Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 1087/15 04-07-2019
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 1087/15 04-07-2019

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2019:T108715.20190704
Date of decision
04 July 2019
Case number
T 1087/15
Petition for review of
-
Application number
04753497.9
IPC class
A61F 13/56
A61F 15/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 421.79 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

DISPOSABLE ABSORBENT ARTICLES CONTAINED IN PACKAGE HAVING TRANSPARENT WINDOW

Applicant name
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Opponent name

Essity Hygiene and Health Aktiebolag

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Incorporated

Board
3.2.06
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Keywords

Selection of appropriate closest prior art

Inventive step - main request and auxiliary request 1 (no)

Late-filed auxiliary requests 2 and 3a

Late-filed auxiliary requests - admitted (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 0548/03
Citing decisions
T 0605/20
T 0843/22
T 0853/22

I. An appeal was filed by the appellant (opponent) against the decision of the opposition division rejecting the opposition to European patent No. 1 628 614. It requested that the decision be set aside and the patent be revoked.

II. In its letter of response, the respondent (patent proprietor) requested that the appeal be dismissed or, in the alternative, that the patent be maintained according to one of auxiliary requests 1 to 4.

III. The following documents, referred to by the appellant in its grounds of appeal, are relevant to the present decision:

D1 WO-A-02/096331

D5 WO-A-97/49618

D7 GB-A-2 273 279

IV. With letter of 25 January 2019 the respondent filed an auxiliary request 5.

V. The Board issued a summons to oral proceedings and a subsequent communication containing its provisional opinion, in which it questioned the presence of an inventive step in the subject-matter of claim 1 as granted and in that of claim 1 of the auxiliary requests 1 to 4.

VI. With letter of 4 June 2019, the respondent withdrew certain auxiliary requests and filed new ones resulting in auxiliary requests 1 to 7 being on file.

VII. Oral proceedings were held before the Board on 4 July 2019, during which the appellant withdrew auxiliary requests 2 and 4 to 7 on file, made auxiliary request 3 its new auxiliary request 2 and filed a new auxiliary request 3a. The final requests of the parties were as follows:

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and the European patent No. 1 628 614 be revoked.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed or, in the alternative, that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of auxiliary request 1 or the new auxiliary request 2, filed as auxiliary request 3 with letter dated 4 June 2019, or the new auxiliary request 3a filed during the oral proceedings on 4 July 2019.

VIII. Claim 1 of the main request reads as follows:

"A disposable absorbent product, comprising:

a package (100) having a transparent window (16); and

a plurality of individually wrapped disposable absorbent articles (20) which are stacked and contained in the package (100);

each absorbent article having a longitudinal centerline (L) and a transverse centerline (T), and including a liquid impermeable backsheet (34) having a garment facing surface, an adhesive means disposed in the longitudinal direction, and a wrapper sheet (26) for individually wrapping the absorbent article, the adhesive means being disposed between the garment facing surface of the backsheet (34) and the wrapper sheet (26);

the adhesive means including a plurality of adhesive sections (41-49) which are spaced apart one another by at least one non-adhesive section (51-56), the wrapper sheet (26) covering the adhesive means and the garment facing surface of the backsheet, each absorbent article being folded about at least one folding line (F1) that intersects the adhesive means at the non-adhesive section (51-56) such that the folding line (F1) contains no adhesive section (41-49);

wherein the stacked plurality of the individually wrapped absorbent articles (20) are arranged associated with the transparent window (16) such that the folding line (F1) of each absorbent article (20) positions towards the transparent window (16) of the package (100)."

Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 reads as for claim 1 of the main request wherein immediately after the first recitation of 'wrapper sheet (26)' the following feature is inserted:

"having a light transmittance of at least about 10%".

Claim 1 of new auxiliary request 2 reads as for claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 wherein immediately before the first recitation of 'transparent window (16)' "a" is deleted and the following is inserted:

"exactly one".

Claim 1 of new auxiliary request 3a reads as for claim 1 of the main request wherein immediately after the first recitation of 'wrapper sheet (26)' the following feature is inserted:

"having a light transmittance in a range of about 80-100%".

IX. The appellant's arguments may be summarised as follows:

Main request

The subject-matter of claim 1 lacked an inventive step starting from D7 and combining this with the technical teaching of D5. D7 was a suitable starting point being directed to a similar product and function to that of the claimed invention. No avoidance of adhesive deterioration could be credited to the claimed window and folded article combination as claimed, since adhesive degraded by uv light was not claimed and multiple windows in the package were not excluded from the claim's scope. The objective technical problem to be solved was simply to obtain information about the packaged articles, the information possibly being just the number of articles remaining in the package. D5 disclosed packaging for absorbent articles incorporating a window for obtaining information about the packaged articles and thus provided the necessary hint to the solution of claim 1.

Auxiliary request 1

This did not overcome the inventive step objection against the main request. A light transmittance of about 10% was extremely low and might be regarded even as de minimis and could thus not contribute to the visibility of any information relating to the wrapped absorbent articles viewed from the edge. The objective technical problem to be solved relating to this feature was nothing more than providing an alternative wrapper sheet.

New auxiliary request 2

This should not be admitted since 'exactly one' transparent window in the package was prima facie not directly and unambiguously derivable from the application as filed.

New auxiliary request 3a

This should also not be admitted. The newly added feature in claim 1 changed the nature of the invention as well as the course of the appeal case and would require a new search to be carried out. It would also not be reasonable to expect the appellant to deal with such a complex change of case without adjournment of the proceedings.

X. The respondent's arguments may be summarised as follows:

Main request

The subject-matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step. D7 was an inappropriate starting point for an inventive step attack. T548/03 confirmed that when starting from a remote document the formulation of the problem to be solved would involve hindsight. D1 was a better starting point for an inventive step attack since it disclosed all features of claim 1 save for the pattern of adhesive and the orientation of the articles. If nonetheless starting from D7, the technical problem to be solved based on the differentiating features over D7 was 'to facilitate handling of sanitary napkins in a manner that best protects them and better allows a consumer to obtain information about them'. The inventive claim simply needed to deliver a solution to the technical problem rather than be limited to products experiencing degradation by uv light. D5 would not be considered by the skilled person for a solution to the technical problem, particularly since it provided no information as to

- how the fold of a sanitary napkin would be arranged relative to the package window if it were used to package the absorbent articles of D7, and

- all the articles being consistently stacked within the package.

Auxiliary request 1

The subject-matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step. Relative to a wrapper sheet with absolutely no light transmittance the claimed wrapper sheet would allow some light to pass through. This contributed to the objective problem of enabling a consumer to directly obtain information about the packaged sanitary napkins. Paragraph [0032] linked back to paragraph [0004] of the patent such that the claimed light transmittance enabled information about the sanitary napkins to be obtained.

New auxiliary request 2

The request should be admitted as it prima facie overcame the inventive step objections of the previous requests and did not introduce any new problems. The basis for the added feature in claim 1 of the present request 'exactly one transparent window' was claims 1, 9 and 10 as filed in addition to the final two lines of page 2 and page 13 line 4 of the description as filed.

New auxiliary request 3a

This should also be admitted as it was filed in response to objections to the previous request, particularly relating to 10% light transmittance being de minimis, heard for the first time at oral proceedings before the Board. Both auxiliary request 1 and 2 had already included a light transmittance of at least 10% such that the appellant should have been in a position to deal with the amendment in this request.

1. Main request

1.1 Article 100(a) EPC - Inventive step

The Board finds that starting from D7 and combining this with the technical teaching of D5, the skilled person would reach the claimed subject-matter without exercising an inventive step.

1.1.1 The respondent's contention that D7 was an inappropriate starting point for an inventive step attack is not accepted. In this regard the Board finds that an 'appropriate' starting point for an inventive step objection can be any piece of prior art in the same field as, or a closely neighbouring field of, the claimed invention, as also stated in the Board's communication prior to oral proceedings. D7 clearly meets this requirement, being directed to individually wrapped, folded sanitary napkins which are an integral part of the subject-matter of claim 1. To be overly restrictive as regards possible starting documents for an inventive step attack is unnecessary since less promising starting points would anyway make an obvious modification thereof (in order to reach the claimed subject-matter) more difficult than when starting from a more promising document. Therefore, rather than the 'appropriateness' of a document being analysed in too great detail in advance of the formulation of an inventive step attack, less promising starting documents will ultimately be exposed by resulting in unsuccessful inventive step attacks. In this regard it should be remembered that 'closest' prior art is merely a label given to the piece of prior art from which an inventive step attack starts and which is considered to be the most promising. In many cases it may indeed not be possible to identify whether one piece of prior art is necessarily 'closer' than another piece of prior art, and doing so may well artificially restrict inventive step considerations using the problem/solution approach. In the present case, the claim is directed to a combination of a package and the articles in the package such that selecting one element of the combination claimed is found by the Board to be an appropriate starting point - not least since it is well known that such articles as in D7 are typically stacked and contained in an outer package.

1.1.2 The respondent's contention that D1 presented a better starting point for an inventive step attack is not convincing. Although D1 discloses a packaged stack of sanitary napkins, each being folded inwardly and individually wrapped, the packaged articles disclosed there are not specified in the same way as claimed regarding the positioning of adhesive.

1.1.3 The respondent's reference to T0548/03, and the suggestion therein that hindsight would influence the formulation of the technical problem when starting from an inappropriate document, fails to change the above finding, not least since D7 is found to be an appropriate starting point (as explained above). In as far as hindsight is concerned, knowledge of the claimed invention is however absolutely necessary in order to formulate the objective technical problem, irrespective of how 'close' the prior art document is to the claimed invention; the features differentiating the claimed subject-matter from the starting document must be identified, their technical effect determined and thus the problem to be solved formulated. In as far as such knowledge of the claimed invention is labelled as 'hindsight', then indeed this particular type of hindsight is a necessity in order for the technical problem to be formulated on an objective basis. As long as there is no reason (primarily a technical reason) why the content of the document selected as the closest prior art would itself not be suitable or compatible for use with respect to the subject-matter claimed, any analysis of 'how close' the prior art starting document is judged to be to the claimed invention is not something which should exclude it from being the closest prior art. In the present case, no such reason excluding D7 from being suitable was apparent; in fact quite the opposite.

1.1.4 In summary, therefore, the Board finds D7 to be a perfectly valid starting point for an inventive step attack against the subject-matter of claim 1.

1.1.5 At oral proceedings both parties stated their agreement with the preliminary opinion of the Board regarding D7 failing to disclose the following features of claim 1:

- A package (for absorbent articles) having a transparent window; and

- a plurality of individually wrapped absorbent articles which are stacked and contained in the package;

- wherein the stacked plurality of the individually wrapped absorbent articles are arranged associated with the transparent window such that the folding line of each absorbent article positions towards the transparent window of the package.

The respondent notably dropped its contention that D7 failed to disclose non-adhesive sections at the fold lines.

1.1.6 The respondent's contention during written proceedings that the technical problem to be solved based on these differentiating features over D7 was 'to facilitate handling of sanitary napkins in a manner that best protects them and best allows a consumer to obtain information about them' is however found not to be objective. The context of 'how best to protect the sanitary napkins' in the posed technical problem related to protection from undesirable consequences of uv radiation on the adhesive in the articles. This problem is however not solved across the scope of claim 1 since the absorbent product claimed is not even limited to employing adhesive degraded through exposure to light and, absent such, protection of the article from UV radiation is irrelevant. Likewise, in accordance with the claim, the articles are individually wrapped in an undefined wrapper material, which for example could well be fully opaque such that no uv radiation, even if it did enter the outer package, would impinge on the articles. The respondent's argument in this regard that the claim simply needed to 'deliver a solution' to a technical problem which could occur in some products, albeit not defined, rather than be limited to products experiencing degradation by uv light, misses the point here; lacking any product features in the claim which are subject to degradation by uv light results in a technical problem directed to avoiding uv light degrading effects not being objective, since that problem simply does not exist over part of the scope of the claim. The lack of such features has as a consequence that the objective technical problem cannot rely on avoidance of uv light effects at all. The objective technical problem is thus, as also argued by the appellant, seen to be 'how to facilitate handling of sanitary napkins which allows a consumer to directly obtain information about them'.

1.1.7 In trying to solve this problem the skilled person would consider the teaching of D5. The respondent's argument that D5 would not be considered by the skilled person for a solution to the technical problem is not persuasive. D5 discloses, particularly in the Fig. 12 embodiment, a package with a transparent window suitable for containing disposable absorbent products such as feminine care products (see page 3, lines 23 to 26). D5 thus discloses information relating to the same technical field as the claimed invention and also directed to facilitating handling of the napkins as included in the posed objective technical problem; the Board thus holds that the skilled person would indeed consider D5 as providing a solution to the posed problem.

1.1.8 The information obtained by the consumer about the absorbent articles may be the number of articles in the package or remaining in the package. This is found to be a reasonable interpretation of the expression 'information about them (the sanitary napkins)' as stated in the objective problem since paragraph [0004] of the patent gives size and thickness of the absorbent articles just as examples of the type of information that consumers can gain from a window in a package. There is therefore no limitation in the claim just to such information being size and thickness, and the number of articles in the package can equally be understood as 'sanitary napkin information'.

1.1.9 Specifically with respect to D5, the number of remaining articles can be directly ascertained via the window 106 in Fig. 12, which wraps around the end, top and bottom walls (52, 56, 58) of the package (50). Particularly with individually wrapped sanitary napkins, the number of napkins remaining will be readily ascertained irrespective of the orientation of the napkins themselves both within the wrappers and also relative to the package itself.

1.1.10 The respondent's argument that D5 provided no information as to how the fold of a sanitary napkin would be arranged relative to the package window if it were used to package the absorbent articles of D7 has no bearing on the inventive step argument. In this regard it should be noted that the claimed absorbent products are each individually wrapped such that any advantage in ease of identifying individual articles by their folded, rather than open, edge cannot be recognised due to the wrapper making each article appear essentially identical whichever edge is observed. The feature in claim 1 that the folding line of each absorbent article positions towards the transparent window is thus, due to the wrapper essentially hiding the orientation of the fold, found to be arbitrary and cannot be considered a relevant differentiating feature of claim 1 over D7 for the purposes of supporting the presence of an inventive step.

1.1.11 The same is true of the alleged need to stack all the articles consistently within the package. With all the articles being individually wrapped, how the articles are oriented relative to the package window is irrelevant since the wrapper will mask any differences in orientation (see e.g. D7 Figures 13 and 15). At least for the purpose of identifying the number of articles remaining in the package, every edge of the wrapper will provide an equally convenient visual surface for identifying an individual article enabling those remaining to be counted.

1.1.12 It thus follows that, starting from D7 and wishing to solve the objective technical problem posed, the skilled person would take the technical teaching in D5 to package the articles in D7 in the manner claimed and reach the subject-matter of claim 1 without the exercise of an inventive step.

1.1.13 The ground for opposition under Article 100(a) EPC consequently prejudices maintenance of the patent according to the main request due to the subject-matter of claim 1 not involving an inventive step. The main request is thus not allowable.

2. Auxiliary request 1

2.1 Inventive step (Article 56 EPC)

The subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).

2.1.1 Claim 1 of this request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that the following feature has been added:

'(the wrapper sheet) having a light transmittance of at least about 10%'.

2.1.2 Despite the respondent's arguments to the contrary, the Board does not find this added feature to contribute in any appreciable manner to enabling the consumer to obtain information about the sanitary napkins wrapped therein. While relative to a wrapper sheet with absolutely no light transmittance the claimed wrapper sheet will allow some light to pass through, the claimed lower limit of 'at least about 10%' is not seen to be of any significance for the purposes of enabling information regarding the wrapped sanitary napkins to be visually ascertained. In this regard it should also be noted that paragraph [0061] of the patent states that the window only needs to be 'somewhat translucent' and it is only 'preferable' (i.e. not a limitation of the claim) that the window provide sufficient transparency to provide a preferred view of the wrapped articles.

2.1.3 In this regard, however, the appellant's argument that the claimed light transmittance of at least about 10% was de minimis is not decisive. Rather, with the transparent window in the package having no claimed light transmittance, this potentially almost opaque window would extremely restrict a consumer from obtaining any information about the sanitary napkins per se in the package, beyond being able to ascertain the number of products, irrespective of any desired light transmittance of the wrapper sheet itself. Further, claim 1 fails to provide any indication regarding the orientation in the package of the seal or seals which must necessarily join the opposed edges of each individual wrapper sheet. Should the seal be oriented towards the transparent window in the package, which is within the scope of claim 1, this would further obscure any appreciable information which may otherwise be transmitted to the consumer through the wrapper sheet.

2.1.4 The respondent's argument that paragraph [0032] linked back to paragraph [0004] of the patent such that the claimed light transmittance enabled information about the sanitary napkins to be obtained is not accepted. Whilst paragraph [0032] of the patent does discuss light transmittance of the wrapper sheet, it solely indicates the light transmittance 'ranges' as providing 'an effective view of the sanitary napkin through the wrapper sheet', this unambiguously relating to the disclosed light transmittance ranges of 45-100% and 80-100%, but not the preceding lower limit value 'at least about 10%', which is the claimed value. The claimed level of light transmittance is thus not seen to necessarily contribute in any manner to information that the consumer can obtain regarding the wrapped articles.

2.1.5 Lacking any contribution to the objective technical problem posed for claim 1 of the main request, the added feature in the present claim 1 must be directed to a separate problem which, as also argued by the appellant, can be seen as being the provision of a suitable wrapper sheet.

2.1.6 Wrapping materials for the sanitary napkin of D7 are disclosed on page 21, lines 7 to 13, including a non-woven fabric of polyethylene. Such a material is also disclosed in paragraph [0031] of the patent as a suitable wrapper material. Whilst such a wrapper material lacks the specifically claimed light transmittance value of at least about 10%, this is merely a typical value attributable to such well known sheet materials, which as such was not contested by the respondent, such that selecting one with at least about 10% light transmittance would be obvious. It thus follows that the newly added feature to claim 1 is obvious to the skilled person when starting from D7 and wishing to solve the (partial) objective technical problem formulated above.

2.1.7 The subject-matter of claim 1 thus lacks an inventive step (Article 56 EPC) and auxiliary request 1 is therefore not allowable.

3. New auxiliary request 2

Admittance (Article 13(1) RPBA)

3.1 With this request having been filed as auxiliary request 3 on 4 June 2019 it may be admitted and considered at the Board's discretion, which is set out in Article 13(1) RPBA, such discretion being exercised inter alia in view of the need for procedural economy. As is established case law of the Boards of Appeal, such procedural economy implies that amended requests should at least be prima facie allowable in order to be admitted.

3.2 As regards the subject-matter of claim 1 meeting the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC, the basis for the added feature in claim 1 of the present request 'exactly one transparent window' was given as claims 1, 9 and 10 as filed in addition to the final two lines of page 2 and page 13, line 4 of the description as filed.

3.3 Claims 1, 9 and 10 as filed each claim 'a transparent window', yet this is not an unambiguous disclosure of 'exactly one transparent window' as now claimed. The same is true for the reference to page 2 of the description which also discloses 'a transparent window', subsequently referred to as 'the transparent window' yet this is not a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the claimed 'exactly one' transparent window.

3.4 Lines 4 to 10 on page 13 of the description discloses 'at least one transparent window' which 'can be provided at any panels (sic) of the package'. This wording alone fails to disclose 'exactly one' window in the package not least due to a plurality of panels being disclosed in relation to at least one transparent window being provided; this thus could include a window being provided in each panel of the package. It is further noted that this passage relates to the Fig. 8 package embodiment which notably also fails to unambiguously disclose exactly one window despite only one being depicted: nothing is known about the opposing side of the package to that depicted with the window, this also perfectly reasonably including a window as well.

3.5 The passages of the description and claims referred to as the basis for the amendments thus fail to provide a prima facie direct and unambiguous disclosure for the amended subject-matter.

3.6 Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 is not prima facie allowable, which would be necessary for fulfilling the need for procedural economy and consequently admitting the request into the proceedings. Accordingly, the Board exercised its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA not to admit this request.

4. New auxiliary request 3a

Admittance (Article 13(1) RPBA)

4.1 This request was filed during the oral proceedings before the Board and its admittance is thus again at the discretion of the Board.

4.2 Relative to claim 1 of the previously considered new auxiliary request 2 (see point 3 above), claim 1 has had the 'exactly one' limitation for the transparent window removed, and further limits the light transmittance of the wrapper sheet to 'a range of about 80-100%'.

4.3 The deletion of the 'exactly one' limitation for the transparent window results in a claim which is not convergent with claim 1 of the previous request considered. The procedural complexity associated with a non-convergent set of requests requires the appellant and the Board to now consider a request of a broader scope, at least in the aspect of the transparent window, to that previously considered, which presents a new, complex situation in which the necessary considerations made in respect of the foregoing, higher ranking auxiliary request would in fact be in vain. Such a 'divergence of direction' in a set of requests, as in the present case with new auxiliary requests 2 and 3a, is thus seen as detrimental to procedural economy. Moreover, after discussion of the main request, the respondent was informed that the admittance of certain requests was an issue to be considered in regard to lack of convergency within the set of requests, and also due to the fact that the 'exactly one transparent window' language in the claim was provisionally considered to contravene Article 123(2) EPC (see the minutes, paragraph bridging pages 2 and 3), upon which the respondent was given the opportunity to reconsider its requests.

4.4 It is also noted that the introduction of the 'light transmittance range of about 80-100%' in claim 1 takes the appeal case and the alleged inventive subject-matter in a completely new direction to that previously argued by the respondent. Hitherto, for the entirety of the written appeal proceedings, the respondent had argued that avoiding degradation of the adhesive by uv light to at least be included, if not be at the heart of, the problem to be solved; only on the day of oral proceedings were these arguments dropped and a new line pursued whereby the invention now lay solely in enabling the consumer to obtain information about the packaged absorbent articles. The claimed light transmittance range of about 80-100% for the wrapper sheet might well contribute to an objective problem concerned with high light transmittance levels, since it can reasonably be expected to be able to ascertain features of the article wrapped within the wrapper sheet, albeit not necessarily through the window of the outer package for which no light transmittance levels are stated. As a result the changes made in the present auxiliary request are considered to involve not inconsiderable complexity, with which both the appellant and the Board cannot reasonably be expected to deal.

4.5 The respondent's argument that the previous auxiliary requests had already included a light transmittance of at least 10% and this was now being further limited to about 80 to 100%, as had also been indicated necessary in the Board's preliminary opinion, does not change the above finding. Whilst claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 indeed did claim a light transmittance of at least about 10%, the consequences on the presence of an inventive step in that claim did not require discussion since the request was not admitted for other reasons. As regards auxiliary request 1, the claimed light transmittance of at least about 10% failed to influence the ability of the consumer to obtain information about the sanitary napkins (see point 2.1.2 above). The relevance of the wrapper sheet having the now claimed light transmittance would thus require discussion for the first time with respect to inventive step in the present request, which was, as indicated above, unreasonable for the appellant to deal with at such a late stage of the appeal procedure.

4.6 Although the respondent argued that the appellant had only mentioned the value of 10% being a de minimis value in regard to the first auxiliary request during the oral proceedings before the Board, and that this was its reason for introducing the far higher transmittance values by way of auxiliary request 3a, the Board had not based its conclusion regarding the first auxiliary request on the idea of a de minimis value, but merely on one which was simply very low and thus not necessarily, over the whole scope of the claim, solving the problem as formulated by the respondent.

4.7 For completeness it is further noted that the inclusion in claim 1 of the present request of a light transmitting wrapper sheet only partially responds to the indication in the Board's preliminary opinion regarding features lacking in the claimed subject-matter. These further features were an adhesive being degraded by uv light and there being just a single window in the package which were also of importance if the objective technical problem to be solved were indeed to concern protecting the sanitary napkins as well as allowing a consumer to obtain information about them.

4.8 Additionally, the admittance of this request would involve completely new aspects with respect to the consideration of inventive step, seemingly also requiring a search for new prior art due to the fact that this feature was taken from the description at such a late stage; this could not reasonably be achieved without adjournment of the oral proceedings which would clearly run counter to the need for procedural economy.

4.9 As a consequence, the Board exercised its discretion not to admit new auxiliary request 3a into the proceedings (Article 13(1) RPBA).

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility