Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2299/08 (Hair coloring compositions/THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY) 29-03-2011
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2299/08 (Hair coloring compositions/THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY) 29-03-2011

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T229908.20110329
Date of decision
29 March 2011
Case number
T 2299/08
Petition for review of
-
Application number
00973666.1
IPC class
A61K 7/13
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 35.07 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Hair coloring compositions and methods

Applicant name
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Opponent name
-
Board
3.3.10
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 54
European Patent Convention Art 56
Keywords

Main and auxiliary requests 1 and 2: novelty (no)

Auxiliary requests 3 to 9: inventive step (no) - determination of the closest prior art - comparative experiments not carried out with the closest prior art - obvious alternatives

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0197/86
T 0230/07
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal lies from the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 00973666.1 with the International publication Number WO-A-01/28508.

II. Inter alia the following documents were cited in the examination proceedings:

(1) FR-A-1 592 939 and

(3) DE-C-197 21 797.

In the appealed decision refusing the application on the ground of lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC), the Examining Division held that document (1), which disclosed a hair bleaching and colouring composition having a pH of from 7 to 9 and comprising ammonium carbonate, oxidative hair colouring agent, and an oxidising agent, represented the closest prior art. The oxidative hair colouring agents were defined in document (1) as any aromatic amine or polyhydroxylated aromatic compounds and, thus, encompassed compounds such as m-aminophenol and 1-naphtol required by the claims of the application. The claimed subject-matter was merely an arbitrary selection from the disclosure of document (1) and, thus, lacked an inventive step.

III. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the Appellant submitted the results of comparative experiments and an amended set of claims as a main request. With the communication accompanying the summons to attend oral proceedings, the Board drew the Appellant's attention to the fact that document (1) might be novelty destroying for claim 1 of the main request. The Appellant further filed nine auxiliary requests.

Independent claim 1 of the main request read as follows:

"1. A hair bleaching and colouring composition comprising:

(a) an oxidising agent

(b) an oxidative hair colouring agent; wherein said oxidative hair colouring agent comprises an oxidative hair colouring agent selected from the group consisting of N,N bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine, 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine, 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene, 2-methylresorcinol, m-aminophenol, and 1-napthol; and

(c) ammonium carbonate and/or ammonium carbamate; and

wherein the pH of the composition is from about 8 to about 9."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 differed from claim 1 of the maim request in that 2-methylresorcinol and m-aminophenol were deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine further was deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 read as follows:

"1. A method for bleaching and colouring human or animal hair comprising applying to the hair a hair bleaching and colouring composition comprising:

(a) an oxidising agent;

(b) an oxidative hair colouring agent, wherein said oxidative hair colouring agent comprises an oxidative hair colouring agent selected from the group consisting of N,N bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine, 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine, 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene, 2-methylresorcinol, m-aminophenol, and 1-napthol; and

(c) ammonium carbonate and/or ammonium carbamate; and

wherein the pH of the composition is from about 7 to about 9, and wherein said composition is applied to the hair between 5 minutes and 30 minutes."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that 2-methylresorcinol and m-aminophenol were deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that 2-methylresorcinol, 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine and m-aminophenol were deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 differed from claim 1 of the main request in that m-aminophenol and 1-naphtol were deleted and the pH of the composition was from about 7 to about 9.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 in that 2-methylresorcinol further was deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 8 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 in that 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine further was deleted.

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 9 differed from claim 1 of auxiliary request 8 in that 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene further was deleted.

IV. According to the Appellant multiple selections had to be made within the disclosure of document (1) to arrive at the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1 and 2. Furthermore the pH range of from about 8 to about 9 defined in claim 1 was narrow with respect to the range of from about 7 to 9 disclosed in document (1) (see decision T 230/07, point 4.1.6; not published in OJ EPO). In addition, document (1) concerned slightly alkaline compositions, i.e. to compositions having a pH in the range of 7 to 8 rather than in the claimed range of 8 to 9. Hence the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1 and 2 was novel over document (1).

The method for bleaching and colouring hair according to claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 to 5 was novel over document (1) on account of the required period of time of between 5 and 30 minutes during which the colouring composition was applied to the hair.

For the assessment of inventive step, the closest prior art was not document (1) but the general knowledge of the skilled person concerning oxidative hair colorations conventionally carried out with an oxidative system comprising ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide.

The inventive step of the claimed methods resided in the selection of specific colouring agents. In fact, the experimental data filed with the statement of grounds of appeal revealed that, when compared to other hair colouring agents, the hair colouring agents defined in the claims were more sensitive to a system comprising ammonium carbonate and, hence, gave rise to colorations that were different than that obtained with a conventional ammonium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide system. Since it was not obvious from document (1) that a wider colour variety could be produced with the same hair colouring agents by modifying the oxidation system, the claimed methods implied an inventive step.

The subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary requests 6 to 9 was novel over document (1) since none of the hair colouring agents required by the claim was described in document (1). As document (1) failed to recognize that these specific hair colouring agents were more carbonate-sensitive than the hair colouring agents disclosed in document (1), the subject-matter of claim 1 of these requests involved an inventive step.

V. The Appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted in the following version:

1) on the basis of claims 1-15 of the main request filed with the Grounds of Appeal dated 20 October 2008; or subsidiarily

2) on the basis of the claims of one of the auxiliary requests 1 to 9, all filed under cover of a letter dated 28 February 2011.

VI. At the end of the oral proceedings, the decision of the Board was announced.

1. The appeal is admissible.

Main request

2. Amendments (Article 123(2) EPC)

Claim 1 is based on the combination of claims 1 and 2 of the application as filed. Furthermore the oxidative colouring agents have been specified according to page 18, second paragraph of the application as filed. Hence, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are satisfied.

3. Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

3.1 Document (1) discloses an intermediate hair colouring composition comprising an oxidative hair colouring agent, including 1-naphtol and m-aminophenol, and ammonium carbonate (see "résumés" 1 and 2e on page 6 of document (1)). This intermediate colouring composition is mixed with an oxidising agent to give the final hair colouring composition having a pH of about 7 to 9 (see résumé 5).

Résumé 5 refers back to résumés 1 and 2 and, hence, discloses a composition with the combination of technical features required by claim 1 of the main request.

3.2 According to the Appellant a double choice had to be made in the disclosure of document (1) in order to arrive at the subject-matter of claim 1, that is, first choosing the option 2e from options 2a through 2f in résumé 2, and then within the option 2e choosing m-amino phenol or 1-naphtol from the listed oxidative dyes.

However, this argument is not convincing since only the choice of m-amino phenol or 1-naphtol is to be made from the list of oxidative dyes disclosed in résumé 2 to arrive at the claimed compositions. This choice of m-amino phenol or 1-naphtol does not result in a novel combination of technical features and, thus, cannot render the claimed compositions novel.

3.3 The Applicant further submitted that the indication of the pH ranging from about 8 and about 9 in claim 1 conferred novelty to the claimed subject-matter, since this range was narrow when compared to the range of 7 to 9 disclosed in document (1). However, this argument must be rejected since the claimed range of about 8 to about 9 cannot be considered as narrow when compared to the pH range of about 7 to 9 disclosed in document (1).

3.4 Consequently, the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks novelty with respect to document (1).

Auxiliary requests 1 and 2

4. Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

Claim 1 of auxiliary requests 1 and 2 differs from claim 1 of the main request exclusively in that 2-methylresorcinol, m-aminophenol and/or 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine are deleted.

As claim 1 of these requests still encompasses colouring compositions comprising 1-naphtol, which alternative is disclosed in résumé 2e of document (1), their subject-matter lacks novelty for the same reasons as claim 1 of the main request (see point 3 above).

Auxiliary request 3

5. Amendment (Article 123(2) EPC)

Claim 1 of this request is based on the combination of claim 11 with claim 1 of the application as filed. The oxidative colouring agent has been specified according to page 18 second paragraph of the application as filed which recites inter alia the six particular agents listed in amended claim 1. Furthermore, the application time of between 5 minutes and 30 minutes is disclosed on page 41 penultimate paragraph of the application as filed. Hence, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are satisfied.

6. Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

Document (1) discloses a method for colouring hair comprising applying to the hair a colouring composition having a pH of about 7 to about 9 and comprising an oxidising agent, an oxidative hair colouring agent, in particular m-aminophenol and 1-napthol, and ammonium carbonate. Document (1) further discloses that the composition is applied to the hair during sufficient time to assure substantial dyeing (résumés 5 and 6), but does not disclose any precise application time, let alone an application time comprised between 5 minutes and 30 minutes.

Consequently, the subject-matter of claim 1 is novel over document (1).

7. Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

According to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal it is necessary, in order to assess inventive step, to establish the closest state of the art, to determine in the light thereof the technical problem which the invention addresses and successfully solves, and to examine the obviousness of the claimed solution to this problem in view of the state of the art. This "problem-solution approach" ensures the assessment of inventive step on an objective basis.

7.1 Closest prior art

Document (1) relates to oxidative hair colouring compositions and method for colouring hair and describes all the technical features required by the method according to claim 1 with the exception of the indication of a particular application time of the colouring composition on the hair (see point 6 above).

Consequently, the Board considers, in agreement with the Examining Division that the disclosure of document (1) specified above represents the closest state of the art, and, hence, takes it as the starting point in the assessment of inventive step.

The Appellant considered, however, that the closest prior art would rather be the general knowledge of the person skilled in the art relating to conventional oxidative hair colorations carried out with an oxidation system, comprising ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide at pH 10, this system being by far the most used.

However, the closest prior art is represented by a prior art document disclosing subject-matter conceived for the same purpose as the claimed invention and additionally having the most relevant technical features in common. In the present case, a method for colouring hair using an oxidation system comprising ammonium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide at pH 10, the purported general knowledge of the skilled person, differs from the claimed method by the oxidation system which is involved, whereas the claimed method for colouring hair falls within the ambit of the disclosure of document (1).

The Board concludes therefore that a method for colouring hair using the ammonium hydroxide/hydrogen peroxide system is further away from the claimed method than the method for colouring hair disclosed in document (1). This argument of the Appellant must thus be rejected.

7.2 Technical problem underlying the application

The Appellant submitted that the technical problem underlying the application consisted in finding dyes which lead to a different coloration in an ammonium carbonate and/or ammonium carbamate system than that obtained in the ammonium hydroxide system.

However, the subject-matter of claim 1 which, following the problem/solution approach, should represent the solution to this technical problem, relates to a method for bleaching and colouring hair characterized by a particular application time of the colouring composition. Hence, the proposed solution is not a solution to the problem identified by the Appellant.

The Appellant argued that the problem/solution approach was not appropriate in the present case. The feature establishing novelty with respect to document (1) was the period of time of 5 to 30 minutes during which the colouring composition is applied to the hair. However, the inventive step resided in the selection of hair colouring agents which were more sensitive to a system comprising ammonium carbonate than to a system comprising ammonium hydroxide. This increased sensitivity was demonstrated by the filed data of the comparative tests. Document (1), on the other hand, failed to distinguish such carbonate-sensitive hair colouring agents from carbonate-insensitive hair colouring agent.

This argument does not, however, put into question the applicability of the problem-solution approach to the present case, it merely shows that the Appellant defined a technical problem which is not in agreement with the claimed subject-matter. In fact, the technical problem defined by the Appellant, i.e. finding particular colouring agents having specific properties cannot logically have as a solution a method of colouring hair with known colouring compositions characterized by the length of time they are applied to the hair.

With regard to the comparative tests on which the Applicant relied, the comparison with the closest state of the art must be such that the purported effect is convincingly shown to have its origin in the distinguishing feature of the invention (see T 197/86, EPO OJ 1989, 371, points 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 of the reasons). In the present case, the experimental report filed with the letter of 20 October 2008 compared the colorations of compositions differing from each other by the presence of ammonium carbonate instead of ammonium hydroxide.

However, the claimed method is characterised in that the colouring composition is applied to the hair for a length of time from 5 to 30 minutes, the presence of ammonium carbonate as required by present claim 1 being already disclosed in the closest prior art (see point 6 above). Accordingly, this test report does not concern the impact of the essential technical feature distinguishing the claimed composition from the closest prior art (see point 7.1 above), i.e. that the composition is applied to the hair for a length of time from 5 to 30 minutes. Hence, the comparison provided by this test does not adequately demonstrate any effect linked to the feature distinguishing the claimed subject-matter from the closest prior art.

In the absence of any demonstrated effect with respect to methods disclosed in document (1) the technical problem underlying the application is to be reformulated into the provision of a further method for colouring hair.

7.3 Solution

The proposed solution is the method according to claim 1 characterised in that the colouring composition is applied to the hair for between 5 and 30 minutes.

7.4 Obviousness

At the oral proceedings before the Board the Appellant submitted that the introduction into claim 1 of the range of time during which the composition is applied was only intended to establish novelty with respect to the method disclosed in document (1), which merely required sufficient time to colour the hair without further precision. Therefore, since the claimed range of time of from 5 to 30 minutes is not linked to any surprising technical effect, it must be considered as an arbitrary limitation for which no inventive step can be acknowledged.

As a result, claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 is not allowable since its subject-matter lacks an inventive step pursuant to Article 56 EPC.

Auxiliary request 4 and 5

8. Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 differs from claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 in that 2-methylresorcinol and m-aminophenol are deleted. In claim 1 of auxiliary request 5, 2-amino-3-hydroxypyridine is additionally deleted.

Claim 1 of these requests encompasses a method involving colouring compositions comprising 1-naphtol, which is also described in document (1) (see point 3 above). Thus, the restriction to specific colouring agents, but still comprising 1-naphtol, does not change the negative conclusion reached by the Board with regard to the inventive step of the subject-matter claimed in auxiliary request 3.

Under these circumstances, auxiliary requests 4 and 5 are not allowable since the subject-matter of claim 1 of these requests lacks an inventive step for the same reasons as for auxiliary request 3 (Article 56 EPC).

Auxiliary request 6 to 9.

9. Amendments (Article 123(2) EPC)

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 to 9 is based on claim 1 of the application as filed wherein the oxidative colouring agent is specified according to page 18, second paragraph of the application as filed which discloses inter alia the particular agents listed in claim 1 of each of these requests. Hence, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are satisfied.

10. Novelty (Article 54 EPC)

The particular hair colouring agents listed in claim 1 of each of the auxiliary requests 6 to 9 are not specifically disclosed in document (1). Accordingly, their subject-matter is novel over document (1).

11. Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

Independent claim 1 of auxiliary request 9 is directed to an embodiment comprised within claim 1 according to auxiliary requests 6, 7 and 8, namely to the alternative wherein the oxidative hair colouring agent comprises N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine.

In case this embodiment according to auxiliary request 9 lacked inventive step, a consequence must be that the subject-matter of auxiliary request 6, 7 and 8, which comprises that embodiment, cannot involve an inventive step either. For this reason, it is appropriate that the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 9, is examined first for the presence of inventive step.

11.1 The comparative report filed on 20 October 2008 referred to by the Appellant does not compare the dyeing properties obtained by the claimed compositions with respect to those obtained by compositions of document (1) (see point 7.2 above). Accordingly, since no technical effect has been shown for the claimed compositions with respect to the closest prior art compositions of document (1), the technical problem underlying the invention is to provide alternative colouring compositions.

The proposed solution is the composition of claim 1 characterised in that the colouring agent comprises N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine.

Finally, it remains to be decided whether it is obvious to replace in the compositions of document (1) the colouring agent by N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine in order to provide an alternative composition.

Any oxidative colouring agent, in particular aromatic diamines, is taught to be suitable for use in the hair colouring compositions of document (1) (see page 3, lines 1 to 7). Document (3) discloses a process for bleaching and colouring hair with similar hair colouring composition having a pH of 8 to 11, comprising an oxidising agent, ammonium carbonate and as colouring agent, inter alia, N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine (see claim 1 in combination with page 4, line 1).

It was thus obvious for the person skilled in the art, seeking to provide an alternative hair colouring composition to that taught by document (1), to use another colouring agent, namely the N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediamine disclosed in document (3) in the same type of hair colouring composition, thereby, arriving without inventive ingenuity at a composition in accordance with present claim 1 of auxiliary request 9. For these reasons, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 9 is obvious in the light of documents (1) and (3).

Consequently, the subject-matter of claim 1 of auxiliary request 9 lacks an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).

11.2 As Claim 1 of auxiliary requests 6 to 8 encompasses the composition according to claim 1 of auxiliary request 9, their subject-matter lacks an inventive step for the same reasons.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility