Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0547/08 10-03-2011
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0547/08 10-03-2011

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T054708.20110310
Date of decision
10 March 2011
Case number
T 0547/08
Petition for review of
-
Application number
97938177.9
IPC class
A61M 1/16
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 42.33 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Dialysis machines with touch screen user interface

Applicant name
HHD LLC
Opponent name
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH
Board
3.2.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 64(1)
European Patent Convention Art 69(1)
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 123(3)
Keywords

Extension of scope of protection (no)

Inventive step (yes)

Referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal (no)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
G 0002/88
G 0003/98
T 0352/04
T 0867/05
Citing decisions
T 1673/11
T 0970/17
T 0505/18
R 0013/22
T 1531/21
T 0321/21

I. On 14 February 2008 the Opposition Division posted its interlocutory decision concerning maintenance of European patent No. 0 959 980 in amended form.

II. An appeal was lodged against this decision by the opponent by notice received on 13 March 2008, with the appeal fee being paid on the same day. The statement setting out the grounds of appeal was received on 13 June 2008.

III. By communication of 27 December 2010, the Board forwarded its provisional opinion to the parties.

IV. Oral proceedings were held on 10 March 2011, at the end of which the requests of the parties were as follows:

The appellant (opponent) requested that the impugned decision be set aside and that the patent be revoked. He further requested that the two questions posed on page 11 of his letter dated 9 February 2011 be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.

The respondent (patentee) requested that the appeal be dismissed.

V. The following documents are of importance for the present decision:

D1: DE-A-195 00 529

D5: EP-A-0 321 754

D6: US-A-5 472 614

D11: WO-A-94/11093

D13: US-A-5 326 476.

VI. The independent claims of the patent in the form as maintained by the Opposition Division read as follows:

"1. A system for controlling the operation of a dialysis machine (10), comprising, in combination:

a user interface (12) comprising:

(1) a touch screen (14) displaying messages and information as to said machine (10) to a user and permitting said user to touch said touch screen (14) to select at least one parametric value pertinent to operation of said machine (10) or pertinent to a treatment by said machine (10); and

(2) at least one hard key (16) off of said touch screen (14), said touch screen (14) prompting said user to press said hard key (16) to signify that the selection of said at least one parametric value by said user has been completed; and

a control system (100) within said machine (10) for controlling operation of said machine (10) and responsive to said touch screen (14) and said at least one hard key (16), said control system (100) comprising a host microprocessor (110) and a safety microprocessor (116) operatively connected to each other so as to enable an exchange of information related to said at least one selected parametric value,

wherein pressing of said hard key (16) causes said host (110) and safety (116) microprocessors to undergo a verification routine whereby said selected parametric value is checked for appropriateness for a patient connected to said machine (10) so as to prevent changes to said parameter potentially harmful to said patient."

"15. A method of controlling a dialysis machine (10) having a user interface (12) and a central computer system (100) to control the operation of said dialysis machine (10), said user interface (12) having a touch screen (14) enabling a patient, by touching the touch screen (14), to select parametric values and accomplish entry of said selected parametric values in a process of changing a parametric value pertinent to operation of said machine (10) or pertinent to a dialysis treatment of a patient connected to said machine, the method comprising:

providing said user interface with at least one hard key (16;18);

connecting said hard key (16;18) to said central computer system (100); and

after said user has selected said parametric value and entered said selected parametric value by touching the touch screen (14), prompting said user of said machine (10) to press said hard key (16;18) to confirm the entry of said parametric value, so that a failure in said touch screen (14) to respond to touching of the touch screen (14) to confirm parametric value changes may be avoided."

"22. A dialysis machine comprising a user interface (12) and screen display apparatus that promotes ease of use of said user interface (12) by a user operating said machine (10) without immediate supervision by trained professional medical personnel, comprising:

(a) a touch screen (14);

(b) a screen display for such touch screen (14), said display arranged in at least two portions extending across said display, said at least two portions comprising:

(1) a first portion displaying instruction and status information to a user of said machine (10); and

(2) a second portion (72) adjacent to said first portion on said display and displaying a plurality of icons, each of said icons associated with a specific functional activity associated either with said machine (10) or a treatment session of said machine (10); and

(c) at least one hard key (16; 18) associated with said display, said first portion of said screen display prompting said user to press said at least one hard key (16;18) in a process of confirming entry of information into said machine (10)."

Claims 2 to 14, 16 to 21 and 23 to 29 are dependent claims.

VII. The appellant's relevant arguments are summarised as follows:

Claim 22 as granted was directed to a user interface per se. The term "for a dialysis machine" merely implied its suitability for a dialysis machine and did not exclude the user interface being usable for other devices. The term "for" was not limiting and did not imply that the dialysis machine formed part of the claimed subject-matter. Claim 22 as maintained by the Opposition Division, on the other hand, was directed to a dialysis machine comprising a user interface. Consequently, an "aliud" was claimed and the scope of protection as afforded by the amended claim was shifted and extended in breach of Article 123(3) EPC. A dialysis machine as now claimed was not within the scope of protection as defined by claim 22 as granted and could also not have been claimed by means of a claim dependent therefrom. According to T 352/04 and T 867/05, a shift to a more complex aliud which was not encompassed by the claims as granted was not allowable under Article 123(3) EPC.

As a result of the amendment to claim 22 the rights of the patentee to sue third parties for indirect infringement had changed. The scope of protection had been broadened since parties who could not be sued for contributory infringement on the basis of the claims as granted could be sued on the basis of the claims as upheld in the opposition proceedings. When assessing the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC, the scope of protection had to be determined according to Article 69(1) EPC and its Protocol, as ruled in G 2/88. It followed that the legal certainty of third parties had to be taken into consideration in this respect. Necessarily, this also implied infringement issues.

In the event that the present Board were to decide otherwise on this issue, the following questions should be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal:

1. Which criteria should be applied when deciding whether a change to a patent claim in opposition proceedings from a first physical entity results in a more complex physical entity which qualifies as an aliud and thus constitutes a violation of Article 123(3) EPC?

2. Is it consistent with the safeguarding of legal certainty for third parties as required by the Protocol on the Interpretation of Article 69 EPC if, in at least one designated Contracting State, that change to the claim confers rights on the patent proprietor for the first time which did not exist for the claim as granted?

D13 was particularly relevant for the assessment of inventive step since it related to a dialysis machine with a user interface comprising a touch screen and explicitly referred to the problem of touch screen failure in columns 307/308 and disclosed a "verify button" prompting the user to confirm the entry of information into the machine. A double verification routine was also disclosed in the first paragraph of page 10 of D11. Claim 22 in suit differed from D13 and D11 only in that it required the user to be prompted to press a hard key. The problem to be solved by this feature was to achieve a clearer and better perceptible design of the user interface. This was exactly the problem addressed in D1 (paragraph bridging columns 1 and 2), which also disclosed the solution as claimed by means of a confirmation switch ("Quittierschalter 22"). The obviousness of this feature was further apparent from the fact that the inventors of D1 started from a device without a touch screen, but decided not to incorporate into the touch screen the entire communication and interaction with the user. Instead, they deliberately retained certain hard keys (21, 22), i.e. keys not to be operated via the touch screen. Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 22 was obvious from D11/D13 in view of D1, which documents were clearly combinable since respirators and dialysis machines could be found side by side in a hospital environment.

Even though directed to a respirator, D1 could also be regarded as the closest prior art since it comprised all features of claim 22 with the exception that the user interface was part of a dialysis machine. In particular, D1 disclosed in column 2, lines 26 to 31, the crucial feature of prompting the user to press a key in order to confirm the entry of information. For the skilled person it was obvious to incorporate a user interface known from a respirator into a neighbouring medical device such as a dialysis machine.

