Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Financing innovation programme
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Your business and patents
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Why do we have patents?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Patents and standards
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the Observatory
      • Our activities
      • Our topics
      • Our partners and networks
      • Financing innovation programme
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Our studies on the financing of innovation
        • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
        • Financial support for innovators in Europe
      • Digital library
      • Data desk
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 2003/14 13-09-2018
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 2003/14 13-09-2018

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T200314.20180913
Date of decision
13 September 2018
Case number
T 2003/14
Petition for review of
-
Application number
07849179.2
IPC class
A61F 13/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 360.96 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING STABILIZED ABSORBENT STRUCTURE

Applicant name
The Procter & Gamble Company
Opponent name
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.
Board
3.2.06
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
Keywords

Inventive step - (no)

Amendments - intermediate generalisation

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The opposition division rejected the opposition against European patent EP-B-2 083 779. The opposition division held that the ground of opposition under Article 100(a) EPC was not prejudicial to maintenance of the patent since the subject-matter of claim 1 involved an inventive step in view of

D1 WO-A-2004/100847 and

D2 US-A-4 081 884.

II. The appellant (opponent) filed an appeal against this decision and paid the appeal fee. In its statement setting out the grounds of appeal, the appellant requested that the decision of the opposition division be set aside and the patent be revoked in its entirety.

III. The respondent (patent proprietor) replied to the appeal, requesting that the appeal be dismissed and filing amended claim requests as first to third auxiliary requests.

IV. The Board summoned the parties to oral proceedings.

V. With its communication sent prior to oral proceedings, the Board indicated that irrespective of whether D1 or D2 were considered as the closest prior art, the presence of an inventive step was questionable. As regards the first auxiliary request, the Board noted that a first matter for discussion might be whether the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC had been met.

VI. With letter of 15 June 2018, the appellant withdrew its request for oral proceedings but maintained its request for revocation of the patent.

VII. Oral proceedings were held on 13 September 2018.

The appellant did not attend the oral proceedings as already announced. Thus its requests in writing were that the decision under appeal be set aside and the patent be revoked.

The respondent requested that the appeal be dismissed, alternatively that the patent be maintained on the basis of the first auxiliary request filed with the reply to the appeal.

VIII. Claim 1 as granted (main request) reads:

"A process for producing a stabilized product from a pledget, wherein said stabilized product is a tampon, comprising the steps of:

- providing a pledget (112) into a compression mold (102),

- compressing said pledget (112) in said compression mold (102) to form a compressed pledget (132);

- unloading said compressed pledget (132) from said compression mold (102) and loading said compressed pledget (132) into a stabilization mold (104) by a transfer member (110), whereby said transfer member (110) advances to a loading position;

- retracting said transfer member (110) to a stabilizing position;

- stabilizing said compressed pledget (132) in said stabilization mold (104) to form a stabilized product (20), wherein said transfer member (110) remains in said stabilizing position during at least a portion of the step of stabilizing said compressed pledget (132); and

- unloading said stabilized product (20) from said stabilization mold (104).

wherein said transfer member (110) engages a proximal end of said compressed pledget (132) and said transfer member (110) remains engaged with said proximal end in both said loading position and said stabilizing position."

IX. Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request reads:

"A process for producing a stabilized product from a pledget, wherein said stabilized product is a tampon, comprising the steps of:

- providing a pledget (112) into a compression mold (102),

- compressing said pledget (112) in said compression mold (102) to form a compressed pledget (132);

- unloading said compressed pledget (132) from said compression mold (102) and loading said compressed pledget (132) into a stabilization mold (104) through an inlet region (160) and then into an inner cavity (50) of the stabilization mold (104) through an open proximal end (152) of the inner cavity (150) by a transfer member (110), whereby said transfer member (110) advances to a loading position so that, upon completion of the loading stroke a head region (156) of the compressed pledget (132) fills a closed distal end of the inner cavity (150);

- retracting said transfer member (110) to a stabilizing position;

- stabilizing said compressed pledget (132) in said stabilization mold (104) to form a stabilized product (20), wherein said transfer member (110) remains in said stabilizing position during at least a portion of the step of stabilizing said compressed pledget (132); and

- unloading said stabilized product (20) from said stabilization mold (104).

wherein said transfer member (110) engages a proximal end of said compressed pledget (132) and said transfer member (110) remains engaged with said proximal end in both said loading position and said stabilizing position and wherein the head region (156) of the compressed pledget that is loaded into the distal end (154) of the inner cavity (150) is the insertion end of the product."

X. The appellant argued as follows:

Claim 1 lacked an inventive step in view of D1. D1 disclosed a similar process for producing stabilized tampons (see the title and Figures). Figure 19 of D1 described an arrangement in which a transfer member transferred the pledget for a sequence of process steps, including supplying the pledget to the compression mold and the stabilization mold. The transfer member remained in contact with the compressed tampon while it was subjected to stabilisation through the flow of gas in a stabilisation mould.

Starting from D1, the difference to the claimed subject-matter was the retraction step to a stabilizing position. When trying to solve the objective technical problem of improved dimensional stability for a tampon, the skilled person would consider the teaching of D2.

D2 was also concerned with a process of providing a more stable tampon. The skilled person was taught by D2 that by over-compression and relaxation, improved stabilisation could be obtained.

D2 disclosed a corresponding process using a piston member which engaged one end of a compressed pledget in a stabilisation mould and which should be retracted from a first to a second position to enable the pledget to slightly relax longitudinally with some stabilisation of the pledget being carried out while the piston member remained engaged with the end of the pledget. The skilled person would consider this teaching to be advantageous in the context of D1 and would implement it in the D1 arrangement.

The difference between the disclosure of D2 and the claimed subject-matter to use the compression piston 46 (that then retracts (see Figure 3d of D2)) rather than the reciprocating pusher which introduced the pledget into the chamber 40 was merely an equivalent mechanical arrangement.

XI. The respondent argued:

Only D1 represented the closest prior art for starting the assessment of inventive step. D1 already disclosed a process for producing a stabilized tampon and the process was characterized by the tampon being moved by a transfer member through the system. For stabilization, a step applying heated gas in a stabilizing mold was provided.

Starting from D1, the difference to the claimed subject-matter was the retraction step to a stabilizing position. The objective technical problem to be solved was to provide better stabilized tampons.

Although D2 suggested a manufacturing process for the production of dimensionally stable tampons, the skilled person would not consider D2 in combination with D1. D1 disclosed the application of heated gas and thus related to a more advanced process for stabilization of the pledgets. The teaching of D2 went in a different direction. D2 described a process where the tampon blank was heated and stabilized at the same time. Additionally, D2 did not suggest carrying out a compression/retraction step before the stabilization started. There was also no reason for the skilled person to single out from D2 the step of applying over-compression before the stabilization started. Additionally, D2 required two plungers for the process and no suggestion to use only one plunger was present. Moreover, D2 referred to a process for producing cylindrical tampons only.

Concerning the auxiliary request, the basis for the amendments was to be found in the application as filed on page 16 and in Figures 17 to 20A which described the compression and stabilization steps including the retraction of the transfer member. It was not necessary to include any further feature. In particular, it was not necessary to include the feature of the transfer member advancing to an adjustable and predetermined loading position or the feature of the loading of the transfer member having to be applied in a controlled manner, since these features were implicitly already present in claim 1.

1. Inventive step - Main request

1.1 D1 represents an appropriate starting point for the assessment of inventive step. This is not in dispute. It discloses (see e.g. Figs. 10 and 19 and Example 2) the manufacturing process for a shaped tampon. In the process of D1 the pledget is compressed radially in the compression mold (102) and subsequently moved by a transfer member (110) into the stabilization mold (104) there being further compressed axially by the transfer member. Figure 19 of D1 shows the process step where the compressed tampon is subjected to stabilization via a heated gas flow and where the transfer member is aligned with the closed position of the stabilization mold. According to D1 (see e.g. page 11, fourth paragraph), pressures and temperatures suitable for compression of the pledgets are well-known and the molds may be pre-heated prior to insertion of the tampon pledget in addition to the gas being heated (see page 14, l. 10-18).

1.2 Hence, D1 discloses the process of claim 1 with the exception of the step of retracting the transfer member to a stabilizing position before starting the stabilization step. This retraction step causes an improvement in stabilization (see the patent in suit, paragraphs 65 to 67 and 69 which refer to enhanced uniformity of radial expansion along the length of the tampon due to the retraction step). Since D1 is already directed to producing a stabilized tampon (inter alia by passing the pledget through a stabilization mold), the objective technical problem to be solved when starting from D1 can be regarded as being to provide a process resulting in improved stabilized tampons.

1.3 Starting from D1, and trying to solve the problem of providing a process resulting in improved stabilised tampons, the skilled person would consider the disclosure in D2, as explained below.

1.4 D2 discloses a process for providing dimensionally stable tampons (see e.g. title and col. 1, l. 43/44). The process of D2 includes the provision of a pledget via a compression mold and transferring this pledget into a heated chamber for stabilization (abstract;

col. 1, l. 57-60; col. 5, l. 3-28). One piston (44) (transfer member) is provided for insertion of the radially compressed pledget into the chamber (and ejection from this chamber) and another piston (46) on the other end of the pledget is provided for correct placement of the pledget (15) enabling initially over-compression (Figure 3c) and subsequently part relaxation of the over-compressed state of the pledget (Figure 3d). The piston (44) representing the transfer member remains in the same position during the steps of over-compression and release thereof which represent the steps of stabilizing said compressed pledget (Figures 3c/3d). The piston (46) providing the retraction from over-compression is moved after the pledget has attained its over-compressed state to the retraction position (Figure 3d) and holds the pledget in the heated chamber in this position while still maintaining a force resistant to further expansion (col. 5, lines 23-28).

1.5 D2 includes in particular the information that, in such a method, it is the step of (longitudinal) over-compression of the pledget (Figure 3c) and subsequent relaxation (Figure 3d) in a heated mold which leads to the desired increased stabilization of the tampon (col. 2, l. 1-18).

1.6 Hence, in D2 there is not only a single set of linked and inseparable method steps disclosed for obtaining better stability of the tampon but also the disclosure to a skilled person of a retraction step following a compression step (see 1.5 above) and thus, the skilled person would also readily extract the teaching of using a retraction step from D2 when starting from D1 and attempting to solve the stated problem.

1.7 The respondent argued that D2 discloses that it is not the transfer member (reciprocating pusher 44) but the compression piston 46, which retracts to remove the over-compression.

1.8 The compression piston 46 indeed acts as a complementary piston to the transfer member on the other end of the pledget in the pledget canal. Yet, retracting the reciprocating pusher 44 instead of piston 46 would be understood by the skilled person as being an obvious mechanical alternative and basic mechanical consideration, not least when considering this alternative in the knowledge of other processes (such as D1) where only one reciprocating member is used to transfer a pledget into a stabilization mold and to hold it during stabilization. Accordingly, this difference is a step which a skilled person would take without exercising inventive skill when considering the objective problem and starting from D1 which itself already uses a single transfer member for movement in and out of the mould.

1.9 The respondent's further arguments put forward in the context of the problem/solution-approach as set out above as to why the skilled person would not consider a combination of the disclosures of D1 and D2 are not convincing either.

1.9.1 The process in D1 does not refer to stabilization via heated gas only. The temperature of the stabilizing mold is disclosed in D1 (page 14, lines 14 to 19; page 22, lines 5-11) as being preferably at an elevated level and thus the disclosure of D2 is consistent with this because D2 refers to preheating of the stabilization mold as being advantageous (see col. 4, l. 30-37, where it is indicated that whilst it is not essential, it greatly advances the objective of compressing the blank).

1.9.2 D1 as well as D2 describe a process wherein the tampon blank is heated and stabilized at the same time. A relation to a 'more advanced process' as argued by the respondent during the oral proceedings before the Board for stabilization of the pledgets may apply for the step of the additional use of heated gas in D1 - however this aspect is not directly related to the step of retraction from over-compression which is highlighted in D2 as being beneficial for stabilization. Accordingly, the respondent's argument does not alter the conclusion that the skilled person would single out this process aspect from D2 and apply it in the process of D1.

1.9.3 In the process of D2, the steps of over-compression and retraction from over-compression are carried out in the stabilization mold. The retraction step takes place during the stabilization step, and there is no suggestion of operating a retraction step before the start of the stabilization. However, the stabilization step continues - in that the pledget is held in the heated chamber in the retracted position (col. 5, l. 23 - 28) to thus stabilise in the same way as defined in claim 1. Thus, again, the technical effect achieved by the retraction step when considering D2 does not alter the conclusion reached above by the Board as to why the teaching of D2 would be utilized in D1. In particular, no evidence of the influence of the exact timing of the retraction step in D2 has been submitted, nor can any be seen, to suggest that the timing and exact sequence of the individual steps together is of importance in a way that would prevent a separation of over-compression and relaxation steps from the entire set of the process steps in D2 in order to provide the benefit in stability stated there. To summarise, the skilled person still receives the teaching that the over-compression and expansion steps are those which provide the required stabilisation.

1.9.4 The further reference of the respondent to D2 disclosing a process only for producing "cylindrical" tampons is not related to the features defined in claim 1, as these do not define any particular shape of tampon, and thus may be disregarded when considering whether the subject-matter of claim 1 involves an inventive step.

1.10 This also applies to the arguments of the respondent concerning the aim to obtain a smooth surface of the tampons in D2 (col. 2. l. 18 - 21), as well as to the issue of the terminology concerning "stabilization" allegedly being changed in the course of the years in view of D2 being filed in 1977.

1.11 Hence, the skilled person starting from D1 as the closest prior art would immediately recognize that in D2 it is the retraction step from over-compression which provides the benefit to stabilization and that this step is that which is available to be singled out and implemented in the process of D1. Therefore, the skilled person would include the retraction step into the process of D1 and thus arrive at the subject-matter of claim 1 without the exercise of inventive skill. Consequently, the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC) and the main request is not allowable.

2. Auxiliary request 1

2.1 Claim 1 was amended to include additionally the following steps - set out below in italics in the context of the features concerned:

- "unloading said compressed pledget (132) from said compression mold (102) and loading said compressed pledget (132) into a stabilization mold (104) through an inlet region (160) and then into an inner cavity (50) of the stabilization mold (104) through an open proximal end (152) of the inner cavity (150) by a transfer member (110), whereby said transfer member (110) advances to a loading position so that, upon completion of the loading stroke a head region (156) of the compressed pledget (132) fills a closed distal end of the inner cavity (150);"

- .... "and wherein said transfer member (110) engages a proximal end of said compressed pledget (132) and said transfer member (110) remains engaged with said proximal end in both said loading position and said stabilizing position and wherein the head region (156) of the compressed pledget that is loaded into the distal end (154) of the inner cavity (150) is the insertion end of the product."

The amendments concern the orientation of the pledget in the process, such as shown in Figures 17 to 20, in particular Figure 19. The wording of the first cited amendment is partly to be found in the second paragraph of page 16 and the wording of the second cited amendment can be found in claim 2 as filed. It is the subject-matter introduced by the first cited amendment which is considered below.

2.2 An unambiguous disclosure of the subject-matter resulting from the combination of only those features now encompassed by claim 1, cannot be derived.

2.3 The respondent referred to page 16, lines 10 to 26 of the application as filed as a basis. The wording in this paragraph concerns the embodiment shown in Figure 19 and reference is made to the controlled loading stroke of the transfer member which may load the compressed pledget into an inner cavity of the stabilization mold and to Figure 19A. In particular, it is stated in this section that during the loading stroke the transfer member advances to an adjustable and predetermined loading position.

2.4 The respondent considered the requirement of the loading position having to be adjustable and predetermined by a controlled loading stroke as being implicit in the claimed subject-matter.

2.5 However, only the control of the loading position can lead to the determination of whether a desired density is or can be achieved and whether upon completion of the loading stroke and prior to the controlled retraction of the transfer member the conditions for a desired stabilization of the pledget are given. Accordingly, the desired degree of stabilisation is only obtained when the loading stroke is adjustable and predetermined. Moreover, in the description related to the embodiment shown in Figures 19, 19A and 20 on page 16, l. 10 to 25, such disclosure is explicitly given. A disclosure wherein a predetermined and adjustable loading position is omitted is however covered by claim 1 and is also technically feasible, for example a position based on measured force rather than a predetermined position, such that an implicit disclosure is not present in the features already in claim 1, contrary to the respondent's argument.

2.6 Further, it may be added that these features are also functionally and structurally linked to the process and result described (see 2.5 above). Their omission thus cannot be found to be derivable directly and unambiguously for this reason either.

2.7 Thus the omission of (at least) the feature "advances to an adjustable and predetermined loading position" represents subject-matter which is an undisclosed intermediate generalisation of the content of the application as filed.

2.8 Accordingly, an unambiguous disclosure for the subject-matter as now encompassed by the subject-matter of claim 1, cannot be found. Hence, the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC is not fulfilled. For this reason, auxiliary request 1 is not allowable.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The patent is revoked.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility