Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2152/19 04-11-2022
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2152/19 04-11-2022

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2022:T215219.20221104
Date of decision
04 November 2022
Case number
T 2152/19
Petition for review of
-
Application number
06121125.6
IPC class
F25D 17/06
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 412.35 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Production method of vertical freezers

Applicant name
Electrolux Home Products Corporation N.V.
Opponent name
Liebherr-Hausgeräte Ochsenhausen GmbH
Board
3.2.03
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 116(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(8)
European Patent Convention Art 100(c)
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 123(3)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(2)
Keywords

Oral proceedings - withdrawal of request for oral proceedings

Oral proceedings - decision in written proceedings

Amendments - features from schematic drawings

Amendments - added subject-matter (yes)

Amendments - inescapable trap (yes)

Late-filed request - circumstances of appeal case justify admittance (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0169/83
T 0748/91
G 0001/93
Citing decisions
-

I. European patent No.1 906 117 relates to a freezing compartment of a vertical freezer having an upper wall provided with a cavity partially lodging an evaporation battery.

II. With the impugned decision, the opposition division rejected the opposition which was based on the grounds of Article 100(a) and (c) EPC.

III. With its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 dated 13 June 2022, the board informed the parties of its preliminary view of the case, inter alia that feature [1.8] of claim 1 of the main request constituted added subject-matter (see section VI below for the feature analysis). This objection seemed to apply to claim 1 of all of the requests on file.

IV. With a letter dated 31 August 2022 the respondent announced it would not be attending the scheduled oral proceedings. It also filed new auxiliary requests 9a and 9b.

V. The parties' requests were as follows.

The opponent ("appellant") requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be revoked.

The patent proprietor ("respondent") requested that the appeal be dismissed and that the patent be maintained as granted (main request), or, alternatively, that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of any one of the submitted auxiliary requests, in the following order:

- auxiliary request 4, filed by letter dated 15 January 2018

- auxiliary request 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e or 4f, filed by letter dated 4 August 2020

- auxiliary request 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 or 8, filed by letter dated 15 January 2018

- conditionally all requests but auxiliary request 3 with a modified claim 3 ("replacement claim 3") and a correspondingly modified auxiliary request 3 (auxiliary request 3a), all filed by letter dated 4 August 2020

- auxiliary request 9a or 9b filed by letter dated 31 August 2022.

VI. Claim wording as far as is relevant for the decision

(a) Claim 1 of the main request (patent as granted) reads as follows (with feature numbering added in "[]"):

"[1.1] Freezing compartment of a vertical freezer provided with:

[1.2] - an upper wall (4),

[1.3] - an evaporating battery (2) contained in an outer envelope (Nx) mounted on a bottom side of said upper wall (4),

[1.4] the front sides of said evaporating battery (2) and said outer envelope (Nx) being inclined upwards,

[1.5] - said upper wall (4) of said freezing compartment being provided, towards the evaporating battery (2), with a cavity (6) having a front side inclined upwards,

[1.6] said cavity (6) partially lodging an upper portion of said evaporating battery (2),

characterised in that

[1.7] said cavity (6) is defined by a reduction of the thickness of said upper wall (4),

and in that

[1.8] said thickness of said upper wall (4) is substantially constant in front of and behind said cavity (6).".

(b) Claim 1 of auxiliary requests 4 and 4a to 4e is based on claim 1 of the main request but has permutations of the following features [a] to [c] in addition:

[a] "wherein only a small portion (9) of the upper wall

(4) of the compartment (2) is sacrificed to create

said cavity (6)"

[b] "wherein the reduction of the overall insulation

ability of said upper wall (4) is low"

[c] "wherein the average thickness (Sm) of said upper

insulating wall (4), provided with said cavity (6),

is only slightly reduced with respect to the

thickness (S) of the same insulating wall without

said cavity".

The permutations are as follows:

- Auxiliary request 4: Feature [a]

- Auxiliary request 4a: Features [a] and [b] and/or [c]

- Auxiliary request 4b: Features [a] and [b] or [c]

- Auxiliary request 4c: Features [a] and [b]

- Auxiliary request 4d: Feature [c]

- Auxiliary request 4e: Features [a] and [b] and [c]

(c) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4f is based on claim 1 of auxiliary request 4a but has the following amendments (marked with bold type and strike-through):

"Vertical freezer having a f[deleted: F]reezing compartment, wherein the freezing compartment is [deleted: of a vertical freezer] provided with: ...".

(d) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following additional features:

"... and in that said front side of said cavity (6) which is inclined upwards faces a first side of the evaporating battery (2), and in that the cavity (6) has another side inclined downwards and facing a second side of the evaporating battery (2)".

(e) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following amendments in feature [1.8] (marked with bold type and strike-through):

"[1.8] said thickness (S) of said upper wall (4) without said cavity (6) is [deleted: substantially] constant in front of and behind said cavity (6)".

(f) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following additional features:

"... and in that said cavity (6) has substantially the same width as said evaporating battery (2).".

(g) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3a is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following amendment:

"... and in that the width of said cavity (6) is only a portion of the whole compartment width and is the same as the width of the evaporating battery (2)."

(h) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following amendments in feature [1.1] (marked with bold and strike-through):

"Vertical freezer having a f[deleted: F]reezing compartment, wherein the freezing compartment is [deleted: of a vertical freezer] provided with: ...".

(i) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 6 is based on claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 but has the following amendment in feature [1.1] (marked with bold):

"Vertical household freezer having a freezing compartment [0001] [0039], wherein the freezing compartment is provided with: ...".

(j) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 7 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following additional features:

"..., wherein said cavity (6) being open downwards and having geometry, size and position configured to lodge said upper portion of said evaporating battery (2).".

(k) Claim 1 of auxiliary request 8 is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following amendment in feature [1.3] (marked with bold):

"... - an evaporating battery (2) and a fan (3) contained in an outer envelope (Nx) mounted on a bottom side of said upper wall (4), ...".

(l) Claim 1 of auxiliary requests 9a and 9b is based on claim 1 of the main request but has the following amendment in feature [1.7] (marked with bold), and feature [1.8] has been deleted:

... [1.7'] said upper wall (4) has a thickness S and in that said cavity (6) is defined by a reduction of the thickness S of said upper wall (4)[deleted: ,]

and in that

[1.8][deleted: ][deleted: said thickness of said upper wall (4) is substantially constant in front of and behind said cavity (6)].".

VII. The appellant's arguments, where relevant to the present decision, can be summarised as follows.

(a) Article 100 (c) EPC

The main request was not allowable since the subject-matter of claim 1 extended beyond the application as filed due to the introduction of feature [1.8]. The sole thickness disclosed in the application as filed related to an average thickness and there was no clear and unambiguous disclosure of any thickness outside the cavity. Since Figures 1, 5 and 6 are only schematic, relying on the thickness disclosed therein as a basis for the amendment was not allowable. That a constant thickness in front of and behind the cavity was an essential feature also had no basis in the application as filed. However, in accordance with decision T 169/83, cf. the headnote, such consistency with respect to structure and function was the precondition for considering such features from schematic drawings to be disclosed. Moreover, there were inconsistencies between the figures and the description, such as that the average thickness Sm was shown in Figure 5 only as the minimum thickness of the cavity. Furthermore, the figures showed only a single cross-section and did not disclose the thickness at any other possible cross-section. Even though the cavity was formed from a precursor wall, this did not imply that the thickness was uniform.

(b) Admittance of auxiliary requests 9a and 9b

Auxiliary requests 9a and 9b should not be admitted into the proceedings since no reasons were apparent as to why they were submitted at that late stage. In addition, and contrary to the requirements of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, no reasons were provided for the late submission of these requests. Furthermore the amendments made gave rise to further objections under Article 123(3) EPC.

VIII. The respondent's arguments, where relevant to the present decision, can be summarised as follows.

(a) Article 100 (c) EPC

The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request did not extend beyond the disclosure of the application as filed. The description disclosed a given thickness S with a given magnitude. Figures 1, 5 and 6 were more than schematic and a dimensional analysis with respect to the thickness was possible, which was also confirmed by decision T 169/83, which stated that schematic figures generally could also provide a basis for amending the claims. From Figures 1, 5 and 6 the skilled person would have unambiguously understood that this thickness was indeed constant, i.e. uniform, except in the area of the cavity. A cavity was a hollowed-out space, i.e. the cavity was formed by sacrificing a part of the precursor upper wall shown in Figure 1. Due to the insulation requirements of such a precursor wall, the wall outside the cavity has to have a uniform thickness.

(b) Admittance of auxiliary requests 9a and 9b

Auxiliary requests 9a and 9b should be admitted into the proceedings. Due to the rewording of granted features [1.7] to [1.7'], the deletion of granted feature [1.8] was not an issue under Article 123(3) EPC. By introducing a specific (uniform) thickness S into claim 1, the scope was not broadened with respect to claim 1 of the main request and thus no issue of extension of protection arose from this amendment.

1. Since the respondent's requests on file are either not allowable or not admitted into the proceedings the appellant's request for the impugned decision to be reversed and for the patent to be revoked is successful. Thus, the appeal is allowable.

Decision in written proceedings

2. In view of the respondent's explicit written statement following the board's preliminary opinion, in which it indicated that it would not be attending the oral proceedings, the scheduled oral proceedings were cancelled and the decision will now be handed down in written proceedings (Article 12(8) RPBA 2020).

As a matter of fact, in accordance with established case law (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 10th edition, 2022, III.C.4.3.2) the respondent's statement that it would not be attending oral proceedings is interpreted as a withdrawal of its request for oral proceedings. When a party states that it will not be attending oral proceedings, it is unequivocally expressing its interest in an immediate decision on the file as it stands and implying that it does not wish to present its arguments orally in the previously requested oral proceedings.

The arguments of the respondent on file with respect to the objection of added-subject matter are not persuasive and the board maintains its preliminary view as according its communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA 2020. Furthermore, auxiliary requests 9a and 9b, which were filed after this communication, are not admitted into the proceedings, as explained in the following, for the reasons provided by the appellant in reaction to the filing of these requests.

Thus, holding oral proceedings is not considered to be expedient and therefore they have been cancelled (cf. Article 116(1) EPC).

Ground of opposition under Article 100(c) EPC

3. Main request - added subject-matter with respect to feature [1.8]

3.1 Feature [1.8] has no literal basis in the application as filed. It specifies that the thickness of the upper wall is substantially constant in front of and behind a cavity provided in the upper wall. The cavity is defined, according to feature [1.7], by a reduction of the thickness of said upper wall. The upper wall with its cavity extends in two directions, i.e. in the direction of the cross-section of Figures 5 and 6 and in the direction normal thereto.

3.2 The criterion for establishing that the subject-matter does not extend beyond the content of the application as filed is that the features in question are directly and unambiguously disclosed for a skilled person on the basis of their common general knowledge. Since the wording of feature [1.8] cannot be found verbatim in the application as filed, the feature firstly needs to be construed with respect to its limiting effect for the subject-matter of claim 1. The respondent's understanding was that feature [1.8] required the thickness outside the area of the cavity to be substantially the same in every direction the upper wall extends. In view of this understanding, the following points were under dispute.

- Firstly, it was discussed whether the feature "constant" is to be understood as defining that the thicknesses in front of and behind the cavity are the same value or whether the term refers to constant thicknesses on both sides but possibly with different values.

- Secondly, it was discussed whether the wording "in front of" and "behind" (the cavity) refers to a specific orientation seen relative to the front and back side of the freezing compartment. While a "front side" is addressed in claim 1 in feature [1.4], it was discussed whether "in front of" actually refers to this front side.

- Thirdly, it was also discussed whether feature [1.8] is to be understood as having the same "constant" thickness over the whole extension of the wall in front of and behind the cavity or whether a small portion with the same thickness would also be encompassed by this feature.

However, contrary to the respondent's view, the general technical concept of the upper wall in front of and behind the cavity having a constant thickness is disclosed nowhere in the application as filed, whether explicitly or implicitly, as explained in the following paragraphs. This general concept is common to all of the above interpretations.

Therefore, the disputed points mentioned above with respect to the detailed interpretation of feature [1.8] can be left undecided. In addition, the significance of the term "substantially" in relation to "constant" is not relevant to the question of added subject-matter.

3.3 The respondent argued that in view of the thickness "S", as shown in Figure 1 and as referred to on page 9, lines 3 to 6 of the application as filed, the upper wall beside of the cavity formed therein was clearly and unambiguously disclosed as having a (substantially) uniform thickness. This is not persuasive. The definition of the thickness "S" and "Sm" in the sole paragraph and figures in which these are disclosed (page 8, line 21, to page 9, line 6 and Figures 1 and 5) is not directed to a uniform thickness. On the contrary, the paragraph states that an average thickness of the wall "is reduced" from a dimension S to a dimension Sm. Therefore, the thickness "S" does not relate to a "given magnitude" implying that the same thickness value can be found at any point of the upper wall beside the area of the cavity as argued by the respondent.

3.4 The feature is not disclosed in the figures of the application as filed either. In accordance with established case law (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 10th edition, 2022, II.E.1.13), sizes or proportions can be derived from figures of the application as filed if, inter alia, one of the following criteria applies:

- the figures are technical drawings or photographs or it is indicated that the figures are a representation to scale (either explicitly or by means of respective dimensioning in the figure)

- the dimensions represented in the figures inherently have, in combination with the technical teaching in terms of structure and function disclosed in the application as a whole, a certain value or relation (this is in line with, for example, the conclusions in the decision cited by the parties, i.e. T 169/83, see the headnote, or T 748/91, see Reasons 2.1.1).

None of these criteria applies in the case at hand.

Contrary to the opinion of the respondent, Figures 1, 5 and 6 do not represent technical drawings but are instead considered to simply be schematic representations of a freezing compartment intended to demonstrate the essential features of the device which are the cavity and the orientation of the evaporating battery therein. As outlined before, the disclosure of the description provides no basis for a constant thickness outside the cavity, nor does it imply that this is essential. As far as dimensions are indicated in the figures, they only relate to average thicknesses. Therefore, it cannot be directly and unambiguously concluded from the schematic figures seen in conjunction with the description that "the thickness of the upper wall varies only due to the provision of the cavity" as argued by the respondent.

Furthermore, even if the skilled person considered Figures 5 and 6 to be true cross-sectional representations of an upper wall and its thickness in front of and behind the cavity, the appellant is correct in that in the absence of any teaching in this regard, Figures 5 and 6 do not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the thickness in further cross-sections in width direction, let alone a cross-section normal to that direction.

3.5 In addition, the thickness definitions disclosed in the application as filed comprise further ambiguities. As also noted by the appellant, the "average thickness" Sm is indicated in Figure 5 at the point of the smallest thickness. A thickness "S" (referred to in the paragraph with "fig. 4") is not indicated in Figure 5 at all. That the application as filed has a clear and unambiguous disclosure with respect to a constant thickness is not persuasive also for this reason.

3.6 Finally, the claim wording "provided with a cavity" "defined by a reduction of the thickness of said upper wall" (features [1.5] and [1.7]) is not limited to a product-by-process definition with a step of forming a cavity in a precursor and this view is also consistent with the disclosure on page 8, lines 4, to page 9, line 2 of the application as filed. However, even if the term "sacrificed" disclosed therein were to be interpreted such that it relates to a product-by-process step of removing a part from a precursor to form the cavity, it still does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the thickness of the precursor upper wall over the area thereof, even if, technically, a constant uniform thickness might be considered a relatively straight-forward choice. The argument in the decision under appeal, in section 2.1.4, last paragraph, "that the reduction of the overall insulating ability when creating the cavity cannot be compromised" is not convincing, since also the cavity as such reduces the insulation effect.

3.7 To conclude, the main request is not allowable since due to the introduction of feature [1.8] the subject-matter of the claim extends beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC).

4. Irrespective of questions relating to the admittance of late filed auxiliary requests 4a to 4e, feature [1.8] is also present in auxiliary requests 4, 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and the corresponding requests relying on replacement claim 3. The amendments to claim 1 made in these requests do not affect the added subject-matter discussion of feature [1.8], a fact which was undisputed. Therefore, none of the requests is allowable for the same reasons as those set out with respect to the main request (Article 123(2) EPC).

Admittance of auxiliary requests 9a and 9b under Article 13(2) RPBA 2020

5. Auxiliary requests 9a and 9b were submitted for the first time by the respondent in response to the communication under Article 15(1) RPBA 2020 in order to address the objections to feature [1.8] under the ground of opposition under Article 100(c) EPC. They represent an amendment of the respondent's appeal case within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020 and the admittance of these requests is subject to the presence of exceptional circumstances, which have to be justified with cogent reasons.

5.1 The respondent did not provide any such reasons or arguments in support of such circumstances and the board is of the opinion that there are no such circumstances present in the case at hand.

The objection to feature [1.8] based on the ground of opposition under Article 100(c) EPC has already been raised in the notice of opposition and was re-submitted in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal. None of the claim requests submitted by the respondent with its reply to the appeal include an amendment in reaction to this objection. The mere fact that the board pointed in their preliminary opinion to possible consequences under Article 123(3) EPC when addressing the Article 123(2) EPC objection does not constitute exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 13(2) RPBA 2020. This consequence inherently follows from Article 123(2) EPC and the fact that the added subject-matter objection was raised against a feature restricting the subject-matter of claim 1 as granted.

For these reasons alone, auxiliary requests 9a and 9b are not taken into account.

5.2 However, even if auxiliary requests 9a and 9b were to be assessed under the criterion of the suitability of the amendment to resolve the issues raised without giving rise to new objections, the board would not come to a different conclusion (when applying Article 13(2) RPBA 2020, a board may also rely on the criteria set out in Article 13(1) RPBA 2020, cf. EPO OJ 2020, Supplementary Publication 2, page 60).

As a matter of fact, claim requests 9a and 9b are prima facie not suitable for overcoming the added subject-matter objection linked to feature [1.8] without giving rise to new objections. As already explained (see section 3. above), the term "thickness S" as defined in the application as filed does not represent a thickness of given uniform magnitude, i.e. a substantially constant thickness, and, hence, the amendments according to feature [1.7'] are not considered to further restrict the scope such that a deletion of feature [1.8] does not constitute an extension of protection. Thus, feature [1.8] cannot be deleted from the claim without violating the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC, a situation commonly described in the case law as an "inescapable trap" (see G 1/93, EPO OJ 1994, 541, Reasons 13).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility