Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0139/00 14-11-2002
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0139/00 14-11-2002

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T013900.20021114
Date of decision
14 November 2002
Case number
T 0139/00
Petition for review of
-
Application number
86110079.0
IPC class
C08L 55/02
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 77.12 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Blends based on vinyl-aromatic polymers having high tenacity and impact strength

Applicant name
ECP ENICHEM POLIMERI S.r.l.
Opponent name
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Board
3.3.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 123(3) 1973
European Patent Convention R 88 1973
Keywords

Amendments - added subject-matter (yes)

Amendments - opposition proceedings

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0003/89
G 0004/92
T 0153/85
T 0108/91
T 0133/92
Citing decisions
-

I. The mention of the grant of European patent No. 0 216 065, with 9 claims, in respect of European patent application No. 86 110 079.0, filed on 22 July 1986 and claiming an IT priority of 26 July 1985 (IT 2173385) was published on 2 February 1994 (Bulletin 1994/05). Claim 1 read as follows:

"1. Polymer blends having a high tenacity and impact strength based on

(a) a vinyl-aromatic copolymer containing an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and an elastomer, and

(b) a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer containing an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and a synthetic elastomer,

characterized in that the blends comprise

(a) from 10 to 98% by weight of the vinyl-aromatic copolymer obtained by a polymerization process in suspension, mass-suspension or continuous mass and containing from 2 to 25% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and a rubber in an amount not exceeding 15% by weight and

(b) from 90 to 2% by weight of the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer consisting of a three-step polymer having as a first step a rubber core based on butadiene, a second step polymerized from styrene and a final step, or shell, polymerized from methylmethacrylate, the elastomer content of said grafted polymer being higher than 35% and up to 95% by weight."

The remaining Claims 2 to 8 were dependent claims. Claim 9 was an independent claim directed to composites prepared by co-extruding the blends of the preceding claims with other polymers or engineering polymers.

II. A Notice of Opposition was filed on 2 November 1994 by The Dow Chemical Company, on the grounds of Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step) and Article 100(b) EPC (insufficiency of disclosure). The documents cited during the opposition procedure were inter alia:

D1: GB-A-2 143 242; and

D11: Acryloid® KM-653 information sheet (no date).

III. By a decision which was given at the end of the oral proceedings held on 10 November 1999 and issued in writing on 22 November 1999 the opposition division revoked the patent. The decision was based on three sets of claims forming a main request (Claims 1 to 9), an auxiliary request I (Claims 1 to 8) and an auxiliary request II (Claims 1 to 8).

(i) Claim 1 of the main request differed from Claim 1 as granted in that the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (later termed (B)) was defined in the preamble (b) as "a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer containing a synthetic elastomer", ie the mandatory presence of an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile had been deleted.

(ii) Claim 1 of auxiliary request I differed from Claim 1 of the main request in that, apart from minor amendments of an editorial nature, it defined a vinyl-aromatic copolymer (A) as specified in granted Claim 3, and the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) was defined in the preamble (b) as "a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) containing vinyl monomers and a synthetic elastomer".

(iii) Claim 1 of auxiliary request II differed from Claim 1 of auxiliary request I in that it contained the additional requirement that the vinyl-aromatic copolymer (A) was "no ABS".

The decision held that the cancellation of the term "an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" in the definition of the grafted vinyl-aromatic copolymer (B) in the respective Claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests I and II was not allowable under Article 123(3) since it extended the protection conferred by the European patent as granted.

Auxiliary requests III and IV, filed at the oral proceedings, were not admitted into the proceedings because the objections against the main request and auxiliary requests I and II under Article 123(3) EPC would have applied to these requests analogously.

IV. On 1 February 2000, a Notice of Appeal against the above decision was filed by the proprietor (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), the prescribed fee being recorded as paid on the same day.

In the Statement of Grounds of Appeal, filed on 3 April 2000, the appellant filed various sets of amended claims, ie a main request and auxiliary requests I to III. In a further letter filed on 12 June 2001, the appellant filed auxiliary requests IV to IX.

(i) Claim 1 of the main request read as follows:

"1. Polymer blends having a high tenacity and impact strength based on

(a) a vinyl-aromatic copolymer (A) containing at least 50% by weight of one or more vinyl-aromatic compounds of formula:

FORMULA

in which X is hydrogen or an alkyl radical containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms; n is zero or an integer ranging from 1 to 5 and Y is a halogen or an alkyl radical having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and an elastomer, and

(b) a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) containing derivatives of (meth)acrylic acid and a synthetic elastomer,

characterized in that the blends comprise

(a) from 10 to 98% by weight of the vinyl-aromatic copolymer (A) which is obtained by a polymerization process in suspension, mass-suspension or continuous mass and containing a vinyl-aromatic monomer, from 2 to 25% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and a rubber in an amount of about 8% by weight and

(b) from 90 to 2% by weight of the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) consisting of a three-step polymer having as a first step a rubber core based on butadiene, a second step polymerized from styrene and a final step, or shell, polymerized from methyl-methacrylate, the elastomer content of said grafted polymer being higher than 35% and up to 95% by weight."

(ii) Claim 1 of auxiliary request I differed from Claim 1 of the main request in that, in the preamble (b), the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) was defined as "containing alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid, R = C1-16, and a synthetic elastomer".

(iii) Claim 1 of auxiliary request II differed from Claim 1 of the main request in that, in the preamble (b), the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) was defined as "containing methylmethacrylate and a synthetic elastomer".

(iv) Claim 1 of auxiliary request III, drafted in the one part form, read as follows:

"1. Polymer blends having a high tenacity and impact strength comprising

(a) from 10 to 98% by weight of a vinyl-aromatic copolymer (A) containing at least 50% by weight of one or more vinyl-aromatic compounds of the formula:

FORMULA

in which X is hydrogen or an alkyl radical containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms; n is zero or an integer ranging from 1 to 5 and Y is a halogen or an alkyl radical having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and an elastomer, and which is obtained by a polymerization process in suspension, mass-suspension or continuous mass and containing a vinyl-aromatic monomer, from 2 to 25% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and a rubber in an amount of about 8% by weight, and

(b) from 90 to 2% by weight of a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) consisting of a three-step polymer having as a first step a rubber core based on butadiene, a second step polymerized from styrene and a final step, or shell, polymerized from methyl-methacrylate, the elastomer content of said grafted polymer being higher than 35% and up to 95% by weight."

(v) Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV corresponded to granted Claim 1 with the exception that the amount of rubber in copolymer (A) was restricted to about 8% by weight.

(vi) Claim 1 of auxiliary requests V to IX corresponded to Claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests I to IV, respectively, with the exception that the word "about" had been deleted, at each occurrence, from the term "a rubber content of about 8% by weight".

The appellant's arguments, as far as they are relevant for this decision, were as follows:

The amended claims met the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC because they were restricted as compared to the granted claims. Furthermore, it was obvious to a person skilled in the art that granted Claim 1, according to which the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) contained an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile, comprised an obvious error (Rule 88 EPC) which had to be corrected according to the originally disclosed subject-matter.

V. According to the opponent (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), which commented only on the main request and auxiliary requests I to III in the letter filed on 27 September 2000, the amendments to Claim 1 of these requests were neither allowable under Article 123(3) EPC nor could they be considered as corrections under Rule 88 EPC.

VI. In response to a summons, dated 2 May 2002, to oral proceedings, the respondent informed the board in a letter filed on 18 September 2002 that it would not be represented at the oral proceedings, but that it took it also for granted that the appellant would not change the requests on file.

VII. In a communication dated 6 November 2002, the board informed the parties that there was no legal or procedural basis for taking it "for granted" that the proprietor would not change the requests on file. In that respect, the respondent's attention was drawn to T 133/92 (18 October 1994; not published in the OJ EPO) according to which an opponent which failed to appear at the oral proceedings could not be taken by surprise when the proprietor filed new claims during that oral proceedings to overcome objections arising within the scope of the proceedings. According to that decision, the submission of auxiliary requests was, clearly, not a "fact" within the meaning of G 4/92 (OJ EPO 1994, 149). However, this observation was made without prejudice to the normal exercise of the discretion of the board to allow or not allow, in its conduct of the proceedings, the consideration of further requests.

VIII. On 14 November 2002, oral proceedings were held before the board at which the appellant but not the respondent was represented. Because the latter had been duly summoned, however, the oral proceedings were continued in its absence in accordance with Rule 71(2) EPC.

In the discussion, the representative of the appellant elucidated the written submissions with regard to the allowability of the amendments in Claim 1 of the requests on file. Furthermore, auxiliary requests X and XI were filed to overcome the board's reservation, under Article 123(2) EPC, against the amendment in Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV.

(i) Claim 1 of auxiliary request X corresponded to Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV with the exception that the amount of rubber in copolymer (A) was from 2 to 12% by weight.

(ii) Claim 1 of auxiliary request XI corresponded to Claim 1 of auxiliary request X where, in addition, the term "an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile and" was deleted from the preamble for the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B).

IX. The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be maintained:

- on the basis of the main request or auxiliary requests I, II or III, all filed on 3 April 2000; or

- on the basis of auxiliary requests IV, V, VI, VII, VIII or IX, all filed on 12 June 2001; or

- on the basis of auxiliary requests X or XI filed at the oral proceedings on 14 November 2002.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. The key issue in the present case is related to the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B). In the preamble of Claim 1 as granted, the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer is defined as "containing an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile (emphasis added by the board) and a synthetic elastomer", whereas the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer is defined in the characterizing portion of the claim as "consisting of a three-step polymer having as a first step a rubber core based on butadiene, a second step polymerized from styrene and a final step, or shell, polymerized from methylmethacrylate", ie the ethylenically unsaturated nitrile is not mentioned any more in the characterizing portion of the claim. Since it became apparent during the opposition procedure that none of the examples in the patent in suit used a grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) comprising an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile, the appellant tried to substitute or to delete the term "containing an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" with respect to the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) in Claim 1.

3. Main request

3.1. Article 123(2) and (3) EPC

3.1.1. In Claim 1 of the main request, the term "ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" with respect to the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) is substituted by the term "derivatives of (meth)acrylic acid" which is disclosed in the application as originally filed on page 7, line 6. Thus, the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are met.

3.1.2. According to the appellant, the amendment in Claim 1 met also the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC because this amendment was a restriction over granted Claim 1. As could be seen from a comparison of the general formulae for an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile (I) and a derivative of (meth)acrylic acid (II),

FORMULA (I)

FORMULA (II)

the number of substituents R in formula (II) was more restricted than in formula (I). Although the restriction to derivatives of (meth)acrylic acid may be in fact narrower from a certain point of view to the extent that the number of substituents R in formula (II) is smaller than in formula (I), amended Claim 1 does not require the presence of an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B) any more, and to that extent is inevitably broader than Claim 1 as granted.

3.1.3. A further argument of the appellant to justify the amendment was based on T 108/91 (OJ EPO, 1994, 228). In this case, an amendment of a granted Claim to replace an inaccurate technical statement, which offended against the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC and was evidently inconsistent with the totality of the disclosure of the patent, by an accurate statement of the technical features involved, was considered allowable under Article 123(3) EPC. The board took the view that, on a fair interpretation of the claim in the totality of the disclosure of the patent, the protection conferred by it had not in fact been extended.

3.1.3.1. The appellant argued that the reference to an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B) in the preamble of granted Claim 1 of the present case was an obvious error because the statement was in clear contradiction to the examples in the patent in suit where a polymer (B) having no unsaturated nitrile had been used. Therefore, in analogy to T 108/91, the incorrect reference to an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile could be replaced by another, originally disclosed feature without violating Article 123(3) EPC.

3.1.3.2. The board cannot accept this argument because the present case differs from T 108/91, mainly, because Claim 1 as granted is not inconsistent with the totality of the disclosure of the patent. Even if it were assumed, in favour of the appellant, that the reference to an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B) was an incorrect technical statement, it is nevertheless consistent with page 2, lines 33 to 45 and page 3, lines 40 to 42 of the patent specification. The first passage is the exact counterpart of granted Claim 1 whereas the latter describes the elastomeric core (backbone) of the grafted vinyl-aromatic polymer (B) which can be -inter alia - "polybutadiene copolymers of butadiene with styrene and/or with acrylonitrile". Thus, a polymer (B) containing acrylonitrile, ie an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile, in the elastomeric core would be clearly within the scope of Claim 1 as granted. Hence, in contrast to T 108/91, it is not immediately apparent from the description of the patent specification that what is defined in granted Claim 1 could not be that for which protection is sought and that the intended meaning must have been the equivalent of what is stated in this respect in amended Claim 1.

3.1.4. Thus, the amendment in Claim 1 of the main request does not meet the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC.

3.2. Rule 88 EPC

3.2.1. When trying to justify the replacement of the wrong technical statement "ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" with respect to polymer (B) in Claim 1 as granted, the appellant relied also on the argument that this statement was an obvious error (Rule 88 EPC) which had to be corrected according to the originally disclosed subject-matter.

3.2.2. In general, corrections and amendments (other than corrections) originate from two different situations:

(a) a correction brings an application or patent document into its originally intended form corresponding to the original intention of the applicant or the proprietor;

(b) an amendment represents usually a change of opinion of the applicant or the proprietor which wishes to put the application or patent in a different, improved form. Nevertheless, corrections and amendments (other than corrections) have something in common, namely the idea of a modification being made to the document, in the present case to Claim 1. In fact, a correction is a special case involving an amendment within the meaning of Article 123 EPC (G 3/89, OJ EPO, 1993, 117, point 1 of the reasons for the Opinion).

3.2.3. As pointed out in G 3/89 (point 5 and 6 of the reasons for the Opinion), a correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC is allowable when:

(i) there is such an obvious error that a skilled person is in no doubt that this information is not correct and - considered objectively - cannot be meant to read as such; and

(ii) it is immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as the correction.

3.2.4. Although the person skilled in the art may discover in the present case a certain discrepancy between Claim 1 as granted (and a part of the description) on the one hand and the examples on the other (see point 3.1.3.1 above), an inconsistency in the granted patent is not necessarily an indication for an error in Claim 1. It may well be that the error occurred in the examples and not in Claim 1. Furthermore, the preamble of Claim 1 is not inconsistent with the characterizing portion of the claim, and a skilled person even finds at page 3, line 40 a passage which has an affinity with the subject-matter of Claim 1, and in particular with the reference to an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B): the possible presence of acrylonitrile in the elastomeric core of polymer (B). The point of view that Claim 1 does not contain an obvious error is also supported by the fact that the desire to remove the reference to an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile with respect to polymer (B) did not come from a discrepancy on the face of the patent itself, but arose only when further information on the compositions of the polymers used in the examples was provided by the opponent.

Thus, it is doubtful whether Claim 1 contains any incorrect information 1 at all, let alone an obvious error, and for this reason alone a correction is ruled out.

3.3. Summing up, the amendment of Claim 1 of the main request contravenes Article 123(3) EPC. Even when considered as a correction under Rule 88 EPC, ie a special case of an amendment, the correction of Claim 1 is not allowable. Hence, the main request as a whole is not allowable.

4. Auxiliary requests I to III

4.1. In Claim 1 of auxiliary requests I to III, the term "ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" with respect to polymer (B) is substituted by definitions which include even fewer compounds than the term "derivatives of (meth)acrylic acid" in the main request: "alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid, R = C1-16" (auxiliary request I) and "methylmethacrylate" (auxiliary requests II and III).

4.2. Nevertheless, these amendments are not suitable to overcome the objections raised against Claim 1 of the main request. On the contrary, all the reasons to refuse the main request apply equally to auxiliary requests I to III because, however narrowly the acrylates are defined in their respective claims, Claim 1 of these requests does not require the presence of an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B), and, to that extent, is still broader than granted Claim 1. Hence, Claim 1 of auxiliary requests I to III does not meet the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC, and auxiliary requests I to III as a whole are not allowable.

5. Auxiliary request IV

5.1. In auxiliary request IV, the term "ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" with respect to polymer (B) is retained in Claim 1 but the amount of rubber in polymer (A) is restricted to about 8% by weight. According to the appellant, the basis for this amendment can be found in the examples of the patent in suit where a polymer (A) comprising 8% by weight of butadiene rubber is used.

5.2. Although a rubber content of 8% by weight for polymer (A) is explicitly disclosed in Examples 1 to 8 of the patent in suit, polymer (B) in these blends admittedly does not contain an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile, the presence of which is a mandatory feature in Claim 1. In other words, all the examples are outside the scope of Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV. It is not permissible to isolate an individual item from a specific embodiment (in this case: a rubber content of 8% by weight for polymer (A) from the examples) and to combine it with items belonging to different embodiments (in this case: combination of the isolated rubber content with the polymer (B) from Claim 1), unless of course such a combination of features is clearly and unambiguously derivable from the application itself. In the present case, a rubber content of 8% by weight for polymer (A) is disclosed only in the context of a polymer blend where the polymer (B) does not comprise an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile. The combination with a polymer (B) comprising an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile is, however, nowhere suggested in the application as originally filed or the patent specification, respectively. Thus, the specific combination of polymers (A) and (B) as presented in Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV does not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, and therefore auxiliary request IV as a whole is not allowable.

6. Auxiliary requests V to IX

Claim 1 of auxiliary requests V to IX differs from Claim 1 of the main request and auxiliary requests I to IV only in that the word "about" has been deleted from the term "a rubber content of about 8% by weight". Thus, the objections under Article 123(3) and Article 123(2) EPC, respectively, apply equally to Claim 1 of auxiliary requests V to IX. Claim 1 of each of these requests being not allowable, the requests as a whole are not allowable.

7. Auxiliary requests X and XI

7.1. Emerging from the discussion of the allowability of the amendment in Claim 1 of auxiliary request IV during oral proceedings, the appellant filed auxiliary requests X and XI.

7.2. In principle, admission of new requests put forward by a proprietor at a late stage in the opposition appeal proceedings is a matter of discretion of the appeal board. Furthermore, according to established case law, when deciding an appeal during oral proceedings, a board of appeal may refuse to consider alternative claims which have been submitted at a late stage, eg during the oral proceedings, if such claims are not clearly allowable (T 153/85, OJ EPO 1988, 001).

7.2.1. In the present case, Claim 1 of auxiliary request X, if admitted, would imply that the subject-matter of the claim was in contradiction to all the examples, thus revealing a lack of clarity in the sense of Article 84 EPC. Alternatively, if the examples were to be deleted to remove this contradiction, the amended claim would then be unsupported by any example. This would in turn imply a prima facie contravention of Article 83 EPC. Even if, as submitted by the appellant during the oral proceedings, the presence of examples is not a pre-requisite under Article 83 EPC, nevertheless, such examples were quite evidently considered necessary at least by the appellant itself at the relevant filing date. They have, furthermore, implicitly been regarded, in the proceedings up to the date of the oral proceedings, as representing, as argued by the appellant in favour of the amendment of Claim 1 as granted, the "core" of "the invention". It is not credible that some "other invention" could be shown to exist at this late stage of the proceedings which would enable such a claim to be regarded as meeting simultaneously the requirements of Article 83 and Article 84 EPC. Nor would it be an appropriate exercise of the board's discretion, at such a late stage of the proceedings, to commence ex officio an investigation as to whether such an invention could be discovered.

7.2.2. The deletion of the term "ethylenically unsaturated nitrile" in the context of polymer (B) in Claim 1 of auxiliary request XI contravenes Article 123(3) EPC because Claim 1 does not require the presence of an ethylenically unsaturated nitrile in polymer (B) any more, and to that extent is inevitably broader than Claim 1 as granted.

7.3. Consequently, auxiliary requests X and XI were not admitted to the proceedings because Claim 1 of each of these requests was, for the reasons given, prima facie not clearly allowable.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility