Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0928/11 24-08-2016
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0928/11 24-08-2016

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T092811.20160824
Date of decision
24 August 2016
Case number
T 0928/11
Petition for review of
-
Application number
06252094.5
IPC class
H04N 7/10
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
NO DISTRIBUTION (D)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 373.56 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Image display device, method of controlling the same and home network system

Applicant name
LG Electronics Inc.
Opponent name
-
Board
3.5.04
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
Keywords

Inventive step - (no)

Request for oral proceedings to be held by video conference - (refused)

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
T 1942/12
T 2068/14
Citing decisions
-

I. The appeal is against the decision of the examining division refusing European patent application No. 06252094.5 published as EP 1 715 689 A2.

II. The documents cited in the decision under appeal included the following:

D1: EP 1 355 451 A2

III. The application was refused on the grounds that claims 1, 7 and 11 of the sole request did not meet the requirement of clarity of Article 84 EPC. The examining division also observed in a section entitled "Additional remarks not forming part of the decision" that, notwithstanding the clarity objections, if the claims were construed according to the applicant's interpretation, their subject-matter would not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC) in view of prior-art document D1.

IV. In the notice of appeal, the appellant requested that the decision under appeal be set aside. With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant filed amended claims 1 to 12 replacing all previous claims on file and requested the grant of a patent on the basis of these amended claims. As a precaution, the appellant also requested oral proceedings.

V. The board summoned the appellant to oral proceedings and in a communication under Article 15(1) RPBA (Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, OJ EPO 2007, 536) gave its preliminary opinion that

- the amended claims complied with the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC and overcame the objections of lack of clarity set out in the decision under appeal;

- the wording of the amended claims nonetheless still lacked clarity (Article 84 EPC 1973) for a number of other reasons; and

- the subject-matter of amended claims 1 and 7 did not involve an inventive step in view of prior-art document D1, for the reasons set out in the board's communication and essentially corresponding to the examining division's observations under "Additional remarks not forming part of the decision".

VI. With a letter dated 22 July 2016, the appellant filed three sets of claims according to a main and first and second auxiliary requests, replacing all previous claims on file.

VII. In a letter dated 8 August 2016, the appellant requested that the oral proceedings scheduled for 24 August 2016 be held by video conference. The appellant also stated that if this request was not accepted by the board, neither the appellant nor its representative would attend the oral proceedings.

VIII. With a "Communication of the Registry" faxed to the appellant on 17 August 2016, the appellant was informed that the oral proceedings could not be held by video conference.

IX. The board held oral proceedings on 24 August 2016. As announced, the duly summoned appellant did not attend. The Chairman noted that the appellant had requested that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims according to the main request, the first auxiliary request or the second auxiliary request, all requests filed with the letter dated 22 July 2016. At the end of the oral proceedings, he announced the board's decision.

X. Claim 1 according to the appellant's main request reads as follows:

"An image display device (100) for controlling operation of plural external devices of different types through a home network, the device comprising:

a tuner (101) arranged to receive a broadcasting signal;

a demux (102) arranged to divide the received broadcasting signal into a video data, an audio data, and an additional data;

an audio processing unit (103) arranged to process the audio data;

a video processing unit (105) arranged to process the video data;

a display unit (106) arranged to display the video data outputted from the video processing unit; and characterized by further comprising:

a key input unit (107) for inputting a transmission setup including i) selection of a received broadcasting signal stored in memory (109), or a channel of a received broadcasting signal to be transmitted ii) a time for transmission to an external device, and iii) identification of a selected external device using the key input unit (107);

a memory (109) for storing the transmission setup;

a controller (108) arranged to control operation of the image display device (100) according to an output of the key input unit (107);

wherein the image display device (100) determines and outputs transmission data according to the type of the selected external device, a first type having only a speaker and no display unit and a second type having a speaker and a display unit wherein data selected from video data, audio data and additional data in the broadcasting signal is transmitted to the selected external device at the time for transmission of the transmission setup; and

a communication unit (110) being configured to communicate the data with the selected external device."

XI. Claim 1 according to the appellant's first auxiliary request reads as follows (additions to claim 1 of the main request are underlined, deletions are [deleted: struck-through], long identical text portions are replaced by "[...]"):

"An image display device (100) for controlling operation of plural external devices of different types through a home network system, the device comprising:

[...]

wherein the image display device (100) determines and outputs transmission data according to the type of the selected external device, a first type having only a speaker and no display unit and a second type having a speaker and a display unit wherein transmission data selected from video data, audio data and additional data in the broadcasting signal is transmitted to the selected external device at the time for transmission of the transmission setup; and

a communication unit (110) being configured to perform data communication[deleted: communicate the data] with the selected external device."

XII. Claim 1 according to the appellant's second auxiliary request reads as follows (additions to claim 1 of the main request are underlined, deletions are [deleted: struck-through], long identical text portions are replaced by "[...]"):

"An image display device (100) for controlling operation of plural external devices of different types through a home network system, the device comprising:

[...]

a controller (108) arranged to control operation of the image display device (100) according to an output of the key input unit (107)[deleted: ;],

wherein the image display device (100) is arranged to determine[deleted: s] and output[deleted: s] transmission data selected from video data, audio data and additional data in the broadcasting signal according to the type of the selected external device at the time for transmission of the transmission setup, and

wherein:

the selected transmission data is audio data when the selected external device is a first type having only a speaker and no display unit, and

the selected transmission data is video data, audio data and additional data when the selected external device is a second type having a speaker and a display unit[deleted: wherein data selected from video data, audio data and additional data in the broadcasting signal is transmitted to the selected external device at the time for transmission of the transmission setup]; and

a communication unit (110) being configured to perform data communication[deleted: communicate the data] with the selected external device."

XIII. The examining division's additional remarks as to inventive step in the decision under appeal may be summarised as follows:

Document D1, the closest prior art, disclosed an image display device comprising almost all the features of claim 1 of the sole request underlying the decision under appeal, the sole difference being, if not implicit in D1, that the controller selected only those components (video and/or audio and/or data) which it had determined could be handled by the user-selected external device.

The objective technical problem could be formulated as how to avoid malfunction caused by transmitting inappropriate content components to external devices with only limited capacity to handle the full range of content components, for example by sending video signals to a pair of headphones.

There was no inventive step because it was a matter of routine for the skilled person to overcome this problem by sending only those components which the selected external devices could adequately process.

XIV. In its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA the board informed the appellant that the examining division's reasoning as to inventive step was also relevant to amended claim 1 filed with the statement of grounds of appeal. More specifically, the board explained that the distinguishing features of claim 1 were that the selected external device could be of a first type having only a speaker and no display unit and that the transmission data output by the controller in that case was "according to this first type". The objective technical problem remained as formulated by the examining division and the solution of claim 1 was regarded as obvious because D1 hinted that some external devices could only receive audio data and that only audio data would be transmitted to these external devices.

XV. The appellant's arguments as to inventive step (which were submitted with the letter of 22 July 2016) may be summarised as follows:

The arguments applied equally to the main request, first auxiliary request and second auxiliary request. In particular, the claim language of the second auxiliary request further restricted the possibility of any ambiguity.

In D1, the session manager matched external devices which had complementary data-processing capabilities (see paragraph [0121]) and actively prevented communication between non-complementary devices by deactivating device buttons on a graphic user interface (GUI). For instance, the user was not permitted the option of allowing a digital video cassette recorder (DVCR) to communicate with a CD device, because the DVCR was capable of outputting and accepting a video signal (and very likely an audio signal too), but the CD device could only output an audio signal (see paragraph [0112]). Moreover, the examples provided in D1 suggested that data transmitted between two complementary devices was a whole broadcasting signal (e.g. a TV show) rather than data selected from within the broadcasting signal.

In contrast to D1, the image display device of claim 1 advantageously provided the user with the capability to select, from a broadcasting signal, subsets of data which could be used by a particular external device and to transmit only those subsets to the external device at a time selected by the user. In the case of an external device of a first type having only a speaker but no display unit (e.g. a speaker), it allowed to select only the audio data from a broadcasting signal comprising video, audio and additional data, and to transmit only the audio data (i.e. the soundtrack) to the external device. It had the technical effect of minimising the volume of data transmitted and, as identified in the decision under appeal and in the communication of the board, of avoiding malfunction caused by transmitting inappropriate content components to external devices (for example by sending video signals to a pair of headphones).

The objective technical problem solved by claim 1 was therefore correctly identified in section 12 of the communication of the board as how to avoid a malfunction caused by transmitting inappropriate content components to external devices with only limited capacity to handle the full range of content components.

D1 provided an alternative solution to this problem, which was to restrict a user's choice so that errors could not occur. It was based on the fundamental assumption that the user would not want, for example, to send a video to a device which could not display a video. What D1 completely failed to recognise, and what formed the inventive spark for the present invention, was that while a device might not be able to display a video, it might have capabilities to handle some of the data that made up that video. Specifically, a video might comprise video and audio data, and certain devices might be able to handle the audio even if they could not handle the video. Nothing in D1 hinted or suggested that a piece of content (i.e. a video, or the "broadcasting signal" in the claim language) should be broken down into its constituent parts (i.e video data and audio data) before the ability of a device to handle these constituent parts was assessed.

Dl took the view that in order to maintain the stability of the system a user should be prevented from making inappropriate choices. In contrast, the present invention identified potential connections between devices that a user might not have intuitively recognised. The two approaches were diametrically opposed; one restricted choice and the other increased it. With this in mind, it was clear that the skilled person starting with Dl and faced with the objective technical problem would not have modified the teaching of Dl to arrive at the subject-matter of claim 1.

1. The appeal is admissible.

The request to hold oral proceedings by video conference

2. Irrespective of whether a "general framework" is a prerequisite for holding oral proceedings by video conference before a board of appeal (see decision T 1942/12, point 2 of the Reasons), the appellant in any case did not provide any reason for exceptionally doing so (see decision T 2068/14, points 1.2.2 to 1.2.5 of the Reasons). As a consequence, the appellant's request was refused.

The invention

3. The invention relates to an image display device for controlling the operation of multiple other devices of different types via a home network system.

Main request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC 1973)

4. Preliminary remark

The claims according to the main request filed with the letter dated 22 July 2016 are identical to the claims of the sole request filed with the statement of grounds of appeal.

5. Construction of claim 1

The appellant's argumentation as to inventive step in view of D1 (summarised under point XV supra) is based on a construction of claim 1 according to which the claimed image display device has the capability to select, from a broadcasting signal, subsets of data which the selected external device can handle and to transmit only those subsets to the external device.

The board does not share the appellant's construction of claim 1 for the following reasons:

First, the board notes that the appellant did not indicate in its letter of 22 July 2016 (which contained all the arguments on inventive step submitted by the appellant during the appeal proceedings) which wording in claim 1 implied that subsets of data from the broadcasting signal, instead of the whole broadcasting signal, could be transmitted to a selected external device.

However, this is not a problem because it is quite clear to the board that the appellant must have been relying for its construction on the expression "wherein data selected from video data, audio data and additional data in the broadcasting signal is transmitted" in claim 1.

The board further notes that the above expression had been used once in the application as filed in the given context, namely in dependent claim 11; hence, the use of this expression in claim 1 of the present main request does not raise an issue under Article 123(2) EPC.

However, the board considers that, in the light of the description and drawings, this expression should not be construed as meaning that subsets of the data contained in the broadcasting signal (e.g. only the audio data from a broadcasting signal containing video, audio and additional data) are transmitted to the external device. Instead, in the board's view, this expression should be construed as meaning that the whole broadcasting signal selected by the user is transmitted, but that the broadcasting signal itself may contain only some of video, audio and additional data, for instance, only audio data in the case of a broadcasting signal on a radio channel.

The board arrives at the above construction because there is no mention in the description and drawings of less than the whole broadcasting signal being transmitted to the selected external device. The description discloses two concrete examples of transmission of audio data only to an external device capable only of handling audio data: however, in both cases, the audio data is not a subset of the broadcasting signal but the whole broadcasting signal from a radio channel (see paragraph [0030], first sentence, and paragraph [0034] of the application as filed).

The appellant gave an example of only the soundtrack (audio data) of an audio-visual broadcasting programme being transmitted to an external device having a speaker but no display unit. However, no such example is disclosed in the application as filed.

6. Disclosure of D1 - closest prior art

It is undisputed that D1 represents the closest prior art and that it discloses a home network comprising "home devices" of different types corresponding to the "external devices" of present claim 1 (see, for instance, paragraph [0002] and figure 1 of D1). Any home device having a display, e.g. digital television (DTV) 102, can be used to display a graphic user interface (GUI) to allow the user to enter commands for setting up data transmission between two home devices: see, for instance, paragraphs [0029] and [0082] to [0085] and figures 8 to 13, of D1. A controller (called "session manager" in D1: see "SESSION MANAGER" section starting at paragraph [0082]) controls the operation of the image display device according to the user input. The user input can select a current broadcasting signal (received via DBSS 104) or a stored broadcasting signal (stored in DVCR 110), set a time for transmission (see "timer select a program" in paragraph [0087]) and identify a selected home device for the transmission (see figures 11 to 13). Moreover, the controller (session manager) makes sure that the home devices at both ends of the data transmission have matching capabilities, i.e. that the receiving home device can accept the type of data transmitted by the transmitting home device: see, for instance, paragraphs [0097] to [0101]. In the board's view, it is implicit that only the type of data corresponding to the matching capabilities is transmitted between the two home devices.

7. Distinguishing features

7.1 The board thus considers that the only distinguishing features of claim 1, i.e. the features which are not explicitly or implicitly disclosed in D1, are that the selected external device can be of a first type having only a speaker and no display unit and that in such a case the image display device determines and outputs transmission data according to this first type.

7.2 The appellant submitted that there were other distinguishing features, such as the selection of subsets of data from the broadcasting signal; however, for the reasons given under point 5 supra, the board considers that these additional distinguishing features are based on an incorrect construction of claim 1 and therefore do not exist.

8. Objective technical problem

The appellant did not dispute that the objective technical problem can be formulated, as proposed by the examining division under point 35 of the decision under appeal, as how to avoid a malfunction caused by transmitting inappropriate content components to external devices with only limited capacity to handle the full range of content components (for example by sending video signals to a pair of headphones).

9. Obviousness

An external device of a first type having only a speaker and no display unit is strongly hinted at in D1. Indeed, as explained in paragraphs [0120] and [0121] of D1, the capabilities of the home devices are either source-like or sink-like and "each source-like capability has a complementing sink-like capability that is compatible with it". Since some of the devices of D1 are sources of audio data but not of video data (see, for instance, "audio server" in paragraph [0102] and "CD player" in paragraph [0120]), it would have been obvious to the skilled person that the home network of D1 should also include home devices which are sinks of audio data, a prime example of which would be "speakers" (e.g. loudspeakers or headphones). These speakers, i.e. external devices of the "first type" according to the claim language, would thus have received from the image display device a broadcasting signal comprising audio data only, as stated in the distinguishing features of claim 1.

The appellant's arguments as to why the skilled person would not have arrived at the subject-matter of claim 1 when starting from D1 are all based on the incorrect construction of claim 1 refuted by the board under section 5 supra.

For the above reasons, the skilled person starting from D1 would have arrived at the image display device of claim 1 without an inventive step.

10. Conclusion on the main request

Since the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step, the appellant's main request is not allowable.

First auxiliary request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC 1973)

11. Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request only by minor amendments (see point XI supra) addressing objections of lack of clarity raised in the board's communication.

These amendments, however, do not substantially change the claimed subject-matter. The board's reasoning under points 5 to 9 supra therefore also applies to claim 1 of the first auxiliary request.

12. Conclusion on the first auxiliary request

Since the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step, the appellant's first auxiliary request is not allowable.

Second auxiliary request - inventive step (Article 56 EPC 1973)

13. Relative to claim 1 of the main request, several changes have been made in the wording of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request, essentially by reordering features in order to improve the clarity of the claim (see point XII supra).

In the board's view, this reordering of features does not substantially change the subject-matter of claim 1. Nor has the appellant argued otherwise.

The board thus considers that its reasoning under points 5 to 9 supra also applies to claim 1 of the second auxiliary request.

14. Conclusion on the second auxiliary request

Since the subject-matter of claim 1 does not involve an inventive step, the appellant's second auxiliary request is not allowable.

Conclusion

15. Since none of the appellant's requests is allowable, the appeal must be dismissed.

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility