Skip to main content Skip to footer
HomeHome
 
  • Homepage
  • Searching for patents

    Patent knowledge

    Access our patent databases and search tools.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
      • European Publication Server
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
      • European Patent Bulletin
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
      • Web services
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
    • Technology platforms
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
      • Water innovation
      • Space innovation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
      • Firefighting technologies
      • Clean energy technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Overview
      • First time here?
      • Asian patent information
      • Patent information centres
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
    Image
    Plastics in Transition

    Technology insight report on plastic waste management

  • Applying for a patent

    Applying for a patent

    Practical information on filing and grant procedures.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • European route
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Request for extension/validation
    • International route (PCT)
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide – PCT procedure at the EPO
      • EPO decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • Find a professional representative
    • MyEPO services
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
      • Get access
      • File with us
      • Interact with us on your files
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Forms
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Fees
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
      • International fees (PCT)
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
      • Fee payment and refunds
      • Warning

    UP

    Find out how the Unitary Patent can enhance your IP strategy

  • Law & practice

    Law & practice

    European patent law, the Official Journal and other legal texts.

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
      • Unitary patent system
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent
    • Court practices
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
    Image
    Law and practice scales 720x237

    Keep up with key aspects of selected BoA decisions with our monthly "Abstracts of decisions”

  • News & events

    News & events

    Our latest news, podcasts and events, including the European Inventor Award.

    Go to overview 

     

    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the finalists
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventor Prize
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
    • Press centre
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • Innovation and patenting in focus
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
      • Green tech in focus
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
      • The future of medicine
      • Materials science
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
      • Patent classification
      • Digital technologies
      • The future of manufacturing
      • Books by EPO experts
    • "Talk innovation" podcast

    Podcast

    From ideas to inventions: tune into our podcast for the latest in tech and IP

  • Learning

    Learning

    The European Patent Academy – the point of access to your learning

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Overview
      • Learning activities
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Overview
      • EQE - European qualifying examination
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
      • National offices and IP authorities
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and technology transfer centres (TTOs)
    Image
    Patent Academy catalogue

    Have a look at the extensive range of learning opportunities in the European Patent Academy training catalogue

  • About us

    About us

    Find out more about our work, values, history and vision

    Go to overview 

    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Overview
      • Official celebrations
      • Member states’ video statements
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states of the European Patent Organisation
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
      • Administrative Council
    • Principles & strategy
      • Overview
      • Our mission, vision, values and corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
      • Towards a New Normal
    • Leadership & management
      • Overview
      • President António Campinos
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Overview
      • Environmental
      • Social
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Services & activities
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
      • Consulting our users
      • European and international co-operation
      • European Patent Academy
      • Chief Economist
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Overview
      • Innovation actors
      • Policy and funding
      • Tools
      • About the Observatory
    • Procurement
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering and electronic signatures
      • Procurement portal
      • Invoicing
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Transparency portal
      • Overview
      • General
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
      • "Long Night"
    Image
    Patent Index 2024 keyvisual showing brightly lit up data chip, tinted in purple, bright blue

    Track the latest tech trends with our Patent Index

 
Website
cancel
en de fr
  • Language selection
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Français
Main navigation
  • Homepage
    • Go back
    • New to patents
  • New to patents
    • Go back
    • Your business and patents
    • Why do we have patents?
    • What's your big idea?
    • Are you ready?
    • What to expect
    • How to apply for a patent
    • Is it patentable?
    • Are you first?
    • Patent quiz
    • Unitary patent video
  • Searching for patents
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Technical information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Espacenet - patent search
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • National patent office databases
        • Global Patent Index (GPI)
        • Release notes
      • European Publication Server
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
        • Cross-reference index for Euro-PCT applications
        • EP authority file
        • Help
      • EP full-text search
    • Legal information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Register
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes archive
        • Register documentation
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Deep link data coverage
          • Federated Register
          • Register events
      • European Patent Bulletin
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Download Bulletin
        • EP Bulletin search
        • Help
      • European Case Law Identifier sitemap
      • Third-party observations
    • Business information
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • PATSTAT
      • IPscore
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Technology insight reports
    • Data
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technology Intelligence Platform
      • Linked open EP data
      • Bulk data sets
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Manuals
        • Sequence listings
        • National full-text data
        • European Patent Register data
        • EPO worldwide bibliographic data (DOCDB)
        • EP full-text data
        • EPO worldwide legal event data (INPADOC)
        • EP bibliographic data (EBD)
        • Boards of Appeal decisions
      • Web services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • European Publication Server web service
      • Coverage, codes and statistics
        • Go back
        • Weekly updates
        • Updated regularly
    • Technology platforms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Plastics in transition
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Plastics waste recovery
        • Plastics waste recycling
        • Alternative plastics
      • Innovation in water technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Clean water
        • Protection from water
      • Space innovation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Cosmonautics
        • Space observation
      • Technologies combatting cancer
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Prevention and early detection
        • Diagnostics
        • Therapies
        • Wellbeing and aftercare
      • Firefighting technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Detection and prevention of fires
        • Fire extinguishing
        • Protective equipment
        • Post-fire restoration
      • Clean energy technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Renewable energy
        • Carbon-intensive industries
        • Energy storage and other enabling technologies
      • Fighting coronavirus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Vaccines and therapeutics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Vaccines
          • Overview of candidate therapies for COVID-19
          • Candidate antiviral and symptomatic therapeutics
          • Nucleic acids and antibodies to fight coronavirus
        • Diagnostics and analytics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Protein and nucleic acid assays
          • Analytical protocols
        • Informatics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Bioinformatics
          • Healthcare informatics
        • Technologies for the new normal
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Devices, materials and equipment
          • Procedures, actions and activities
          • Digital technologies
        • Inventors against coronavirus
    • Helpful resources
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • First time here?
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Basic definitions
        • Patent classification
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)
        • Patent families
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • DOCDB simple patent family
          • INPADOC extended patent family
        • Legal event data
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • INPADOC classification scheme
      • Asian patent information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • China (CN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Chinese Taipei (TW)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • India (IN)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
        • Japan (JP)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Korea (KR)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Grant procedure
          • Numbering system
          • Useful terms
          • Searching in databases
        • Russian Federation (RU)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Facts and figures
          • Numbering system
          • Searching in databases
        • Useful links
      • Patent information centres (PATLIB)
      • Patent Translate
      • Patent Knowledge News
      • Business and statistics
      • Unitary Patent information in patent knowledge
  • Applying for a patent
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • European route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Guide
      • Oppositions
      • Oral proceedings
        • Go back
        • Oral proceedings calendar
          • Go back
          • Calendar
          • Public access to appeal proceedings
          • Public access to opposition proceedings
          • Technical guidelines
      • Appeals
      • Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Unitary Patent
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Legal framework
          • Main features
          • Applying for a Unitary Patent
          • Cost of a Unitary Patent
          • Translation and compensation
          • Start date
          • Introductory brochures
        • Unified Patent Court
      • National validation
      • Extension/validation request
    • International route
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Euro-PCT Guide
      • Entry into the European phase
      • Decisions and notices
      • PCT provisions and resources
      • Extension/validation request
      • Reinforced partnership programme
      • Accelerating your PCT application
      • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
        • Go back
        • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) programme outline
      • Training and events
    • National route
    • MyEPO services
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Understand our services
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Exchange data with us using an API
          • Go back
          • Release notes
      • Get access
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Release notes
      • File with us
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • What if our online filing services are down?
        • Release notes
      • Interact with us on your files
        • Go back
        • Release notes
      • Online Filing & fee payment outages
    • Fees
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European fees (EPC)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • International fees (PCT)
        • Go back
        • Reduction in fees
        • Fees for international applications
        • Decisions and notices
        • Overview
      • Unitary Patent fees (UP)
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Decisions and notices
      • Fee payment and refunds
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Payment methods
        • Getting started
        • FAQs and other documentation
        • Technical information for batch payments
        • Decisions and notices
        • Release notes
      • Warning
    • Forms
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Request for examination
    • Find a professional representative
  • Law & practice
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Legal texts
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Convention
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Documentation on the EPC revision 2000
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • Diplomatic Conference for the revision of the EPC
            • Travaux préparatoires
            • New text
            • Transitional provisions
            • Implementing regulations to the EPC 2000
            • Rules relating to Fees
            • Ratifications and accessions
          • Travaux Préparatoires EPC 1973
      • Official Journal
      • Guidelines
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • EPC Guidelines
        • PCT-EPO Guidelines
        • Unitary Patent Guidelines
        • Guidelines revision cycle
        • Consultation results
        • Summary of user responses
        • Archive
      • Extension / validation system
      • London Agreement
      • National law relating to the EPC
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Archive
      • Unitary Patent system
        • Go back
        • Travaux préparatoires to UP and UPC
      • National measures relating to the Unitary Patent 
    • Court practices
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • European Patent Judges' Symposium
    • User consultations
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Ongoing consultations
      • Completed consultations
    • Substantive patent law harmonisation
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The Tegernsee process
      • Group B+
    • Convergence of practice
    • Options for professional representatives
  • News & events
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • News
    • Events
    • European Inventor Award
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The meaning of tomorrow
      • About the award
      • Categories and prizes
      • Meet the inventors
      • Nominations
      • European Inventor Network
        • Go back
        • 2024 activities
        • 2025 activities
        • Rules and criteria
        • FAQ
      • The 2024 event
    • Young Inventors Prize
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the prize
      • Nominations
      • The jury
      • The world, reimagined
      • The 2025 event
    • Press centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Index and statistics
      • Search in press centre
      • Background information
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • European Patent Office
        • Q&A on patents related to coronavirus
        • Q&A on plant patents
      • Copyright
      • Press contacts
      • Call back form
      • Email alert service
    • In focus
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Water-related technologies
      • CodeFest
        • Go back
        • CodeFest Spring 2025 on classifying patent data for sustainable development
        • Overview
        • CodeFest 2024 on generative AI
        • CodeFest 2023 on Green Plastics
      • Green tech in focus
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About green tech
        • Renewable energies
        • Energy transition technologies
        • Building a greener future
      • Research institutes
      • Women inventors
      • Lifestyle
      • Space and satellites
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patents and space technologies
      • Healthcare
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Medical technologies and cancer
        • Personalised medicine
      • Materials science
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
      • Mobile communications
      • Biotechnology
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Red, white or green
        • The role of the EPO
        • What is patentable?
        • Biotech inventors
      • Classification
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Nanotechnology
        • Climate change mitigation technologies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • External partners
          • Updates on Y02 and Y04S
      • Digital technologies
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About ICT
        • Hardware and software
        • Artificial intelligence
        • Fourth Industrial Revolution
      • Additive manufacturing
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • About AM
        • AM innovation
      • Books by EPO experts
    • Podcast
  • Learning
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Learning activities and paths
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Learning activities: types and formats
      • Learning paths
    • EQE and EPAC
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • EQE - European Qualifying Examination
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compendium
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Paper F
          • Paper A
          • Paper B
          • Paper C
          • Paper D
          • Pre-examination
        • Candidates successful in the European qualifying examination
        • Archive
      • EPAC - European patent administration certification
      • CSP – Candidate Support Programme
    • Learning resources by area of interest
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent granting
      • Technology transfer and dissemination
      • Patent enforcement and litigation
    • Learning resources by profile
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Business and IP managers
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Innovation case studies
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • SME case studies
          • Technology transfer case studies
          • High-growth technology case studies
        • Inventor's handbook
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Introduction
          • Disclosure and confidentiality
          • Novelty and prior art
          • Competition and market potential
          • Assessing the risk ahead
          • Proving the invention
          • Protecting your idea
          • Building a team and seeking funding
          • Business planning
          • Finding and approaching companies
          • Dealing with companies
        • Best of search matters
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Tools and databases
          • EPO procedures and initiatives
          • Search strategies
          • Challenges and specific topics
        • Support for high-growth technology businesses
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Business decision-makers
          • IP professionals
          • Stakeholders of the Innovation Ecosystem
      • EQE and EPAC Candidates
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Paper F brain-teasers
        • Daily D questions
        • European qualifying examination - Guide for preparation
        • EPAC
      • Judges, lawyers and prosecutors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Compulsory licensing in Europe
        • The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes
      • National offices and IP authorities
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Learning material for examiners of national officers
        • Learning material for formalities officers and paralegals
      • Patent attorneys and paralegals
      • Universities, research centres and TTOs
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Modular IP Education Framework (MIPEF)
        • Pan-European Seal Young Professionals Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • For students
          • For universities
            • Go back
            • Overview
            • IP education resources
            • University memberships
          • Our young professionals
          • Professional development plan
        • Academic Research Programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Completed research projects
          • Current research projects
        • IP Teaching Kit
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Download modules
        • Intellectual property course design manual
        • PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa
          • Go back
          • The PATLIB Knowledge Transfer to Africa initiative (KT2A)
          • KT2A core activities
          • Success story: Malawi University of Science and Technology and PATLIB Birmingham
  • About us
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • The EPO at a glance
    • 50 years of the EPC
      • Go back
      • Official celebrations
      • Overview
      • Member states’ video statements
        • Go back
        • Albania
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czech Republic
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Iceland
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Liechtenstein
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Monaco
        • Montenegro
        • Netherlands
        • North Macedonia
        • Norway
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • San Marino
        • Serbia
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • Switzerland
        • Türkiye
        • United Kingdom
      • 50 Leading Tech Voices
      • Athens Marathon
      • Kids’ collaborative art competition
    • Legal foundations and member states
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Legal foundations
      • Member states
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Member states by date of accession
      • Extension states
      • Validation states
    • Administrative Council and subsidiary bodies
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Communiqués
        • Go back
        • 2024
        • Overview
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2018
        • 2017
        • 2016
        • 2015
        • 2014
        • 2013
      • Calendar
      • Documents and publications
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Select Committee documents
      • Administrative Council
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Composition
        • Representatives
        • Rules of Procedure
        • Board of Auditors
        • Secretariat
        • Council bodies
    • Principles & strategy
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Mission, vision, values & corporate policy
      • Strategic Plan 2028
        • Go back
        • Driver 1: People
        • Driver 2: Technologies
        • Driver 3: High-quality, timely products and services
        • Driver 4: Partnerships
        • Driver 5: Financial sustainability
      • Towards a New Normal
      • Data protection & privacy notice
    • Leadership & management
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • About the President
      • Management Advisory Committee
    • Sustainability at the EPO
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Environmental
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring environmental inventions
      • Social
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Inspiring social inventions
      • Governance and Financial sustainability
    • Procurement
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Procurement forecast
      • Doing business with the EPO
      • Procurement procedures
      • Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) publications
      • Sustainable Procurement Policy
      • About eTendering
      • Invoicing
      • Procurement portal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • e-Signing contracts
      • General conditions
      • Archived tenders
    • Services & activities
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Our services & structure
      • Quality
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Foundations
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • European Patent Convention
          • Guidelines for examination
          • Our staff
        • Enabling quality
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Prior art
          • Classification
          • Tools
          • Processes
        • Products & services
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
          • Continuous improvement
        • Quality through networking
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • User engagement
          • Co-operation
          • User satisfaction survey
          • Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels
        • Patent Quality Charter
        • Quality Action Plan
        • Quality dashboard
        • Statistics
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Search
          • Examination
          • Opposition
        • Integrated management at the EPO
      • Consulting our users
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Standing Advisory Committee before the EPO (SACEPO)
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Objectives
          • SACEPO and its working parties
          • Meetings
          • Single Access Portal – SACEPO Area
        • Surveys
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Detailed methodology
          • Search services
          • Examination services, final actions and publication
          • Opposition services
          • Formalities services
          • Customer services
          • Filing services
          • Key Account Management (KAM)
          • Website
          • Archive
      • Our user service charter
      • European and international co-operation
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Co-operation with member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
        • Bilateral co-operation with non-member states
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Validation system
          • Reinforced Partnership programme
        • Multilateral international co-operation with IP offices and organisations
        • Co-operation with international organisations outside the IP system
      • European Patent Academy
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Partners
      • Chief Economist
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Economic studies
      • Ombuds Office
      • Reporting wrongdoing
    • Observatory on Patents and Technology
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Innovation against cancer
      • Innovation actors
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Startups and SMEs
      • Policy and funding
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Financing innovation programme
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Our studies on the financing of innovation
          • EPO initiatives for patent applicants
          • Financial support for innovators in Europe
        • Patents and standards
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Publications
          • Patent standards explorer
      • Tools
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Deep Tech Finder
      • About the Observatory
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Work plan
    • Transparency portal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • General
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Annual Review 2023
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • 50 years of the EPC
          • Strategic key performance indicators
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
        • Annual Review 2022
          • Go back
          • Overview
          • Foreword
          • Executive summary
          • Goal 1: Engaged and empowered
          • Goal 2: Digital transformation
          • Goal 3: Master quality
          • Goal 4: Partner for positive impact
          • Goal 5: Secure sustainability
      • Human
      • Environmental
      • Organisational
      • Social and relational
      • Economic
      • Governance
    • Statistics and trends
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Statistics & Trends Centre
      • Patent Index 2024
        • Go back
        • Insight into computer technology and AI
        • Insight into clean energy technologies
        • Statistics and indicators
          • Go back
          • European patent applications
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Top 10 technical fields
              • Go back
              • Computer technology
              • Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
              • Digital communication
              • Medical technology
              • Transport
              • Measurement
              • Biotechnology
              • Pharmaceuticals
              • Other special machines
              • Organic fine chemistry
            • All technical fields
          • Applicants
            • Go back
            • Top 50
            • Categories
            • Women inventors
          • Granted patents
            • Go back
            • Key trend
            • Origin
            • Designations
      • Data to download
      • EPO Data Hub
      • Clarification on data sources
    • History
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • 1970s
      • 1980s
      • 1990s
      • 2000s
      • 2010s
      • 2020s
    • Art collection
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • The collection
      • Let's talk about art
      • Artists
      • Media library
      • What's on
      • Publications
      • Contact
      • Culture Space A&T 5-10
        • Go back
        • Catalyst lab & Deep vision
          • Go back
          • Irene Sauter (DE)
          • AVPD (DK)
          • Jan Robert Leegte (NL)
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #1
          • Jānis Dzirnieks (LV) #2
          • Péter Szalay (HU)
          • Thomas Feuerstein (AT)
          • Tom Burr (US)
          • Wolfgang Tillmans (DE)
          • TerraPort
          • Unfinished Sculpture - Captives #1
          • Deep vision – immersive exhibition
          • Previous exhibitions
        • The European Patent Journey
        • Sustaining life. Art in the climate emergency
        • Next generation statements
        • Open storage
        • Cosmic bar
      • "Long Night"
  • Boards of Appeal
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Decisions of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Recent decisions
      • Selected decisions
    • Information from the Boards of Appeal
    • Procedure
    • Oral proceedings
    • About the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • President of the Boards of Appeal
      • Enlarged Board of Appeal
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Pending referrals (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Decisions sorted by number (Art. 112 EPC)
        • Pending petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
        • Decisions on petitions for review (Art. 112a EPC)
      • Technical Boards of Appeal
      • Legal Board of Appeal
      • Disciplinary Board of Appeal
      • Presidium
        • Go back
        • Overview
    • Code of Conduct
    • Business distribution scheme
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Technical boards of appeal by IPC in 2025
      • Archive
    • Annual list of cases
    • Communications
    • Annual reports
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
      • Go back
      • Abstracts of decisions
    • Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Archive
  • Service & support
    • Go back
    • Overview
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • FAQ
      • Go back
      • Overview
    • Publications
    • Ordering
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent Knowledge Products and Services
      • Terms and conditions
        • Go back
        • Overview
        • Patent information products
        • Bulk data sets
        • Open Patent Services (OPS)
        • Fair use charter
    • Procedural communications
    • Useful links
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Patent offices of member states
      • Other patent offices
      • Directories of patent attorneys
      • Patent databases, registers and gazettes
      • Disclaimer
    • Contact us
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Filing options
      • Locations
    • Subscription centre
      • Go back
      • Overview
      • Subscribe
      • Change preferences
      • Unsubscribe
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
    • RSS feeds
Board of Appeals
Decisions

Recent decisions

Overview
  • 2025 decisions
  • 2024 decisions
  • 2023 decisions
  1. Home
  2. T 0397/03 10-01-2006
Facebook X Linkedin Email

T 0397/03 10-01-2006

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2006:T039703.20060110
Date of decision
10 January 2006
Case number
T 0397/03
Petition for review of
-
Application number
92119800.8
IPC class
G07B 17/00
Language of proceedings
EN
Distribution
DISTRIBUTED TO BOARD CHAIRMEN (C)

Download and more information:

Decision in EN 70.35 KB
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the European Patent Register
Bibliographic information is available in:
EN
Versions
Unpublished
Application title

Automatic selection of postage meter print element based on mail class selection

Applicant name
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Opponent name
Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
Board
3.5.02
Headnote
-
Relevant legal provisions
European Patent Convention Art 52(2) 1973
European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
European Patent Convention R 76(1) 1973
Keywords

Patentable invention - business features disregarded

Inventive step - yes

Text of requests filed at oral proceedings not contained in the minutes

Catchword
-
Cited decisions
-
Citing decisions
-

I. The proprietor of the patent filed an appeal against the decision of the opposition division to revoke European patent No. 0 543 395.

II. The following documents of the state of the art have been cited in the appeal:

D1: EP-A-0 333 043;

D2: DE-A-2 916 811; and

D3: US-A-4 326 460.

III. The decision under appeal indicated that the patent proprietor had filed a main request and first, second and third auxiliary requests during the course of oral proceedings before the opposition division held on 28 November 2002. However, no claims or amended pages of description according to the requests were appended to the minutes of the oral proceedings or to the decision of the opposition division. Following enquiries made by the board, the department of first instance sent the claims and amended pages of description according to the requests filed during the oral proceedings of 28 November 2002 to the board. As both the appellant (proprietor) and the opponent (respondent) had requested oral proceedings, the board issued a summons, dated 6 June 2005, to attend oral proceedings. Copies of the claims and amended description pages according to the requests, as forwarded by the department of first instance, were annexed to the summons. With a letter dated 1 September 2005, the respondent confirmed that the documents annexed to the summons were in accordance with the requests filed at the oral proceedings before the opposition division. The respondent also withdrew its request for oral proceedings and announced that it would not take part in the oral proceedings. With a letter dated 29 September 2005, the appellant confirmed that the documents annexed to the summons were in accordance with the requests filed at the oral proceedings before the opposition division. The appellant also filed a fourth auxiliary request and announced that, in view of the developments in the case, it too would not participate in the oral proceedings. The oral proceedings before the board took place in the absence of the parties on 30 November 2005.

IV. The appellant (patentee) requests that the decision under appeal be set aside and that the patent be maintained in amended form in accordance with the main request or first to third auxiliary requests filed in the oral proceedings held on 28 November 2002 before the opposition division; or the fourth auxiliary request filed with letter dated 29 September 2005.

V. The respondent (opponent) requests that the appeal be dismissed.

VI. The version of the patent in accordance with the main request is as follows:

Description:

pages 2 and 5 of the main request filed during the oral proceedings of 28 November 2002 (annexed to the summons dated 6 June 2005 to attend oral proceedings before the board);

pages 3 and 4 of the printed patent specification.

Claims:

No. 1 to 6 of the main request filed during the oral proceedings of 28 November 2002 (annexed to the summons dated 6 June 2005 to attend oral proceedings before the board).

Drawings:

Sheets 9 to 16 of the printed patent specification.

VII. Claims 1 and 6 of the main request read as follows:

1. "A mail processing system having:

a postage meter (22) for dispensing postage and having printing means (24, 26) for printing postage information on an envelope;

microcomputer means (20) for accounting for postage dispensed by said postage meter (22) and having means for providing departmental accounting of said dispensed postage and means for controlling said printing means;

data entry means (7) for providing operator date to said microcomputer means (20);

memory means for storing carrier and carrier fee information;

memory means for storing permitted carrier and carrier fee sets for each department; and

said microcomputer means (20) being programmed to cause said microcomputer means to enable permitted carrier and carrier fee sets in response to operator data entry through said data entry means (7) in accordance with an operator selected department account;

said printing means (24, 26) including a postal inscription mechanism (70) having a plurality of printing surfaces (72, 74, 76) providing respective mail carrier class indicia; and

said microcomputer means (20) being further programmed to cause said postal inscription mechanism (70) to position said respective printing surface for printing corresponding to the carrier class selected by the operator."

6. "A method of processing mail comprising the steps of:

dispensing postage and printing postage information on an envelope;

accounting for postage dispensed by said postage meter and providing departmental accounting of said dispensed postage;

storing carrier and carrier fee information;

storing permitted carrier and carrier fee sets for each department;

enabling permitted carrier and carrier fee sets in response to operator data entry in accordance with an operator selected department account; and

printing respective mail carrier class indicia corresponding to the carrier class selected by the operator by operating a postal inscription mechanism (70) having a plurality of printing surfaces (72, 74, 76) providing respective mail carrier class indicia, said postal inscription mechanism (70) positioning the respective printing surface for printing in correspondence to the carrier class selected by the operator."

Claims 2 to 5 are dependent on claim 1.

VIII. The appellant essentially argued as follows:

D1 concerned a dispatch management system for processing parcels from different senders, routed to different recipients via different carriers. It was not obvious to adapt the system of D1, which related to parcels, to print postage information on an envelope. A franking machine 13 of the system of D1 was used solely for printing a franking impression for the national carrier, which was a single carrier. Additional printers of the system of D1 served for printing an indication of the carrier and the service selected for a particular parcel. Printings or indicia were technical features, in the same way that a standard franking indicia was a technical feature, so that differences in printings or indicia between D1 and claims 1 and 6 of the patent in suit were technical features and should not be disregarded. There was no justification for assuming that "service" as referred to in D1 corresponded with "class" as used in the patent in suit. The reason for entering the service in D1 was for calculating the franking amount, not for indicating the required postage class. Although D1 was very similar in structure to some features of claim 1 of the patent in suit, it differed in the functional inter-relationship between the recited integers. There was no explicit disclosure or suggestion in D2 that entering a particular class would cause not only the correct franking amount to be printed but also the corresponding class indicia to be printed on the envelope. In other words, the device of D2 merely printed a mail type insignia ("Nachnahme", "Einschreiben", "Drucksache") independently of any franking impression to be printed. D2 and D3 disclosed a postage meter or franking machine capable of printing respective indicia indicative of different types of mail. However, a franking machine was used to print a franking impression pertaining to the national carrier and there was no suggestion in either reference for selectively printing such indicia for different carriers. Therefore, the skilled person would not be motivated by D2 or D3 to modify the system of D1 by adapting the franking machine printer for printing (carrier class) indicia for any other carrier than the national postal system, under microcomputer control.

IX. The arguments of the respondent can be summarised as follows:

A skilled person would not find any essential difference between the computer structure of the system of document D1 and the computer structure of the invention of the patent in suit. In particular, the meter unit 22 of the patent in suit was a peripheral unit of the microcomputer 20 in the same way as the franking machine 13 of D1 was a peripheral unit of the CPU 1. D1 disclosed all features of claim 1, except that the printing means included a postal inscription mechanism as specified in the claim and that the microcomputer means was programmed to cause this mechanism to position a respective printing surface for printing corresponding to the carrier class selected by the operator. The term "services" as used in D1 designated different possible types of mailing ("modes d'envois") and different possible mailing categories ("catégories d'envois") and therefore corresponded to the term "classes" as used in the patent in suit. Furthermore, the categories "printed matter" ("Drucksache") and "registered" ("Einschreiben") mentioned in document D2 attracted a special fee and were "classes" in the sense of the patent in suit. In a letter dated 22 July 2002, the respondent opponent had also submitted that it was known from D1 to select between different carriers associated with different fees and classes and it was not inventive to use the postal inscription mechanism known from D2 for printing data associated with different carriers. Nothing had to be changed in the known postal inscription mechanism. The microprocessor determined which data were printed. Whether these data were associated with a single carrier or with different carriers did not influence the structure of the postal inscription mechanism. In the case of different carriers, it was merely necessary to provide indicia identifying the different carriers on the printing surfaces of the mechanism.

1. The appeal is admissible.

2. As mentioned in paragraph III above, no claims or amended pages of description according to the requests filed by the patent proprietor on 28 November 2002, during the oral proceedings before the opposition division, were attached to the minutes of the oral proceedings, nor to the decision under appeal. Indeed, they were not included in the European Patent Office file relating to the patent in suit at all. It is of course of utmost importance that the complete text of any request on which a decision is taken be properly included in the file of the application or patent in question. According to Rule 76(1) EPC, the minutes of oral proceedings should contain in particular the essentials of the oral proceedings and the relevant statements made by the parties. There is no doubt that the text of requests filed by a party at oral proceedings is an essential element that should be contained in the minutes. Thus, the minutes of the oral proceedings before the opposition division were not in conformity with Rule 76(1) EPC. However, since both parties have confirmed that the text obtained by the board and annexed to the summons is the one filed at the oral proceedings before the opposition division, there is no need to pursue the matter further.

3. Claim 1 of the main request corresponds to claim 1 as originally filed with editorial amendments. Claim 6 of the main request corresponds to claim 6 as originally filed with editorial amendments and the additional feature of operating a postal inscription mechanism having a plurality of printing surfaces providing respective mail carrier class indicia, said postal inscription mechanism positioning the respective printing surface for printing in correspondence to the carrier class selected by the operator. This additional feature was recited in claim 1 as filed. Claims 2 to 5 of the main request correspond to claims 2 to 5 as originally filed. The description has been amended for consistency with the claims and for acknowledging the background art known from document D1. Thus, the amendments do not introduce subject-matter extending beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC).

The protection conferred has not been extended (Article 123(3) EPC) because claims 1 and 6 of the main request differ from claims 1 and 6 as granted merely in that they are drafted in one-part form.

4. Document D1 relates to a system for processing the dispatch of parcels from various senders, whereby the parcels can be forwarded by different carriers, each of which may offer different services. The system of D1 includes programmed microcomputer means 3, 4, 5, data entry means 6 allowing an operator to enter data to the microcomputer means, memory means 21, 25, 26 storing carrier and carrier fee information, memory means 22 storing information identifying the carriers and the services permitted for each sender, and printing means 10, 11, 12 for printing various forms associated with the dispatch of the parcels, in particular labels and letters of transport ("lettres de transport"). The system of D1 may also include a postage meter 13 coupled to the microcomputer means, whereby the postage meter prints franking labels that represent postage value information, to be affixed on parcels forwarded by the national carrier ("la poste (transporteur public)") (see in particular column 3, lines 47 to 54 of D1). For each dispatch, the microcomputer means of D1 records an identification 65 of the sender, an identification 66 of the carrier and the total costs 80 for that dispatch in a file 20 (see in particular column 11, lines 29 to 33; column 12, lines 10 to 36; column 13, lines 2 to 10; and Figure 4 of D1). Thus, in a general sense, the system of D1 accounts for the costs incurred by each sender. It is implicit that these costs include the postage dispensed by the postage meter 13.

5. Claims 1 and 6 of the main request of the appellant specify providing departmental accounting of the dispensed postage. In the view of the board, there is no apparent reason why a "department" should not be considered as a "sender". In any case, the difference between providing accounting for each (individual) sender and providing departmental accounting lies in the present case entirely in the sphere of business organisation. Therefore, this difference relates to a scheme for doing business as such, which in accordance with Article 52(2) and (3) EPC is excluded from patentability and thus has to be disregarded when assessing whether the claimed subject-matter meets the patentability requirements specified in Article 52(1) EPC. In the judgment of the board, this also applies to the differences between the expressions "sender" and "service" as used in document D1 and "department" and "class", respectively, as used in claims 1 and 6 of the main request.

6. It is apparent from the specification of the patent in suit, that the term "carrier class" is used in the patent in suit for identifying a carrier together with a class associated with that carrier. This may be deduced in particular from a passage at column 3, line 52, to column 4, line 3, where it is stated that: "Illustrated in Fig. 5 is a schematic of the carrier fee table structure which is preferably stored in the non-volatile memory (NUM) 21 of the microcomputer 20. Represented within the enclosed area is the fee associated with the respective carrier (ABC through XYZ). Each carrier has a plurality of classes (e.g., Class A through AA). Each class has an associated range of fees (e.g., C1 through CN) associated with each class. As an example, Class BB may be assigned to a private carrier for two day service." Thus, the board construes the term "carrier class" as used in claims 1 and 6 of the main request as referring to both a particular carrier and a class associated with that carrier.

7. D1 discloses printing means 10, 11, 12 for printing various forms and a postage meter for printing franking labels, but not a postal inscription mechanism as specified in claims 1 and 6 of the main request.

The documents D2 and D3 relate to franking machines having postal inscription mechanisms with a plurality of printing surfaces carrying respective indicia. D2 and D3 do not disclose departmental accounting of the dispensed postage or memory means for storing permitted carrier and carrier fee sets for each department.

Thus, the subject-matter of claims 1 and 6 of the main request is considered to be new in the sense of Article 54(1) EPC.

8. The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request differs from the prior art disclosed in D1 in that:

the printing means of the postage meter is able to print postage information on an envelope;

said printing means includes a postal inscription mechanism having a plurality of printing surfaces providing mail carrier class indicia; and

the microcomputer means is programmed to cause said postal inscription mechanism to position said respective printing surface for printing corresponding to the carrier class selected by the operator.

These features are directed to the processing of mail contained in envelopes, which can be handled according to different carrier classes.

9. Since the system disclosed in D1 processes parcels, it is questionable whether the skilled person would consider processing mail contained in envelopes in such a system. However, the board has examined what would be the result of an adaptation of the system of D1 to the processing of mail contained in envelopes, i.e. letters, in a situation as envisaged in the patent in suit where the mail can be transported by different carriers.

10. In the system of D1, the postage meter 13 concerns a single, national carrier ("la poste (transporteur public)") and prints a franking label only when the national carrier has been selected. In the judgment of the board, it is not obvious to use that postage meter, which is reserved to the national carrier, to print an indication of another carrier selected by the operator. Documents D2 and D3 disclose printing mechanisms contained in postage meters and do not refer to different carriers. Taking into account that postage meters or franking machines are normally reserved for a single carrier, it is apparent that D2 and D3 do not concern situations in which mail can be transported by different carriers. It follows that it is not obvious to include in the printing means of the postage meter of D1 a postal inscription mechanism relating to a plurality of carriers. Since claim 1 of the main request specifies a plurality of printing surfaces providing respective mail carrier class indicia, the board concludes that, on its proper construction and having regard to the cited state of the art, its subject-matter is not obvious to a person skilled in the art. The subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is therefore considered as involving an inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC.

The subject-matter of claims 2 to 5 of the main request, which depend on claim 1, is also considered to be new and involve an inventive step.

11. Although claim 6 of the main request mentions a postage meter, it does not state that the postal inscription mechanism is included in the postage meter.

Claim 6 of the main request differs from the prior art disclosed in document D1 in that:

postage information is printed on an envelope, and

respective mail carrier class indicia corresponding to the carrier class selected by the operator is printed by operating a postal inscription mechanism having a plurality of printing surfaces providing respective mail carrier class indicia, said postal inscription mechanism positioning the respective printing surface for printing in correspondence to the carrier class selected by the operator.

These features aim at processing mail contained in envelopes, which can be handled according to different carrier classes.

12. Starting from the prior art disclosed in D1, in order to arrive at the method defined in claim 6 of the main request, the skilled person would, as a first step, have to consider adapting the system of D1 to process mail contained in envelopes, i.e. letters. Then, as a second step, the skilled person would have to consider printing carrier mail indicia by operating a postal inscription mechanism as specified in claim 6. It is apparent from D1 that the printed forms, in particular labels and letters of transport, associated with a particular parcel must carry indications of the selected carrier and class for that parcel, so that the printing means 11, 12 that fill in the forms must be able to print carrier class indicia in the sense of the patent in suit. There seems therefore to be no need in the system of D1 for a specialised postal inscription mechanism printing an indication of a carrier class. The requirements for the printing means 11, 12 of D1 could be met by general-purpose printing means. D2 and D3 are not concerned with different carrier classes (in the sense of the patent in suit), but only with classes of a single carrier. The board therefore doubts whether it would be obvious to the skilled person to provide the system of D1 with a postal inscription mechanism of the type described in documents D2 and D3 and use this mechanism for printing carrier class indicia in the sense of the patent in suit.

As appears from Article 102 EPC, a granted European patent can only be revoked in opposition or appeal proceedings if the opposition division or the board of appeal is of the opinion that the grounds for opposition laid down in Article 100 EPC prejudice the maintenance of the European patent; otherwise the patent shall be maintained. Thus, a patent shall be revoked only if it is clearly and unambiguously established that one or more grounds for opposition prejudice its maintenance. Therefore, in a situation like the present one, in which there are unresolvable doubts as to whether the steps necessary to arrive at the invention would be obvious to the skilled person, the decision should be in favour of maintaining the patent. In view of this situation, the board concludes that the subject-matter of claim 6 of the main request can be considered as involving an inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC.

Order

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The decision under appeal is set aside.

2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to maintain the patent as amended in the following version:

Description:

pages 2 and 5 of the main request filed during the oral proceedings of 28 November 2002 (annexed to the summons dated 6 June 2005 to attend oral proceedings before the board);

pages 3 and 4 of the printed patent specification.

Claims:

No. 1 to 6 of the main request filed during the oral proceedings of 28 November 2002 (annexed to the summons dated 6 June 2005 to attend oral proceedings before the board).

Drawings:

Sheets 9 to 16 of the printed patent specification.

Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility