3. Admissibility of requests
3.2. Requests of equal ranking
|
You are viewing the 9th edition (2019) of this publication; for the 10th edition (2022) see here |
In T 148/06 the board held several requests inadmissible which were submitted not as principle and auxiliary requests, but as requests of equal ranking. It was not the board's duty to give a legal opinion on the admissibility of several requests as guidance for appellants in defining the order in which they would like their requests to be examined.