Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0298/87 23-02-1989
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0298/87 23-02-1989

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T029887.19890223
Date of decision
23 February 1989
Case number
T 0298/87
Petition for review of
-
Application number
83200938.5
IPC class
C11D 3/39
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
-

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 668.4 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Bleaching compositions

Applicant name
The Procter & Gamble Company
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention Art 111 1973
Keywords

Inventive step/decision not supported by the reasoning

amended claim having formal deficiencies - remittal

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
T 0167/93
T 0110/00
T 0167/93
T 0167/93
T 0167/93

I. European patent application No. 83 200 938.5, published on 11 January 1984 under publication No. 98 021 was refused by a decision of the Examining Division dated 24 March 1987. The decision was based on Claims 1 to 10 as filed with the letter of 3 October 1985. Claim 1 after correction of three obvious errors was as follows:

"A laundry detergent composition for use in domestic automatic washing machines comprising:

a) from 1% to 30% by weight of the composition of a surfactant system comprising a mixture of anionic, ethoxylated nonionic and optionally cationic surfactants; b) from 1% to 60% of a peroxygen bleaching compound capable of yielding hydrogen peroxide in an aqueous solution; and c) from 0.5% to 40% of a bleach activator having the general formula:

(FORMULA) wherein R is an alkyl group containing from 5 to 18 carbon atoms wherein the longest linear carbon chain extending from and including the carbonyl carbon contains from 6 to 10 carbon atoms and L is a leaving group, the conjugate acid of which has a pKa in the range of from 6 to 13; wherein the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide yielded by (b) to bleach activator (c) is greater than 1.5."

II. According to the reasons for the decision, the subject- matter of Claim 1 did not involve an inventive step having regard to the prior art as represented by

(a) GB-A-864 798 and (b) EP-A-43 173.

The technical problem underlying the application in suit was that of selecting particularly efficacious bleaching compositions from the broad scope of document (a).

The compositions of the illustrative examples 9 and 10 of that document differed from those of the application insofar as (i) an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant was not comprised in the surfactant system and (ii) the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide yielded to bleach activator was about 1:1, i.e below 1.5.

The mere addition of an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant would have been an obvious measure in view of its well known reduced sudsing behaviour. As to the molar ratio of the components of the bleaching system document (a) did not teach that a variation of their molar proportions could affect the bleaching efficiency of the selected activators. Although there were no hints to use the indicated upper limits, the preferred range of 1/4 to 4 was to be taken as a direct indication that any molar ratio within this narrow range might be used. Thus the selected ratio for the bleaching composition was directly derivable from that prior art. A molar ratio of 4:1 would have been obvious taking into account also the possible activator decomposition during storage.

Example II of the application in suit, relating to the % conversion of bleach activator to percarboxylic acid at various molar ratios clearly showed that complete conversion was already achieved at molar ratios of the bleaching system of 1:1 with activators falling within the scope of document (a).

The bleach effect on dingy soils of the activators having a longer linear carbon chain had in any case been recognised in document (b) which disclosed bleach activators within Claim 1 of both the application in suit and document (a).

III. A Notice of Appeal was lodged by the Appellant on 1 June 1987 with payment of the fee on the same day. A Statement of Grounds was filed on 24 July 1987 together with a new set of Claims 1 to 6.

Claim 1 of the new set differs from the aforementioned version in that the leaving group L in the general formula under component (c) is further defined, following the phrase ".... the range of from 6 to 13...." by the wording:

".., the leaving group L having the formula

(FORMULA) wherein Y is -SO3-M+ or -COO-M+ and M is a cation which provides solubility to the bleach activator, preferably sodium, potassium or mixtures thereof;..."

IV. The Appellant has argued substantially as follows:

(i) document (a) was only concerned with the problem of the storage stability of the compositions and not with their efficacy; the claimed invention provided a solution to the problem of enhancing the yield of the desired peroxycarboxylic acids by a surface bleaching mechanism;

(ii) there was no recognition in document (a) of any performance difference between different members of the disclosed class of activators nor of a requirement for a high hydrogen peroxide to activator molar ratio for certain activator structures; document (a) in any case did not recognise the concept of dingy soil clean up;

(iii) the argument of "complete conversion" of certain members of the claimed activators already at molar ratios of 1:1, corresponding to the molar ratios exemplified in document (a), was inaccurate in view of the values actually quoted in the table on page 24 of the application in suit; as the incorporation of a nonionic surfactant did not enhance the bleaching efficacy, the demand for a comparison between the compositions of document (a) and similar compositions incorporating a nonionic surfactant was unjustified;

(iv) document (b), although referring to dingy soil clean up, dealt with a different kind of activator which was unsuitable for use with conventional anionic surfactants; it also failed to recognise a requirement for high molar ratios of hydrogen peroxide to activator; equimolar ratios were preferred; V. The Appellant requests that the decision of the Examining Division be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims submitted with the Statement of Grounds on 24 July 1987.

1. The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 64 EPC and is, therefore, admissible.

2. The application in suit relates to detergent bleach compositions that provide removal of stains and/or dingy soils from textiles by a peroxygen bleaching mechanism which takes place on the textile surface. In order to obtain a desirable level of bleaching performance at bleach solution temperatures below 60°C, when peroxygen bleaches normally become only partially effective or even ineffective, substances known as bleach activators are added, which render peroxygen bleaches more effective at lower temperatures.

3. Claims 1 to 10 filed on 10 October 1985 were refused by the Examining Division on the sole ground of lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC). In arriving at this conclusion, the Examining Division used as its starting point document (a), which it considered to be the closest state of the art. The Board will also consider the matter from this point of view.

4. Document (a) discloses detergent bleaching compositions which contain:

10 to 50% (by weight) of organic detergent; for instance an alkarylsulphonate or an alkylsulphate; from 1 to 15% of persalt, and from 2 to 30% of a bleach activator which is a solid reactive organic ester, the remainder being detergent adjuncts (cf. page 3, paragraph 2).

These compositions have strong bleaching properties at relatively low temperatures and are suitable for removing stains from textile materials (cf. page 1, line 10 and page 2, line 36). The bleach activator ester is derived preferably from an aliphatic carboxylic acid having not more than 10 carbon atoms and a phenolsulphonic or a hydroxybenzoic acid respectively (cf. Claim 8; page 2, paragraph 3). The free-flowing solid compositions contain the bleach activator as particles separate from the persalt, the size of the ester particles being such that at least 70% of the ester is retained on a 60 mesh British Standard sieve (cf. Claim 1). The molar ratio of the reactive ester to each atom of available oxygen is preferably from 1:4 to 4:1 (cf. page 2, lines 100-104).

The bleach activators of the examples have the formula p-RO-C6H4-SO3Na, R being acetyl (CH3CO), butyryl (C3H7CO), caproyl (C5H11CO) or caprylyl (C7H15CO), or p-CH3COOC6H4COOH (Examples 1-7; 8; 9; 10; 11). In the examples, the aforesaid molar ratio is about 1:1.

The tendency of the ester and persalt to decompose during storage in the presence of one another is reduced by using the ester in granular form (cf. page 2, lines 2-16).

5. The technical problem arising in respect of this state of the art was to provide a composition of enhanced bleaching efficiency.

5.1. The solution to this technical problem as set out in refused Claim 1 was a detergent composition comprising, briefly:

a) a particular surfactant system, i.e. a mixture of anionic, ethoxylated nonionic and optionally cationic surfactants; b) a peroxy compound, and c) a bleach activator of the formula RC(o)L, with R being an alkyl group wherein the linear carbon chain (including the carbonyl carbon) contains from 6 to 10 carbon atoms and L being a leaving group having a conjugate acid pKa from 6 to 13, d) the molar ratio of hydrogen peroxide yielded by b) to bleach activator c) being greater than 1.5 ("molar ratio" hereinafter meaning molar ratio H2O2/activator).

6. In addressing the issue of the decision under appeal, it has to be considered, whether the subject-matter claimed was obvious in the light of the cited prior art.

7. Starting out from document (a), the following inferences can be drawn by the skilled person:

(i) all the activators, whether they are derived from an aliphatic carboxylic acid with a long or a short carbon chain, are equally efficient as bleaching components; sodium p-acetoxybenzenesulphonate is preferred for economic reasons, although it is more unstable;

(ii) a "molar ratio" of 1:1 is optimal as illustrated in the examples;

(iii) the prime consideration in formulating the detergent compositions is that of storage stability by using activator granules of controlled particle size.

8. Document (b) relates to detergent products. The bleaching compositions therein comprise certain long chain acyl group-containing compounds which are said to promote or to augment the bleaching power of common peroxygen compounds thus providing highly effective, colour-safe bleaches especially suitable for use at relatively low laundering solution temperatures. Combined with detergents, the bleaching compositions are capable of concurrently delivering fabric bleaching and laundering benefits.

8.1. Such detergent formulations may comprise from: 1 to 50% by weight of a solubilizing surfactant and 1 to 60% by weight of a bleaching composition that is a hydrogen peroxide-yielding peroxygen compound and a bleach activator compound (Claim 10).

Detergent surfactants suitable for the above-mentioned purposes include in principle conventional nonionics (especially polyethylene oxide condensates of alkylphenols or aliphatic alcohols), ampholytic, zwitterionic and cationic surfactants and also - contrary to the Appellant's allegation - conventional anionic surfactants (page 12, para. 3, Claim 6; page 15, para. 3).

From the bleach activator compounds disclosed the preferred ones have the formula RC(o)Z, wherein R is a hydrocarbyl-lipophilic group containing from 5 to 13 carbon atoms (and additionally containing at least 2 oxyethylene groups if R contains more than 9 carbon atoms) and Z is a leaving group, having a pKa of from 5 to 20 and a molecular weight of less than 175, selected from certain enols, carbon acids and imidazoles. The more interesting activator compounds are those wherein R in the above formula includes no more than 9 carbon atoms and wherein Z is selected from the enols and carbon acids.

8.2. Activator compounds of the said structure have a sufficiently rapid rate of perhydrolysis to deliver the desired degree of peroxygen bleach activation, i.e. they are able quickly to react with the hydrogen peroxide in the laundering solution to form peroxyacids which, presumably in the form of a highly reactive oxygen - yielding radical are the species which provide enhanced bleaching activity relative to the unactivated peroxygen bleach. This rate determines the degree of bleach activation and this has been found to be highly dependent on the identity of the bleach activator compound.

In addition the relatively long chain substituent R is believed to enhance the fabric substantivity so that the bleaching species have sufficient surface activity to concentrate at the fabric surfaces where they are most effective (cf. page 10).

8.3. The bleaching compositions preferably contain the peroxygen compound and the bleach activator compound in approximately equimolar ratios (cf. page 11, para. 2).

The preferred bleach activator compounds are isopropenyl hexanoate C5H11COOC(:CH2)-CH3 and hexanoyl malonic acid diethylester, C5H11COCH(COOC2H5)2, the former being most preferred. In the working examples qualitatively excellent bleaching results are secured also on dingy soils.

8.4. The Examining Division when referring to document (b) did not identify any indication, whether in the general description or in the examples, that a variation of the molar ratio in the bleaching compositions towards higher H2O2 values would result in an improved bleaching performance. Nor did they look into the various types of bleach activators disclosed therein, especially those relevant to the application in suit having a conjugate acid pKa of 6-13 (which means a relatively high degree of acid character).

Thus neither of the documents considered, taken alone or in combination, has been shown to lead in an obvious manner to the subject-matter claimed especially as regards the "molar ratio" greater than 1.5 in association with the selected bleach activators.

8.5. As to the interpretation of the experimental data in the application in suit, the examples adequately demonstrate the significance of the critical parameters in relation to the technical problem as stated.

Example IV, for instance, shows that the dingy soil clean up is improved by using a claimed detergent-activator system once the "molar ratio" is raised into the claimed range above 1.5. This focusses on the effect of changing the crucial parameter "molar ratio" whilst keeping the other parameters constant. In the light of this there was no need to alter further parameters, such as the detergent system. Indeed the Examining Division itself considered the addition of a nonionic surfactant to be trivial and not to affect the bleaching efficiency (cf. decision, page 6, first two paragraphs).

Example II illustrates the additional percarboxylic acid formation (percent conversion, corresponding to enhanced bleaching efficiency) at a "molar ratio" higher than 1:1 for bleach activators falling within refused Claim 1 compared with those falling outside (cf. Table on page 24). The argument of "complete conversion" already at a "molar ratio" of 1:1 for claimed bleach activators is in contradiction with the figures given in that Table. The view taken by the Examining Division in this respect was therefore unjustified.

The Examining Division also adopted the position that the claimed "molar ratio" was directly derivable from document (a) having regard to the disclosure therein of the preferred "molar ratio" of from 4:1 to 1:4. This range is, however, disclosed generally in respect of all the bleach activators covered by that document and not specifically in relation to particular ones. Indeed, the skilled person could have hit upon the claimed "molar ratio" and the selected bleach activators simultaneously by chance or by extensive experimentation. Nevertheless, there was no incentive to do so and in the absence of any expectation of success one cannot assume that the practitioner would have made an effort in this area (cf. T 2/83 - OJ EPO 1984, 265).

Apart from this, the implication that losses of bleach activator through decomposition should be compensated by applying more, must be understood as pointing to a "molar ratio" below 1:1 and this leads rather away from what is claimed (cf. page 1, last paragraph page 2, first paragraph).

8.6. Accordingly the reasoning given in the decision under appeal does not support the finding under Article 56 EPC which led to refusal of the application. The decision under appeal must therefore be set aside.

9. Nevertheless, the application is to be prosecuted further on the basis of Claims 1 to 6 filed on 24 July 1987. Whilst it is appreciated that the amendments bring a further distinction over the leaving groups of document (b), and that the reasons given in the decision under appeal cannot be more effective against a narrower claim, no final position can be taken on the matter for the following reasons.

9.1. Claim 1 of this new set differs from Claim 1 as refused in that the bleach activator c) is more precisely defined by adding a limiting feature to the leaving group L (cf. Section III). This insertion finds support on page 10, paragraph 2 of the application as originally filed. It is therefore acceptable under Article 123(2) EPC. This is also true for the subsequent Claims 2 to 6 which correspond to original Claims 2, 3, 8, 9 and 11.

9.2. Feature a) of Claim 1, however, which relates to the particular surfactant system set out under Section 5.1 a) does not seem, on closer review, to meet the formal requirements of in Article 123(2) EPC. It was introduced during the examination procedure to remove an objection of lack of novelty and was tacitly accepted by the Examining Division.

As to the wording objected to, the Board is unable to trace any explicit disclosure at the places indicated by the Appellant in the originally filed documents. It is true that there is a list of surface active agents and mixtures thereof on page 13, third paragraph. However, no preference for any particular surface active agent or mixture of such agents appears to be expressed, let alone e.g. a mixture of anionic, ethoxylated nonionic and optionally cationic surfactants. In the relevant Examples nothing but certain detergent compositions containing some specific anionics, namely alkyl sulphates and alkyl benzene sulphonates, and specific nonionics, namely alkylpolyethoxylates (cf. Example III A) and specific cationics, namely alkyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (cf. Examples I, III B, VI) are mentioned. The general terms under consideration do not clearly arise directly from this information.

It therefore seems that feature a) has no sound basis in the original documents.

Apart from this, with features b) and c) the reference to the weight % is missing (Art. 84 EPC).

However, the amendments requested under Rule 88 EPC are clearly allowable as already indicated by the Examining Division (cf. Decision, paragraph 9).

10. It seems that a full examination of the matter of the amended claims is required, especially as regards Article 123 EPC, on which the decision under appeal is completely silent.

In these circumstances the Board deems it appropriate, making use of its powers under Article 111 EPC, to remit the case to the first instance, for further investigation.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the Examining Division for further prosecution.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility