Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. J 0006/18 18-06-2019
Facebook X Linkedin Email

J 0006/18 18-06-2019

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2019:J000618.20190618
Date of decision
18 June 2019
Case number
J 0006/18
Petition for review of
-
Application number
13875211.8
IPC class
C07K 14/00
C07K 14/545
C07K 19/00
C12N 15/09
C12N 15/117
C12N 15/66
A61K 38/16
A61K 38/20
A61P 19/02
A61P 9/06
A61P 3/10
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 334.01 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

IL-1BETA INHIBITOR COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF

Applicant name
R-Pharm International, LLC
Opponent name
-
Board
3.1.01
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 122(1)
European Patent Convention R 112(1)
European Patent Convention R 136(1)
Keywords

Re-establishment of rights - time limit for filing request for re-establishment

Re-establishment of rights - two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance

Re-establishment of rights - all due care (yes)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The appellant (who shall be referred to inter-changeably as the "applicant" or "appellant" in what follows) contests the decision of the Receiving Section rejecting its request for re-establishment of rights and declaring that European patent application 13 875 211.8 is deemed to be withdrawn with effect as of 1 September 2016.

II. In a communication dated 6 April 2016 the Receiving Section informed the applicant that the renewal fee for the fourth year, falling due on 29 February 2016, had not been paid and reminded it that the unpaid fee and the additional fee could be paid up to the last day of the sixth calender month following the due date. It also drew its attention to Article 86(1) EPC whereby an application is deemed withdrawn if the renewal fee and the additional fee are not paid in due time.

III. In the absence of any payment, the Receiving Section, in a communication of 28 September 2016, noted a loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC and informed the appellant that the European patent application was deemed to be withdrawn under Article 86(1) EPC since the renewal fee for the fourth year and the additional fee had not been paid in due time.

IV. The above mentioned communications were addressed to the professional representative indicated as representative for the European phase (hereinafter "European professional representative").

V. On 1 June 2017, the European professional representative requested re-establishment of rights, paid the fourth renewal fee with surcharge and the fee for re-establishment of rights. It submitted inter alia that the applicant had no responsibility for monitoring renewal fee deadlines or for instructing the European professional representatives to pay the renewal fees.This responsibility had been transferred completely to a US aattorney, Dr Korkhin, a sole practitioner, working at SciTech Legal P.C. ("SciTech"). SciTech was thus responsible for instructing the European professional representative to pay renewal fees in respect of this application.

Further, the European professional representative stated that it sent numerous reminders to SciTech with respect to the payment of the fourth renewal fee. In July 2016, shortly before the final date for payment of the renewal fee with surcharge on 31 August 2016, Dr Korkhin at SciTech upgraded his computing system which ran the software used to monitor deadlines and renewal fee payments. It only emerged during evidence gathering for the present request for re-establishment that after this upgrade timely reminders failed to appear in the docket and Dr Korkhin was thus not notified by the system of the missed renewal fee with surcharge payment.

VI. In a communication pursuant to Article 113 EPC dated 5 July 2017, the Receiving Section expressed its preliminary view that the request for re-establishment of rights was inadmissible and not allowable.

VII. In response to this communication, the European professional representative, in a letter dated 6 September 2017, further substantiated the reasons for the admissibility and allowability of the request. It stated, inter alia, that the removal of the cause of non-compliance did not occur on 30 September 2016, i.e. when the communication pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC was received by SciTech. Contrary to the view of the Receiving Section, the removal of the cause of non-compliance occurred either on 1 April 2017 or on 4 April 2017: the applicant itself became aware that the application was deemed to be withdrawn on 1 April 2017 and contacted the European professional representative by email dated 4 April 2017. Only on receipt of this email did the European professional representative become aware that it was never the intention of the applicant to withdraw the application.

VIII. After a second communication under Article 113 EPC and a further response letter dated 12 January 2018, the Receiving Section rejected the request for re-establishment of rights by decision of 26 January 2018.

In the decision's reasons, the request was considered to be inadmissible since the request had been filed outside the period defined in Rule 136(1) EPC of two months from the removal of the cause of non-compliance. The date of the removal was the date on which the responsible person became aware or should have become aware of the omission. The responsible person was the US attorney, Dr Korkhin of SciTech, since the applicant had transferred all responsibility for monitoring renewal fee deadlines, and for instructing payment of renewal fees to the US attorney. The communication noting the loss of rights was sent to him by the European professional representative via email to three different SciTech email addresses on 30 September 2016, this being the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance.

It had not been sufficiently explained how the system upgrade performed in July 2016 on the US attorney's computer system could have influenced the receipt of the email noting the loss of rights sent some months later to three different email addresses belonging to the US attorney. The applicant stated that problems with the server migration carried out by the US attorney affected his email-system. This prevented him from taking the necessary action. The Receiving Section did not find that these arguments demonstrated that all due care had been taken before and at the time of the occurrence. The Receiving Section accepted that an upgrade of a computer system could create a glitch in the functioning of the monitoring system. However, it considered that it had neither been demonstrated that a backup system existed, nor that other precautionary measures to mitigate the negative consequences of a server migration, where the server included such vital components for the well-functioning of the firm as the maintenance of the docketing database, the email-communication and the web services, had been taken. Thus, the Receiving Section deemed the cause of non-compliance as being removed on 30 September 2016.

Further, the request was unallowable since all due care of the US attorney had not been sufficiently demonstrated.

IX. The applicant filed a notice of appeal and paid the appeal fee. In the statement setting out the grounds of appeal the appellant provided additional information to the arguments already submitted in the previous proceedings and filed supporting evidence (declaration of the US attorney, previously filed; reminders from the European professional representative provided by the US attorney, previously filed; and a diagram of the US attorney's email archive system provided by the US attorney). In particular, information relating to the server migration which included a backup system of all data was provided. It was also explained that since a single server was used for maintenance of the docketing database and email storage, both were migrated at the same time. Upon upgrading the server, the docketing database was restored as well, but it was erroneously no longer pointing to the new correct location. After restoring the correct location, some reminders somehow disappeared.

Furthermore, for some reason, some emails were moved to the Archive folder instead of the Inbox folder on the US attorney's PC.

In the statement setting out the grounds of appeal, it is further explained that, later on, the applicant decided to take over responsibility for international prosecution itself. As a consequence, it became aware that the application was deemed to be withdrawn on 1 April 2017. Accordingly, the appellant considers that it was only on 1 April 2017 that the removal of the cause for non-compliance occurred as this was the earliest date on which anyone who was aware of the intention to pay the renewal fee knew of the fact that it had not been paid. The US attorney did not know that there had been a loss of rights until contacted by the European professional representatives in May 2017.

The appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside, that it be re-established in its rights in respect of the period for payment of the renewal fee for the fourth year with surcharge, and that the case be remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution. Conditionally, it requested oral proceedings.

X. In a communication issued together with a summons to oral proceedings, the Board informed the appellant of its provisional opinion on the case.

XI. With letter dated 13 June 2019 the appellant provided further information relating to the server migration implemented by the US attorney.

XII. Oral proceedings before the Board were held on 18 June 2019 at which the appellant essentially reiterated its earlier written submissions and further clarified some issues relating to the server migration and back up systems of the US attorney. In particular, Dr Korkhin explained that as well as updating the server software he had implementated a new RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks or Drives) for storage protection which was not internally integrated into the new server, but in a separate networked architecture, having a separate network address and its own power supply. The purpose of this was to build greater security into the IT system by having separate power supplies for the hard disks and the server. This placing of the hard disks into a network architecture had the unfortunate and unforeseen consequence that files of email data, when transferred over the network were divided into smaller packages and not delivered chronologically. This appeared to be the cause of the mis-direction of the emails.

XIII. At the end of the oral proceedings the decision was announced.

1. The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.

2. Admissibility of the request for re-establishment of rights

2.1 Rule 136(1), fist sentence, EPC stipulates that the request for re-establishment of rights under Article 122(1) EPC must be filed in writing within two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance with the period.

2.2 The removal of the cause of non-compliance normally occurs on the date on which the person responsible for the application is made aware of the fact that a time limit has not been observed. The decisive factor in this is the time when the person responsible ought to have noticed the error if he had taken all due care (established case law, see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, section III.E.4.1.1 a)).

From the submissions on file, the US attorney, Dr Korkhin, sole practitioner at SciTech "took over all responsibility for ensuring that the application was maintained and processed to grant effectively. This responsibility included formal matters, such as monitoring and instructing on payment of renewal fees." (see letter dated 1 June 2017, page 2). Moreover, it is stated in the same letter that the applicant itself had no responsibility for monitoring renewal fee deadlines, or instructing the European professional representative payment of renewal fees in respect of this application.

Consequently, the Board concurs with the Receiving Section in considering the US attorney as being the person primarily responsible for the application in suit.

2.3 The further issue to be determined is the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance and whether, at that date, the person responsible for the application, i.e. the US attorney, ought to have noticed the omission of the payment if it had taken all due care.

The Receiving Section considered that the date when the communication under Rule 112(1) EPC, noting the loss of rights, was sent to the US attorney by the European professional representative via email to three recipients addresses of SciTech on 30 September 2016 was the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance.

In the statement of grounds of appeal and during oral proceedings, the appellant explained in detail why the US attorney could not have become aware of the noting of loss of rights communication already on 30 September 2016.

The appellant confirmed that the communication under Rule 112(1) EPC, which was sent to three different email addresses, was received by the US attorney's computer system on 30 September 2016. However, the different email addresses were configured to forward incoming messages into a single mailbox. As a result of the server migration which had occurred in July 2016, in combination with the implementation of the RAID network architecture, the incoming mail, including the reminders for the payment of the renewal fee and the loss of rights communication, was automatically redirected to the Archive folder instead of appearing in the Inbox folder. Since no technical problems were noted after the upgrade and the system appeared to be functioning normally, the US attorney had no reason to believe that the upgraded computer system was not working satisfactorily.

Therefore, the US attorney could not become aware on 30 September 2016 that there had been a loss of rights in spite of taking all due care required by the circumstances.

In view of these circumstances, the Board considers that it cannot be assumed that the receipt of the communication under Rule 112(1) EPC by the US attorney's computer system and redirected to the Archived folder as a consequence of the server migration removed the cause of non-compliance.

2.4 The Board agrees with the appellant in considering 1 April 2017 as the earliest date on which any person responsible for the application who was aware of the intention to pay the renewal fee, could know that it had not been paid, this being the date of removal of the cause of non-compliance. At that time, the applicant decided to take over responsibility for the international prosecution of the application itself and, as a consequence, became aware that the application was deemed to be withdrawn on 1 April 2017.

2.5 The request for re-establishment of rights of 1 June 2017 has therefore been filed in the time limit of Rule 136(1) EPC. The omitted act was completed and the fee for re-establishment was paid on time. The request for re-establishment is admissible (Article 122(2) in connection with Rule 136(2) EPC).

3. Allowability

3.1 Under Article 122(1) EPC the applicant shall have its rights re-established if it shows that it missed the time limit despite taking all due care required by the circumstances. In the present case, the time limit missed was the payment of the 4th renewal fee with surcharge.

3.2 The appellant alleged that due to an isolated error in server migration, the US attorney did not instruct payment of the renewal fee in time. Because a single server was used for maintenance of the docketing database and for email communications, both were migrated at the same time. The server migration was made in July 2016, shortly before the final date for payment of the renewal fee with surcharge on 31 August 2016.

The server migration affected the docketing database and led reminders for the payment of the renewal fees not being generated by the in-house monitoring system Flex-trac after the computer upgrade in July 2016. Further, the email reminders sent by the European professional representative after the upgrade in July 2016 informing the US attorney that the final deadline for the payment of the fee was approaching moved into the Archive folder due to the server migration issue/implementation of the RAID network architecture.

With the submission dated 13 June 2019 and during oral proceedings the cause of the error in the server migration has been explained, to the Board's satisfaction, as being a result of the implementation of a new RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks or Drives) for storage protection which was not internally integrated into the new server, but in a separate networked architecture, having a separate network address. In particular, the appellant pointed out that the docketing database as well as the email archive have been transferred to this separate RAID array. The server pointed to the new RAID array via NFS (Network File System) links. An initial incorrect configuration of some NFS links affected data transfer into client software. Over time it also became apparent that technical issues as network lag times combined with substantial sizes of email archive affected timely access to these files on the new RAID array.

3.3 Consequently, a technical error occurred in server migration which affected both the docketing database and email communication. This can be considered as an isolated mistake in a system which apparently operated efficiently for several years.

The appellant sufficiently explained that, during seven years, and in order to ensure safe keeping of the files, the server had a redundant networking capability and a 3 hard disk drive linked into a redundant data storage. Additionally, all data had been backed up into a cloud storage Dropbox location. Since no networking failures, storage failures or other server failures were ever observed, the Board concludes that the appellant has shown that a satisfactory system was in place.

3.4 Since the US attorney worked as a sole practitioner in a small office where only a limited number of time limits had to be monitored (aprox. 300 - 400 US Patent- and Trademark files and 2 international files), there was in the Board's view no necessity for more redundancy in the system for monitoring time limits.

3.5 For all these reasons, the Board finds that the US attorney's systems which were allegedly in place demonstrate the taking of all due care required by the circumstances. In spite of all due care, the appellant was unable to observe the time limit for paying the 4th renewal fee with surcharge. The requirements of Article 122(1) EPC are thus met and the request for re-establishment of rights of 1 June 2017 is to be allowed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The appellant is re-established in its rights.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility