T 0678/12 (Affiliate advertising/ SONY) 06-03-2018

1. Background

The invention concerns a scheme for paying a commission when a customer shops at an online store (a "business transaction website"). At the date of the invention, commissions were typically paid to the administrator of an advertisement website providing a link to the business transaction website, based on the results of leads from the advertisement website to the business transaction website (see paragraphs [0002] and [0003] of the published application). The invention extends this concept to include commissions to another person (a "commission object person"), for example the customer himself, or the manufacturer of the terminal (paragraphs [0004] and [0010]; and Figure 9(a)).

The claims of the main and auxiliary requests define various parts of a system for handling such commissions.

2. Main request, claim 1

Claim 1 of the main request is directed to a program in the customer's terminal, the terminal being a computer including a "reader/writer" that accesses an "IC-chip" of the customer.

In the Board's understanding, claim 1 of the main request defines the following functions of the program:

detecting that the IC chip is connected to the reader/writer;

receiving an "electronic money function unit ID" from the IC chip;

connecting the terminal to the advertisement website when the (IC chip) connection is detected;

storing "commission object person information" that comprises "the electronic money function unit ID" and that specifies the "commission object person"; and

transmitting the stored "commission object person information" to the advertisement website by including it in the "connection information" when connecting to the advertisement website.

The "electronic money function unit ID" identifies, as the term suggests, an "electronic money function unit", i.e. an electronic payment means. In the application, the "electronic money function unit ID" is the ID of the IC card, which is a sort of electronic cash card (see paragraph [0038] of the published application). However, the subject-matter of claim 1 is not limited to any specific type of "electronic money function".

Claim 1 of the main request does not define any function of actually paying or receiving the commission. Indeed, the commission object person information is just transmitted to the advertisement website, and there it ends. However, it may be useful for the understanding of the claimed invention that, when the customer receives a commission, it may be paid to the electronic money function unit identified by the ID (see paragraphs [0027] to [0029]).

3. Main request, inventive step

3.1 The examining division started from D1. The Board agrees that D1 is a reasonable starting point for assessing inventive step, because it concerns an Internet connecting program with an IC card that has many technical features in common with the invention as defined in claim 1 of the main request. Whether or not D1 is directed to paying commission is, in the Boards view, irrelevant, because it is suitable for that purpose and this is a non-technical aim, which does not count towards inventive step.

3.2 In D1, the user's terminal is automatically connected to a website when the user inserts an IC card into the computer's card reader (page 6, lines 3 to 13). Thus, D1 discloses a customer terminal as defined in claim 1 of the main request, as well as the functions of detecting and connecting.

3.3 The URL of the website is read from the IC card. The IC card also has, stored thereon, personal information including the user's name and credit card number (page 5, lines 11 to 18). The personal information may be read from the IC card and be provided automatically to the website when connecting to it (page 9, lines 19 to 23).

3.4 In the Board's view, the credit card number in D1 reads onto the "electronic money function unit ID" in claim 1 of the main request. Therefore, D1 discloses the function of receiving an "electronic money function unit ID" from the IC card as well as the function of transmitting person information, comprising the ID and specifying a person (the user), to the website. In the Board's view, the disclosure of D1 anticipates the feature of including the person information in "connection information", at least at the level of generality of claim 1. At any rate, passing data in, for example, the URL (see paragraph [0057] of the published application) was normal practice at the priority date.

3.5 The applicant argued that, since the person information was only provided when connecting to the predetermined advertisement website, bandwidth could be saved. The Board does not find this argument convincing. Claim 1 does not exclude that the commission object person information is transmitted as default when connecting to a website. Furthermore, the person information in D1 is only transmitted "as needed" (see page 8, lines 18 to 22). Thus, the Board does not see that the invention in claim 1 provides any difference over D1 that contributes to the effect argued by the appellant.

3.6 The appellant also argued that D1 did not disclose the storing of person information in the user's terminal. The Board disagrees. It is not possible to read information from an IC card and transmit it to a website without the intermediate step of storing it in a data buffer, for example a transmit buffer in the network unit. Since the storing is implicitly disclosed in D1, the appellant's arguments on the effects of the storing are not at issue.

3.7 Claim 1 of the main request defines "commission object person information" that specifies the person who receives a commission based on past results of leading the customer to the business transaction website through the advertisement website. This is not in D1. The Board has doubts, however, whether such use of personal information to identify a person who receives a commission is really a feature of the program as defined in claim 1. The distribution of commission is done outside the terminal, namely by the introducing server and/or the distribution server (see Figures 10 and 11). Seen from the terminal, the commission object person information is just some information identifying a person, for example the user. This is no different from the personal information in D1.

3.8 In any case, paying a commission to a person based on a number of leads is not technical. That is a business idea formulated by the business person as a business requirement to be met. The technically skilled person comes into play when the requirement is to be implemented. In the Board's view, it would have been normal routine for the skilled person to provide means for paying a commission using the person information in D1.

3.9 For these reasons, the Board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request lacks an inventive step over D1 (Article 56 EPC).

4. First auxiliary request, inventive step

4.1 Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request adds over the main request that the IC chip stores "electronic data representing a monetary value", as well as a reading function of "transmitting an ID reference command to the IC chip to read an electronic money function unit ID".

4.2 The data representing a monetary value is stored on the card but not used. Therefore, the Board does not see that this features provides any technical effect apart from taking up space on the card. Therefore, it cannot provide an inventive step.

4.3 Furthermore, the claimed reading function is already disclosed in D1. The system in D1 makes a select DF/EF command or performs an auto-run function to read data from IC card (see page 5, lines 23 to 25).

4.4 For these reasons, the Board finds that the features added by claim 1 of the first auxiliary request do not provide anything of inventive significance over D1. Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the first auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).

5. Second auxiliary request, claim 1

Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request is directed to a server device that accepts access from a customer terminal and operates the advertisement website that leads to the business transaction website.

The server device acquires the commission object person information from the customer terminal and stores it "in association with" a "commission amount", which is acquired from an unspecified source. The commission amount is based on past results of leads. It is stored but not used. Indeed, like in the main request, claim 1 of the second auxiliary request does not specify any actual payment of commission.

The server device associates the commission object person information and an "affiliated store ID" of the business transaction website with an "introductory ID", which it transmits to the business transaction website.

In the application (see paragraphs [0076] to [0079]), the server operating the advertisement website (the introducing server 3) and the server operating the business transaction website (the affiliated store server 8) both use the introductory ID for identifying an introductory case, i.e. a lead from the advertisement website to the business transaction website. This is necessary for keeping track of the leads and the sales amounts resulting from those leads, which, in turn, are needed for determining the commissions.

6. Second auxiliary request, inventive step

6.1 For the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request, the Board considers the conventional technology described in paragraphs [0002] and [0003] of the application as published to be a better starting point than D1. The described technology involves a server device operating an advertisement website that leads to a business transaction website of an online store. The server device implicitly comprises a "storing means" for storing information. The described server device also comprises "connection accepting means" and "leading means" as defined in claim 1 of the second auxiliary request.

6.2 The subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request differs from the conventional technology by:

the "commission object person acquiring means" for acquiring commission object person information included in the connection information from the customer terminal;

the "commission amount acquiring means" for acquiring the commission amount; and

the server device being configured to associate the commission object person information and an affiliates store ID of the business transaction website with an introductory ID and to transmit the introductory ID to the business transaction website.

6.3 Claim 1 does not say that the commission object person information and the commission amount is stored; it just defines suitable means for storing it. However, the storing of at least the commission object person is implicit from the context of claim 1. Therefore, this is also a difference over the prior art.

6.4 As concluded above with regard to the main request, the scheme of paying a commission to a person based on a number of leads from an advertiser to an online store is not technical and, as such, it cannot contribute to inventive step. The non-technical requirements include identifying the person who receives a commission and the payment means (for example an account) for paying the commission to that person. The technically skilled person with the task of implementing the non-technical commission scheme would need to provide suitable means for obtaining the commission object person information and, as set out in point 3.4 above, it would have been a matter of normal design to include it in the connection information when the customer terminal connects to the advertisement website.

The commission amount in claim 1 is not used. Therefore, it cannot support the presence of an inventive step. In any case, the commission amount is part of the non-technical commission scheme, and the implementation comprising means for acquiring it and storing it would have been straightforward and obvious to the skilled person.

6.5 The question remains whether the introductory ID provides a technical effect, which could contribute to inventive step. The appellant argued that the introductory ID improved the security of the payment when the customer purchased an item from the business transaction website. According to the appellant, the payment was effectuated by referring to the introductory ID without providing the electronic money function ID to the business transaction website.

6.6 The Board is not persuaded by the appellant's arguments. The introductory ID is not defined or limited in any way, nor is it used in any payment transaction between the customer and the online store. It is used for identifying a lead in the commission scheme. The Board has doubts whether such an identifier is at all technical. At any rate, providing a suitable identifier would have been a matter of normal design for the skilled person implementing the commission scheme.

6.7 For these reasons, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).