respondent referred to document

(8) EP-A-0355908 cited under Article 54(3) EPC in the European search report.

Since document (8) was only discussed before the Examining Division but was not referred to by the parties in the opposition and appeal proceedings, the Appellant requested that the case be remitted to the first instance if the Board considered this prior art relevant to the novelty of the subject-matter of the patent in suit. After deliberation by the Board the Chairman announced that the proceedings were to be continued in writing.

V. In a communication dated 28 September 1999, the Board indicated inter alia that Example 4 in document (8) appeared to be prejudicial to the novelty of each of the product claims on file, except for those of the contracting state DK. In response the Appellant filed on 8 December 1999 a new main request and five auxiliary requests, each request including a separate set of claims for the contracting state Denmark DK.

Claim 7 of the main request for the contracting states other than DK reads as follows:

"Fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, at least part of which gelling agent has been chemically set, wherein the chemically set gelling agent is predominantly present as microgels having a mean equivalent diameter of less than 100 micrometer, preferably of less than 50 micrometer, wherein either (a) the chemically setting gelling agent comprises pectin, and/or (b) the microgels are irregularly shaped."

Claim 1 of the two sets of claims of the first auxiliary request is the same for all designated contracting states and reads as follows:

"A process for preparing a fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, wherein a liquid containing the gelling agent is chemically set by combining two separate streams, one containing the gelling agent and another containing the cation, whilst subjecting said liquid to sufficient shear to obtain a substantially less rigid composition than would have been obtained by chemically setting the liquid under quiescent conditions, wherein the composition comprises at least 75 wt% of the liquid and wherein either (a) the gelling agent comprises a gelling agent selected from the group consisting of pectin, iota-carrageenan, kappa-carrageenan, furcellaran and mixtures thereof, or (b) the gelling agent is alginate and the liquid containing the gelling agent is set at a temperature above 30 C."

Claim 7 of the first auxiliary request for the contracting states other than DK reads as follows:

"Fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, at least part of which gelling agent has been chemically set, wherein the chemically set gelling agent is predominantly present as microgels having a mean equivalent diameter of less than 100 micrometer, preferably of less than 50 micrometer, wherein the chemically setting gelling agent comprises pectin."

Claim 7 of the first auxiliary request for the contracting state DK reads as follows:

"Fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, at least part of which gelling agent has been chemically set, wherein the chemically set gelling agent is predominantly present as microgels having a mean equivalent diameter of less than 100 micrometer, preferably of less than 50 micrometer, wherein the chemically setting gelling agent comprises a gelling agent selected from the group consisting of pectin, iota-carrageenan, furcelleran and mixtures thereof."

Claim 10 of the two sets of claims of the first auxiliary request is the same for all designated contracting states and reads as follows:

"10. Process for preparing a spread containing from 5 to 60 wt.% fat, including the admixture of fat with the fluid composition according to any of claims 7-9."

VI. The Appellant submitted that the current interpretation of Article 54(3) EPC was that national rights of earlier date had no effect on the patentability of European patents since they were not comprised in the state of the art.

Regarding the disclosure of the prior art, the Appellant argued inter alia that according to the method of the patent in suit gelation started immediately upon the combination of the gelling agent and the cation and that neither of documents (4) and (8) disclosed the chemical setting of a gel by combining two separate streams whilst applying shear, and hence novelty of the process claims containing such setting of a gel was given.

Document (8) exclusively concerned thermally reversible gels and therefore neither the indication of pectin in a list of gelling agents was sufficient information to disclose its use to obtain a chemically set gel nor the reference to the optional use of ion sources such as salts in the composition of document (8) disclosed pectin in combination with a salt which allowed chemical setting of the gel. Moreover, since there was no disclosure in document (8) of a chemically set gelling agent present in the form of microgels irregularly shaped, the fluid composition of the patent in suit was clearly novel over this prior art.

VII. Document (8) clearly disclosed that examples of gelling polysaccharides capable of forming reversible gels were agar, carrageenan, furcelleran, gellan and pectin and that the microgels of its fluid composition might be of a spherical or irregular shape. The mere fact that no specific example in document (8) made use of pectin did not preclude this prior art constituting an anticipatory document. As a consequence, in the Respondents view, at least claim 7 of the main request and first auxiliary requests, claims 1 and 8 of the second and third auxiliary request and claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request all lacked novelty in the light of the disclosure of document (8).

The Respondent submitted that the worked examples of the patent in suit did not show that gelification took place immediately after mixing the gelling agent and the cation and that therefore the process claims of each request had to be construed as encompassing the possibility of combining the streams of gelling agent and cation and only subsequently chemically setting the combined stream whilst subjecting it to shear. Accordingly, the process claims of the various requests lacked novelty with respect to both document (4) and document (8).

In order to show lack of novelty of the claimed process, the Respondent sought to introduce two further documents US-A-3185576 and US-A-3978243 into the appeal proceedings.

The Respondent contested these arguments and inter alia took the view that the filing of a separate set of claims for the contracting state Denmark DK was unjustified since document (8) had a Danish equivalent and Danish law had a provision which corresponded to Article 54(3) EPC.

VIII. In the communication dated 28 September 1999, the Board had indicated that the parties and the subject of the proceedings regarding patentability of the claimed subject matter remained the same and that accordingly it could not be expected that the Appellant's request for further oral proceedings would be allowed.

IX. The Appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained either on the basis of the main request or on the basis of one of the five auxiliary requests filed on 8 December 1999.

In case in which not all the requests could be considered to be novel over any of the documents cited, further oral proceedings were requested.

The Respondents requested that the appeal be dismissed.

As an auxiliary request further oral proceedings were requested.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. Main request for contracting states other than DK

2.1. Amendments

Claim 7 of this request comprises the broadest scope of protection and is based on claims 10 and 11 originally filed in combination with page 7, lines 9 to 23, of the description originally filed and corresponds to claim 8 as granted. Accordingly the requirements of Article 123 EPC are fulfilled.

2.2. Novelty

Document (8) relates to liquid-based compositions comprising at least one gelling polysaccharide capable of forming a reversible gel. Examples of such gelling polysaccharides are agar, carrageenan, furcelleran, gellan and pectin. The gelling polysaccharides are predominantly present in the composition as microgels having a mean equivalent diameter of less than 100 micrometer, preferably of less than 50 micrometer. According to Figures 1 and 2, the microgels of the composition are of a spherical or irregular shape. The composition can also contain materials which have the effect of modifying the gel-melting and setting temperature, for example ion sources such as salts, which have a strong influence on the gel-melting and setting point (see particularly page 2, lines 1/2, 4/5 and 14/15, page 4, lines 8/9, page 5, lines 44 to 47, as well as Figures 1 and 2).

Example 4 on pages 7/8 specifies components and a formulation according to the general teaching of document (8) referred to above. The liquid based composition of said example contains 1.3% carrageenan (kappa /iota carrageenan 70/30), 0.41% sodium chloride, 1.05% potassium sorbate and the balance deionised water. The carrageenan and the salts are dissolved in the deionised water at 80 C and then heated to 95 C. Subsequently the solution is cooled while applying shear in order to produce a thick pumpable liquid.

2.3. Even when taking into account the Appellant's submission that gel formation in a chemical setting process is extremely sensitive to the type of ingredients and relationship of the amounts of each of the components, particularly the cation and gelling-agent content present in the mixture to be gelled, the Board is convinced that in the final product of said Example 4 of document (8) with 1.05% potassium sorbate in the formulation, at least part of the gelling agent has been chemically set as required for the product of claim 7 of the main request.

2.4. On page 6, line 56, of document (8) it is clearly indicated that "the invention is further illustrated by means of the following examples". Accordingly, since the invention of document (8) clearly relates to liquid-based compositions with the gelling agent predominantly being present in the composition as microgels having a mean equivalent diameter of less than 100 microns (see claim 1), the Board is convinced that the final product of Example 4 of document (8) also contains the size of microgels as required for the product of claim 7 of the main request.

It is also demonstrated by Figures 1 and 2 of document (8) that it is not possible to distinguish the microgels of claim 7 from those disclosed in document (8) by a vague term such as "irregularly shaped".

Moreover, in the absence of any clear definition of the expression "at least part of which gelling agent has been chemically set" in claim 7, the chemically set "part" of the gelling agent cannot be accepted as a feature delimiting the claimed product over the prior art disclosure.

In the light of these facts the Board can only conclude that at least for alternative "(b)" the subject matter of claim 7 of the main request for the contracting states other than DK lacks novelty over the disclosure of document (8).

2.5. Since at least one claim of the main request does not fulfil the requirements of the EPC the whole request, including the set of claims for DK, must fail.

3. Auxiliary request 1 for contracting state DK

3.1. Admission into the proceedings

The present sets of claims for the contracting state Denmark DK were filed in response to an objection under Article 54(3) EPC raised for the first time during the appeal proceedings. In the circumstances of the present case, the filing of such requests containing separate claims for the contracting states other than DK, which by means of amendments are deemed to be delimited over the state of the art under Articles 54(3) and (4) EPC, namely document (8) and claims for DK, which by other amendments are deemed to be delimited over each of the other prior art under Articles 54(1) and (2) EPC, can be regarded as admissible under Rules 87 and 57a EPC.

Having regard to the outcome of decision T 550/88 (OJ 1992, 117) clearly stating

- "that the effect of a prior national right upon a European patent is a matter purely for national law"

and that

- "the combined effect of Article 138 (1) and 139 EPC is to provide an additional possible ground of revocation under national laws based upon the existence of a prior national right which is not available under Article 54 EPC",

the Respondent's argument that the amendments to the claims for the different contracting states are unjustified because of the fact that there exists a Danish application equivalent to document (8) must fail.

3.2. Amendments

Independent claim 1 can be derived from claims 1 and 2 originally filed in combination with page 4, line 28, up to page 5, line 2, of the description originally filed and claim 1 as granted in combination with page 3, lines 10 to 12, of the description as granted; dependent claims 2 to 6 correspond to dependent claims 3 and 4 and 6 to 8 as originally filed and dependent claims 2 and 3 and 5 to 7 as granted.

Independent product claim 7 is based on claims 10 and 11. originally filed and claim 8 as granted. Dependent claims 8 and 9 correspond to dependent claims 12 and 13 as originally filed and 9 and 10 as granted.

Process claim 10 corresponds to claim 14 originally filed and claim 11 as granted.

Accordingly, the requirements of Article 123(2) and (3) EPC are fulfilled.

3.3. Clarity of claim 1 and its interpretation

Regarding the Respondent's clarity objections to the process for preparing a fluid composition as set out in claim 1, it is to be noted that combining two separate streams of different reactants whilst subjecting the liquid to sufficient shear to obtain a reaction product is a unit operation well known to those skilled in the field of process engineering. Moreover, dependent claim 5 originally filed and dependent claim 4 as granted relate to this process feature. In these circumstances the objection under Article 84 EPC regarding the amendments of claim 1 is not justified.

Furthermore, in the absence of experimental counter evidence it must be regarded credible on the basis of common general knowledge about the law of chemical equilibrium that gelation under conditions as required by claim 1 at least starts upon combining the cation and the gelling agent, and consequently the liquid containing the gelling agent at least begins to be chemically set when combined, even if such gelation is not expressly mentioned in the working examples.

Process claim 1 does not require completion of chemically setting immediately after mixing the gelling agent and the cation.

The Board sees no reason to give the wording of claim 1 an interpretation other than its normal understanding in the specific technical field.

3.4. Novelty

When deciding in the light of the facts on file on the question of novelty of the product of claim 7, it is to be noted that except for the deletion of the gelling agent "kappa-carrageenan" and of the feature that " the microgels are irregularly shaped", claim 7 corresponds to claim 8 as granted.

In consideration of the specific wording of claim 7, namely

"Fluid composition containing a chemically setting gelling agent, ..... , wherein the chemically setting gelling agent comprises a gelling agent selected from .... iota-carrageenan ... ",

document (7), in particular Example II which was already cited by the Respondent against the novelty of claim 8 as granted, remains relevant also for the novelty of claim 7 of the first auxiliary request for the contracting state DK.

3.5. According to said Example II carrageenan is used as gelling agent. Since it is, however, well known in the art that carrageenan must be regarded as a generic term of natural products and since document (7) does not disclose gelling agents other than carrageenan claim 7 of auxiliary request 1 for contracting state DK specifying iota-carrageenan is recognised novel.

3.6. The same reasoning applies to document (6), page 4, lines 33/34, in combination with claims 1 and 5 of this document.

Document (6) discloses in addition to carrageenan, gelatin, agar and alginate gelling agents, none of which is comprised in claim 7 as one of the obligatory components.

3.7. The other documents cited during the proceedings -documents (1) to (5) and the two documents US-A-3185576 and US-A-3978243 which the Respondent sought to introduce into the appeal proceedings do not disclose microgels having a mean equivalent diameter as claimed. In the light of these facts the novelty of claim 7 can be acknowledged.

3.8. In the light of the clear technical meaning of the wording of process claim 1 as set out under point 4.2 above, the prior art cited during the proceedings, although disclosing the possibility of carrying out gelification in a fluid composition by a continuous process (see for example document (7), page 1, lines 40 ff), cannot be construed as relating to a process for chemically setting a gelling agent under shear conditions with a cation by combining two separate streams, one containing the gelling agent and another containing the cation. The Respondent did not show such disclosure and did not prove that in the process of the patent in suit as now claimed chemically setting of the gelling agent does not start immediately after combining the two separate streams of the reactive components.

The Respondent's reference to document US-A-3978243, column 3, lines 56 to 60, stating that the stabilised sour milk product is preheated to a temperature in the range 50 C to 80 C to avoid gelation as the two components are mixed, must fail since the whole teaching of this prior art is to carry out specific measures in order to avoid gelification of the reactants which otherwise would take place.

Accordingly, the novelty of claim 1 can be acknowledged.

3.9. Process claim 10 includes the fluid composition of claim 7 which, as set out under point 4.4 above, can be regarded novel over the cited prior art.

3.10. Since in the European patent application published as document (8) the contracting state DK is not designated this document cannot be taken into account as prior art, and therefore the whole set of claims for DK can be regarded as novel in the light of the rest of the cited prior art.

4. Auxiliary request 1 for contracting states other than DK

4.1. Since the set of claims 1 to 10 of this request consists of the process claims 1 to 6 for DK and product claims 7 to 9 and the same process claim 10 including the product of claim 7, and since the product claims are more restricted than the product claims for the contracting state DK, it is in principle only necessary to discuss novelty of the claimed subject-matter in the light of the disclosure of document (8) under Article 54(3) EPC.

4.2. The disclosure of document (8) is analysed in detail under points 3.2 to 3.4 above for claim 7 of the main request.

In addition to 3.2 to 3.4 above, it is to be noted that document (8) does not contain any working example using pectin as gelling agent and indicates only that "the composition according to the invention can contain materials which have the effect of modifying the gel melting and setting temperature, for example ion sources such as salts, which have a strong influence on the gel melting and setting point", in other words, the general teaching of document (8) indicates only optionally the presence of ion sources. Moreover, document (8) contains both working examples with and without components capable of releasing metallic cations necessary for chemically setting at least part of the gelling agent.

4.3. Regarding the process for preparation of the liquid composition of document (8), it is clearly set out on page 7, lines 39 to 41, of this document that carrying out the process by continuously passing a (pre-heated) stream of gelling polysaccharide containing liquid through one or more cooling and shearing units is preferred. Document (8), however, does not teach combining two separate streams of the gelling agent and the cation in a manner as required by claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 for contracting states other than DK.

Accordingly, the whole set of claims for contracting states other than DK can be regarded as novel over the cited prior art.

5. Since the subject-matter of the claimed process of the only request forming a basis for the decision of the Opposition Division lacked novelty over at least one document, in the absence of auxiliary requests, the Opposition Division correctly decided not to examine whether the requirements of Article 56 EPC have been met.

Since the matter of inventive step was also not dealt with in the proceedings before the Board, it appears appropriate for the Board to exercise its powers under Article 111 EPC and to remit the case to the Opposition Division, so as not to deprive the parties of two instances for completion of examination of the amended claims.

In these circumstances it does not appear appropriate to take a final decision on the relevance of the two new documents US-A-3185576 and US-A-3978243 for the assessment of inventive step.

6. Regarding the Respondent's request for further oral proceedings, it is to be noted that the Respondent, by submitting document (8) at a very late stage of the appeal proceedings, namely at the beginning of the oral proceedings before the Board, prevented the Board from taking a final decision in the present case and consequently caused the proceedings to be delayed and prosecuted in writing.

In this context the Respondent's attention is drawn to Article 116(1) EPC according to which "The European Patent Office may reject a request for further oral proceedings before the same department where the parties and the subject of the proceedings are the same" (see point VIII above).

Moreover, the new sets of claims now on file clearly represent a reasonable reply of the Appellant to the content of document (8). These sets of claims forming a basis for this decision were filed on 8 December 1999 and both parties had ample opportunity to discuss the subject-matter of the new claims in written form. The present decision is not a final decision on the validity of the patent and there will be opportunity for both parties to have further oral proceedings before the first instance (see point 6 above). Therefore, it does not seem appropriate to hold further oral proceedings at the present stage before the Board.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to continue the proceedings on the basis of "Auxiliary Request 1" filed on 8 December 1999.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility