4.4. Decision on re-establishment of rights
Decisions on requests for re-establishment of rights are taken by the UPP Division. If all the requirements are met and the request is granted, the proprietor is informed accordingly (EPO Form 7115). If the request is granted, the legal consequences of the failure to observe the time limit will be deemed not to have ensued.
If the request for re-establishment cannot be granted, for instance if it is deemed inadmissible or not allowable, the UPP Division issues first a communication (Art. 113 EPC, which applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to Rule 20(1) UPR). The communication informs the proprietor of the UPP Division's intention to reject the request for re-establishment and includes the statement of the grounds for the intended rejection. The proprietor is then invited to file any comments or supporting evidence within a non-extendable time limit of one month from receipt of the communication. The proprietor's response may be taken into account only if it is submitted within the time limit set and if it does not extend beyond or alter the facts and grounds as presented in the original request. If needed, the UPP Division may invite the proprietor to file further comments or supporting evidence prior to taking a final decision.
After considering all duly presented facts and evidence, the UPP Division takes a final decision to grant or reject the request for re-establishment. A decision to grant the request is communicated to the proprietor via EPO Form 7155 unless a reasoned decision to reject the request is to be issued (EPO Form 7099). Grounds for a decision will only be provided if the request is rejected. An action against such decision can be lodged before the UPC under Arts. 32(1)(i) and 66 UPCA (see 7.7.1). Attention is also drawn to Rules 88 to 97 RoP UPC.
Where re-establishment has been requested in respect of the period specified in Rule 6(1) UPR, and the UPP Division decided to reject the request, the UPP Division will issue an intention to reject the request for unitary effect, citing the grounds for that decision. The proprietor will have the opportunity to file comments within a non-extendable time limit of one month. Upon expiry of this time limit, a decision on the request for unitary effect will be issued (see 2.4).