VIII. The respondent's relevant arguments are summarised as follows:

Claim 22 as upheld had been clearly restricted by including the dialysis machine as an additional technical feature, being of the same category (apparatus) as the user interface. According to G 2/88, the appellant's arguments relating to contributory infringement should be ignored. Such matters related to the rights conferred on the patentee by national law of the Contracting States per Article 64(1) EPC. As clearly ruled in G 2/88, this issue was not to be considered when deciding about the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC. Accordingly, there was no need to refer the questions posed by the appellant to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.

When starting from documents D11/D13, which both disclosed "verification buttons" appearing on the touch screen and prompting the user to confirm the entry of changed parameter values via the touch screen, there was no motivation whatsoever for the skilled person to consider the possibility of prompting the user to press a separate hard key, the presence of which was not even envisaged in D11/D13. The problem to be solved by the distinguishing feature was to improve the safety of operation, in particular by an untrained user such as the patient himself. D1 was not combinable with D11/D13 since D1 related to a different technical field, namely a respirator which was generally operated by trained medical personnel, the patient being unconscious.

Since D1 did not relate to a dialysis machine, it could not be considered as closest prior art with respect to the subject-matter of claim 22. Moreover, it failed to address the problem underlying the claimed invention. The touch screen disclosed in D1 did not display any instruction information to the user and did not prompt the user to press a hard key to confirm the selection of a parametric value. Any assumption that a skilled person would seek to incorporate the respirator user interface disclosed in D1 into a conventional dialysis machine would be based on hindsight.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. The feature denotation of claim 22 proposed by the respondent as given below in bold will be used in the following:

(P) A dialysis machine comprising a user interface (12) and screen display apparatus that promotes ease of use of said user interface (12) by a user operating said machine (10) without immediate supervision by trained professional medical personnel, comprising:

(Q) (a) a touch screen (14);

(R) (b) a screen display for such touch screen (14), said display arranged in at least two portions extending across said display, said at least two portions comprising:

(S) (1) a first portion displaying instruction and status information to a user of said machine (10); and

(T) (2) a second portion (72) adjacent to said first portion on said display and displaying a plurality of icons, each of said icons associated with a specific functional activity associated either with said machine (10) or a treatment session of said machine (10); and

(U) (c) at least one hard key (16; 18) associated with said display, said first portion of said screen display prompting said user to press said at least one hard key (16;18) in a process of confirming entry of information into said machine (10).

3. Amendments

3.1 Basis

Claim 1 corresponds to original claim 1 as published under WO-A-98/35747. Independent claim 15 is based on claim 8 (with alternative (a) deleted). Independent claim 22 is based on claim 15. The Board is satisfied that the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC are met.

3.2 Scope of protection

Claim 22 as granted was directed to a user interface (12) and screen display apparatus for a dialysis machine (10) that promotes ease of use of said user interface (12) by a user operating said machine (10) without immediate supervision by trained professional medical personnel, comprising features Q to U. Claim 22 as maintained by the Opposition Division, on the other hand, is directed to a dialysis machine comprising a user interface (12) and screen display apparatus that promotes ease of use of said user interface (12) by a user operating said machine (10) without immediate supervision by trained professional medical personnel, comprising features Q to U. Accordingly, the scope of protection has been changed from "a user interface and screen display apparatus" per se [suitable] for a dialysis machine, i.e. a device A for a device B, to "a dialysis machine comprising a user interface and screen display apparatus", i.e. a combination of the two devices B and A. The remaining claimed features, Q to U, are identical in both cases. In the Board's view, the scope of the claim as maintained has been restricted vis-à-vis that of the claim as granted since the subject-matter upheld explicitly comprises the dialysis machine as an additional feature, instead of mere suitability of the user interface and screen display apparatus for a dialysis machine.

The appellant's arguments relating to the rights of the patent proprietor to sue for indirect or contributory infringement are not relevant to the issue of extension of scope of protection under Article 123(3) EPC. According to G 2/88 (OJ 1990, 93; see Reasons 3.3) a distinction is to made between the protection conferred by a patent as determined by the claims according to Article 69(1) EPC and the rights conferred on the patent owner in the designated Contracting States according to Article 64 EPC. According to G 2/88 the rights conferred on the proprietor of a European patent under Article 64(1) EPC "are the legal rights which the law of a designated Contracting State may confer upon the proprietor, for example, as regards what acts of third parties constitute infringement of the patent, and as regards the remedies which are available in respect of any infringement". In G 2/88 it is clearly ruled that it is not necessary to consider the national laws of the Contracting States in relation to infringement and that this issue is not relevant when deciding upon admissibilty of an amendment under Article 123(3) EPC (see Reasons 3.3).

With respect to the question of extension of scope of protection under Article 123(3) EPC, it is rather appropriate to take into account that the protection conferred by a patent is determined by the terms of the claims, and in particular by the categories of the claims and their technical features, in accordance with Article 69(1) EPC and its Protocol (G 2/88, loc. cit.). According to the latter, Article 69 should be interpreted as a compromise between a fair protection for the patentee and a reasonable degree of legal certainty for third parties. The description and drawings may be employed to a certain extent to interpret the claims, rather than only for the purpose of resolving a possible ambiguity in the wording of the claims.

In the present case, the wording of granted claim 22 is not directed to a user interface and screen display apparatus per se, being suitable for many kinds of devices other than dialysis machines. On the contrary, the expression "for a dialysis machine" is already to be regarded as a limiting technical feature. Moreover, the technical features S, T and U relating to the user interface and screen display apparatus are defined with reference to the dialysis machine and are closely related to its functional interaction therewith. In the description and drawings, the user interface and screen display apparatus is always presented in combination and interaction with the dialysis machine (see, for instance, Figure 1 and paragraph [0022] of the patent specification). Its protection in combination with a dialysis machine was clearly intended, even at the very beginning when the application was filed (see original claim 8).

The decisions cited by the appellant to support his line of argument are not applicable to the present situation. The case underlying T 352/04 relates to a change from a substance to a combination of the substance and a device, which was regarded as a change of the claim category. In the present case, however, there is no such change of category. T 867/05 relates to a change from "a membrane material for use in dialysis ...", i.e. a substance A for use in a method X, to "an artificial kidney in which there is used a membrane material...", i.e. a combination of a device B and the substance A, which is also a situation quite different from the present case.

Therefore, the appellant's argument that the scope of protection has been shifted to an "aliud", i.e. from a user interface and screen display apparatus to a dialysis machine, thus being in breach of Article 123(3) EPC, is not accepted by the Board.

Accordingly, the Board is satisfied that the scope of protection has not been extended and that claim 22 as maintained by the Opposition Division complies with the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC.

4. Referral to the Enlarged Board

Under Article 112(1) EPC a board shall refer a question to the Enlarged Board if it appears necessary in order to ensure a uniform application of the law or if a point of law of fundamental importance arises. Neither pre-condition is fulfilled for eihter of the two questions (1) and (2) proposed for referral by the appellant (see point VII above). The case law referred to above is not contradictory and not applicable to the present case, which concerns only devices and their technical features.

A change from a (granted) claim, directed to a first physical entity, to a second, more complex physical entity (an "aliud") in opposition proceedings is a common and usual procedure entirely in line with the requirements of Article 123(3) EPC: adding one or more limiting technical features to a claimed device naturally renders the claimed entity more complex and results in a restriction rather than an extension of scope. Accordingly, question (1) is not of "fundamental importance".

Question (2) is not relevant either since the Board considers that the rights of the patentee have not been extended by the modification. As a consequence, the legal certainty of third parties is sufficiently safeguarded.

Moreover, the admissibility of a referral under Article 112(1)(a) presupposes that an answer to the question is necessary for the referring board to be able to decide on the appeal (cf. G 3/98, OJ 2001, 62; Reasons 1). This is not the case here where the two questions are not relevant for deciding on the specific situation under consideration. A purely theoretical interest in clarifying points of law is no justification for a referral. Consequently, the request for referral to the Enlarged Board is rejected under Article 112(1)(a) EPC.

5. Inventive step

5.1 Document D13 as closest prior art discloses a dialysis machine comprising those features of claim 22 (which appears to be the broadest independent claim) which are acknowledged in paragraph [0004] of the specification of the patent in suit.

There is no indication in D13 that the machine is designed to be operated by a user without immediate supervision by trained professional medical personnel. After the user has entered a new value of a parameter via the touch screen display of D13, a "verify button" (see for instance the dashed box shown at the lower right of the drawing in columns 667/668) appears on the screen and prompts the user to confirm the changed value by touching this virtual "verify button" on the screen. This verification is said to serve as a protection against random touches or failures of the touch screen (see columns 307/308, sixth to last paragraph).

5.1.1 Accordingly, the subject-matter of claim 22 is distinguished over D13 by the first portion of the screen display prompting the user to press the at least one hard key in a process of confirming entry of information into the machine.

5.1.2 The technical advantage achieved by the distinguishing feature is that in case of a defective touch screen, the computer system is still able to independently receive the correct information from the touch screen (see paragraph [0005] of the specification). Accordingly, the objective technical problem is to improve the operational safety of the system, especially when it is operated by a user without immediate supervision by trained professional personnel, such as the patient himself (cf. paragraphs [0009] and [0011] of the specification).

5.1.3 None of the cited prior art documents gives a hint towards a screen display prompting a user to press a hard key for the stated purpose.

D1 relates to a respirator which is used not by a patient (who is normally unconscious) but rather by skilled medical professionals. The mere fact that respirators may be located side by side with dialysis machines in a hospital environment or treatment centre does not imply that the teachings relating to these two kinds of device are necessarily combinable. Accordingly, the skilled person starting from D13 and attempting to solve the above-mentioned problem would not necessarily consider the teaching of D1, which furthermore fails to give any hint towards the above-mentioned problem. However, even if the teaching of D1 were combined with that of D13, the subject-matter of claim 22 would not be rendered obvious. D1 discloses a hard key ("Quittiertaster 22") for verification of a parameter which may be changed and adjusted by turning a knob or dial 21 (paragraph bridging columns 4 and 5) or by using hard keys (column 2, lines 29 to 40), but there is no indication whatsoever of any prompting, in particular not from the screen display, to press the hard key 22. Once the dial 21 has been adjusted as desired, it can simply be pressed in order to confirm the revised setting. Accordingly, even a combination of the teachings of both documents, D13 and D1, does not lead to the subject-matter of claim 22. Even if touch screen prompting for verification purposes and parameter entry via a hard key separate from a touch screen are both routinely known, this does not render obvious the functional combination of touch screen display prompting the user to press the at least one hard key in a process of confirming entry of information into the machine as claimed.

5.2 The inventiveness of the subject-matter of claim 22 has also been challenged starting from D11. D13 is the patent resulting from the US-application that is the priority document of D11. The teaching of D11 does not go beyond that of D13 (however, the problem of touch screen failure is not addressed in D11). Accordingly, the distinguishing feature over D11 and the underlying objective technical problem are the same as that mentioned above with respect to D13, and inventiveness is given for the same reasons as already explained.

Further, the Board cannot follow the appellant's argument that the distinguishing feature merely results in a clearer arrangement which is easier to use, which is the objective mentioned in D1 (paragraph bridging columns 1 and 2). The fact that D1 seems to start from a respirator without touch screen (as defined in the preamble of claim 1 of D1), but nevertheless teaches (see characterising portion) not to use a touch screen only for the entire communication with the user, but to explicitly retain certain hard keys (Eingabeelement 21, Quittierschalter 22), also does not render obvious a screen display prompting the user to press the at least one hard key for confirming entry of information into the machine.

5.3 As D1 does not deal with a dialysis machine and does not aim at the same objective as the patent in suit, this document does not constitute the closest prior art. Claim 22 is furthermore distinguished over D1 in that there is no display of instruction information to the user as required by feature S and, moreover, no prompting at all as defined in feature U.

5.3.1 The first input sector 23 as shown in Figure 2 of Dl merely shows various parameters and associated values, e.g. oxygen concentration 02 231, respiratory gas flow V 232, etc. The first input sector 23 does not though display instruction information to a user as required by claim 22. The first output sector 25 displays quantities that vary over time, such as respiration pressure or respiratory flow. Again, the first output sector 25 does not display instruction information to a user as required by claim 22. Furthermore, neither the first input sector 23 nor the first output sector 25 of Dl (i.e. the alleged first portion of the screen as claimed in claim 22) prompts a trained professional medical operator to press a hard key. This shows that the respirator as disclosed in Dl is intended to be used by trained professional medical personnel and not by a patient. Dl does not operate by getting a user to vary a parameter using the touch screen and then getting him to confirm that the change is correct using a hard key. Instead, Dl simply teaches that various parameters which may be altered are displayed only on the touch screen and that the varying of a selected parameter is done by turning the dial 21 and then confirmed by pressing it, yet without any prompting. This is a quick and easy solution which is quite appropriate for artificial respiration, where the speed of response of the user is crucial.

5.3.2 The appellant regarded the subject-matter of claim 22 as being obvious from D1 in view of the general knowledge of the skilled person who would routinely incorporate the user interface of a respirator known from D1 into a dialysis machine. However, since the further distinguishing features of display of instruction information and prompting were not taken into account, this line of argumentation must fail. Both features contribute to solving the problem of designing the user interface such that it is easy to use by a person who is not a technically trained medical professional such as the patient himself, who needs more guidance (by means of instructions and prompting) than a professional user. The fact that the hard key is to be pressed in response to prompting is further advantageous in case of defects in the touch screen as mentioned above. Since D1 is entirely silent with respect to these features and the above-mentioned objective technical problem to be solved, the subject-matter of claim 22 is not obvious from D1 in combination with common technical knowledge.

5.3.3 Even taking into account the teaching of D11/D13, the skilled person would not arrive at the subject-matter of claim 22 since both documents fail to disclose or suggest the touch screen display prompting the user to press a hard key for entry confirmation, as mentioned above. The first paragraph of page 10 of D11 and columns 307/308 and 667/668 of D13 merely describe touch screen prompting of the user to press a (virtual) key or "verify button" appearing on that touch screen, and there is no obvious reason why the skilled person should deviate from this simple and coherent concept and consider prompting the user to press a hard key. Accordingly, D1 in combination with these documents does not render the claimed invention obvious, either.

5.4 Documents D5 and D6 have not been cited against claim 22 and are of interest only in that they both disclose dialysis machines comprising safety microprocessors and verification routines as defined in claim 1. However, they fail to disclose or suggest any prompting as defined in feature U of claim 22 and the advantages associated therewith. Accordingly, their teaching likewise does not render the claimed invention obvious.

5.5 From the above it follows that the subject-matter of claim 22 involves an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

Since claims 1 and 15 are more restricted in that they define further technical features, but yet both also comprise the above-mentioned decisive feature of the touch screen prompting the user to press the hard key for the purpose of confirming entry or completion of selection of the parametric value, the above reasoning and conclusion apply to the subject-matter of these independent claims as well. Consequently, it is not necessary here to discuss any further arguments regarding inventiveness relating to the additional features comprised in claims 1 and 15. The subject-matter of these claims also involves an inventive step within the meaning of Article 56 EPC.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The request for the questions posed on page 11 of the appellant's letter of 9 February 2011 to be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility