Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0076/83 21-03-1985
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0076/83 21-03-1985

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1985:T007683.19850321
Date of decision
21 March 1985
Case number
T 0076/83
Petition for review of
-
Application number
79901012.9
IPC class
-
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
-

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 812.77 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Fibrous products and their manufacture

Applicant name
Lintrend Limited
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 54 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention R 67 1973
Keywords

Implied lack of novelty

Inventive step

Demonstration of effect

Causality of distinguishing feature to the effect

Reimbursement of appeal fee

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
T 0686/91

I. European patent application No. 79 901 012.9 filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) on 9 August 1979 and published on 20 March 1980 with the publication number WO 80/00463, for which the priorities of the prior applications on 15 August and 26 September 1978 (GB-33423/78 and 38156/78) are claimed, was refused by the decision of the Examining Division 024 of the EPO dated 14 December 1982. The decision was based on 15 claims. The main Claim 1, filed on 20 September 1982, had the following wording :

"1. A process for modifying the properties of a fibrous product comprising linen or ramie fibres, by contacting the product with strong alkali while the product is substantially free of resin or textile cross-linking agent under conditions such that the fibres can shrink by at least 10% in length and such that the product shrinks by at least 10%, and then cross-linking the product, characterised in that the product resulting from the contact with alkali is rinsed and is then reacted with a cellulose cross-linking agent in the presence of an acidic catalyst while the fibres are substantially in the said shrunk configuration, thereby fixing the fibres substantially in the said shrunk configuration."

II. The reason given for the refusal was that the subject-matter of the main claim did, not involve an inventive step. It was known from document (a), i.e. US-A-3 542 503, that the properties of fibrous cellulosic products could be modified by a process which used strong alkali while the product was substantially free from resin or textile cross-linking agents. The products included linen and ramie (col. 1, line 39). Although document (a) did not indicate the percentage of shrinkage, it was apparent that a shrinkage of more than 10% was achieved by virtue of the process conditions. Moreover, the product was thereafter rinsed and then reacted with a cellulose cross-linking agent whilst substantially in the shrunk configuration (cf. column 4, lines 52 to 55). The only difference between Claim 1 of the application under consideration and the process of document (a) was that an acid catalyst was used at cross-linking in the former process. It was, however, known from document (b), i.e. Mark, H. et. al. "Chemical Aftertreatment of Textiles", 1971, John Wiley and Sons, page 340, that such catalysts were generally suitable for such cross-linking processes of cellulosic fibres. The claimed process therefore lacked an inventive step.

III. The Applicant lodged an appeal against the decision of 14 December 1982 on 8 February 1983 paying the fee on 11 February 1983, and submitted a Statement of Grounds on 12 April 1983. In reply to objections raised by the Board, the Appellant submitted a new set of claims. An oral hearing was appointed and the Appellant amended this set by deleting Claim 16 in a letter dated 12 March 1985 (1st request).

Furthermore, the request to consider these claims was supplemented with auxiliary requests for relief in the same letter, relating to Claims 1 to 13 (2nd request), Claims 1 to 13 wherein Claim 1 was additionally limited to the features of Claim 4 (3rd request), Claims 1 to 13 wherein Claim 1 was additionally limited to the features of Claim 7 (4th request) and to any one of these requests subject to the further limitation to "linen", respectively. The main claim and the relevant Claims 4, 7, 14 and 15 of the 1st request are as follows :

1. A process for modifying the properties of a fibrous product comprising linen or ramie fibres, by contacting the product with strong alkali while the product is substantially free of resin or textile cross-linking agent under conditions such that the fibres can shrink by at least 10% in length and such that the product shrinks by at least 10%, and then cross-linking the product, characterised in that the contact with alkali is conducted for a time of more than 10 minutes and under conditions such that the resulting fibres appear substantially free of nodes when mounted in oil and observed at 125 magnification, and the product resulting from the contact with alkali is rinsed and is then reacted with a cellulose cross-linking agent in the presence of an acidic catalyst while the fibres are substantially in the said shrunk configuration, thereby fixing the fibres substantially in the said shrunk configuration.

4. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the catalyst is a non-phase separation catalyst.

7. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that, after fixing the fibres substantially in their shrunk configuration, the product is mercerised.

14. A fibrous product comprising linen or ramie fibres characterised in that the fibres, when mounted in oil and observed at 125 magnification, appear substantially free of nodes.

15. A product according to Claim 14 characterised in that the fibres have been reacted with a cellulose cross-linking agent.

IV. In his submissions the Appellant presented substantially the following arguments in support of the appeal :

a) The Examining Division wrongly interpreted document (a) as teaching that cotton, linen and ramie are similar in respect of chemical treatment. For linen no such treatment could be envisaged which would have provided wet crease resistance without embrittlement. This was the problem and the cited document gives no guidance as to how to solve it. The cited document only mentions linen and ramie once and exemplifies the process with cotton only. It also refers to rayon although this would be dissolved in alkali. In practice the treatment of linen and ramie with alkali must be conducted for more than 5 minutes, i.e. at least 10 minutes (cf. Claim 1). Otherwise the results are unsatisfactory.

b) As regards cross-linking, the use of an alkaline catalyst in accordance with document (a) gives inferior results. The replacement of this with an acid catalyst was unexpected in the circumstances, since the use of the residual alkali from the previous step was the basic idea of the cited art in order to simplify the process. The requirement in the process according to the patent in suit, for rinsing the material before further processing, is therefore an essential and important feature. The known method did not aim at the improvement of properties and provided no significant improvement in dry crease resistance. At best it improved wet crease resistance. The use of a non-phase separation catalyst (cf. Claim 4) eliminates the risk with conventional acid catalysts that they would migrate in the surface of the fibres and concentrate at the crown of the yarn, causing thereby a tendency towards embrittlement.

c) As far as the products are concerned (Claims 14 and 15), only soaking the fibre in alkali for more than 10 minutes removes the nodes from the linen. Any treatment for less than 5 minutes only causes insignificant denoding. The product has therefore novel features in comparison with anything obtainable with the process of document (a) which prescribes a treatment for 0.5 to 5 minutes. The result is a material with new physical properties. There is no hint in the cited art how to obtain such results.

V. The Appellant has also stated that he is also appealing against the decision of the first instance on procedural grounds. The alleged procedural violation lies in the unwillingness of the Examining Division to indicate at which level of subsidiary claims patentability could be recognized. It is submitted on behalf of the Appellant that unless there are reasoned objections against each of such claims the assumption must be that the combination of their subject-matter with those under objection should render the matter acceptable to the EPO, as satisfying the appropriate requirements. The result is that the final refusal was based on grounds on which the Applicant had not previously had a reasoned statement before, and that this must, according to the Appellant, amount to a gross procedural violation.

VI. The Appellant, although duly summoned, elected not to attend the oral hearing, which took place in his absence on 21 March 1985. The Appellant requests that the decision of the first instance be set aside and a European patent granted on the basis of Claims 1 to 15 or of one of the sets of claims specified in the auxiliary requests for relief. The reimbursment of the appeal fee is also requested.

1. The appeal complies with Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 64 EPC and is, therefore, admissible.

2. There is no formal objection to the current version of the main claim since it is adequately supported by the original disclosure (cf. original Claims 1 to 3, 8, 10 and 21 in conjunction with page 5, line 36 and page 9, lines 29 and 30). Claim 4 is based on page 9, lines 34 and 35, Claim 7 on original Claim 11, and Claims 14 and 15 on original Claims 20 and 21.

3. The relevant state of the art is, as recognized by the Examining Division, still represented by document (a), US-A-3 542 503. This describes the basic treatment of fibrous cellulosic products with strong alkali ("mercerisation") under minimum tension, in particular of cotton and also mentions linen and ramie as suitable for the purpose (col. 1, line 39). The process is carried out after scouring and bleaching of woven material (cf. Examples 1 to 4), i.e. in the absence of resin and cross-linking agents, in order to allow it to shrink. Subsequently the material is partially rinsed to remove most of the alkali and then cross-linked in the shrunk configuration under minimum tension in the presence of residual alkali as a catalyst. The purpose of the treatments is to obtain cellulosic textile materials with "excellent stretch properties and high level of wet-and-dry wrinkle resistance in a continuous sequence of finishing steps" (col. 2, lines 8 to 13). In addition (col. 2, lines 14 to 18), the process is economised by the elimination of certain steps, e.g. of the total removal of alkali by rinsing before cross-linking.

4. The problem to be solved in view of such state of the art was the attainment of improved properties (cf. page 2, lines 25 to 30 of the application), x.e. better wet crease resistance, expressed otherwise as wrinkle recovery, and also, allegedly, satisfactory handleability in connection with linen and ramie fibres, without significant embrittlement. The solution of the problem modified the known two-stage process of mercerisation and cross-linking by prolonging the time for the first stage to at least 10 minutes, introducing a complete rinsing step between the two stages, and carrying out the cross-linking in the presence of an acid catalyst.

5. The fibrous product comprising linen or ramie fibres appears to be substantially free of nodes at a certain magnification (Claim 14). This is after mercerisation alone, since the further product of cross-linking by any method is only a subsidiary aspect (Claim 15). The closest state of the art is the inevitable outcome of the specific mercerisation step according to document (a) whenever linen or ramie is used as starting material (col. 1, line 39) for the treatment with strong alkali (col. 2, lines 19 to 28 and 58 to 63). The state of the art suggests a time from 0.5 to 5 minutes for the treatment, against the 10 minutes recommended by the application under appeal. The other conditions for mercerisation are substantially identical (e.g. 10 to 30% sodium hydroxide at 18 to 20°C in (a), col. 3, lines 48 to 61, against the preferred 20 to 30% sodium hydroxide below 30°C in Claim 2 of the present application). The question arises whether or not the outcome of mercerisation is substantially identical in the two documents, i.e. whether the products claimed in the present application are novel.

6. The decision of the Board of Appeal in case T 12/81, ("Diastereomers/BAYER" OJ. 8/1982, 296) established that products of adequately defined specific processes are to be considered as part of the state of the art, even if their structural characteristics are not mentioned in a publication. Indication of a particular starting material and a definite process are sufficient in this respect. The suggestion that linen is a suitable starting material for the mercerisation stated in document (a) and the expressly suggested end-point of a range (5 minutes) to obtain sufficient shrinkage would, in the opinion of the Board, doubtlessly enable the skilled person to follow the instructions and provide the linen resulting after the treatment. Only if such conditions would not necessarily remove substantially all nodes could Claim 14 to a node-free linen be considered as novel in the circumstances.

7. Since the present Applicants repeatedly recommended 5 minutes as adequate treatment time for the mercerisation step (page 5, line 36 and page 6, line 24), the presumption prevails that this is in reality sufficient in the circumstances. It was also apparent that when the main claim was effectively limited to "more than 10 minutes processing time, the letter accompanying the amendment, dated 8 June 1984, still referred to time "usually more than 5 minutes" (page 3, line 17) which is hardly different from the state of the art. In view of T 12/81, "Diastereomers/BAYER" (Ibid), a mere formal test for novelty, relying on the disclosure of all relevant features of the claim alone, may be inadequate, and must be supplemented with an inquiry as to the real identity of matter at hand whenever appropriate. The onus was therefore on the Appellant to show that the limitation is technically meaningful, i.e. causal to the effect and therefore distinguishing (cf. also T 192/82, "Moulding compositons/BAYER", OJ. 9/1984, 415, Headnote III).

8. The Appellant has not submitted any evidence in the proceedings to refute the presumption that the treatment for 5 minutes according to the state of the art would also remove the nodes from linen and thereby anticipate the claim. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the subject-matter of Claim 14 therefore lacks novelty, and the same must apply to Claim 15, which relates to the cross-linked further product prepared by any known method, including that of the cited art using an alkali catalysed reaction. Since Claims 1 to 15 were presented together for decision, there is no need to consider the subject-matter of independent Claim 1. No partial decisions are possible and the 1st request must be rejected in its entirety.

9. The subject-matter of the main process Claim 1 of the set of Claims 1 to 13 (2nd request) is distingushed from the specific two-stage processes described in document (a) inasmuch as it relates inter alia to a cross-linking step in the presence of an acid catalyst. Since only alkali catalysed cross-linkings of cellulosic fibres are suggested in document (a), novelty of processes according to Claim 1 and dependent Claims 2 to 13 can be recognized in respect of this citation. The same conclusion applies relative to document (b), cited in prosecution, which discloses the general use of acid catalysts for the purposes of cross-linking, without mentioning, however, mercerised linen or ramie specifically.

10. The question of inventive step with regard to the process claims in question must be considered in the light of the problem to which the invention relates and the results achieved thereby. Since document (a) is also concerned with the problem of achieving wet crease resistance, i.e. wrinkle resistance, any improvement achieved in this respect is relevant and must be considered as the real problem facing the inventor. In view of the general statements in the cited art, a degree of crease resistance must be assumed to be provided with any variant described in or implied by the document. Results with cotton only were tabulated (col. 6) showing improvements with regard of both dry and wet "wrinkle recoveries" with this material. Nevertheless, some yet undisclosed degrees of recovery must also be assumed to be the case for linen and ramie, the other recommended starting materials for the same treatment. The unexpected character of the outcome of the modifications according to the present application could have been demonstrated by comparative tests against the closest product in the state of the art which is linen treated under the conditions of document (a), but no evidence has been submitted in the proceedings (cf. Statement of Grounds, page 6).

11. Since the possibility of the effective removal of nodes in a 5 minute treatment with alkali cannot be dismissed, the corresponding other consequences of mercerisation must also be presumed to be similar and no better. The use of an acid catalyst in the cross-linking stage, instead of alkali of the cited art, would not necessarily change the character of the product since the catalyst itself contributes nothing to the structure of the product. Again, in the absence of any comparisons virtual identity of results must be assumed with no unexpected effect justifying an inventive step.

12. Document (b) established that the use of acid catalysts was known and preferred for the purpose, and any one of those recommended for cross-linking cellulosic fibres could be considered as obviously suitable in this respect. The statements in the examples in the application that a wet crease recovery angle of about 130° was achieved and that the recovery was "high" cannot in themselves be accepted as surprising in this respect, in view of the general expectation created by document (a). The rinsing step, another allegedly distinguishing feature, is simply predetermined by the subsequent use of an acid catalyst after alkaline conditions were employed in the previous stage. The suggestion that this resulted in a better control of the catalyst quantity is neither unexpected nor necessarily relevant since it is not known or disclosed by the Appellant to what extent the reaction is dependent on the quantity of the catalyst.

13. The Appellant also emphasized in his submissions that handleability is an important second property which is indicative of good results. Unfortunately, since this attribute is necessarily "rather subjective and there is little point in trying to quantify" the same, the Appellant has taken the attitude that his statements "must be accepted as true" (cf. letter dated 12 March 1985, page 4). The Board has already emphasized in cases T 01/80, ("Carbonless copying paper/BAYER" OJ. 7/1981, 206) and T "20/81, ("Aryloxybenzaldehydes/SHELL", OJ. 6/1982, 217) that "the technical problem must be based on objective criteria" and "advantages, which are relevant to the definiton of the problem and hence to the inventive step, must be supported by sufficient evidence where comparison is made with the pertinent prior art". In absence of actual submissions no surprising consequences of modifications of the known process were demonstrated. It appears that there is no way to establish an improvement in respect of "handleability" in an objective manner at all. In view of the above, the resulting process defined in Claim 1 is obvious to the skilled person. No patentability can therefore be recognized for Claims 1 to 13 (2nd request).

14. The main Claim 1, when limited to the subject-matter of Claim 4 (3rd request for relief), would be restricted to a cross-linking acid catalyst which is of the non-phase separation type. Allegedly, the use of this preferred variant avoids the tendency towards embrittlement (cf. letter dated 8 June 1984; page 2, third full paragraph).

According to the Appellant, conventional acid catalysts have a tendency to migrate towards the surface of the fibres and to concentrate at the crowns of the yarn. A non-phase separation catalyst eliminates this tendency and thereby the tendency towards embrittlement.

Nothing supports this particular effect of non-phase separation catalysts in the disclosure itself, apart from an express statement of preference for such means. Example 3 which alone used a triethylene glycol citric acid polyester falling into the category provides material with "a weft stretch of about 16%" after a second mercerisation which follows cross-linking. Since the provision of wet-and-dry crease resistance without embrittlement was already known to represent somewhat incompatible or contrary requirements (cf. Statement of Grounds, page 5), there is no independent property or part-effect involved. (cf. also T 69/83, "Thermoplastic moulding compositions/BAYER", OJ. 8/1984, p. 357, Headnote II).

15. In such circumstances a comparison with the closest state of the art, i.e. the use of an alkaline catalyst, may have shown a surprising improvement. Alternatively, the discovery of an unexpected problem with ordinary acid catalysts might have been demonstrated in support of the contention that the expected effect had some undesirable deficiency which could then be removed under certain conditions in an unexpected manner. In the absence of demonstrating a distinction in this respect against the state of the art, the choice of the suggested specific non-phase separation catalysts remains obvious on the basis of expectancy of equivalent performance.

No patentable subject-matter can therefore be recognized for Claim 1 incorporating Claim 4 and the 3rd request for relief must also be rejected. Since this request, as well as the ones hereinbefore considered, have also been found unacceptable whenever linen was the treated fibre, a limitation to this particular material, as suggested in the 5th request, cannot impart patentability either.

16. The restriction of Claim 1 with the subject-matter of Claim 7 (4th request for relief) extends the process with a second mercerisation step after the cross-linking stage. The Board has no knowledge from the Search Report or other documents submitted during prosecution about any disclosure of such an additional step in relation to linen and ramie. Some cross-linked fabrics from these materials are alleged in the application to benefit from such further treatment which may improve its extensibility and therefore the resistance to tear and abrasion in particular in a tightly woven state (page 10, second paragraph). This matter raises questions which have not yet been examined. In the absence of a considered view by the Examining Division, the Board cannot in the circumstances refuse the request based on claims which incorporate such subject-matter and makes use of its power under Article 111(1) EPC to remit the case to the Examining Division for further prosecution.

17. As regards the alleged procedural violation by the Examining Division, the history of the prosecution fails to support the detailed contentions in the statement of appeal. The Appellant's assumption (cf. Statement of Grounds page 1, third paragraph) that the absence of specific objections to subsidiary claims renders them automatically suitable for validating independent claims by incorporation, is wrong and unjustified. As long as the application fails to comply with the requirement of the Convention for reasons of deficiencies in one or more of the claims, the Examining Division may refuse the grant if is sees no progress towards removing the ground of objection (cf. T 84/82, "Chloral derivatives/ MACARTHYS"; OJ. 11/1983, 451-458).

18. Whilst the Examining Division may indicate possible avenues for removing objections, this is discretionary and not an unqualified obligation on its part. Principally, the initiative must come from the Applicant to indicate which claims, including alternative sets thereof, they wish to prosecute to grant. The independent claims submitted in the prosecution of the present application represented no patentable subject-matter, and the incorporation of some of the features from subsidiary claims were no real answers to the objections. The Appellant's argument that Claim 3 would have been an acceptable basis for amendment and that there was a failure to object to such a move on the part of the Examining Division, is unacceptable. It was made clear in the first communication of the Examining Division that the feature in question, the freedom from nodes, is a direct outcome of the process and cannot, as such, contribute to the inventive step. No new main claim was presented to the Examining Division before the refusal. It is therefore the view of the Board that it was rather a misconception, on the part, of the Appellant, of the legal situation and of the intrinsic deficiencies of the case than any procedural violation, which inevitably led to a refusal of the application in the third communication. No reimbursement of the appeal fee is therefore justified.

Order

ORDER

It is decided that

1. The decision of the Examining Division of 14 December 1982 is set aside.

2. The application is remitted to the Examining Division for further substantive examination on the basis of Claims 1 to 13 originally submitted with letter of 8 June 1984 wherein Claim 1 is also limited to the features of Claim 7, with or without the further limitation to "linen", as requested in letter dated 12 March 1985, page 1, paragraphs 6 and 7.

3. The appeal insofar as it relates to requests based on unamended Claims 1 to 15 or 1 to 13, or 1 to 13 wherein Claim 1 is additionally limited to the features of Claim 4, as submitted in the letter dated 12 March 1985, page 1, is rejected.

4. The request for reimbursement of the appeal fee is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility